{"id":120013,"date":"2008-06-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008"},"modified":"2016-06-14T04:48:37","modified_gmt":"2016-06-13T23:18:37","slug":"m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"M Paravaiah Since Decd By His Lrs vs Veeramma on 20 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M Paravaiah Since Decd By His Lrs vs Veeramma on 20 June, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH mum or KARNAMIQ,    \"  V\n\nDATED THIS THE mm DAY:'\u00bb9F\u00e9R;I\u00a7i}?    \"\n\nBEFQRE,\n\nTHE HGNBLE MR.  Au 3 B2(}P1u\u00a74Ni\\lAV g\n\n \n\nREGULAR   Q}? 2002\n\nBETWEEN :\n\nrd\n\nM 1\u00bbARAv.A3m'~1.T.V V} : f-- _ _ A \n\nsnares z:;x:\u00a2f;a.A;s-\u00a7:\u00a7i:_  V\n\nSM? PA.I\u00a7V&fF\ufb01?s.%.\u00a3M&_'.V M \" %  \nW go LA'I\"E5$Ri PAR'AVAIAH_ %\nsmgzg --.l3ECE1%$*E}13M BY' .1-:39 LRS\nMAL;;Esw.NNA   .--   %\nS10 mm M FAPAV-Ala\"\n\u00e9';..(3w-'EI;) ABOiJT_ 60 YEARS\n\n\"  ' P 5631-I\u00a3lfa\u00a5I'~IABAA'.5V'\u00e9;\\'?A$iAIri\n\nj = .. Sm LA'FE; 'MPARAVAIAH\n\"  _A\u20ac.'\u00abE_.'D.V_A1%G1j'1f.58 YEARS\n\n' A  'i' P mpmm\n\n\"-S\/O-__'LA'-I'E M PARAVAIAH\nsmca; DECEASED BY HIS LRS\n\n* =J_Ac.AmMBHA\n\nv  W.'\/0 LATE MALLAPPA\n\nAGED ABOUT 50 YEARS\nMAMATHA\n\nD \/0 LATE '12? MIALLAPFA\nAGEE) ABOUT 25 YEARS\n\nL\n\nr\nH\n\n\n\n(BY SR! (3 s VENKATASUBBA FAQ; Ki)':\nSR1 R B SADASIVAPPA, Abvs; ' 1. _ \n\nAND :\n\nI\n\nNANJAMMA\nW\/O SHNANNA\n55 YEARS\n\nALL THE APPELLANTS ARE   V\nR \/0 THEETI-IA, KORATA\/{(3.313 CROSS SEDDAGANGA EXTENSION\n\n  {ii}  -.442\u00a7!ALL\u00a7\u00a5{:A3RA.3UNAIAH\n\nS] O\" SADASHIVAIAH\nAGE 45 YEARS\n\n \" :  .R\/O\"IiI C-ROSS SIDDAGANGA EXTENSION\n\n   S\n\n\"\ufb01_JN\u00a3I<IUR\n\nNIRAN-JAN\n\nsxo LATE samsrvaxsm\n\nAGE 39 YEARS\n\nR\/O III CROSS SIDDAGANGA EXTENSION\n\nTUMKUR\n\nt\n\n\n\n(iv}'I' S SHASI-HDHARA\n\nM\n\n(Vii\n\nS\/O LATE SADASHIVAIAH\nAGE 36 YEARS\n\nR\/O III CROSS SIDDAGANGA \n\nTUMKUR  \n\nT S NANDESH  V'\nS\/O LATE SADASHIVAIAH  '\nAGE 30 YEARS ' "\n\nR\/0 III (moss SIBDAQANGA  %\n\nTUMKUR\n\n'rss\u00a7~Io13HA_  ; '~ _  ' \n1)\/0 IATE;SAm;sH:VA1AH" "   \nAGE41_.Yi?';ARE'g.V_V..';'. 'V _;  "   .\n\nR I 0 IR {GROSS SID~DA\u00a3?a-\ufb01N(}u*h.IEX'EfEi5iSION\n\n2. K s R11mRA\u00a731i:;\u00a2_  \n\nW\/ONKAPIN&I&H   _.\nA<3Ei:xVAr3oLrr..6:s--.Y {ems  "\n\nR\/0 HI 530,33 SIDADAQANGA EXTENSION\n'I.'U_MKUR" ,   %\n\nv-.,._PA\u00a7?,1lA1?HAMMA"' ---- \n w;o,P.N::-;osALLAPPA\n " AGE_S:'3_YEA}R'S\n\n R10. 1:1.,cRoss snzuzmczamn EXTENSION\n\n1. A "-FUMKUR: \n\n""s;os;\u00a7.i\u00aba';"\u00a7i~:E CHANNAPPA\n\nS\/'Q GHIKKEEERAPPA\n\n_ 'T LSINCE DECEASED BY HIS ms\n\nRUDRAMMA\n\nW\/O LATE HOSAMANE\nCI-IANNAPPA\n\nAGE "YO YEARS\n\nDECEASED ANI) HER LRS ARE\n\nis\n\n\n\nEb}\n\nto")\n\n(C1)\n\n(6)\n\n%%[\u00a7; \n\nALREADY ON RECORD\nAS 4(1)) TO 46)\n\nVEERABHADRAIAH\ns\/0 LATE HOSAMANE\nCHANNAPPA\n\nAGE 55 YEARS\n\nCHIKKEERAPPA .  \ns\/0 LATE HOSAMANE _ I\nCHANNAPPA T '\nAGE 53 YEARS .... ..\nCHANNASOMFsNNA  , \nS\/0 I~{o_sA'MAa;E_--.cHANnA?Pr.<'  v\n\nAGE 51%YEAR$'   \n\nG0wRzuv.iNEA in  "\n\nmg yIOSA?-\ufb01~AHE'\u00abCHA:N'NAPP&\n\nAGE 49 'YEARS. \n\nRUDRAPPA,   " \nS\/0 LATE I-EOSAMANE CHANNAPPA\n\n  "\u00a7GE47YEAR$A\n .1m.    %\n '  " 53fC)_Vl.A"lfE HQSAMANE CHANNAPPA\n\n(h)  '\n\n"sii\u00e9ija\u00e9aezxvaran\n\nQzsws\u00e9vz\u00e9man\n\n';<3;0= LA'rE HOSAMANE CHANNAPPA\nAGE 43 YEARS\n\n'V 'T 'PRAKASH\nV 9..-\/0 LATE HOSAMAISIE CHANNAPPA\n\nAGE 41 YEARS\n\nVRISPHBHENDRAIAH\nS\/O LATE HGSAMANE CHANNAPPA\nAGE 39 YEARS\n\n"iv\n\n\n\nRESPONDENTS ARE ALL  <\/pre>\n
R’\/O THEERTHA VILLAGE V
\nKORATAGERE TALUK
\nTUMKUR DISTRICT<\/p>\n
(BY SR1 J CHANDRASEKHA AH, _VR–   2<\/p>\n
THIS ma IS FILED U_;’S.  0_1r-..c:9c–.A0A1Nsr THE
\nJUDGMENT AND 0001220  ’13V.e.o2,m’s.<;Ei3 10:" R.A.NO. 13\/as
\nON THE FILE 09*-ma \u00a2]VIL~…i1J.D:.";E.V_ {SR.1DN), MAD}-IUGIRI,
\nALLOWING THE APP;..'-."s3_\u00a3.'L 10:0 ::SET1'ING'A'E\u00ab';ID.E THE JUDGMENT
\nAND DEGREE  23.3.1.8?' ~PA~ssEi3 I.1~:.o.s.N0.206\/7'2 on THE
\nmm: 00 THE 30:33.'… MUbiSiP'FfAN\ufb02 ggnupamwc, MADHUGIRI.<\/p>\n
 "0n~\u00ab.00R"?:~;~zAL HEARING THIS DAY,
\nTHE comm' nEr.:x;fg,Rar\u00ab.'*:)%'mE+\u00a70:,L0w1Ne:<\/p>\n
   H B x 'r<\/p>\n
  defendants in 0.8. 119.206,! 1972.<\/p>\n
 …m  im judmcns: dated 23.1 1.1937 dismissai<\/p>\n
tiii;-.'s\u00a31;_i_t1df4  on the gmund of Iilnita\ufb01on, though<\/p>\n
 'the I\ufb01\u00e9atcti\ufb01i ig\ufb01iues went held in favour of the plaintiffs. The<\/p>\n
" " 'T  to bc aggtricved by the said judgment and<\/p>\n
  were before the First Appclhtc Court in<\/p>\n
 ff v;2.AfNo.1s\/as. The First Appcllairz Court by its judgment<\/p>\n
 ilatcd 13.06.2002 has allowed the appeal and deemed the<\/p>\n
1.<\/p>\n
suit. The defendants therefore c-laixnmg to be <\/p>\n
the judment of the First Appellate C’ou:rt is before   _<\/p>\n
in this: appeal. The parties are mfened to  ”  <\/p>\n
as assigned to them before the Trial  T <\/p>\n
convenience and clarity.\n<\/p>\n
2. The plain\ufb01\ufb01s mmtmmmeme ir;*x\u00a7i:a1coug~t”sc\u00e91;i1ag fbr<\/p>\n
a judgment and decree to are the<\/p>\n
owners    in the schedule ‘Av to
\nthe 1:31.351′   and szepaxate pcs:3essau’ n<\/p>\n
of the     of Madhya Venkatapuxa<\/p>\n
‘V V’  ‘i’he    jmkainti\ufb01s in that regard was that the<\/p>\n
  gifted the eastern portion measuring 1<\/p>\n
  of land under a deed dated 10.01.1941.<\/p>\n
 7{‘hcugh~~ said area was: gven to the plainti\ufb01\ufb01, the same<\/p>\n
  Vtjict demarcated de\ufb01nitely, but being a close relative, the<\/p>\n
  was being ct\ufb02tivated by the defendants for the<\/p>\n
