{"id":12135,"date":"2010-12-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-12-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010"},"modified":"2017-12-15T18:12:14","modified_gmt":"2017-12-15T12:42:14","slug":"smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010","title":{"rendered":"Smt Puttagangamma W\/O Dasegowda vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 December, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt Puttagangamma W\/O Dasegowda vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 December, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: B.S.Patil<\/div>\n<pre>,, 1 W\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2o-.1_o\n\nBEFORE  T\n\nTHE HON'BLE M'R.JUSTICE B.S. PATI1,    \n\nw.P.No.12944\/2o1o\u00bb{m.R-R;\u00e9sj\u00ab\"91;'    'V\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSmt.Puttagangamma,\n\nW\/0 Dasegowda,\n\nD \/ 0 late Mangamma,\n\nAged about 70 years, _ ,_ ; _  .,\n\nR\/o Pura Village, Kasabal-iob3i,,  }\n\nTuruvekere Taluk, '- _  2   _' \nTumkur District.  V   --  \"  '.P_ETITIONER\n\n{By Sri R.c.eova1aswamy, Adv.)  1     ,\n\nAND:\n\n1. The State of Vloiamvataka, \" '  _\nRep.3oy its Secretary'   _ \nDepartment of'Re{I'er111e',----  '\nVidhana Sou'dha;._ A 'Q\nBa\u00a71iga,1.ore~01.. _ \" ' '\n\nV\" ' 2 .\u00ab   Commissioner,\n\nV  Tumk.arrDist1'ict, Tumkur.\n\n3.   Ta\u00abhsi1j_da'r,\nTuruv__eker-e Taluk, Turuvekere.\n\n'A h \" \" --   , Sri ashekaraiah.\n\nS )'-o Giriyappa,\n\n --..V\"Aged about 51 years,\n\nVM   Sri T.M.GiI'iyappa,\n\nS \/ 0 Mudahgirigowda,\nAged about 61 years,\n\n\n\n6. Sri Nanjegowda,\nS \/ 0 Byatarayagowda.\nAged about 59 years,\n\n7. Sn' T.C.Lakshmanaiah,\nS\/o Channappa,\nAged about 61 years,\n\n8. Sn' Doddarangaiah,   \nS \/ o Chikkarangaiah, : 0\nAged about 51 years,\n\nRespondents 4 to 8 are _ --~<\/pre>\n<p>residing at Thalakere Village, pg <\/p>\n<p>Kasaba Hobli, Tumvekere Ta1_u_k;-_ _y<br \/>\nTumkur District. .    &#8221;  &#8220;RESPONTJENTS<\/p>\n<p>(By Sri R.Om Kumar, AGAD<br \/>\nSri Jayakumar S.Pati1, S:.r;~\u20acvou&#8217;nse1_for &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This writ:-.,pet&#8217;ition~.is flied under Articles 226 and 227 of<br \/>\nthe Constituitioij\ufb01of &#8216;India p.faying_.to&#8217;&#8211;.quash the order passed by<br \/>\nthe 2nd respond&#8217;ent_; De_p&#8217;uty Commissioner, Tumkur, in case<br \/>\nNo.RP.66\/di2U&#8217;O9}-5,10 d?ated&#8221;19;3.20&#8217;1&#8217;0&#8217;Vide Annexure&#8211;F and etc.<\/p>\n<p>This    on for Final Hearing this day,<br \/>\nthe Court made the fo110WiI.1g:&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;   &#8230;.. _. \u00bb ORDER<\/p>\n<p>,O1*vder&#8217;y.._d&#8217;ated 19.03.2010 passed by the Deputy<\/p>\n<p>Conimissiotifer,Vjfumkur, is challenged in this writ petition. By<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;V the   the Deputy Commissioner, exercising his powers<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;&#8216;,.&#8217;utider_.&amp;Section 136(3) read with Section 67(2) of the Karnataka<\/p>\n<p> Revenue Act, 1964 (for short, &#8216;the Act&#8217;), has held that the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; ing land in Sy.No.272 measuring 2 acres shall be treated<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; 3 Dl\ufb02ld<br \/>\nas Government land and the name of the Government shall be<br \/>\nentered in Column Nos.9 and 12(2) of the RTC.<\/p>\n<p>2. The claim of the petitioner is that the property.._hearing<\/p>\n<p>Sy.No.272 is her ancestral property and she is the-gahsblute<\/p>\n<p>owner of the property having inherited the <\/p>\n<p>grandfather late Thimmegowda. According to the titi&#8217;on_er,  . <\/p>\n<p>grandfather Thimrnegowda acquired hearing <\/p>\n<p>measuring 3 acres 12 guntas  public auction.&#8217;l..&#8217;1&#8217;o\u00a7._evid.ence the<\/p>\n<p>same, reliance is placed on Column &#8216;No.9 of the  where<br \/>\nname of Thimmegowda is rnentioned&#8221;&#8216;nVotigng,, the interest of the<\/p>\n<p>villagers as well.  Reliance. is Valso &#8221; on the RR entry<\/p>\n<p>bearing_&#8217;t&#8217;N&#8217;o;7;.;&#8221;.3;\u00a7&#8217;p5iv,l.&#8217;fojiind  No.10 of RTC which is<\/p>\n<p>produced at .