{"id":119710,"date":"2010-12-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-12-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010"},"modified":"2015-01-05T14:19:11","modified_gmt":"2015-01-05T08:49:11","slug":"ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010","title":{"rendered":"Ramesh S\/O Irappanna Warad vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By The … on 15 December, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Ramesh S\/O Irappanna Warad vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By The … on 15 December, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: K.Govindarajulu<\/div>\n
W\n\n.3\nTEES CRHVHNAL APPEAL CONEENC} 0N FOR HEARING\nTHIS DAY, THE CQURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWINfI}:._ \n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
Accused in S.C.No.10\/2002 onthe  <\/p>\n
Court I, Bagalkot, are the appe11a.nts.:’-._  . 3 <\/p>\n
:2. Case of the State is   <\/p>\n
of Shailaja, accused Nos;  of
\nShailaja, accused No.5 is   accused No.6
\nis the mothersn   to 6 being the
\nmembers of   with Common object
\nsubjected    prior to 03.07.2001. On
\naccount of  Sh\u00e9.i1.etJe;A’pcoerhiitted suicide at P.M.Budhni<\/p>\n
Village yggfithin the  Mudhol Police Station. So, accused<\/p>\n
 offence under Sections 498A, 306, {PC<\/p>\n
 read wEt’rj;\u00ab 1V4′.5?_~of <\/p>\n
 After’ .c_c:mmitta1, the learned 19.0. of Fast Track Court 1,
\n E’:a;s0.AAsccti.:”ed the presence of the accused} charge is framed:<\/p>\n
 \u00a7:cct;_sed has pleaded for trial; learned Presiding Officer has<\/p>\n
recorded the evidence, SW1 te }3.W,2\u00e9$ are  .<\/p>\n
to 13.21 are marked, E’\u00bb\/1.0.1 to 5 are mafked\ufb01  bett}te’~. <\/p>\n
is marked as per M.O.1, E:><,D.1 to \u00a313 <\/p>\n
trial judge has believed the cas'e.<__ef thedf3tateV\u00bb"e:t;d'_v<\/p>\n
convicted the accused for the dffehce cdregdlaiined by the<\/p>\n
State. The same is cha11enged..in <\/p>\n
4. Heard both $ides;._T  for consideration
\nis: 1 V V _ _ V V
\n“Whethe’r  t’eh${?i’ctiQh offthe accused is
\njustified in Vfacte o4f:fh,\u00a2 ‘\u00a7a_::e?'”\n<\/p>\n
5. PW.1\u00a5VRamat)pa’\u00abetates;;he”went to Government Hospital
\nat Jamkhandi per’ rgfqduedst.-‘cf the police, found male chi1d’s<\/p>\n
 Widtf; _;injufiee..e,n’d he identifies the signature on the<\/p>\n
maha;:af~va_s”pVer;’E:i;P.1(a). The cross~examir1ation in regard to<\/p>\n
:’u”,_xthe 1i1’a.rri”e”ofth’e..e1’hespita}, death is not disputed. P.W.2~
\nVh..eRatnatwze that she knows the complainant, Basappa
\nc.=wh\u00e9adf\u00bbeAh1y…\u00a2ded1ghter nameiy Sayawwa and she was given in<\/p>\n
 Ute accused no.1, fezmd the dead body of Sayawwa in<\/p>\n
V’<\/p>\n
rnortuary and police have conducted inquest over-‘jbo’e%yY””of<\/p>\n
Sayawwa as per E:><;.P.2 and she has signed it. Sh-a\ufb02ajauis"a}sss{: '
\nreferred as Sayawwa. Cross examination' is."rna\u00e9i'e':Vto"'d_oubt u<\/p>\n
that the presence of the Witness is  there, East <\/p>\n
elicited. P.W.,3~Barrr1appa statesvnthpat he   the'-L'<\/p>\n
dead body of Sayawwa. p__P.W.4~p1\\z'tai3:a<iev   prove
\nEX.P.3, the poison bottle  tirawing Ex.P.3
\nwitness has turnect.v.h0Sti:1\u00a7,'\\.:'.:'F.vV\u00bb\ufb02.hj speaks
\nabout his   Ex.P.S(b} but did
\nnot support  of police recording
\nmahazars  pert P.W.6-Bhirnappa states
\npolice have  per EX.P.6. While seizing
\nI\\\/1.0.1 to:'5._  states that he is father of
\n   She is given in marriage to<\/p>\n
aeetltser\u00e9tp  has given birth to a child by name<\/p>\n
' VV"hethan~…__  marriage, Shylaja was staying in the
