{"id":118948,"date":"2009-10-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2"},"modified":"2015-01-16T20:21:48","modified_gmt":"2015-01-16T14:51:48","slug":"madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2","title":{"rendered":"Madho Singh vs State & Ors on 1 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur<\/div>\n
Madho Singh vs State & Ors on 1 October, 2009<\/div>\n
                              1\n\n       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR\n              RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR\n\n                             :::\n\n                        JUDGMENT\n\n                      Madho Singh\n                            vs\n                State of Rajasthan & Ors.\n\n\n           D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL NO.409\/2001\n           AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 12.3.2001\n           PASSED IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION\n           NO.9605\/2001\n\nDATE OF ORDER                      ::               1.10.2009\n\n                     PRESENT\n           HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA,J.\n          HON'BLE MRS. MEENA V. GOMBER, J.\n\n\nMr.BL Purohit, Rajeev Purohit, for the appellant.\nMr.LD Khatri ]\nMr.Sunil Mehta ], for the respondents.\n\n                         \n\nBY THE COURT:<\/pre>\n
     Heard learned counsel for the parties.\n<\/p>\n
     The appellant Madho Singh is aggrieved against the<\/p>\n
dismissal of his writ petition vide order\/judgment dated 12th<\/p>\n
March,2001 by which the learned Single Judge of this Court<\/p>\n
in appellant’s-petitioner’s writ petition held that since the<\/p>\n
Board of Revenue had decided the pure question of fact<\/p>\n
after appreciation of fact and law, therefore, there is no<\/p>\n
reason to interfere in such finding of facts by the High Court
\n                              2<\/span><\/p>\n
obviously while exercising jurisdiction under Article 227 of<\/p>\n
the Constitution of India.\n<\/p>\n
     The facts in brief will be sufficient as it is a matter<\/p>\n
relating of cancellation of allotment made in favour of one<\/p>\n
Jagannath in the year 1967 of agricultural land under the<\/p>\n
Rajasthan Land Revenue (Allotment of Land for Agricultural<\/p>\n
Purposes) Rules, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules<\/p>\n
of 1957) as well as under the Rules of 1970. According to<\/p>\n
the appellant one Jagnu Das got allotment of land under the<\/p>\n
rules referred above in village Mawa in the year 1966. The<\/p>\n
appellant has no concern with this land. One Jagannath got<\/p>\n
the land in the village Agarsar in the year 1967. Jagannath<\/p>\n
sold his land to the petitioner-appellant in the year 1997<\/p>\n
i.e., after about 30 years from the time of allotment of land<\/p>\n
in favour of Jagannath then an application was submitted<\/p>\n
under Section 82 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956<\/p>\n
by the Tehsildar Pokaran before the court of District<\/p>\n
Collector, Jaisalmer to challenge the original order of<\/p>\n
allotment of 1967 made in favour of Jagannath. Jagannath<\/p>\n
died and his daughter Smt. Suwa Devi was taken on record<\/p>\n
as party-legal representative of Jagannath. In this petition,<\/p>\n
the appellant-writ petitioner-purchaser of the land from<\/p>\n
Smt. Suwa Devi was not made party. Be it as it may be,<\/p>\n
the learned District Collector vide order dated 3rd June,
\n                               3<\/span><\/p>\n
1997 reached to the conclusion that same Jagannath<\/p>\n
obtained land by way of allotment under Rules of 1970, the<\/p>\n
then Rules for allotment of agricultural land, in the village<\/p>\n
Mawa and suppressing that fact, obtained another allotment<\/p>\n
of land in village Agarsar in the year 1967.            The said<\/p>\n
subsequent allotment dated 9th June, 1967 of 75 bighas of<\/p>\n
land in the village Agarsar was, therefore, obtained illegally<\/p>\n
and by suppressing the relevant facts.       The order of the<\/p>\n
learned Addl. District Collector dated 3rd June, 1997 was<\/p>\n
challenged   by   Smt.   Suwa     Devi   before   the   Revenue<\/p>\n
Appellate Authority, which was allowed by the Revenue<\/p>\n
Appellate Authority vide order dated 10th Sept., 1997 after<\/p>\n
taking note of the plea taken by Smt. Suwa Devi that her<\/p>\n
father never applied for the land in village Mawa in the year<\/p>\n
1966 and remanded the matter to the District Court,<\/p>\n
Jaisalmer for holding a fresh inquiry and for giving an<\/p>\n
opportunity of hearing to both the parties and to decide the<\/p>\n
matter afresh whether it is a fit case for making reference<\/p>\n
under Section 85 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act or not.<\/p>\n
     The respondent-State being aggrieved against the<\/p>\n
order of remand dated 3rd July, 1997 submitted reference<\/p>\n
