{"id":121022,"date":"2009-07-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009"},"modified":"2017-07-21T09:20:47","modified_gmt":"2017-07-21T03:50:47","slug":"prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Prem Kumar vs Amar Nath And Others on 20 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
Prem Kumar vs Amar Nath And Others on 20 July, 2009<\/div>\n
R.S.A.No. 1883 of 2009 (O&M)                             1\n\n\n\n      In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh\n\n\n                         R.S.A.No. 1883 of 2009 (O&M)\n                         Date of decision: 20.7.2009\n\n\nPrem Kumar\n                                                     ......Appellant\n\n                         Versus\n\n\n\nAmar Nath and others\n                                                  .......Respondent\n\n\nCORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA\n\n\nPresent:   Mr. Gourave Bhayyia, Advocate,\n           for the appellant.\n\n                  ****\n\n\nSABINA, J.\n<\/pre>\n
           Plaintiff Prem Kumar filed a suit for possession by way of<\/p>\n
partition and   for permanent injunction restraining defendants No. 1<\/p>\n
to 3 from alienating the property to any person.     The suit of the<\/p>\n
plaintiff was dismissed by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Divn.)<\/p>\n
Talwandi Sabo vide judgment and decree dated          18.8.2006.       In<\/p>\n
appeal, the said judgment and decree were upheld by the Additional<\/p>\n
District Judge (Fast Track Court), Bathinda vide judgment and<\/p>\n
decree dated 27.10.2008. Hence, the present appeal.<\/p>\n
           Brief facts of the case, as noticed by the lower appellate
\n R.S.A.No. 1883 of 2009 (O&M)                                2<\/span><\/p>\n
Court in para Nos. 3 to 5 of its judgment, are as under:-<\/p>\n
           “3. Adumbrated in brief, the facts necessary for the<\/p>\n
           disposal of this appeal are that Babu Ram, father of the<\/p>\n
           appellant and respondent No. 1, was owner in possession<\/p>\n
           of the property. He was karta of the family and the<\/p>\n
           property was co-parcenary ancestral property in his<\/p>\n
           hands. That after his death, the appellant is entitled to<\/p>\n
           1\/7th share. That Babu Ram had expired in the year 1964,<\/p>\n
           therefore, the appellant as elucidated in the head note of<\/p>\n
           the plaint, is entitled to 1\/7th share in the property. That<\/p>\n
           Babu Ram was owner of the agricultural land also and<\/p>\n
           mutation    No.   6978    dated   21.10.1974         has   been<\/p>\n
           sanctioned in equal share in favour of the appellant and<\/p>\n
           respondents No. 1 and 6. That Babu Ram had not<\/p>\n
           partitioned the suit property during his life time and as<\/p>\n
           such appellant is entitled to claim his share as above said<\/p>\n
           i.e. 1\/7th. The appellant through his power of attorney<\/p>\n
           came to know that respondents No. 1 to 3 and 5 are<\/p>\n
           making efforts to alienate the property and respondent<\/p>\n
           No. 3 Parkash Chand in order to deprive the appellant,<\/p>\n
           has illegally given 1\/3 share from the property No. 1 i.e.<\/p>\n
           residential house to Raj kumar his son, respondent No. 7<\/p>\n
           who had handed over the said portion to Mithu Lal son of<\/p>\n
           Chanan Ram, respondent No. 8. That a suit was filed by
\n R.S.A.No. 1883 of 2009 (O&M)                             3<\/span><\/p>\n
          respondent No. 2 namely kesar Chand for obtaining the<\/p>\n
          ownership and possession of the shop measuring 15′ x<\/p>\n
          24′, but appellant was not a party to the said suit. Thus<\/p>\n
          the said judgment had got no bearing upon the rights of<\/p>\n
          the appellant as in family settlement all the co-sharers<\/p>\n
          were not a party to the co-promise\/ partition, if any. Hence<\/p>\n
          the present suit.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
          4.    Upon notice, respondents\/ defendants appeared<\/p>\n
          and furnished written statement thereby taking objections<\/p>\n
          of no locus\/ standi and that the appellant has no concern<\/p>\n
          with the property in dispute, which has fallen to the share<\/p>\n
          of the respondent during the life time of Babu Ram and<\/p>\n
          the respondent is in possession of the same house,<\/p>\n
          whereas shop in question was given to the others i.e.<\/p>\n
          appellant and other respondents, so the appellant has got<\/p>\n
          no concern with the house in question.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
          5.     in the written statement filed by respondent-<\/p>\n
          defendant no. 5 Jagan Nath, it has been averred that<\/p>\n
          Hans Raj, attorney of the appellant, is also a respondent<\/p>\n
          no. 4, so the suit is not maintainable. It is further averred<\/p>\n
          that Kesar Chand filed the suit against respondent no.5<\/p>\n
          and others, which was dismissed. The appeal was also<\/p>\n
          decided against Kesar Chand. The respondent no. 5 is<\/p>\n
          stated to be owner of the property in dispute. Suit is bad
\n R.S.A.No. 1883 of 2009 (O&M)                              4<\/span><\/p>\n
            for partial partition. Appellant has concealed the material<\/p>\n
            facts and that the suit is bad on the principal of<\/p>\n
            resjudicata. On merits, it has been averred that shop had<\/p>\n
            fallen in the share of answering respondent. The other<\/p>\n
            averments were denied one-by-one and prayer for<\/p>\n
            dismissal of the suit was made.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      On the pleadings of the parties, following issues were framed<\/p>\n
by the trial Court:-\n<\/p>\n
            “1.        Whether the plaintiff is owner of 1\/7th share in<\/p>\n
            suit property? OPP<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
