{"id":118696,"date":"2010-08-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2"},"modified":"2019-03-02T02:30:53","modified_gmt":"2019-03-01T21:00:53","slug":"rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2","title":{"rendered":"Rangamma vs C T Surendra on 20 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Rangamma vs C T Surendra on 20 August, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: K.Govindarajulu<\/div>\n
 UAGE58YEARS\n\nINTT\ufb02EHK\u00a7{COURTCNTKARNADM\ufb02&KTBANGALQRE\n\nDATED THIS THE 20% DAY OF AUGUST 201G\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.  \n\nREGULAR SECOND APPEAL 451 1\" GOP   '\n\nBEUNEEN:\n\nS \/O LATE GUNDAPPA  A  ~  \nAGE 65 YEARS'   \nOCC:F'LOURVENDOR,.....__'--     S-\nR\/O SHANIMAHATHMA  ' \"\n\nNEHRU ROAD, I)IURt3I\"GU_DI,   \n\nSHIMOGA   A    1    APPELLANT\n\n[BY SRI    \nAND: V '  V' M\n\nC.T.S_II_RENDR_A A _  .\nS \/O E\u00a3?A'I'EL THATVIIVIAIAY GOWDA,\n\n O;CC_V:A{.}_I'{ICLIL'i__'RU1ST,\n'AR\/O CHII{,I{1\u00bb\\f:-U.R,\n\nPOSTiKAI\u00bbiMARADI.\nTHE.ERTHAI~1ALLY TALUK.\n\n SHIMOGA DISTRICT --- 577201.  RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
I    ..7I’HIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC
\n  AGATSNT THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED\n<\/p>\n
 -08.12.2008 PASSED IN R.A.NO.75\/2006 ON THE FILE<\/p>\n
OF THE 11 ADDL. CIVXL JUDGE (SR.DN.] SHIMOGA,
\nALLOWING THE APPEAL AND’ SETTING ASIDE
\nJUDGMENT’ AND DEGREE DATED 17.04.2006 P.A~SS.ED<\/p>\n
IN OS No.32\/1998 ON THE FILE OF THE CIW.I,.il’UI:}CiE”‘ <\/p>\n
[JR.DN.) & JMFC, THIRTHAHALLK.\n<\/p>\n
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FORApmsls-iON”THi1s’e\u00ab_ G’ ”
\nDAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE $QigLO\\K7_I’N.G:,   ;<\/p>\n
JUDGMENT  _
\nThe case is posted for adfniosion.  it is
\ntake up for \ufb01nal disposal; _\n<\/p>\n
2.  .O\u20ac’S_lVV.32:;\/lQ\u00a7}\u20ac3″‘on the file of the
\nCivil Ju\u00a71_8″\u20acl,   is the appellant in<\/p>\n
this appeal  ‘ \u00bb] __G-.’_) CFC.\n<\/p>\n
..  Parties” be referred according to their status<\/p>\n
V ‘ V . 2 in; the suit p convenience.\n<\/p>\n
  the case of the plaintiff that plaintiff has<\/p>\n
 “..jjp{Vn’ChAased plaint schedule property in the year 1974<\/p>\n
  the registered sale deed. The plaintiff is in<\/p>\n
possession of the property from the date of purchase.<\/p>\n
Defendant has left the village and settled at Shirnoga.<\/p>\n
‘ Defendant is trying to interfere with the possession of<\/p>\n
the property. So, plaintiff seeks for an <\/p>\n
permanent injunction and also for consequential’reliefs’, D <\/p>\n
5. Defendant in the Written statei’nent_i’~.fiied-.1<\/p>\n
contend that the case of the <\/p>\n
purchased the property in the year4’19f7’4 andxraas   if<\/p>\n
possession of the property  corr’ec._t’.”‘o  is<\/p>\n
called   is contended further
\nthat the-.defendajitfi_s~\u00ab.in~…possession of the property,<\/p>\n
taking _VadvDantVage.’:-of’=.th’eDV illiteracy, ignorance of the<\/p>\n
  azsalewdeedv is taken in the year 1974. It is
\n is in possession of the property
\n  though defendant is residing at Shimoga. So pray<\/p>\n
  disriiisisal of the suit.\n<\/p>\n
“3…\/’ I<\/p>\n
6. Learned trial Judge has framed issues.<\/p>\n
Permitted parties to lead evidence. PWS 1 <\/p>\n
examined. Exs.P.l to P.6 are marked. On  .<\/p>\n
defendants. DWs 1 and 2 were examined  it it<\/p>\n
D.l9 were marked. Learned  <\/p>\n
the following issues with the:””‘fo11o\\if1ng’ while ” it<\/p>\n
dismissing the suit.\n<\/p>\n
(1) Whether the plaintiff firoves-.th.a’t.he is in
\nlawful ,p0ssessio1f1=. of the “suit  ‘schedule
\nproperty? ‘ ” –  ‘ <\/p>\n
(2) VU7’hether”‘the”-1;:lVaintiffV’7.proVes that the<\/p>\n
__ %_a.1lege’d *.:interfere’1ic–e by the defendant in
\n re’spe.ct of t’l1e’suit schedule property?<\/p>\n
(3x)7. Whether entitle for the relief of
\nperinanenteginjtjriction as prayed for’?<\/p>\n
.. \u00ab ‘ ~ What ‘order or decree?\n<\/p>\n
  gclndge answered the issues as under:<\/p>\n
A  (1_).~  No.1: In the Negative<\/p>\n
 AA _ tlssue No.2: In the negative<\/p>\n
    ..n5(3) Issue No.3: In the negative<\/p>\n
(4) Issue No.4: As per the final order for the H
\nfoilowing, I ‘”\n<\/p>\n
7. Plaintiff preferred RA 7 5\/ 06 on the   ~<\/p>\n
Add}. Civil Judge, [Sr.Dn.), Shimoga. taelee  K ”<\/p>\n
Judge has raised the foilowing  <\/p>\n
and has answered them asttfoilews While  the
\nSuit.\n<\/p>\n
(1) Whether the 4’app’e11ai’};t:’ hasth. fproved that
\nhe is, in lawful. ‘possession of the
\nschedu1e:- .property5 as o1i_j1;h’e “date of the
\n(2) H M_V\\Ii–_ei~.he_zr_ it  interfere with