&lt;   &quot; J<\/p>\n<p>3. The dispugeplliarosell  some of the Villagers moved the<br \/>\n  {3:ommissAioI1er&#8230;stating that the land in question is a<br \/>\nV&#8217;7,Gox}e1\u00b0=nn1ent:land&#8211;.used by the villagers and the same shall be<\/p>\n<p> purpose of construction of a hospital. The<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;.Deputy..Corrimissioner has initiated proceedings under Section<\/p>\n<p>it V&#8217; &#8220;..j1.3A6{3},_read with Section 67(2) of the Act and has conducted an<\/p>\n<p> After giving an opportunity to both the parties, he has<\/p>\n<p> .  &#8216;lg;\/.,VV4V%rded a \ufb01nding holding that the land in question was used<\/p>\n<p>__ 4 IIIAALI<br \/>\nfor public purpose. In the RTC, in Column No.12 (2), it was<br \/>\nmentioned as &#8216;Gramastara Hullu Koppa&#8217; meaning &#8216;area meant<\/p>\n<p>for hay stock&#8217;. He has also referred to the fact that of<\/p>\n<p>the land out of 3 acres 12 guntas was demandedby <\/p>\n<p>for construction to establish a hospita.l_andlvillagers&#8217; . <\/p>\n<p>had no objection for the sarneg 1&#8217;_&#8221;I&lt;&#039;urther;&quot;  :l_3Z)e1f,i,ity<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner has also referred__t&quot;e._the fact &#039;that&quot;the._us.ufructs &#039;of&#039;<\/p>\n<p>the tamarind trees grown in the__said__1and vve1*e.:auct:loned every<br \/>\nyear and the amount&quot;&#8230;r&#039;ec_eivecl&#039;  used for the<br \/>\ndevelopment of th.&amp; tem\ufb01les.   Based on these<br \/>\nmaterials,   that as the land<br \/>\nin question   individual and was<br \/>\nmeant   no impediment for treating it as<br \/>\na Government    available for the purpose of<\/p>\n<p>putting&#039; up construction to establish a hospital.<\/p>\n<p>   contention of the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>Ap&#039;eti&#039;done1&#039;vl4lisp:  the proceedings initiated by the Deputy<\/p>\n<p>V _ Comrnissi_&#039;onei&#8211;l&quot;&#039; are without authority of law as the same is<\/p>\n<p> initiated &quot;after a lapse of nearly 50 years from the date the<\/p>\n<p> ,en.t&#039;1&#039;ies&quot;l were found in the name of the grandfather of the<\/p>\n<p> netltioner and that the Deputy Commissioner had no right to<\/p>\n<p>I. Met.\n<\/p>\n<p>  ~ . ark a private land owned by a private individual for public<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; 5 _<br \/>\npurpose to construct a hospital. Referring to RR755, based on<br \/>\nwhich the entries are effected, counsel for the petitioner submits<\/p>\n<p>that without finding out the nature of the right<\/p>\n<p>under RR755, the Deputy Commissioner could net <\/p>\n<p>the impugned order. He has placed, rel.ianceon&#8217;  . <\/p>\n<p>in the case of SHIVANNA vs. NARAYANA.  &#8211; &#8217;11.R&#8221;1_S\u00a795VV1\u20acl=L,RlVlAivO:00<\/p>\n<p>and in the case of ANNA mo] &#8216;&amp;_oTIn:\u00ab:Rs vs;&#8221;..vGei\ufb01DARL\u00ab*DDY &#8216;sat&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>OTHERS &#8212; mi 1997 KAR 1998 to contend that ait&#8217;er,suc_F: long lapse<br \/>\nof time, the Deputy Cominissione1f_&#8217;cou*ldvi  have exercised his<br \/>\npowers under Section  delete lltheyentries made in the<br \/>\nname of the grandfath_e1?.of <\/p>\n<p>5. Learned. &#8220;Additional._C\u00a7overnn1ent Advocate has strongly<\/p>\n<p>supported the  the Depuw Commissioner, so<\/p>\n<p>also the counse1&#8217;va.ppeari.ng\u00ab .fpr respondents 4 to 8.<\/p>\n<p>  iDn_._co:isideratisn\u00ab&#8217;of the entire materials on record, prima<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u00bb.rac.ie&#8221;, =1  -the revenue record produced by the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>collectively  Annexure~\u00bbB series that the name of<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;,Thimmego&#8217;-.2_vda under whom the petitioner claims is not entered<\/p>\n<p>it ha.\u00bb-siigolwner of the property exclusively. Column No.9 of the RTC<\/p>\n<p>&#8217;ementions the name of Thimmewowda and as aiso the Villagers<\/p>\n<p> 4  &#8220;vlg\ufb01ll\/persons who have right over the property. In the column<\/p>\n<p>_ 6 IIIAAA<br \/>\ndepicting the particulars of the actual cultivators right from the<br \/>\nyear 1984-85 it is shown as &#8216;Gramastara Hullu Koppa&#8217; meaning<br \/>\n&#8216;area meant for hay stock of the villagers&#8217;. In the absence of any<\/p>\n<p>material produced by the petitioner to show the e2&lt;.cla,is\u00abi.ife.Vvtitle<\/p>\n<p>and ownership of Thimmegowda over the propertiyllirIl\u00ab&#039;ques\u00bbtiong<\/p>\n<p>and in the light of the findingsMregcorded&#039;&quot;by&#039;_&quot; <\/p>\n<p>Commissioner, this Court in exercise :_&#039;0f.g&quot;\u00a3h\u20ac*,W1&#039;i&#039;t&#039; juri&#039;sdii:1i;ion<\/p>\n<p>cannot record a finding regarding the entitl&#039;en1ent_.3of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>7. Counsel for the pe\u00a31t:\u00a2n\u00e91=.,i1as  the fact that<\/p>\n<p>the proceedings Could  by the Deputy<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner;lafteriifi-such~.long  of time for a direction to<br \/>\nenter the &#8216;named &#8216;of~.gthef&#8217;&#8211;C}g:vernment deleting the private<\/p>\n<p>individuals&#8217; name.