{"id":1185,"date":"2010-11-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010"},"modified":"2016-04-17T07:11:46","modified_gmt":"2016-04-17T01:41:46","slug":"smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Smt Ningamma vs Smt H K Jayanthi W\/O H L Karibasappa on 4 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Ningamma vs Smt H K Jayanthi W\/O H L Karibasappa on 4 November, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Pachhapure<\/div>\n
3 WP E2350\/O9 81\nVV1' 14990\/O9\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 4'?\" DAY OF NOVEMBER 2010\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HONBLE }\\\/IRJUSTICE A.s.PAcHHApI}REV.'_*V:-\ufb01i 5  _\n\nWRIT PETITION NO.1235O OF 2009 ('C}ivi--~:(:ji?Q1~i: 4- _  O'\n\nAND   .,\n\nWRIT PETITION NO. 14990 GE 2009; ((3vi.\\\/.i~.~.C'.P('i)'i  A ;_s T\n\nIN WRIT PETITION NO. 1235001? 2009-.(GM;C?C'3'.s\u00ab:  ::\nBETWEEN K % O O O\n\nSmt. Ningamma,\n\nAged about 76 years, _\nW\/0 Late Veerappai   '\nR\/at Bychanahalily V}\/illaige, O ' \n\nKushalnagarVV'TgIw\ufb01;;:._ \nSomwairpet Taluk,  '\nKoclagu... DI:su-ict'; -  ._ *\n -     PETITIONER\/S\n[Sri. B.S.N'agaraj,\"Ad'V';) = V \n\nANQQO \"\n\n    .HIK.Jayanihi\n\n\" _W'~,.\/_c.>i H':I,.VKaribasappa\n\n- ._ IAgedv.,absV'u'E 40 years,\n\n'  R\/ai.;sA%i\"5B1ock\n\n Si_ddai.\u20ac1h Puranaika Extension\n\nKushalnagar Town\nI _ S'emwarpetTa1uk,\n\nV \"  Kodagu District.\n\n 2% O Sr1'.B.V.Suresha\n\nAged about 39 years,\n\n53\/ 0 Late Veerappa\n\nR\/at Bychanahally Village.\nOpp:Pe\u20ac:r0l Bunk,\n\n\n\n2 XV?' 12350\/O9 &\nWP 14990 \/09\n\nKushalnagar T own.\nSomwarpet. Taluk,\nKodagu District.\n\n3. Sri Rajeev\n\nAged about 45 years\nS\/0 B.S.Radha1{rishI1a, Deed Writer\nR\/ at Kushalnagar Town,\nSomwarpet Taluk,\nKodagu District.\n\n{Sri. G.Ba1akrishI1a Shastry. Adv.) T A V '\nIN WRIT PETITION NO.1499O 0952009 (GM;cP_\u00a7:1   '\n\nBETWEEN\n\nSmt. Ningar__nI'I1\"a,_  _.  \nAged about ''76 years,  ~\nW\/0 Later..Veer2ip}i+1_,  ._ \nR\/at Bychariah5a1_i1y '{{iiiag'e,z'\nKushainagzir T0WI'i';-  T  \"\nSornwarpet Taluky,   ._  1\nKodagu District. ' \"\n\n \"  PETITIONER\/S\n\nIL  Sri. H.i,.Karibasappa\n Aged -?lb'Ol.1t 43 years.\nR\/a._t, 4\"? Biock.\nn I Sicldaiah Puranaika Extension\n' L \" ~,.'Kusha1nagar Town\n..*S0rr1Warpet Taluk,\nKodagu District.\n\n\"  Sri. B.V.Suresha\n\nAged about 39 years.\nS\/0 Late Veerappa\n\n  .f.-r.RE;sIPoIsmIm.s1\n\n\n\n3 VVP 12350\/09 81\nWP 14990\/O9\n\nR\/at Bychanahally Village.\nOpp. Petrol bunk\nKushalnagar Town.\nSomwarpet. Taluk,\n\nKodagu District.\n\n3. Sri Rajeev\n\nAged about 45 years 1 ' \u00ab i_ \nS\/ o B.S.Radhakrishna. Deed Writ_er.. \nR\/at Kushalnagar Town, 4' \nSomwarpet Taluk, T\nKodagu District.\n\n..l 'rL\u00e9st3oN;oE:NT\/s\n\n{Sri. G.Balakrishna Shalstry,   ~ \n\nThese Writ }\u00a7\u00a7fe\"tit.ior1s are filed ur1'c1e--r' Article 226 of the\nConstitution \"o'f.__h'i.di]a 'Vp\u00abr_a.y\"ir.1g '~--toyqu_ash the order dated\n9.4.2009 p'-a,sseg_d'_.