\n ti1e.._V\u00a7fudg’if;ient~.ai1d decree passed by the
\n t1’ia1VCo’tirt?_   – ~
\n(3) d What e~ee.\u00bbj:\u00bb it j it
\n..  i] ‘ In the “a.fiirIna_tive<\/p>\n
 p ” V(2}.”~.In”i–the af\ufb01fhiative
\n2 _, __ v{.3)_ ‘As.p’e.r__ the final order<\/p>\n
A  8.v_.Thve..’dVefendant in the suit is the appellant.<\/p>\n
 AA _ ‘The scope of Section 100 CPC is settled by the<\/p>\n
 e..\u00abJV1_idgr\u00a51ent of the Apex Court in Kashmir Singh VS.<\/p>\n
  Singh And Anr. [{Appeal) civil 1036 of 2002<\/p>\n
the substantial question of law arises not
\nbecause the law is still debatable, but
\nbecause the decision rendered on a material’–_<\/p>\n
question, violates the settled position of law._V <\/p>\n
17. The general rule is that High Co_I.it*t  <\/p>\n
not interfere with concurrent findi_ngs”cgf’th’e4<\/p>\n
Courts below. But it is notiianabsolutei <\/p>\n
Some of the well recognL\u00bb2:edf_efxceptio’ns_ are it<\/p>\n
where (1′) the courts below’:._have’~.i9’I1r9r\u00a2d<\/p>\n
material evidence or a_cted”o_n’ no evidence:  .\n<\/p>\n
(ii) the courts have drawn wrong’ inferences ”
\nfrom proved facts bypapplyi\ufb02g . the iaw
\nerroneously; or iii}  eo_:urt’s.. have ‘wro: igly
\ncast the burden of” proof,  we refer to
\n‘decision based on no.e1.)idence.’., ” it not only
\nrefers to._cases,u,=here’ there  as total dearth
\nof evidence, but. aiso..Vrefers’ to any case,
\nwhere, thefevidence, taken ‘asawhole, is not
\nrea’soI_ia.biy”–\u00bb._   V. of supporting the<\/p>\n
‘.”..\n<\/p>\n
10;’  the the case, the defendant’s<\/p>\n
positive contention isthat sale deed of 1974 on which<\/p>\n
  claiming title to the property is created on<\/p>\n
laeconnt’  of the defendant. This could have<\/p>\n
V . been accepted but for Ex.P.2 –~ a certified copy of the<\/p>\n
 deed produced by the plaintiff. Ex.P.2 is in<\/p>\n
—   of father of plaintiff. So, prior transaction during<\/p>\n
” “the life time of the father of the plaintiff is refiected in<\/p>\n
the facts of the case. The fact finding Court having held<\/p>\n
that the sale deed relied by the plaintiff is proved;<\/p>\n
material placed before the Court do not give    ~<\/p>\n
substantial question of law for c<0mideratio'n"s by  <\/p>\n
Court. S0, appeal is rejected.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Rangamma vs C T Surendra on 20 August, 2010 Author: K.Govindarajulu UAGE58YEARS INTT\ufb02EHK\u00a7{COURTCNTKARNADM\ufb02&KTBANGALQRE DATED THIS THE 20% DAY OF AUGUST 201G BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE K. REGULAR SECOND APPEAL 451 1″ GOP ‘ BEUNEEN: S \/O LATE GUNDAPPA A ~ AGE 65 YEARS’ OCC:F’LOURVENDOR,…..__’– S- R\/O SHANIMAHATHMA ‘ ” NEHRU ROAD, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-118696","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nRangamma vs C T Surendra on 20 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rangamma vs C T Surendra on 20 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-01T21:00:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Rangamma vs C T Surendra on 20 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-01T21:00:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2\"},\"wordCount\":866,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2\",\"name\":\"Rangamma vs C T Surendra on 20 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-01T21:00:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rangamma vs C T Surendra on 20 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rangamma vs C T Surendra on 20 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rangamma vs C T Surendra on 20 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-01T21:00:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Rangamma vs C T Surendra on 20 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-01T21:00:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2"},"wordCount":866,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2","name":"Rangamma vs C T Surendra on 20 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-01T21:00:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangamma-vs-c-t-surendra-on-20-august-2010-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rangamma vs C T Surendra on 20 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118696","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=118696"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118696\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=118696"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=118696"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=118696"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}