{"id":120193,"date":"2008-07-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008"},"modified":"2015-05-25T21:36:56","modified_gmt":"2015-05-25T16:06:56","slug":"union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"Union Of India vs Shri Mahesh Joshi on 2 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Union Of India vs Shri Mahesh Joshi on 2 July, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Cyriac Joseph Hinchigeri<\/div>\n<pre> ~  5-c2{\u00a7s\u00a3d}.?;\"'t!ze same having regard ta the axigsancies\n_   \u20ac2fvei%k:f;::i\u00a3rf\u00a7\u00a3:\"ation, The guidelinas say that as far as\n'  pos5i\u00e9i\u00a7,'Thasband and wife must be posted at the\n\n A. ,  c\u00e9izfer upon the Government employee a Iegalfy\n=_ _'A\"..'anforteabie right;\n\nthe Eearned Senier Advacate re\ufb01ed an a \nHmfbie Supreme Court in the case \nmam mm omens v. S;-Iii;:\u00a73$\ufb01!xS*\"r\u00a5\u00e9\u00a7?\\Gtt$\u00a7VAV...,\u00a7_;'?':'\n1993(4) sec 357. jibe  p\u00a7r:s\u00a2;-3 \"o'Vf*! 1fi'2\u00a7V\"'~ \n\ngudgment is extracted here'i'r;L\u00a7:\u00e9%9w:\n\n\"F. W320 should.' :b\u00e9L'V'\u20acf1a\u00a775fs;?*\u00e9:;ff.V\u00a7vbere, is a\nmattar fogf'E'!2_e a;abf\u00e9;;. \u00e9j'at eA.,\u00a7'\u00a3;ti2\u00e9ri:\u00a7j?\"' 'to decide,\nUnle\ufb01 \ufb02ffize  if_r\u00e9ns_f\u00e9r..  Vvitiatad by ma\ufb01a\ntides ibr Es &gt; '\u00a735\u00e9:de .LA\u00a7?fel\u00a73\u00a3i@3 of any statutoiy\nprc%visf5.n.\u00a7,' ii;-gA_cow\u00a7' :\u00a7;;h9\u00a3--.in.\u00a3:\u00a7rfa:e with it wfziie\nc{rde;f\u00a3?xgx'T'L'f{3e.V_  r..rfar;sf?e;;___ there is no doubt, Ihe\naiithbgfity \u00a3n:us;\u00a7'j_Lj!dgrnet1\u00e9_ erde:'fV'is:._   L.\n\nformer Judge 9:' the High  azgd ts. 'thes_'Aa\u00a7gere\nef the germs e,_\ufb01'd g.ifenstr\u00e9\u00e9e_%\u00a3s:'~--.gf the writ\njeefsdictiom) The Att!z:fn\u00a3\u00a7t:2fz'\u00a7\u00a7ze__.?'r\u00a3!Je:\u00a7a{ is not an\nappellate e::t!ror\u00a7t}\u00ab\"\"$5ttfi;gV \"\u00a7e.t:-_j;;z{{;m.ef:'t' over the\nerders ef'  ;;\"2}ae_!3et\"':\u00a7abetitute its own\njudgei\u00e9trtj' \" that  .the_ :':;?Lit\u00a7:?0\u00a5*ity competent in\nt;fa:2sfe;*;.__V\"' IE1 ;,;_t\u00a32\u00a3e.j'i:eee '' ttzeevv\ufb01ibunai has eleatiy\nexeee\u00a2fele't'._--vttsV_ \u00a7t;ri::=;:Iit:ti_o:=_ in interfering with the\nofdetef trae's:.\u00b0f:\u00a2:r{' v\u00abi(\u00a7'?e4}:2rder of the Trteenei reads\nas it'e\u00a7t%wete _s4;rtt_i;2:__:g:_\"_.;';\u00b03 eppea! over the order of\n\n; 'fteesfef m'a_de\"'ey'V\"the Senior Administrative Officer\nL '  (eempetent ee'i;'wfity)t\n\n   ebeeivetiens in fact tend :0 negative\n\"Vt!1e' zz\u00e9lfe\u00e9ndeete ceeteetioes instead of supporting\n t\ufb01\u00e9!'\u00a7?;v  The judgment also does not support the\n\nfegeeedents' etzntention that if such an order Se\n\n I ~._qa:estie1}ecf in: a eourt or the tribunal, the eutherfty\n' is obfiged to justify the transfer by adducing the\n\nreasens tizerefer. It dees not afso say that the\nwatt or the tnrbenei can qeash the order of\ntransfer, if any of the administrative\niestxuctfons,\/guide!iees am not followed, much fees\n\n093 H.\n\n \n\n\n\n: 7--..__'with fu.|iA %and e.'i.a'.v'i~;;p\u00a75:\u00e9\u00a7\ufb01e parzicuiars and \u00a3t may be permissible En\n'a.pprop\u00a3ia1Ee\u00ab;_pp'se to draw reasonable inference of malaficies\n\n'  Lfafztswplezaded and established.\nV'   The ieamed cmmsel far the respondent No.3 submitted<\/pre>\n<p>\ufb02_&#8221;&#8216;Ati.