before the Board of Revenue, Ajmer. The Board of Revenue<\/p>\n
while examining the legality and validity of order of remand<\/p>\n
dated 3rd June, 1997 observed that since it is admitted
\n                                  4<\/span><\/p>\n
position after inquiry that Jagannath got two allotments,<\/p>\n
one in village Mawa on 8th July, 1966 and another in village<\/p>\n
Agarsar     on    9th   June,   1997    measuring    75   bighas<\/p>\n
respectively.     Subsequent allotment in village Agarsar had<\/p>\n
been obtained concealing the facts of allotment of village<\/p>\n
Mawa, therefore, he was not landless person when the<\/p>\n
allotment of village Agarsar was made to him. The Board of<\/p>\n
Revenue also took note of the fact that this land had been<\/p>\n
sold by him to the present non-petitioners from time to<\/p>\n
time.     Consequential, the reference was allowed by the<\/p>\n
Board of Revenue and allotment of land made on 9th June,<\/p>\n
1967 measuring 75 biahs of land of village Agarsar was set<\/p>\n
aside. Against the said order of the Board of Revenue dated<\/p>\n
6th July, 1999 a review petition was filed which was<\/p>\n
dismissed by the Board of Revenue vide order dated 18th<\/p>\n
May, 2000. Aggrieved against these orders, the petitioner-<\/p>\n
purchaser from Smt. Suwa Devi preferred writ petition and<\/p>\n
said writ petition was dismissed by the learned Single Judge<\/p>\n
of this court merely on the ground that Board of Revenue<\/p>\n
has decided pure question of facts and, therefore, in writ<\/p>\n
jurisdiction this finding of fact cannot be interfered with.<\/p>\n
        Learned     counsel     for    the   appellant-petitioner<\/p>\n
vehemently submitted that there was two persons, one<\/p>\n
Jagnu Das and another Jagannath.             Jagnu Das obtained
\n                                5<\/span><\/p>\n
land in the village Mawa in the year 1966, whereas<\/p>\n
Jagannath allotted land in the year 1967 in village Agarsar.<\/p>\n
The appellant-petitioner purchased land after 30 years of<\/p>\n
the allotment and i.e., in the year 1997 from Smt. Suwa<\/p>\n
Devi D\/o Jagannath and till then there was no objection<\/p>\n
with regard to allotment in favour of father of the seller of<\/p>\n
the land to the petitioner. It is submitted that the appellate<\/p>\n
authority passed the order of remand only so as to hold an<\/p>\n
inquiry whether there was two persons; namely, Jagannath<\/p>\n
and Jagnu Das or not.       Learned counsel for the appellant<\/p>\n
also submitted ground of delay by which the allotment is<\/p>\n
sought to be cancelled etc, but since the order which was<\/p>\n
under challenge before the Board of Revenue was of<\/p>\n
remand order, therefore, we need not to go into all these<\/p>\n
aspects of the matter.\n<\/p>\n
     It appears that Board of Revenue was convinced that<\/p>\n
Jagannath himself has obtained the land in the year 1966<\/p>\n
and by suppressing that fact with regard to allotment of<\/p>\n
land which was sold to the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n
     Learned counsel for the State vehemently submitted<\/p>\n
that it was never the case of the petitioner that he had no<\/p>\n
knowledge    of   the    proceedings   taken   and   when   the<\/p>\n
petitioner-appellant had full knowledge of all proceedings<\/p>\n
taken before the authorities below then the petitioner has
\n                               6<\/span><\/p>\n
no right to submit that he was not given full opportunity of<\/p>\n
hearing or he was not made party. It was also submitted<\/p>\n
that since the petitioner was not party, therefore, there was<\/p>\n
no plea of the petitioner that Jagnu Das and Jagannath<\/p>\n
were two different persons and even Smt. Suwa Deve<\/p>\n
merely stated that her father would apply for the land of<\/p>\n
village Mawa.    In view of the above reasons, the learned<\/p>\n
Single Judge rightly held that the disputed questions of<\/p>\n
facts decided by the Board of Revenue cannot be interfered<\/p>\n
by this Court while exercising extra ordinary jurisdiction<\/p>\n
under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n
     We considered the submissions of learned counsel for<\/p>\n
the parties and perused the impugned orders.<\/p>\n
     It appears that Smt. Suwa Devi herself challenged the<\/p>\n
order of the District Collector on the ground that her father<\/p>\n
never applied for the allotment of land of village Mawa.<\/p>\n
This fact has two facet; one that her father did not apply<\/p>\n
and someone may have got the allotment in the name of<\/p>\n
her father or second may be that the person who was given<\/p>\n
land in allotment of village Mawa was a different person.<\/p>\n
That plea is inherent in first plea also.         The appellate<\/p>\n
authority found that without holding any proper inquiry, the<\/p>\n
matter cannot be decided.     However, the learned District<\/p>\n
Collector,   Jaisalmer   reached   to   the   conclusion   that