\u00bb in l.'.A.lE~Io.V1'~Atand VII in O.S.No.28 &\n29\/200.3,. on_ the' fill-:;_of thev._CiVii--~J.u_d'ge (Jr. DVn.] and JMFC,\nat Sonjlwarpletg in 'which\u00abV.iailco\\2\\zi.ng the application of the\ndefendant No.1 toa-;1}.end\"*tche~.Written statement a copy of the\nsaid order is=sub'nj1itted_ at~.A11e:\u00bb{--J and etc.\n\n Writ ..I}letitioV11s having been heard and reserved,\n\n  foizpronodlrilcement of Orders, this day, the Court\n\n' made 'the. fol] o'u{ir1--g:\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
‘”l’l3el* petitioner is the plaintiff, whereas the<\/p>\n
it  j’respo;i–‘idents are the defendant Nos.l t.o 3 in the suit<\/p>\n
   _bearing O.S.No.28\/2003 seeking the relief of declaration<\/p>\n
 that the sale deed dated 16.04.2001 registered in the<\/p>\n
 ………. ..\n<\/p>\n
4 WP 12350\/O9 8:\n<\/p>\n
VVP l 4990\/O9<\/p>\n
office of Sub–Registrar, Somwarpet is an irnfalid
\ndocument and is not binding upon the plaintiff-4jar1;.Ci\u00ab.;fo.r<\/p>\n
cancellation of the said sale deed.<\/p>\n
2. Likewise, the plaintiff ;,also..4ir1}st’it1ited. <\/p>\n
suit in O.S.No.29\/2003. 1t?iS__ the”‘ca’se of.’tViie:;;}.laili1tiff if<\/p>\n
that they have never executed:sa_le   of the
\ndefendants at any    rneasiiring one
\nacre out of Survey   {lrummanakolli
\nVillage,    ‘Alter the written
\nstaterrientsl   allegations made, the
\nTrial :C\u00a7Aourt -‘ and PW~l was under<\/p>\n
examination. ” V V’<\/p>\n
  thisjiincture, the defendants filed an<\/p>\n
  the provision of Order 6 Rule 17 CPC<\/p>\n
r\/W-.$ec_..~  of C.P.C. for deletion of the Word in Page<\/p>\n
  No.1 and 13111 Line afterword’s “several<\/p>\n
 odisciissions regarding price” and for insertion of another<\/p>\n
l   paragraph in the written statement in both the suits. As<\/p>\n
“could be seen from the pleadings, it reveals that 40<\/p>\n
o.’ \/_,
\n4 \\,
\niv]: ,,,,,, W<\/p>\n
5 ‘NP l2350\/O9 81
\nWE’ 149530\/O9<\/p>\n
cents of land in the suit Survey No.76 was sold to one<\/p>\n
defendant and 60 cents was sold to another defendant<\/p>\n
in the said suit. The plaintif\ufb01petitioner fil’\u20acd”\u00abd_’li\u20acI’<\/p>\n
objections to this application contending <\/p>\n
admission made by the first defendant  fl<\/p>\n
is being withdrawn by the amen’drnen’t <\/p>\n
therefore, it was her corite’1i.tionAl”that.vppthelilproposedl”V<\/p>\n
amendment cannot be. granted.\/hiUri-xothese ‘grounds, she<\/p>\n
sought for dismissal of the   <\/p>\n
4_._  he   counsel for the parties
\nand   record, has allowed the
\napplication  first defendant in both the<\/p>\n
suits to~amend\u00bb._.the Virritten statement and aggrieved by<\/p>\n
l these petitions have been filed by the<\/p>\n
 plai.ntilfi’llu.”.j:..\n<\/p>\n
   have heard the learned Counsel appearing<\/p>\n
 petitioner and also the respondents. It is<\/p>\n
eonterition of the petitioner that there was an admission<\/p>\n
 the part of the defendant No.1 in both. the suits to<\/p>\n
5.!