“”v.V1.:’ne’t1e\ufb01t of piain\ufb01\ufb01s and some produce was being \ufb01ver: every<\/p>\n
A<\/p>\n
:-\n<\/p>\n
0′<\/p>\n
year. Ultimately szinee the said ext_e11t._ef   ‘A u<\/p>\n
been gi\ufb01ed had not been handed baa; :\u00a2_yfz;:;e <\/p>\n
the demand wee made, the plaiitgtiifs were  <\/p>\n
the suit.\n<\/p>\n
3. The defendant;    emm the suit;\n<\/p>\n
summons \ufb01led    the Cl\ufb01ilil put\nforth by the    itself was disputed\nand in    since the p}ainti\ufb01's\n<\/pre>\n
had Iaotiebeeeu’  of the ploperty alleged to<\/p>\n
have been    deed, no right can be clan’ ned<\/p>\n
 by  ” edth regard to the case put forth by<\/p>\n
 ‘ ing the produce being gven every year,<\/p>\n
tiie S;-\u00e9jgeev’ by the defendants. In addition to the<\/p>\n
 said  the defendants had 3131:) set–up the<\/p>\n
” ”  “that in any event, considering the time lapse, the<\/p>\n
  had perfected the title 130 the property by way of<\/p>\n
   possession and the contention with regantl no the<\/p>\n
 A” ~  itation waa also raised.\n<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
‘as<\/p>\n
4\u00bb. The ‘I’.ual’ Court on eon:.=uic}cI’z3:.:11g   <\/p>\n
put fcarth by the mxties, framed. as m\u00e9xz13;’–as eight   1<\/p>\n
its eonsidela\ufb01on, which read as \ufb01efezmder; ”   <\/p>\n
1. Whether    that\n\ufb01rst de\ufb01::ud\u00e91:1_t  \nmil:   ofmd in\n\n% .   011 1501. 1941\n\n u ' ~ proves that\n\n\" _ 4' ,   the par\ufb01on of 1\n\"  of land?\n<\/pre>\n
 . 7-._W1:1ethc:r the first defendant proves
\n  ”  V”1~tii.at he is in possession of 9 acres
\n\u00ab  >6 guntas in S.No.50 and he is in
\n3 enjoyment of the same?\n<\/p>\n
H 4. Whether the defendant proves that
\nhe is “m poasession of the property
\nadverse to the plaintiff since 1941<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
openly and as a .’    <\/p>\n
the plamti\ufb01?\n<\/p>\n
5. Whether the
\nthat  is  .1:get_7
\nmaintaisggime as i:t.Vi:\u00a7~\u00ab1;a1:*1e(l under
\nMy.-3-are Land’   . V n <\/p>\n
6.  J u  by<\/p>\n
   A
\n _   Xi’eiv3;\u00a2\u00a3he;+-:1\u00a7’ee.p1aiaeeis entitled for
\nA’ ” M <\/p>\n
 ‘V8; V”}’e..;s:e_ttat:I’eliefs p\u00a3ainti\ufb01’ Tm entitled?<\/p>\n
‘  ” 53 E1;V01*_de\u00a7i*’to discharge the burden \u00abmet on the parties,
\n\ufb02ee’  examined herself as PW-1 and marked<\/p>\n
 * ;io(:u1\u00a5ic1..1iiea.t 4Exs.P1 to P12. The defendants examm ed DW3<\/p>\n
   marked documents at Exs.D1 to D8. The Trial<\/p>\n
  assessing the evidence on zeemd though heki
\nJ  “that the 911 deed had been executed in favour of the<\/p>\n
” ‘”p1aimi\u00a3rs, ultimately dismissed the suit as being barred by<\/p>\n
J:\n<\/p>\n
p
\nt<\/p>\n
7. In order to cxmsider the   ezf <\/p>\n
framed in this appeal, I have  ‘V<\/p>\n
Rae, learned counsel for
\nChandrashekamiah,    the