&#8217;:_&#8217;4_a&#8217;4jt:&#8221;respondent Ne.3 is neither a necessary nor a proper party<\/p>\n<p> for the adjudication of issues involved in th\u00a7s petititm. Ha further<\/p>\n<p>1:?\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;3. In our view, transfer pf ef\ufb01cers is required &#8216;.55-.-&#8216;jjf:<br \/>\neffected an the basis pf set of norms or guf\ufb01\u00e9ifn\u00e9\ufb01; <\/p>\n<p>The power of transferrfng an ;of?i\u00a2er\u00ab_ pangz\u00e9f&#8217;<br \/>\nwieided arbitrarily, male fide or aka e7\u00a7\u00a7feitis:?3~.af\u00a7af1&gt;:\u00a7\u00a2.:&#8221;&#8221;p:..,,, p&#8211;A<br \/>\nefficient and independent 0\ufb02&#8217;5Ce!f_ pr pa}:-vtf\u00e9e ;&#8217;nsfz;\u00e9 r1;;&#8217;e..vpf<br \/>\npoliticians whose work is np&#8217;f&#8217;p\u00bb._c;:icne b:?~.t}4\u00a7&#8217;&amp;=&#8211;V-Zoffigser<br \/>\ncsncemed. For bette-:3 adn2pin&#8217;isZ?af5\u00a2rz._ the-A &#8220;c:ff\u00a7&#8217;cf\u00e9:&#8217;s<br \/>\ncancerned must have &#8220;&#8221;fr\u00e9edpg\ufb01i.fr\u00e9h&#8217;\u00e9fj_fpar_Vof being<br \/>\nharassed by repeated traf\u00e9sferp: Ac\u00e9r tfansf\u00e9r\u00e9 srdered<\/p>\n<p>at the instance s:::r\u00a72&#8217;ec;=;s*:e.\u00a7~&#8217; wm}f% !ias._.p.b\u00a3hipg ta dc:<\/p>\n<p>with the bagsir\u00e9\u00e9ggsil&#8217;pf&#8221;_.a&amp;!:%2\u00a7niEs\u00a3&#8221;ra*%ic%\u00a7.  &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>7. Ne:{i:\u00a5y&#8221;&#8216;$;\u00a3:&#8221;:v:&#8217;\u00e9p;\u00a7\u00a7Vi\u00e9e A&#8217;r\u00e9\u00a5_&#8217;iVeti&#8221;V\u00a3on a judgment pf the<br \/>\nHorfble S&#8217;L:.pr:a&#8217;m&#8217;e the case pf M.\n<\/p>\n<p>saAxKARAvApAaA\u00a5ANAp\u00a7,&#8217;*ins v. smrrs or KARNATAKA<br \/>\nA;\u00a7%&#8217;E4,_pGTviE\u00a7:ER;$:V:r&#8217;apcftA\u00e9\u20ac\u00a7&#8217;vv\u00a7&#8211;:&#8221;:~&#8211;\u00abi1993)1 sec 54 wherein it is heid<\/p>\n<p>thVa:&#8217;t\u00abV.iL_i: pAn&#8217;af&#8217;aEw\u00e9:y*s. be possibie ts: dempnstrate malice in fact<\/p>\n<p>HEM.\n<\/p>\n<p>against the first respendent on the basis of the cemp\u00a7ei_rgt&#8217;,&#8217;__e&#8221;&#8221;.349:<\/p>\n<p>Mukesh Sharma whe mule mat take charge et_..3:\u00e9?&#8217;\u00a7:ge::e:\u00a7e&#8217;4_hes&#8217;:<\/p>\n<p>been posted etsewheret en the strength  <\/p>\n<p>Tribune! first respeneent has beenV.tt.gntEnu&#8211;\u00a7eeV\u00abet \u00a7e&#8217;ri&#8211;gts\u00a7ef&#8217;e <\/p>\n<p>Much water has \ufb02awed under the brtitvdgiieig tn si;et1&#8243;&#8221;&#8216;c\u00a7-tcutitetences,<br \/>\nthe best emerge in this case  5}Vt&#8217;eg\u00a2i:vvt&#8217;:t\u00a7}ei_t\u00a7entra&#8217;!Vv\u00e9etternmeet<br \/>\nto have e fresh $430!; at the   fresh decisien<br \/>\nregarding the ceeti:;~Vu&#8217;a&#8217;:t\u00a7;e oftfiret  Sengaiere.<\/p>\n<p>19.,  ttfewazlew this petiticarz by<br \/>\n\ufb01li35\u00a515\ufb01\u00a7   February, 2007&#8242; passed<br \/>\nby the centrata&#8217; .Admm:es\u00a3r%\u00e9t;~t:et\u00ab\u00a7\u00a7;+;&lt;;.\u00a7:,;::at in cm. r~4e,3e3 cf 2905,<br \/>\nHewevergte tArft1e&#039;E&#039;t&lt;7&#039;e..:Vi\u00a7&quot;ciheaftttett the queehing of the impugned<br \/>\n   jizte\ufb01ee ttitetteutemetic rev\u00e9vei ef the impugned<\/p>\n<p>trane\ufb01et-.e-_  faatea 2&quot; Nevember, 2065 and its<\/p>\n<p>VV;._lift&#039;:p!eme2&#039;r.tatie&#039;nt.vtA5\u00a5&quot;i&#039;ie matter caiis fer a fresh censideratien ef the<\/p>\n<p> fotr trve\ufb01efetrieg the first reseendent, Same Senior<\/p>\n<p> ef Deerdershen Kendra may have retired and some<\/p>\n<p>&#039;?r\u00a7e;i&#8230;heve been promoted and same new Beeirdarshen Kendree<\/p>\n<p> have been set up. Taking eii the subeetztzent deveioztrme\ufb02ts<\/p>\n<p>H. .H.