\nz”‘y<\/p>\n
.4 N.\n<\/p>\n
6 WP 12350\/O9 82.\n<\/p>\n
WP 14990\/O9<\/p>\n
the effect that the plaintiff had quoted Rs.70,000\/– for<\/p>\n
one acre of land and the defendant No.1 had finally<\/p>\n
agreed to purchase one acre of land at <\/p>\n
This Portion of the written statement has to”-..3,:3’\u20ac~   <\/p>\n
and the contention that the plaintiff ‘had ‘ioffei-e,d\u00bb’pri_ce”<\/p>\n
Rs.5,65,000\/– in addition to other: facts <\/p>\n
the execution of agreement oi\ufb02saie and”the persons who
\nwere present as attestiiig persor1s,.etVc7;~.,duringAA execution
\nof the sale deed is sought to inserte_’d._’.in the Written<\/p>\n
statement.  \u20acto”‘hei’,.::th’e’admission made by<\/p>\n
the    being’ withdrawn from the
\nproposed ,,amend.mient’gandsuch an amendment cannot<\/p>\n
be granted. uh’ <\/p>\n
 -this aspect of the matter, the counsel<\/p>\n
 the decision of the Apex Court in the<\/p>\n
‘V..pcase’of\ufb01H_EERAIAL v. KALYAN MAL & ores. reported in<\/p>\n
A  (Civil) 41, wherein the Apex Court held that<\/p>\n
 in} case where there is admission in the written<\/p>\n
 statement, the amendment seeking to Withdraw such<\/p>\n
admission cannot be allowed, if such withdrawal wouid
\nf<\/p>\n
‘~.’ W “M .- V<\/p>\n
7 \\VP 12350\/O9 8:.\n<\/p>\n
WP 1.4990\/O9<\/p>\n
amount to totally displacing the case of plaintiff–___and<\/p>\n
which would cause him irretrievable prejudiced. <\/p>\n
7. Now, as could be seen from  if<\/p>\n
in the pleadings of the parties, it:-is”‘a’–sp&ecific.the”;<\/p>\n
plaintiff that she never sold  measyuring<\/p>\n
acre out of revision Survey   at
\nany time. It is her COriff3.11tiOiilllthi\ufb01l;  docurnent is bad
\nfor want of consideration.-lhylt ‘is; als_o_:ll1ervcontention that<\/p>\n
the defe11dant’xi\\’I:yf;,1lging  cases has taken<\/p>\n
disadvantage   also claims that there<\/p>\n
was fraud– played’-\u00bb.loy.the”defendants and they got the<\/p>\n
land throiigh. llllthlej deed dated 15.04.2001.<\/p>\n
Accoizdiing to Ifthe.._..1Z)lai.11tiff, there is no question of<\/p>\n
 1’eceiVi11g’~any”sale consideration by the defendants at<\/p>\n
thenltirne  alleged sale transaction. Whereas, the<\/p>\n
‘.V.defendalln1_t No.1 in the written statement in both the<\/p>\n
A  though initially claimed that the plaintiff<\/p>\n
  proposed to purchase the land for Rs.70.000\/– per acre<\/p>\n
if has sought: for its deletion contending that the land was<\/p>\n
re
\n1<\/span>
\n, ..\/
\n.< '-w,.,g<\/p>\n
8 \\VP 12350\/09 &
\nWE' E4990\/09<\/p>\n
agreed to be purchased for an amount of Rs.E3,65,000\/~<\/p>\n
and there were agreements for sale between the parties-<\/p>\n
8. In my considered opinion, it daesi.\ufb02’r:1ot<\/p>\n
amount to any admission and in the eircum’st.anees  M<\/p>\n
cannot be said that the admissi:on”is\u00ab <\/p>\n
In that View of the matter, theA:4’deC.ision\u00bb.’:;_fhthe <\/p>\n
Court referred supra is not”‘a}T5p1iCat)Ie._t0.et’he”.faets on<\/p>\n
hand.\n<\/p>\n
9. These petitions”  any merit.\n<\/p>\n
Hence; they  accordingly.\n<\/p>\n
Sdf;\n<\/p>\n
JUDGE<\/p>\n
m\u00bb;.__V<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Ningamma vs Smt H K Jayanthi W\/O H L Karibasappa on 4 November, 2010 Author: A.S.Pachhapure 3 WP E2350\/O9 81 VV1′ 14990\/O9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 4′?” DAY OF NOVEMBER 2010 BEFORE THE HONBLE }\\\/IRJUSTICE A.s.PAcHHApI}REV.’_*V:-\ufb01i 5 _ WRIT PETITION NO.1235O OF 2009 (‘C}ivi–~:(:ji?Q1~i: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1185","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Ningamma vs Smt H K Jayanthi W\/O H L Karibasappa on 4 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Ningamma vs Smt H K Jayanthi W\/O H L Karibasappa on 4 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-17T01:41:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Ningamma vs Smt H K Jayanthi W\\\/O H L Karibasappa on 4 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-17T01:41:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":819,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Smt Ningamma vs Smt H K Jayanthi W\\\/O H L Karibasappa on 4 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-17T01:41:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Ningamma vs Smt H K Jayanthi W\\\/O H L Karibasappa on 4 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Ningamma vs Smt H K Jayanthi W\/O H L Karibasappa on 4 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Ningamma vs Smt H K Jayanthi W\/O H L Karibasappa on 4 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-17T01:41:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Ningamma vs Smt H K Jayanthi W\/O H L Karibasappa on 4 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-17T01:41:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010"},"wordCount":819,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010","name":"Smt Ningamma vs Smt H K Jayanthi W\/O H L Karibasappa on 4 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-17T01:41:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ningamma-vs-smt-h-k-jayanthi-wo-h-l-karibasappa-on-4-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Ningamma vs Smt H K Jayanthi W\/O H L Karibasappa on 4 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1185","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1185"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1185\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1185"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1185"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1185"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}