\n"'.-fhesgrseppopf thtevaeeused, had cordial hving only for a span of six<\/p>\n
"-Vrn'onths%,_then narrate the items and ornaments given at the<\/p>\n
A\/'<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
time of the marriage, narrate ef giving cane mere <\/p>\n
after marriage.\n<\/p>\n
6. While so, it is in the further evidence
\nthat he received a phone call. ‘f’he1’_’\ufb011essage <\/p>\n
Sayawwa has committed suicide”b_y”~eonsij-rairzg .330 here’<\/p>\n
went to the hospital, fotlnd hi.s\ufb02’\u00bb\u00a21_aughte’r?s.:,._deAafd body}
\nthereafter filed a c0mp1ait1t”‘a’s–p’e_t on the
\naspect of marriage,:”q1,;esti’e\ufb01’sFregard to the
\nparticulars cf    at the time of
\nmarriage,     to status of family of
\naccused.  eortion of evidence of this
\nwitness. It reads} . V dd ‘ x d<\/p>\n
  ;’It is V’t’a}_se te suggest that due to i11~
\ntrevat’Ir:.,ent”–zcausedmhy me Sayawwa consumed
\n\u00bb p’e-isert a:1d_d–ied.”\n<\/p>\n
dThe\u00bbpcitttfL:i.s’A’a\u00e9hether any father will make the life of the<\/p>\n
dauvghtet”rni’sefah1e, This pertion of the evidence is collected<\/p>\n
 2f1’ete’ddth\u00abat the cress–~eXaminatie:r1 is not having any aim at<\/p>\n
   not had any specific idea} speci\ufb01c defence and at}<\/p>\n
‘:7 ‘.\n<\/p>\n
serfs of improhabiiities are quesiiehed. It is breught<\/p>\n
further erose–exe1nir:atien that the witness ewns_;”\u00e9i”‘\u00a7rfeete:, <\/p>\n
owns 16 acres cf agricultural land. hittie 1ater:.:::he~V::eree.:\u00a7 <\/p>\n
examination is on the political baekgrejan\u00e9i.A’, It.’ <\/p>\n
follows:\n<\/p>\n
“It is true that Bhimasi’~,$vieehak11aVar_7is
\npolitician taking 1ee’ders}:iip ‘A L–.\u00e9;11de’~..’cond1iefing
\npanchayat. He is a1″s:3 T-attee1\u00a7.’df.in’\u20acg ._the Courts,
\noffices, Police Stations for :11e’_Vd’\u20acspute’–\u00a7ef ethers. I
\nalso used to  and gei”hi\u00a7;: ad\ufb01tieee ifejirxy dispute<\/p>\n
arose.” 3  . _   —\n<\/p>\n
Witness  thee:’~’f_e\u00a7{uestV’1of’ the parents to send<\/p>\n
Sayawwa tojher pA\u00e9ii*en:sV:’h0ujse.js refused as false one.<\/p>\n
7.v  harrates the relationship between<\/p>\n
eceueed  narrates about Sayawwa staying in the<\/p>\n
 house.df._Vaeetise_d’,..:;”She is the mother of deceased and she<\/p>\n
S\ufb01aies the\ufb01: it’? fhegvieit of her daughter to the house of P.W.8,<\/p>\n
.1  i~’ae4_mesntien of demand for money by the accused. It is<\/p>\n
 that Sayawwa has visited parents heuse during<\/p>\n
‘V V ‘- Adeegee\ufb01iraii festive} also.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
8. P.W’9~SidCie.ray states after the marriage Qgftgij useine
\ntime Sayawwa returned back home, she stayed  K V’
\nin the house, narrated that after the  ghee “\\Ls;9e._s’7<\/p>\n
harassment by the accused. He else refe1′”s_ to e1<iie:'s'v:*:1ee.:ingg"–<\/p>\n
and advising the accused. A poif\u20ac:ix\u20ac)':1 ef c:rQVse_"<:sxe;mifiation<\/p>\n
which throws light on the :'s1<1bject"'iseeextfacted.'"i'e:'*'reads as
\nfollows:   'V V .\n<\/p>\n
“It is n0t.\u00bb.c0rreet-\u00bb1;hat’–lapse of six
\nmonths on ,t’hat”_’. pa_ncha;ya;t “w_e_ received the
\ninformatiennf, degeitlfz of ~’3&:yfaw_j2v.9;:’7.<\/p>\n
By this suggesti0h.,””t1%1ere is’–ahA adifnission of panchayat and<\/p>\n
advise by e1d_ers..  L<\/p>\n
9. P.W.1_Q~Anfie.p’pa_’V-.sfa\ufb01es”: he is a neighbouring land
\nowrier, 1.;;je7\u00ab1s;\u00a7;r:1_t ahewu\u00e9i——–erying from the house of accused<\/p>\n
pefserxs,Twer:1::_’2L1\ufb01dAV:’i’eund that Sayawwa was rolling infront of<\/p>\n
 heuseh\u00abanei”V’i2fheen he enquired, she said she censumed<\/p>\n
 h-peisen ameepogsmd the ehiid and getting irritated. 1: is his<\/p>\n