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">23<\/span><\/p>\n<p>and exgganciea ef aciministratien inta Qragmatig..\u00ab:,\u00a7f\u00a75\u00a7\ufb01\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7*at\u00a7\u00a7z*s;7<\/p>\n<p>the petiticners are d\u00e9recte\u00e9 is take;\n<\/p>\n<p>acccsrdance with Saw and pass apps&#8217;a4pria\u00a3%&amp;._\u00ae&#8217;-der. _.&#8217;&#8211;F&#8217;.i\u00a7l.&#8217;  1:i*ien&#8221;}the = <\/p>\n<p>first resgandent can gantinue in the \u00a7&#8217;ra:$en_t pc\ufb01sst,  <\/p>\n<p> &#8230;.    A.  Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Union Of India vs Shri Mahesh Joshi on 2 July, 2008 Author: Cyriac Joseph Hinchigeri ~ 5-c2{\u00a7s\u00a3d}.?;&#8221;&#8216;t!ze same having regard ta the axigsancies _ \u20ac2fvei%k:f;::i\u00a3rf\u00a7\u00a3:&#8221;ation, The guidelinas say that as far as &#8216; pos5i\u00e9i\u00a7,&#8217;Thasband and wife must be posted at the A. , c\u00e9izfer upon the Government employee a Iegalfy =_ _&#8217;A&#8221;..&#8217;anforteabie [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-120193","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Union Of India vs Shri Mahesh Joshi on 2 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Union Of India vs Shri Mahesh Joshi on 2 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-25T16:06:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Union Of India vs Shri Mahesh Joshi on 2 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-25T16:06:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":499,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008\",\"name\":\"Union Of India vs Shri Mahesh Joshi on 2 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-25T16:06:56+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Union Of India vs Shri Mahesh Joshi on 2 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Union Of India vs Shri Mahesh Joshi on 2 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Union Of India vs Shri Mahesh Joshi on 2 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-25T16:06:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Union Of India vs Shri Mahesh Joshi on 2 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-25T16:06:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008"},"wordCount":499,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008","name":"Union Of India vs Shri Mahesh Joshi on 2 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-25T16:06:56+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-shri-mahesh-joshi-on-2-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Union Of India vs Shri Mahesh Joshi on 2 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/120193","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=120193"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/120193\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=120193"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=120193"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=120193"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}