{"id":118517,"date":"2008-03-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-11T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2"},"modified":"2015-12-09T23:57:27","modified_gmt":"2015-12-09T18:27:27","slug":"d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2","title":{"rendered":"D Rajkumar vs A B Rudraiah on 12 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">D Rajkumar vs A B Rudraiah on 12 March, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: R.B.Naik<\/div>\n<pre>IN arm: HIGH ccnzmr or rmmurrnxn, nmemons\nnmmzn THIS 'THE 12\" DAY or MARCH, 2:;\u00a7aT\n\nBEFORE\nTHE HGN'BLE HR. JUSTICE n,3{nA1\u00a3}  \n\ntaunt: 13 1:! 131- !;'i.\ufb01'\ufb01\ufb01T'Lf\ufb02  V\n5'15':-I: IL I': :5-E'lo'nLl\"n..'auI\"D  .\n\nNC! 1000 SERVICE _1t:jAL's' _\n\nE. K H0_U'51_E 1u?c\"'mi'1rot::f:\u00bb._M V _\nvLmmmmmmi g&gt;'= J-,\nas-,:str:\u00a21aLo;9,,E_e5\u00bb5.:;p4:;  \n\n %%%%      PETITIONER\n s:\"n\u00a7=-..::Sri':~.:r:mIsmA ms --Ac1v.;\n\nwasas\n\n-' ..II\n\nf  . u *1  B. F'.1IDRP.IPsH\n\n \nI\"~T':)_'\"..2VIig5 S1-'c.RASWJ-'L'I'I-II NAIR-AF'.\n\n11\u00a2 'rm i.?!I'|'|1'!u\"\"hI'.'u 'I!F\\Pl'I'1'\ufb01\"'|'I'l:'.\"P.F\"'|'lT\n.l'.1._'nI|'1-!~\".|.\u00a3.u'.\"'.|.l'|n{1-H'\u00a31.|i\\ .l:u:\\J..I:'.n.I.'H:n.'b..u.1\n\n l3lJGAL.E3RE~40\n. . nnspmmmw\n\n(By 51:5. : C V NAGESH -*Ad'Ir.3\n\n' WTLTTB l\"\"'DT 1313  'l',\"'1\"'T','I'.','1'\\ TTIU 'UH'? I'. 1lr\\'I ('U 3 I\" \"V\nBK +u haumu U19 wua unumnu um\n\n-I--K3-ulna') '.mIK\\~JauI\u00a2 I1-I-3'!\" II\n\nTHE HBWDCATE FOR THE PBTITIONER PRAYING THAT\nTHIS I'ION\"'BLE COURT HE! BE   SET' ASTITFE\n'I'I-IE m  DE' CONVICTION AND SENTENCE PJLSSEIJ\nBE THE EWI E01311. C.1'I.M.; BANGALORE IN C-'.C.N0.\n\n;L.aW,.;\u00bb\u00ab_--\n\n\n\n\u00bb:0H\u00a7giatr0tg, Bangalore. in C.\ufb01.N\n\n3393032002 DT. 19 3.04 AND CDHFIRHMD IN\nCRL.%.NG. 2?%!2DQ\ufb02~ \"T 3=l2=2QD4 QB ZHE ELLE\n\n03 III ADDL. C.C..; \u00a7:&amp;.. BHNGELORE.\n\nThis petition naming on for. \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01i\u00e9aidn\n\nthis day, the court made the coast m\ufb01d\u00e9 \ufb01ne;\n\n\u00a3a;lqwing;\n\nThe petiti\ufb01\u00a7\ufb01F\/a\ufb01\ufb02\ufb01a\ufb01d'au\u00a7&amp;a_V\u00a7b00\ufb010\n\nconvicted for an of\ufb01ang\u00e9fpun;s\ufb01\ufb01b10_u$dor Soc.\n\n:1'\n\n9 pay\n\n5!!\n\n13% 0f th\ufb01 H.I. %0t and 10 %a\ufb01%ensed\nfine uf Esgi\ufb01,0$}G0\u00a7ff;$i0 \u00a7\u00e9Ea0lt ta '\ufb01ff\u00e9f\n5.3:. \u00a30:    Out of the\nfin; am0u\ufb01E}%3$\u00a7S;\u00a70@\u00a7\u00a7Qf- is directed to be\npai\u00a7Au't0 Wf\u00a7ha 00rea\ufb01ondsnt\/camplainant as\ng0mp\u00a7m0g:1oa%\"0y 0;0;n order dated 19.3.2004\n\n 032+ = V.t\u00e91'1a 015\" gal. Chief Metmpal\n\n'1.\n\ntan\n\n.n..n\n\nJ f\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01.\n\nHi!\n\n0.34\n\nEr \ufb01ha \ufb01\u00e9id bide: of convictian and sentence has\n\n10-E-I0.riV:QV.t:\u00a2\u00a7$01firmed -by judgment dated 3.12.2004\n\n' 0x'pgs0\u00e9d by the III Addl. city Civil 5 Seaainna\n\nR0 ;0dge; Eann 0:0, SCH-Z5 in Grl.A.Nh.274!2004.\n\nE. It in tha cage of the complainant that\n\nthe petitiorzarfaccused prczamising to allot: B,\n\u00bb?'.;2eM,0,L..--.\n\n\n\n3|\"! \\d\\I\\lIInI Incl II:-unnn':1uuw.-uni --..---.-  _.-'-_, _ V\n\n_ 'the bankers are marked as E:\u00a2.P.5 to :.