 ease that he iifted beth to the cart? one Nagappa drove<\/p>\n
  ‘Ester he Eearmt that Sayawwa has died; He adds that<\/p>\n
deeeaseti had a happy \ufb01fe in the heuse cf the accused”<\/p>\n
Witness has met supported the other portion of the__e\u00e9;Se..’e\u00a7:   _<\/p>\n
State, the Witness is treated as hest\ufb02eg but the_-exuejal  “~<\/p>\n
of this Witness is that he lifted the sate  anettectr;i’:;:t’<\/p>\n
when she was in troubie. None at the f\u00e9f\ufb02.iiy’  efttthe <\/p>\n
accused inciuding the  n5. :e;teAvVvf5present
\nhave made efferts to savxfe\ufb02’  tzery unusuai
\napproach by husbanti:’tQnVarti’S”}.1i\u00a7\u00a7j <\/p>\n
10. P.W.1 1–Nag;\u00e9L};{;\u00aba  that of RW. 10.
\nHe states t~h’a’t’   ” an the \ufb02oor after
\nconsuming   had a talk with Sayawwa
\nand Sayawfwet   a demand by P.W.7 te get the
\nme\ufb01ey V’ha;:tas\u00a7sment. For better appreciation; a<\/p>\n
p0rti%::=_:f1″‘ef “ev:{._;’<\/p>\n
he __ “V\u00a73vh’en I asked she teld me P.W.?’ has<\/p>\n
V’ .. \u00e9ie:r-handed the azneunt threugh her husband and<\/p>\n
 T ” -_s?e._ due to the said harassment she consumed
\n‘ peisexz.”\n<\/p>\n
<\u00a7<\/p>\n
H) .\n<\/p>\n
Thereafter he states in a meter cycle Saya:Amve;’~\u00ab._’:\u00a7~as<\/p>\n
taken to the hospital but found that she was de.;{ef\u00a3.  ~
\nground that he has not supported the eese of in’ RV’
\nregard to demand for mehey as the ohie :ief19ete’d  .<\/p>\n
Sayawwa State has treated the wKit1rgess.%::s__ hQSti_1e”.._:””‘1″7e”fhis” V<\/p>\n
witness also there is no crQe\u00a7~exa:r;ih{\u00e9\u00a7t–ie’ne,_<\/p>\n
11. P.W.11 and PM\/.12 ahehh te Sayawwa
\nafter she consumed’:hVe\u20acs015;” of Sayawwa is
\nthe cause but    as version of these
\nwitnesses  uh and lifted her to
\ncart and then  zi \u00abIf any members of the family
\nof Sayawxgxa  s:hiftedA.Sej*emWa, they could have asked in
\n  “” if these witnesses. So it easily<\/p>\n
preh-ahlise’ theee hhwi\ufb01hesses being witnesses of the village: they<\/p>\n
‘are gaihed Q_fJe:i;.:’~’T5.W.13 do not support the case ef the State.<\/p>\n
1.4Vee-Ke’e–:iihai states there was a message about death ef<\/p>\n
 S_aya*3vV:i\u00a21aA”ahd child by Consuming poison. She she and her<\/p>\n
? f%::_\u00a7:’ehahd have come :0 Jemkhahdi GOV6:’:”1iT1\u20ac1″1’E Hospital, saw<\/p>\n
the dead bodies. She states that she has <\/p>\n
Sayawwa and her Child were beaten to  \u00a305<\/p>\n
Consume poison for the demand of goiri and  <\/p>\n
examination is that her statement is noi\ufb01showingishve haiging <\/p>\n
stated of Sayawwa being beaten i.e.;”irnproven1eni’ is sought to
\nbe put to the witness. II’1A__S’:.1Ch.’:a:.Si’L’L;_a7\u00a7iC.n also the cross<\/p>\n
examination reads as follows: ”\n<\/p>\n
“It is fa}se_”_r1:o }Asu_ggVest\u00ab.Vi’ih_ja.tVvhlifgave false<\/p>\n
evidence as4_VIj’.,vmef ._Saya,v{rwa _1_E..w:c,V months prior to<\/p>\n
her death’?  ‘<\/p>\n
There is–noeziirn, ‘r’ih};tri-rr1’–in <:ross\u00a5eXa.rnination. P.W.15-<\/p>\n
Nanagouda  he received information
\nfrom CPL Jarr:kihianCi'i,_\u00bb– etgrnduct inquest over body of<\/p>\n
Sayawwaqheor. conoiueted while drawing rnahazar as per<\/p>\n
eonduers the RM. over the dead body of<\/p>\n
Sayaivc-'wai;_  fifnd's the following nine external injuries.<\/p>\n
 'g_Near' right eye brow there is a bruise measuring 1 1\/2<\/p>\n
 J1;1\u00b01C;1Q_ X 1:5 inch.\n<\/p>\n
i’-\u00bb._'”(ii)”‘ i.i’C>:zer..iright maxillary area there is a bruise measuring 2<\/p>\n
‘  irieh X 2 inch!<\/p>\n
I
\n{iii} T here are one each bruise over the left anterior superior