            2.         Whether the plaintiff is entitled to possession<\/p>\n
            by way of partition of his share? OPP<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
            3.         Whether the suit is properly valued for the<\/p>\n
            purpose of court fee and jurisdiction? OPP<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
            4.         Whether plaintiff has got no locus standi to<\/p>\n
            file the suit? OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
            5.         Whether the suit is not maintainable in the<\/p>\n
            present form? OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
            6.         Whether the house in question measures 15x<\/p>\n
            100 feet was given to defendant No.3 in family settlement<\/p>\n
            during life time of Babu Ram, if so its effect? OPD<\/p>\n
            (defendant No.3)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
            7.         Whether Hans Raj is not competent to act as<\/p>\n
            general attorney of plaintiff? OPD (defendant No.5)
\n R.S.A.No. 1883 of 2009 (O&M)                              5<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
           8.         Whether shop in question measuring 15 x 24<\/p>\n
           feet fell to share of defendant No.5 in partition, if so, its<\/p>\n
           effect? OPD (defendant No.5)<\/p>\n
           8-A        Whether the suit is within limitation? OPP<\/p>\n
           8-B        Whether the suit of the plaintiff is barred by<\/p>\n
           principle of res judicata? OPD 3 and 5.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
           8-C        Whether the suit is bad for partial partition?<\/p>\n
           OPD 5.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
           9          Relief. “<\/p>\n
           After hearing learned counsel for the appellant, I am of<\/p>\n
the opinion that the present appeal deserves to be dismissed.<\/p>\n
           The plaintiff had filed a suit for possession by way of<\/p>\n
partition with regard to residential house and shop cum residence.<\/p>\n
Both the Courts below after appreciating the evidence on record<\/p>\n
have held that the plaintiff had sought partial partition of the joint<\/p>\n
property owned by the parties and hence, the suit was not<\/p>\n
maintainable.\n<\/p>\n
           Both the Courts below have held that as per revenue<\/p>\n
record placed on record a Gair Mumkin kiln land measuring 13<\/p>\n
kanals 12 Marlas was also owned by the parties.          Similarly Gair<\/p>\n
Mumkin Chumian measuring 3 kanals 2 marlas as per jamabandi<\/p>\n
Ex.D-22 was also jointly owned by the parties. Hence, it was rightly<\/p>\n
held by the Courts below that the suit for partial partition was not<\/p>\n
maintainable.\n<\/p>\n
 R.S.A.No. 1883 of 2009 (O&M)                               6<\/span><\/p>\n
             Initially the suit was filed by the plaintiff through his<\/p>\n
attorney Hans Raj (real brother- defendant No.4). On an objection<\/p>\n
taken by the defendants that defendant No.4 could himself not<\/p>\n
pursue the suit, Sunil Kumar filed his power of attorney. Both the<\/p>\n
Courts below have observed that Sunil Kumar was not conversant<\/p>\n
with the facts of the case and hence, the statement of the attorney<\/p>\n
failed to establish the case of the plaintiff. Since, the attorney, who<\/p>\n
had appeared on behalf of the plaintiff, had failed to establish the<\/p>\n
case of the plaintiff, the Courts below had rightly dismissed the suit of<\/p>\n
the plaintiff.\n<\/p>\n
             No substantial question of law arises in this regular<\/p>\n
second appeal. Accordingly, the same is dismissed.<\/p>\n
                                                (SABINA)
\n                                                 JUDGE<\/p>\n
July 20, 2009
\nanita\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court Prem Kumar vs Amar Nath And Others on 20 July, 2009 R.S.A.No. 1883 of 2009 (O&M) 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh R.S.A.No. 1883 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.7.2009 Prem Kumar ……Appellant Versus Amar Nath and others …….Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-121022","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nPrem Kumar vs Amar Nath And Others on 20 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Prem Kumar vs Amar Nath And Others on 20 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-21T03:50:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Prem Kumar vs Amar Nath And Others on 20 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-21T03:50:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1090,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Prem Kumar vs Amar Nath And Others on 20 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-21T03:50:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Prem Kumar vs Amar Nath And Others on 20 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Prem Kumar vs Amar Nath And Others on 20 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Prem Kumar vs Amar Nath And Others on 20 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-21T03:50:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Prem Kumar vs Amar Nath And Others on 20 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-21T03:50:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009"},"wordCount":1090,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009","name":"Prem Kumar vs Amar Nath And Others on 20 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-21T03:50:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-kumar-vs-amar-nath-and-others-on-20-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Prem Kumar vs Amar Nath And Others on 20 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/121022","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=121022"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/121022\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=121022"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=121022"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=121022"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}