\n                              7<\/span><\/p>\n
Jagannath got the land     allotted in village Mawa.    The<\/p>\n
appellate authority remanded the matter to the learned<\/p>\n
District Collector for holding an inquiry after giving an<\/p>\n
opportunity of hearing to the parties.   Therefore, subject<\/p>\n
matter before the Board of Revenue was whether the order<\/p>\n
of remand was illegal or not so as to entertain revision and<\/p>\n
to set aside the order of remand by the Board of Revenue.<\/p>\n
We do not find any reason in the order passed by the Board<\/p>\n
of Revenue dated 6th July, 1999 whether it has been<\/p>\n
considered whether the order of remand was illegal on any<\/p>\n
count. It appears from the order, portion of which has been<\/p>\n
quoted above, that the Board of Revenue proceeded<\/p>\n
assuming that the Jagannath obtained the land in the year<\/p>\n
1966 in village Mawa and, thereafter, again obtained land<\/p>\n
by allotment in village Agarsar in the year 1967. The Board<\/p>\n
of Revenue even observed that there was inquiry, whereas<\/p>\n
the appellate authority found that there was no inquiry. In<\/p>\n
such situation, the Board of Revenue should not have<\/p>\n
interfered in the order of remand as by order of remand,<\/p>\n
only opportunity was given to the parties to prove the fact<\/p>\n
position.   The order of the Board of Revenue impugned<\/p>\n
dated 6th July, 1999 since has been passed on assumption,<\/p>\n
rather than on facts, therefore, the learned Single Judge<\/p>\n
was wrong in holding that such finding of fact which has
\n                                         8<\/span><\/p>\n
            been recorded without holding inquiry cannot be interfered<\/p>\n
            in writ jurisdiction may be under Article 227 of the<\/p>\n
            Constitution of India.\n<\/p>\n
                 Consequential, the appeal is allowed. The order of the<\/p>\n
            learned Single Judge dated 12.3.2001 as well as order of<\/p>\n
            the Board of Revenue dated 6th July, 1999 are set aside.<\/p>\n
            The order of the Revenue Appellate Authority dated 10th<\/p>\n
            Sept., 1996 is upheld. Now, the learned District Collector,<\/p>\n
            Jaisalmer may proceed in accordance with the directions<\/p>\n
            given in the remand order dated 10th Sept., 1997 in<\/p>\n
            accordance with law.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
            (MEENA V. GOMBER), J.               (PRAKASH TATIA),J.\n\n\n\n\ncpgoyal\/-\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur Madho Singh vs State & Ors on 1 October, 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ::: JUDGMENT Madho Singh vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL NO.409\/2001 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 12.3.2001 PASSED IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9605\/2001 DATE OF […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-118948","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-rajasthan-high-court-jodhpur"],"yoast_head":"\nMadho Singh vs State & Ors on 1 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Madho Singh vs State & Ors on 1 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-01-16T14:51:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Madho Singh vs State & Ors on 1 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-16T14:51:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2\"},\"wordCount\":1531,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2\",\"name\":\"Madho Singh vs State & Ors on 1 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-16T14:51:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Madho Singh vs State & Ors on 1 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Madho Singh vs State & Ors on 1 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Madho Singh vs State & Ors on 1 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-01-16T14:51:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Madho Singh vs State & Ors on 1 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-16T14:51:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2"},"wordCount":1531,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2","name":"Madho Singh vs State & Ors on 1 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-16T14:51:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madho-singh-vs-state-ors-on-1-october-2009-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Madho Singh vs State & Ors on 1 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118948","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=118948"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118948\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=118948"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=118948"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=118948"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}