\nIe9P0ndent3.   t  Vt   <\/p>\n
8. The  question of law
\nframed   the queseoa to
\nbe oonsitieled’  regard to the question as<\/p>\n
to whether “the anti ”  the plaintiffs was within time.<\/p>\n
 On  uaepect bf ;tt1_atter as already noticed, the Triai<\/p>\n
   isaue 110.6 for its oo1mide1’at1on’ . While<\/p>\n
   issue, the Tag; Court had 11ot:aoed’ the<\/p>\n
t  ease “put fettittlztvy the plainii\ufb01h and also the date of the gift
\n which the praimaes had claimed right. In that<\/p>\n
  T'”x~\u00e9gm:1;.–‘thc me extracts at Ex3.P1O and P11 were nohced’ .<\/p>\n
K  Trial Court a\ufb02ier considering these aspects of the matter<\/p>\n
  taking note of the \ufb01aet that the gift deed had been<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
G<\/p>\n
executed on 10.01.1941 and sinus}: tl-15 suit  <\/p>\n
year 1973?, was cf the vu:’vv’ that   <\/p>\n
instzitutcd the suit for
\nthat the suit was institute\ufb01   as 32;-ch, the
\nTrial Court came to the  ‘suit was barmd
\nby time. That being go,  had held the
\nmain issues.    regard to the
\ncxec1,;t1’on_gvVfE  ”  the plaintiifs had
\ndecIinod’.\ufb02tk1c}_ . the suit was dismissed.<\/p>\n
The  the said \ufb01ding were before<\/p>\n
the.  Apptgliat\ufb01   Since the First Appellate Court<\/p>\n
  }’1asV   \ufb01miing has also come to the<\/p>\n
 suit filed was within time and thercfbzrc<\/p>\n
the  entitled to a decme. The reasoning<\/p>\n
~ : -v, adoptw”  the First Appellate Court based on the re-<\/p>\n
   of the ev1d’ cnoe which was ava\ufb01a’ bk: on this<\/p>\n
  of the matter mquIm’ 3 to be natured’ in the<\/p>\n
  Lbackgmulld of the said contcnticxn. However before<\/p>\n
i<\/p>\n
J
\n‘I<\/p>\n
cozlsieiering this aspect of the ma\ufb01er,__e13e_ethei?   u ”<\/p>\n
requJre’ s to be not1eed\u00b0 is that as ahead’ rye   <\/p>\n
other material issues with
\ndeed and the ownership   ill\ufb01itespect
\nof the said extent of 1    tieed had
\nbeen held in favetzr of    \ufb01ndings
\nrendered by     chailenged by
\nthe defendmite  ‘agpeaz not had the
\n vemss-appeal when the
\n  judgment and decree of the<\/p>\n
T1173}   as  which had been Iendeled<\/p>\n
 the  **** 11:1 this context, the First Appellate<\/p>\n
 that theme is no challenge to that porizion of<\/p>\n
 the defendants, has not adverted to that<\/p>\n
 ‘ ‘aspect Qf matter and has only answered the issue with<\/p>\n
   the limitation which had been eila\ufb02ellged by the<\/p>\n
It   Though the laeanled eouzuaci for the appellants<\/p>\n
” eentcnds that the First Appellate Court was not<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
:-\n<\/p>\n
Pr<\/p>\n
justi\ufb01ed in not eonaitieling the  iaaae,   xaatme V<\/p>\n
could have been exaaxined by the Firat <\/p>\n
by exercising the power under njttier 4-1*.’