\niliac spine and right anterior superior iliac spine  4
\nX 3 inch and left 3 1\/112 inch X 3 inch   <\/p>\n
Ex)<\/p>\n
(iv) There is bruise over left: knee joint l inch X   <\/p>\n
(V) There are multiple small bruises~\u00bb~oxzer  Ru<\/p>\n
one abrasion measuring 2 cm X  ;\n<\/p>\n
(vi) There is a bruise over theolefl: elbowjoints\u00bb:neasurir;g’3 <\/p>\n
cm X l ‘\/2 cm.\n<\/p>\n
{vii} There is a small abrasion m.eas-1_1\/C2 crri’:<:~1\/gvlcm over
\nright elbowjoint. " ' —  * <\/p>\n
(viii) There is a small la<\u00a7era_tion–.AoVe"r"'.the._"lemporal area
\nmeasuring l E\/:g"\u00bb';_V1'f[ll. X ';:''2 erng\ufb01 ' i <\/p>\n
(ix) There is 2: s_rnal’i”i”l.acer’a:i’0F1v’:A;0V~e1*.~ right occipital area
\nrneasuring lg}\/5 cm x 1\/::*cni.*  <\/p>\n
In regard’ i;o’the~i’injuries”are. concerned, portion of the
\ncross examination is rel.eVa.n’LQl’It is recorded. It is as under:<\/p>\n
  is true’iv–if–\u00abia person consumed poison
\nV .iramcdia:ely*\u00ab…_it will start wriggling. The injuries
\n_ r:os1’r4″~4:_ol in’-‘column no, l3 can be caused by
\n‘wri0sliirig:_~v,.__ injury no.l to 3 cannot causerci by<\/p>\n
Z36.)<\/p>\n
wriggling. ‘o’l;t*is not true to suggest that if a person
\ncarriedi’-.in’the bullock cart injury no. l to 3 shown
\n in Ex\u00a7’l?,_l;3 in col, Nos 13 can be caused.”<\/p>\n
 “gi.w;’:7 is the Po, i:>.w,is is also another ac? Powers<\/p>\n
 a:r;l.’Vl3*i.i\\?x?.2G are the LS5, P\u00a7W’.2l states while working as<\/p>\n
omo on o3.o7.:2oo1 he has seen Chethah with  <\/p>\n
Consumption of organo phosphorous g_;;>ois’o:;…V  has given<\/p>\n
stomach wash but patient died by: 12.25  He  eXt’1fs'<:f.'V'–<\/p>\n
of case sheet. He also states Shylsjeswas afso "sdvini.f4;ed with<\/p>\n
the same history, narrates':hze– pt{iS\u20acf..eif1f\u00a7'.S%t'8\u00a2.t6S by: '\u00a350 p.rn.<\/p>\n
she died. Questionsare asked 't'o'\u00a7)Aobetoi*V'as;t—o' who brought<\/p>\n
the patients. Not.3.sL1ggeVstio4i1=_is'found as to whether<\/p>\n
any of the  and the mother.\n<\/p>\n
P.’\\?\\\/”.22 is ah.oth;erVe’iV.?i:*..’,f\u00bb- are also I.Os.<\/p>\n
13, Lemhed’ advocate for the accused place reliance on<\/p>\n
Pjfe-‘eti;Gupta,__a~r2o?. onother us. State of Jharkhand and another<\/p>\n
 [201  )VA’%;2\u00a7?hereir1 the Apex Court has held that there<\/p>\n
 anduty’  and Bench to punish the people involved in<\/p>\n
S 498%. In Gcmguia Mohan Reddy vs. State of<\/p>\n
V v7\u00a2:agz;;:zh%%a Pradesh 9020(2) see 7530) Their Lordships of the<\/p>\n
 ‘\u00bb\u00bbAf:eX Court have heid abateme*a*: invohies a mental process of<\/p>\n
” iostigating a person or intentionaily aiding 21 person in<\/p>\n
oozrnmitiing a thing.\n<\/p>\n
l4<\/p>\n
lei. Careful discuss of materials would”‘d:i-sclose :he–ii’sniil\u00a7_,aoi V
\naccused had two houses. ln ihe house whei*e._<\/p>\n
committed suicide she was alone-._”s,The. diise:ussioniV”‘would ”<\/p>\n
unerringly lead to a conclusion thaii  have-Aleegpt away
\nfrom themselves. The rnaini  witnesses is
\nagainst: accused r?g0′.il’:L?;he  are general
\nallegations agaiin_st–::_ii_ii  6; The accused is
\nexamined  except for pleading
\nfalse, do notiiiinow,  in any evidence. Positively
\nstates  ‘lie has at all. The death of Sayawwa<\/p>\n
being  acccurii of consumption of organo phosphorous<\/p>\n
pestiicide_,Vp\u00abshei”hasii.i’Vvdied an unnatural death is proved without<\/p>\n
 any doul\ufb01t.  ‘ieason asserted by the witness is demand for<\/p>\n
-._nioney <  accused no. 1.\n<\/p>\n
Except for the roaming cross<\/p>\n
  eziarninaiion nothing is elicited. But at the same time, during<\/p>\n
 \ufb01liehisiaying of the Hindu Women in company of her husband.<\/p>\n