\n\nsite maauring some being an Develcpar and\nBuilder of sites, collected a.  of\n\np.w.s,\u00ab.:~~:3,r.3r.nnn\/- frcxn the respondent\/com;\u00a7',1\u00bb.\u00a5\u00a7iQ4S\".::.iVitV..<\/pre>\n<p>Ps\ufb01fer .4.&#8217;:.Lle_u;:ti,_g money, he went _9_:1&#8243;&#8216;~.posj[i:p&#8221;oni~ng<br \/>\nall\u00e9ffuirnt raf the site an arse pg-eteszt or g.$&#8217;1:1-1.9;.<br \/>\nAs the p-atitit:-nerfa,r:*.&lt;:uae(i&#8211;.A &quot;tfai1\u00e9d&#039;. :t\u20ac;&#039; 5115:<\/p>\n<p>site. the reapondent!\u00a7\u00a7&#039;c:gfplain&amp;rit&quot;*\ufb01eni\u00e9e\ufb01fi\u00e9d fo\ufb01<br \/>\nreturn of the    &#039;\ufb01iiahharga of<br \/>\nthe liability  money thu<\/p>\n<p>at it i k :;g_:*4?&#039;\u00a3:;:{it;1j1:s:?ad =i  &#039;th\ufb01\u00e9a cheque as dated<\/p>\n<p>1&quot;!\n<\/p>\n<p>-3&#8242; &#8220;&#8216; ,<br \/>\n21.3.2092  :.&#8217;_rE&#8221;v:.r g;&#8221;{a&#8217;i;1,5&#8217;3,\ufb02G\ufb02!&#8221;. Cheqnae wated.<\/p>\n<p>22.a\u00a7\u00a7..2\u00a7j_A02.j&#8217;V_fq;E&#8221;VRa:;1:;%50,\u00a7.\u00a7V\ufb01fi.f- axaxi. another c&#8217;:hI&#8217;i&#8221;&#8221;11i&#8217;a<br \/>\nciaate}:i__2&#8217;3.3..\ufb01\u20ac3&#8217;f}2p\u00bb&#8217;f:&#8217;s\u00a7i:&#8217;.ai aum of Rs.2.\u00a3}0,000\/-. on<\/p>\n<p>tlfm maE\ufb01:ity.v&#8221;&#8216; of  said nzhquas-Ex.1?.2 to 4,<\/p>\n<p> . 3:\u00a7It1\u00e9z&#8221; Aw\u00e9:\u00a7 pz\u00e9\u00e9i\u00e9nted fox: ancashment. But, they<\/p>\n<p>V\u00bb&gt;:;aa;t.-v\u00e9&#8221;~._i:\u00e9t=._rhec:I. with bankers endorsement as<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;-7&#8217;._in$&#8217;uf.fii\u00a7:::i:\u00a7:&#8221;&#8216;u: f 151$&#8221;. The ewzceemnt issued.<\/p>\n<p> is the debit slip. After return at the<\/p>\n<p>cheques, notice was given to the<br \/>\npa-titianarlaccusad through R.P.A.I}. Ex.P.9 is<\/p>\n<p>A I-r-&#8216;.&#8217;L.r_:h has been produced,<\/p>\n<p>-ur ww-p _<\/p>\n<p>tha amknmle\ufb01\ufb01men<\/p>\n<p>2 Q9 LLGlfllL&#8230;..\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3|; Inpvp\u00e9nn rs &#8211; &#8212;&#8212;- &#8211;__ -.&#8211;___,_,&#8221;__ 4-; 44, ,<\/p>\n<p>to establish the service of notice to the<br \/>\npa1;it:i.-zranezr accused. Ex.P.1{3 in the ngstdice.<\/p>\n<p>Tb.-are was rm corrrplianca of the <\/p>\n<p>the :;r;&gt;t,:.ia:.a_. o complaint as_V__dg.\u00a2i:i{st&#8217;4 <\/p>\n<p>filed.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. The  ..\u00a7x-dmiiiad xum\ufb01l<br \/>\nand gm:  I.;\ufb01:\u00a7:l:;3.I{..&#8217;E.\u20ac..!Vd&#8217;::&#8230;a;VI.&#8221;.\u00a5&#8221;\u00ab;.&#8217;:tLIflBI11:\ufb02&#8217;El-I..P.1<br \/>\nto   urged by the<br \/>\nFatit&#8211;i\u00ab\u00a2\ufb01\u00a7\u00a7&#8217;\/ than is no valid<br \/>\nga;:;:_ic&#8217;:a   &#8220;acknowledgement produced<br \/>\ndc.-aas   neceipt 111.1._r&#8217;f.LL1-Iili&#8217;  as<\/p>\n<p>_.x_<\/p>\n<p>v_:si:,c11_&#8221; the &#8220;z&#8217;:mi;_:;qw1edgemr|ant 125.5-BB no a\ufb01tanli\ufb01u<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;1&#8243;&#8216;s.uaanx~ctV.i.&#8217;z::\u00a7s..r&#8217;r.:-f notice. This contention at the<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;.x.p:.\u00e9td.t1%i-b.n\u00a7a=..