\nRule 33 of CPC, what is  be  -iau  even
\nin the absence of a  05;’  whether
\nany contentions were    before the
\nFirst Appellate      Fizst Appellate<\/p>\n
Court had   in the absence of<\/p>\n
9. A  of ttigiudwent of the First Appellate<\/p>\n
  mag that the only oontmtion urged Was’<\/p>\n
V.    possession aspect of the matter which also was<\/p>\n
  {ereoaskier the question regarding liinitatitrm<\/p>\n
 _a;ud as siatehgkthe judgment passed by the First Appellate<\/p>\n
 \u00a33063″ not on the fme of it indicate that the \ufb01ndings<\/p>\n
  Iendexed against the defendants had been<\/p>\n
 assailed even in the absence of an appeal or<\/p>\n
  ~ “Verna;-‘m-objecizion. in this Iegard, the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
’11<\/p>\n
35<\/span><\/p>\n
appellants has placed reliance on a decision of the <\/p>\n
Suprczsm: Court in the case cyf SHRE
\nSHARMA vs. THE STATE 0;? ASSAM 65 ”
\n1999 SAR (CIVIL) 837 to cxmtcnd   <\/p>\n
cmsswobjection under Older I  <\/p>\n
but purely optional. Insofar   1″.’i 1e1\u00a7can31ot
\nbe any quarrel, but the  isf th4\u00a7 alixs.cn(:c: of<\/p>\n
such c:mss~4:1-bjcction or   would have<\/p>\n
to be  “””  ‘b3;jV5\u00bb\u00a7:}1et\u00a2:)u;:'<\u00a7nte1:\u00a3i that the \ufb01ndings
\nwhich w\u00e9m againsf 'ti;g:. ap;\u00a7\u00a711a\u00a7-aats had been assailed and the<\/p>\n
First    Viiifusod to oo;u$;ic1c1' the same. The<\/p>\n
    appellants has pi reliance on<\/p>\n
  of the H\u00a2,)Il'b}c Suplemc Court in the case af<\/p>\n
K.\u00a7;1;}*i'HU$\u00a7\u00a7i;;\u00a7;:i1V GOUNDER vs. N.PA!.ANIAPPA GOUNDER<\/p>\n
 i;epon\u00a7c.1  1993 SAR {CIVIIJ 322 to contend with regard to
\n  tiizscrtg\ufb01onaxy powers available to the Court under Order
\n I'  33 also would not be ofasaiatancc to the appellants<\/p>\n
" the very same reason, since the same has not been<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
a.\n<\/p>\n
fir<\/p>\n
poinhed out. Even assuming for a moment it is    _<\/p>\n
all the contentions which have been put__ VV    ”  <\/p>\n
appellants were not in fact noted by {no    e <\/p>\n
during the course of the o1\ufb01ex,_”it w\u00e9s3.”‘i:1cu1n}3\u00e91;ttV  on
\ndefendants] appellants to raise  nan.\n<\/p>\n
in the present second    urged\nchallenging the \ufb01ndings    against the\n\n<\/pre>\n
appellants had ;::o\u20ac.#b’_een jig’ Vpresent case, a<\/p>\n
perusal  ‘ doesanot indicate such gmumi
\nand as x\u00e9zzeh,  First Appellate Court not<\/p>\n
 itself  oo;esis1ef”‘.the correctness or othelwise of<\/p>\n
 * the  1\u00a7ere’–*i’;eld against the defendants cannot be<\/p>\n
 ‘fo1nVitfi any contention with regard to the same<\/p>\n
calinot be  by this malt<\/p>\n
” ~    is in this backdlop, the substantial question of<\/p>\n
  llave to be considered based on the \ufb01ndings<\/p>\n
T “–.:f1*e1iTclerc>\u00a3i by the First Appellate Oourt lelating in lin\ufb02tation.<\/p>\n
A<\/p>\n
17<\/span><\/p>\n
A perusal of the judment of the First Appellate ” <\/p>\n
indicate that the First Appellate Court had   ‘<\/p>\n
as point No.1 for its consideration.  ea-nei1i:.ei”i1;gv <\/p>\n
aspect of the matter, the First VAppeiiate’__\u20acL’om’f 1jes\u00bb.nolaeeein   ”<\/p>\n
the evzidelaee pie on If:(}0I’liV  ef the
\nwherein mm who had  ‘~-carliez?’  the
\nevidence of DWS 5 and 6.”  than son of the<\/p>\n
original fest defendant    \u00ab\ufb01gs referred to by<\/p>\n
the Fi1’sf; I\u00a7%1;;v:eB.;=i?;e jte.\u00a7omc.’et;55\u00a2om1usien with regard
