{"id":120764,"date":"2009-12-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009"},"modified":"2015-05-06T06:43:10","modified_gmt":"2015-05-06T01:13:10","slug":"sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sai V Dattani S\/O Vijai Dattani vs S Gandhi S\/O Subramani on 3 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sai V Dattani S\/O Vijai Dattani vs S Gandhi S\/O Subramani on 3 December, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.S.Pachhapure<\/div>\n<pre>1 Crl.RP I314\u00bb\/06\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAN\n\nDATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER   \" \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HONTBLE MRJUSTECE    in\n\nCRIMINAL REVISION PsT1vT10N'\"Nc\u00a7'.'--_iA'3 1 4  2006'  . i \" L\n\nBEIWEEN\n\n2. Sai V. Dattani,\nS\/0. Vijai Dattani, __ _ _\nNo. 76, IFIoor, NaHdafI\u20acII1j~,. ' i _ ,\nChamiers Road, Chennai--'35.  '\n\n2. K. Palani @_:E:'a'iani  \nS\/0 Kodhaiiidarn\ufb01 _ . . \nHavmg office at'--l.\\Ia.--._ 10,,  \nMooker I'Ja1iarn_uth1i Sitreseit;\n\nchenng:_sQo\"'o'm__  \"  ...PE'I'ITIONER\/S\n\n(S11. Udajfa Holia,   fdr\" I3. \"Manjunath, Adv.)\nAND V a i x d\n\nS. Gandhi ,\" _\n\n'V 0 S1._1'baF~3Ign*\u00a7'1'1i%.   ..... .. v\n N0; 5v9.'\"H CTQS9, \n'Bhasyam I\"-iz;ga,r:;  ' '\n\nSI*31.raIr;pud1'3.15I1\u00ab._i.' V \nBanga1ore--2I..V_\"\\:._   RESPONDENT\/S\n\nV (By Sf{.\"'C. Pdtt\u00e9fsi Raman, Adv.)\n\n=i=**$\n\n  Criminal Revision Petition is \ufb02ied under Section 39'?\n\n __C_r.F.C'p'raying to set aside the judgment dt.23.6.06 passed by the\n\n  District and Sessions Judge [F'\u00a3'CmV} . Bangalore, in\n\n , Cr}.-A.No.1686\/2005, confirming the judgment dt.29\/I1\/2005 in\nA \"c.c.No.14718\/2003 on the file ofthe XIX Addi.C.M.M., Bangalore.\n\n\n\n2 CFLRP 1314\/06\n\nThis Criminal Revision Petition having been hearcfyand\nreserved coming on for pronouncement of orders, this day, _the'\u20aco'urt,\npronounced the following: ' .   \"\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>The petitioners have challenged <\/p>\n<p>sentence for the offence under_S_ection-.Ai3.8 of [thc&#8217;A.Negot&#8217;iab1e.&#8221;&#8216;i.<\/p>\n<p>Instruments Act [hereinafter calietfas &#8216;the  short) on a<br \/>\ntrial held by the Additional  e~:1&#8243;\\j(ie:t&#8221;r&#8221;opo1itan&#8217;A Magistrate.<br \/>\nBangalore. and the order  by the Fast<\/p>\n<p>Track Court. Bangaioije.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. The fa.ct&#8217;s.1fe1eVant&#8211;.for&#8217; the&#8221;ipui\u00a7pose of this revision are<\/p>\n<p>as under:\n<\/p>\n<p>I will buer\u00ab.re1&#8243;err&#8217;ingVAto&#8221; parties as per their rank before<\/p>\n<p>4_ . the T1&#8217;i.a5tCotart for fhiespiirpose o_f convenience.<\/p>\n<p>    _vpv&#8217;e.titionev:rs herein are the accused 2 and 3 whereas<\/p>\n<p>  the re.sui)on(ient:&#8217;..\u00ab the complainant who filed the complaint<\/p>\n<p>_._f.f&#8217;_:&#8217;:..\u00ab..uV1i.der Section 200 Cr.P.C. for taking action against the<\/p>\n<p> \u00ab._acc_uvsed&#8221;&#8216;Afor the offence under Section 138 of the Act. The first<\/p>\n<p> &#8212;..&#8217;a:ccu&#8217;sed is a company of which Accused }.\\}&#8217;os.2 and 3 are the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;v&#8221;&#8221;i.,_&#8217;4&#8217;4partners. The cornpiainant had an acquaintance with the<\/p>\n<p>X<br \/>\n,<br \/>\n5, \/<\/p>\n<p>. V<br \/>\n\\,,~&#8217;4..,\u00bb&#8212;\n<\/p>\n<p>11 CrI.RP1314\/O6<\/p>\n<p>the accused on different occasions. As to why he did not get the<br \/>\nOn Demand Promissory Note on the first occasion when he<br \/>\npaid an amount of Rs.3,00,000\/&#8211; on the first occasion,<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,50,000\/&#8211; on the second occasion, Rs.1,5o,oopo\/\u00a7{&#8216;V&#8217;o}:-.ee\u00a3iao<\/p>\n<p>third occasion and Rs.2,50,000\/&#8211; on the fourth1.&#8217;:.:oc::-asivofn  <\/p>\n<p>stated by him in the evidence is HQE:mfU1&#8217;th?(ff&#8217;i&#8217;I1ifllfg%4V:&#8217; &#8216;fJ\\i&#8217;Vhefi so<br \/>\nmuch of amount was advanced<br \/>\naccused on each of these occa\u00bbs.\u00a7.\u00a2:Cv:$&#8221;n.:3.p itA.\\&#8221;vo_uidVVAh&#8217;eA th:e&#8221;&#8216;r1atura1&#8243;&#8216;<br \/>\nconduct of a person to get, the ioandocuinents executed and he<br \/>\nkeeps quiet without gettin&#8217;\u00e9t&#8217;.tthe*i_ i\u00e9romissory Note all<\/p>\n<p>along till o4.04.2oo;..__<\/p>\n<p>13_:&#8221;._A&#8221;  is found in the evidence of<\/p>\n<p>the complainanht wherein in the cross examination, he<\/p>\n<p>.