-\ufb01.faccused is far-fetchad. The<\/p>\n<p>dddia-.33&#8243; an the acknowledgment reveals that it<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;   11e_a;gv&#8221;&#8216;1:\u00bbean. forwaxded 1:-:3 the gatitioner whare he<\/p>\n<p>rasidsa-3. The signature gpears ta he by one 9.<\/p>\n<p>Qt<\/p>\n<p>the maj or family membe :3 of th<br \/>\npm: it :i. one 1:! accused. As &#8216;such are mica W1]. 1 have<\/p>\n<p>to he: held to be proved. The existing<br \/>\n\ufb02..0J.t-\/LDL\/Ll&#8217;L-\n<\/p>\n<p>Us! up&#8217;-rwurums :\u00a2 gum.-..-.-&#8230;.._.. ..&#8211;__&#8211;_,;_,.-;___ _4 44 44&#8243; A<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8216;nTob\u00a3ain. &#8216;no objection cextificatea&#8217; from<\/p>\n<p>liability is not in dispute. Issuance at<br \/>\nchsquw towaxda discharge of liability i\ufb01xalao<\/p>\n<p>not in dispute. Thu prasantatian,g\u00a3u\ufb01$a\u00a7uo<\/p>\n<p>and bounce of the cheques on preggututieuawi\ufb01g&#8221;,<\/p>\n<p>bankara an\ufb02azaements has heeu&#8217;uL;yV@gt,hliQh\u00a7d &#8211;<\/p>\n<p>by&#8217; tha cnmp1ainant.&#8217;._ Eu &#8220;a&#8221;\ufb01h._Qt\ufb01e&#8217; \u00e9aurtsL<\/p>\n<p>bulow were justifieu&#8217; in hdl\ufb02in\ufb01  t\ufb01ut thu<br \/>\npntitianarfaccuaudt is  gu;ify_ of  a\ufb01 of\ufb02ance<br \/>\npuniahahle undex Su\ufb01. 13$ \u00a2f&#8221;uhu\ufb02N.I. Act.<\/p>\n<p>if H\ufb01#\u00a7v\u00e9fgu\u00e9$.:uga$ds the sentence; thg<br \/>\nlearned V\ufb01au\ufb01a\u00e9l afar u\u00e9ha patition9rf&#8217;*eusaa<br \/>\naubmittad&#8217;th\u00a3t\u00bbheu\ufb01j%h a bonafids intentiun of<\/p>\n<p>a;zv;n\u00a7\u00b0_.ou&amp; \u00b0-uitas after purchase of<\/p>\n<p>. &#8216;. &amp;\u00a7ri\u00a2ulturai&#8221;&#8216;iunded &#8220;&#8221; properties had formed<\/p>\n<p>seuiaty. gut hgwavar, he could not succeed in<br \/>\nthauvau\ufb01ura, siuma he was nut in a geaiti-&#8221; ta<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;.vurimua autharitias and conversion ordars fram<\/p>\n<p>E varieua .wuthnzities in time. .As the venture<\/p>\n<p>failed, he became liahia to pay to several<\/p>\n<p>garsena who h_- paid mauqg for allotment o\u00a3<\/p>\n<p>sites and he has been settling the liabilitias<br \/>\nmm after the rather and he is in 1-I;i.1:\u00bb;\u00a7:&#8217;\u00a3:.&lt;:ial<\/p>\n<p>distrmew, he has no sufficient <\/p>\n<p>[CL<br \/>\nlb&#039;<\/p>\n<p>inc;-.11 rg-rs the<\/p>\n<p>-&#8216;nan he has &#8220;-&#8216;raad&#8221; ciwnsit\u00e9d &#8216;7 a_ &#8216;*.$=&#8230;..1&#8243;?:&#8221;h Gr<\/p>\n<p>12.5.5, :m,n::u3o\/&#8217;- whirzh has h\u00e9:azi&#8217;V.nace&#8217;ivfevd&#8221;hg\ufb02theyn<br \/>\nrempc&gt;rmiant\/curaplainantivnnd _ se\u00e9}:a&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;n17en\ufb02i3ant View<\/p>\n<p>sh-:3uJ..:.i has taken  es-anti\u00e9ncxaa.<\/p>\n<p>.5. Taking  the aver all<br \/>\ndircura:\u00a7.tsi;n V156  an; Harica . the fol lowing orzder:<\/p>\n<p>___&#8230;;&#8211;u-n.\n<\/p>\n<p> The raviai-an petition is partly<\/p>\n<p>Vf=&#8221;&#8216;i&#8217;he order: of conviction of the<\/p>\n<p>p4\u00a7&#8217;ati&#8217;t.Vin-nirmr fax: an offanc-a puznishabla under:<\/p>\n<p>2  &#8216;n252s::tiu::.n 133 {sf the N.I. Act is continued.<\/p>\n<p> E-:.&#8217;\ufb01&#8217;-&#8216;.#%&#8217;-.