\nto the  of  was being enjeyed by the<\/p>\n
plaintiffs as 4332 ‘the k\ufb02efendants as contended in the<\/p>\n
 v A   ….. .. e<\/p>\n
   regard, the evidence tendered by PW-1 is<\/p>\n
   Though the platint averments are not very<\/p>\n
V’  the ultimate case however put forth by the<\/p>\n
~\u00abT.’1’p1;3ig\u00a7ti\ufb02s is that by the said gr: deed dated 10.01.1941 an<\/p>\n
” e\u00e9\ufb01tent of 1 acre 30 guntas had been game in savour of the<\/p>\n
J:\n<\/p>\n
original plainti\ufb01’ and thexeafter since fhe  vibe ” ” 2<\/p>\n
\ufb01rst defendant being close xela\ufb01vee,  <\/p>\n
possession had been given to’ -the   <\/p>\n
proper demarcation had been  ti1e~  itself.
\nIn that context, the plaii\u00a7\ufb02\ufb01\ufb01’a   the  that
\nsince the defendants  cultivated
\nthe property for\u00a7ihe\u00ab\u00a3.}\u00a7enei:\u00ab’Ait of  giving \ufb02flem
\nmmm Plnduee   the said land. The
\non’@1aJ   as PW–1 has humm-\n<\/p>\n
stated    of the matter and in her<\/p>\n
deposition she’  “stated that “the defeneiant is<\/p>\n
”  :13: la\u00a5id”‘{\u00a7i1 my behalf’. it is further stated by<\/p>\n
  which was gifted had been shown to<\/p>\n
    thm’ g is that the same had not been<\/p>\n
 _ ‘ngeasuxeed given to her by metes and btzrund.-3.<\/p>\n
 N  In this background, the evidence tendered by<\/p>\n
 ‘   and 6 would assume impolfanee as if to compiiment<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
‘0<\/p>\n
the said evidence put forth by  \ufb02ue  ” ”<\/p>\n
also stated that they were cul\ufb01va\ufb02zjg t11e..2\u00a73id “:’lv\u00a7\u00e9.t1’Al.i”‘7.e <\/p>\n
was being gven to the
\nta the produce which was     as
\n“keru” to contend as if   the \ufb01nds as
\ntenants and   lease.\n<\/p>\n
In this regard,  cnl\ufb01va\ufb01ng the
\nproperty in   rejected by the
\nTrial  t\u00a7+t}i\u00a2” Land Refmms Act and
\nthis    the First Appellate Court.<\/p>\n
However,    what requ:i1’es to be noticed<\/p>\n
 v ._i._’3 no  for occupancy right whatsoever<\/p>\n
 _DWs.5 and 6 claiming to be tenants of the<\/p>\n
  etvetement made at this juncture that the<\/p>\n
  was being given to the piainii\ufb01s was by<\/p>\n
 V’   “koru” cannot be accepted. Therefom, in that<\/p>\n
 the evidence of the plain\ufb01\ufb01s that the defendants.<\/p>\n
T  u were cnl\ufb01vating the land an their behalf and tevwanis the<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
4-\n<\/p>\n
It<\/p>\n
20<\/span><\/p>\n
same, the produce was being gven to them would , V.<\/p>\n
accepted. Tllerefere, once the DVJS 5 and 6  tttai\ufb01  M<\/p>\n
are cultivating the land as the  <\/p>\n
piainti\ufb01h, the First Appellate Court   <\/p>\n
the end” enee of the said’ uritneie\ufb01e. de\ufb01ne
\nthat the possession of the defepdeiits the  laaeds can
\nonly be permissive. No d6t\ufb025t,.   which the First<\/p>\n
Appellate Court hf  indicate that<\/p>\n
it is notglaappiiye’ the feet that the plaiuti\ufb01’s had
\nstated the? uthep  cultivating the land on their<\/p>\n
behalf’ and  gsiefcsld\u00e9nigv has aim\u00bb indicated that it was<\/p>\n
 V’ beingr\u00e9uitivated  produce was being given to the<\/p>\n
Izee fort1\ufb01e’ :3 the eonten\ufb02an of the p}.a1′:nt.i\ufb01’s<\/p>\n
met   deed was executed, there was no proper<\/p>\n
  and the joint possession of the property was<\/p>\n
  to that extent of the property which had been<\/p>\n
  under the gi\ufb02 deed, the F113′ t Appellate Co-urt in any<\/p>\n
ue\ufb01ent, was justified in cmning to the oolztelusion that it was<\/p>\n