 Unless there are any sepxate overt acts caused by the other<\/p>\n
accused; they cannot be ‘brought in under Sec, lei’? ll-3C.<\/p>\n
Qvert act against Accused No.2, 3, S and 6 is lacking.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Ramesh S\/O Irappanna Warad vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By The … on 15 December, 2010 Author: K.Govindarajulu W .3 TEES CRHVHNAL APPEAL CONEENC} 0N FOR HEARING THIS DAY, THE CQURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWINfI}:._ JUDGMENT Accused in S.C.No.10\/2002 onthe Court I, Bagalkot, are the appe11a.nts.:’-._ . 3 :2. Case of the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-119710","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nRamesh S\/O Irappanna Warad vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By The ... on 15 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ramesh S\/O Irappanna Warad vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By The ... on 15 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-12-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-01-05T08:49:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ramesh S\\\/O Irappanna Warad vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By The … on 15 December, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-05T08:49:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010\"},\"wordCount\":2215,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010\",\"name\":\"Ramesh S\\\/O Irappanna Warad vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By The ... on 15 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-05T08:49:11+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ramesh S\\\/O Irappanna Warad vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By The … on 15 December, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ramesh S\/O Irappanna Warad vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By The ... on 15 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ramesh S\/O Irappanna Warad vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By The ... on 15 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-12-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-01-05T08:49:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ramesh S\/O Irappanna Warad vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By The … on 15 December, 2010","datePublished":"2010-12-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-05T08:49:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010"},"wordCount":2215,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010","name":"Ramesh S\/O Irappanna Warad vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By The ... on 15 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-12-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-05T08:49:11+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-so-irappanna-warad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-the-on-15-december-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ramesh S\/O Irappanna Warad vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By The … on 15 December, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119710","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=119710"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119710\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=119710"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=119710"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=119710"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}