-&#8216;$1&#8243;, in lieu at the sentence imge<\/p>\n<p>nd &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8216;-I<\/p>\n<p>C)<br \/>\n*3<\/p>\n<p>directed him to pay fine of Tm.1\ufb01,\ufb01\ufb01,G\ufb01<br \/>\nThe p-estitioner is antenna tr: pay a fine of<\/p>\n<p>Ra.B,C=0,t2IDW&#8211;, in default tn suffer S.I. for a<br \/>\nM2c.mu3.\u00bb~&#8212;&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>iahi lity anti in. ..  &#8216; :.A.;:&amp;t4ea&#8221;a&#8217;n1&#8217;;Vi <\/p>\n<p>pariad a\ufb01 ona year. The fine amount shall be<br \/>\ndepeaited within thxee weeks fzam tnd&amp;\u00a7, on<br \/>\nracavary af the fine amount, the aama \u00a7\ufb01\u00a7ii by<\/p>\n<p>paid to tha reapondantfccm1ainany3  j% &#8220;%<\/p>\n<p>Psg*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court D Rajkumar vs A B Rudraiah on 12 March, 2008 Author: R.B.Naik IN arm: HIGH ccnzmr or rmmurrnxn, nmemons nmmzn THIS &#8216;THE 12&#8243; DAY or MARCH, 2:;\u00a7aT BEFORE THE HGN&#8217;BLE HR. JUSTICE n,3{nA1\u00a3} taunt: 13 1:! 131- !;&#8217;i.\ufb01&#8217;\ufb01\ufb01T&#8217;Lf\ufb02 V 5&#8217;15&#8217;:-I: IL I&#8217;: :5-E&#8217;lo&#8217;nLl&#8221;n..&#8217;auI&#8221;D . NC! 1000 SERVICE _1t:jAL&#8217;s&#8217; _ E. K H0_U&#8217;51_E [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-118517","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>D Rajkumar vs A B Rudraiah on 12 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"D Rajkumar vs A B Rudraiah on 12 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-11T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-09T18:27:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"D Rajkumar vs A B Rudraiah on 12 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-09T18:27:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2\"},\"wordCount\":807,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2\",\"name\":\"D Rajkumar vs A B Rudraiah on 12 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-09T18:27:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"D Rajkumar vs A B Rudraiah on 12 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"D Rajkumar vs A B Rudraiah on 12 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"D Rajkumar vs A B Rudraiah on 12 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-11T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-09T18:27:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"D Rajkumar vs A B Rudraiah on 12 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-09T18:27:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2"},"wordCount":807,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2","name":"D Rajkumar vs A B Rudraiah on 12 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-09T18:27:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-rajkumar-vs-a-b-rudraiah-on-12-march-2008-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"D Rajkumar vs A B Rudraiah on 12 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118517","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=118517"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118517\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=118517"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=118517"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=118517"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}