i<\/p>\n
‘n<\/p>\n
pe:rm1’asIve’ possession, though the   ‘A x<\/p>\n
such specific words in that regani but the<\/p>\n
The First Appellate Oourt  piilef
\ndocuments which were marked   that<\/p>\n
the land revenue was  :’Of__tI1e plainti\ufb01.<\/p>\n
13. The  :eensieie1′:i:ng this
\naspect of     the nature of
\n de\ufb01andant.-5 and also
\n failed in their contention<\/p>\n
with award  posse: “~  ‘ 11 before the ‘T1131′ Court, has<\/p>\n
 appxegfiiaiely   in the present facts and<\/p>\n
  the ease, Article 65 of the schedule to the<\/p>\n
  apply and in such circumstance, the<\/p>\n
 _p;esents.azit-am bytheplaintiffsiswithm time’ . Smce’ the<\/p>\n
  -hm E jam had already been held in favour of the plaintiifs<\/p>\n
  the First Appellate Court W88 of the view’ that the<\/p>\n
  anigt was within time, the First Appellate Court was justi\ufb01ed<\/p>\n
 decret:ing the suit of the plajn\ufb01\ufb02s.<\/p>\n
la<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M Paravaiah Since Decd By His Lrs vs Veeramma on 20 June, 2008 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN THE HIGH mum or KARNAMIQ, ” V DATED THIS THE mm DAY:’\u00bb9F\u00e9R;I\u00a7i}? ” BEFQRE, THE HGNBLE MR. Au 3 B2(}P1u\u00a74Ni\\lAV g REGULAR Q}? 2002 BETWEEN : rd M 1\u00bbARAv.A3m’~1.T.V V} : f– _ _ A snares […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-120013","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM Paravaiah Since Decd By His Lrs vs Veeramma on 20 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M Paravaiah Since Decd By His Lrs vs Veeramma on 20 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-13T23:18:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M Paravaiah Since Decd By His Lrs vs Veeramma on 20 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-13T23:18:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":2212,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008\",\"name\":\"M Paravaiah Since Decd By His Lrs vs Veeramma on 20 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-13T23:18:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M Paravaiah Since Decd By His Lrs vs Veeramma on 20 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M Paravaiah Since Decd By His Lrs vs Veeramma on 20 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M Paravaiah Since Decd By His Lrs vs Veeramma on 20 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-13T23:18:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M Paravaiah Since Decd By His Lrs vs Veeramma on 20 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-13T23:18:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008"},"wordCount":2212,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008","name":"M Paravaiah Since Decd By His Lrs vs Veeramma on 20 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-13T23:18:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-paravaiah-since-decd-by-his-lrs-vs-veeramma-on-20-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M Paravaiah Since Decd By His Lrs vs Veeramma on 20 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/120013","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=120013"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/120013\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=120013"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=120013"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=120013"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}