\u00abvv.states&#8217;~that&#8217; he paid\u00abR_s_,2=,50,000\/&#8211; on the fourth occasion at<\/p>\n<p>V7C11enn.ai   amount was paid in the month of December<\/p>\n<p> complainant had paid this amount in<\/p>\n<p>~Decernber&#8221;f.?,V00\u00e9, then there was no question of the complainant<\/p>\n<p>  tiieaccused executing the On Demand Promissory Note for<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; on 04.04.2002 i.e., eight months earlier to the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;&lt;..:am&#039;ount advanced on the fourth occasion by the complainant.<\/p>\n<p>L4 Crl.RP E31-at\/06<\/p>\n<p>this reason that the accused contend that the document<\/p>\n<p>EXs.P.1 and 19.13 have been created by the complairiarit. in<\/p>\n<p>collusion with the said Narendran who must have \u00a7t\u00abaE{en&#039;__&#039;t&#039;h&#039;e:s&quot;c;..g<\/p>\n<p>documents while he was dropped from the_ &quot;of _<\/p>\n<p>Accused No. 1 Company.\n<\/p>\n<p>16. This suggestion gets 1&#8242;.i&#8217;1\u20ac_force&#8217;gi_n&#8217;-&#8216;view   ;<\/p>\n<p>circumstances narrated in the aboVe_V&#8217;hparas.&#8221;  doubtful<br \/>\ncircumstance which couldwbe made. fromg the allegations in<br \/>\nthe complaint is that in Para states that the<\/p>\n<p>accused approachedigcpand received &#8220;a  of..Rs.8,50,000\/~ from<\/p>\n<p>the compvlainantijj.forl?theirHlsusiness purpose by assuring to<br \/>\nreturn thesame  to the complainant. in Para<\/p>\n<p>3, he states tiia:_by .cons&#8217;iclei&#8217;ing the urgency, he paid a sum of<\/p>\n<p>to the&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;accused and on the same day. i.e.,<\/p>\n<p> and 3 accused executed E2x.P.13 the On<\/p>\n<p>Dernand Proniisshry Note in favour of the complainant for the<\/p>\n<p>said sum, if the accused had to pay an amount. within six<\/p>\n<p>   the date of last payment, which was paid in the<\/p>\n<p>  of December 2002, as stated by PW.1 in is evidence, the<\/p>\n<p> by &#8220;issuance of the cheque Ex.P.1 dated 19.12.2002 which was in<\/p>\n<p>mg<\/p>\n<p>5\/&#8217; &#8220;4)A4l ~<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sai V Dattani S\/O Vijai Dattani vs S Gandhi S\/O Subramani on 3 December, 2009 Author: A.S.Pachhapure 1 Crl.RP I314\u00bb\/06 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAN DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER &#8221; BEFORE THE HONTBLE MRJUSTECE in CRIMINAL REVISION PsT1vT10N'&#8221;Nc\u00a7&#8217;.&#8217;&#8211;_iA&#8217;3 1 4 2006&#8242; . i &#8221; L BEIWEEN [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-120764","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sai V Dattani S\/O Vijai Dattani vs S Gandhi S\/O Subramani on 3 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sai V Dattani S\/O Vijai Dattani vs S Gandhi S\/O Subramani on 3 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-06T01:13:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sai V Dattani S\\\/O Vijai Dattani vs S Gandhi S\\\/O Subramani on 3 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-06T01:13:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":611,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009\",\"name\":\"Sai V Dattani S\\\/O Vijai Dattani vs S Gandhi S\\\/O Subramani on 3 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-06T01:13:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sai V Dattani S\\\/O Vijai Dattani vs S Gandhi S\\\/O Subramani on 3 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sai V Dattani S\/O Vijai Dattani vs S Gandhi S\/O Subramani on 3 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sai V Dattani S\/O Vijai Dattani vs S Gandhi S\/O Subramani on 3 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-06T01:13:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sai V Dattani S\/O Vijai Dattani vs S Gandhi S\/O Subramani on 3 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-06T01:13:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009"},"wordCount":611,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009","name":"Sai V Dattani S\/O Vijai Dattani vs S Gandhi S\/O Subramani on 3 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-06T01:13:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sai-v-dattani-so-vijai-dattani-vs-s-gandhi-so-subramani-on-3-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sai V Dattani S\/O Vijai Dattani vs S Gandhi S\/O Subramani on 3 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/120764","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=120764"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/120764\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=120764"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=120764"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=120764"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}