&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>  . .\u00ab.XsE&#8221;&#8216;alre&#8217;ady referred to above, the records do not disclose<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;the   of Thimmegowda in the property. The RTC<\/p>\n<p>._  extracts  the interest of Thimmegowda along With all the<\/p>\n<p>lR&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;\u00ab._hvillagers &#8216;v&#8230;meaning thereby prima facie the property was<\/p>\n<p>A  earmarked for public use of the villagers. Based on the same, at<\/p>\n<p>  the request of some of the villagers, the Deputy Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>\u00abhas found it just and reasonable to delete the name of<\/p>\n<p>_ 7 4444<br \/>\nThirnmegowda and of the villagers and to insert the name of the<br \/>\nGovernment. This action has been initiated in the background<br \/>\nof the request made by the villagers to make use of the property<\/p>\n<p>for the purpose of constructing a hospital which <\/p>\n<p>cater to the needs of the entire villagers. Thereforelll <\/p>\n<p>application of the principle enunciated in.&#8217;the-aforesaid  <\/p>\n<p>decisions will not arise in the facts&#8217;,an+;l-circumstance:\u00a7\u00bb.ofi~i\u00e9this<\/p>\n<p>case. If at all the petitioner intends tux lay,heruclyaimmoverthe&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>property as one absolutely  to her,   is open to<br \/>\nher to approach the  herright. In fact,<br \/>\nshe has \ufb01led a suit in  pending on the<br \/>\nfile of the   v&#8211;\u00abw&#8217;herein the relief of<\/p>\n<p>declarat;i,on_ ofVtitle._  &#8216;svoug t in respect of the very land.<\/p>\n<p>Petitionerhas  consequential relief of permanent<\/p>\n<p>in_}&#8217;unQ,~;1011, In su_chV1 circumstances, it is appropriate that the<\/p>\n<p>   thewpetitioner before the Civil Court has to be<\/p>\n<p> passed by the Deputy Commissioner, it is<\/p>\n<p>needless to&#8217;oVb&#8217;serve, will be subject to the result of the civil suit.<\/p>\n<p> rightlyfcontended by the learned Additional Government<\/p>\n<p>A  :yil:iv&#8221;acaA:~te even as per Section 67(2) of the Act, if any person is<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;&#8221;.:,agglieved by such an order passed under Section 67, the<\/p>\n<p>  lies before the Civil Court to file a civil suit. Petitioner<\/p>\n<p>\\l\ufb02Jll 8 ._<br \/>\nhas rightly availed such a remedy though before passing the<br \/>\norder by the Deputy Commissioner. In the light of the same<\/p>\n<p>without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to and<\/p>\n<p>prosecute the said suit and keeping open all _t&#8217;ii&#8211;e <\/p>\n<p>raised, this writ petition is dismissed;\n<\/p>\n<p>9. In the light of the final <\/p>\n<p>does not survive for consideration and the .same~fis&#8221;&#8221;therefore<\/p>\n<p>dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>PKS<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Smt Puttagangamma W\/O Dasegowda vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 December, 2010 Author: B.S.Patil ,, 1 W IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2o-.1_o BEFORE T THE HON&#8217;BLE M&#8217;R.JUSTICE B.S. PATI1, w.P.No.12944\/2o1o\u00bb{m.R-R;\u00e9sj\u00ab&#8221;91;&#8217; &#8216;V BETWEEN: Smt.Puttagangamma, W\/0 Dasegowda, D \/ 0 late Mangamma, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12135","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt Puttagangamma W\/O Dasegowda vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Puttagangamma W\/O Dasegowda vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-12-15T12:42:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Puttagangamma W\\\/O Dasegowda vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 December, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-15T12:42:14+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1303,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010\",\"name\":\"Smt Puttagangamma W\\\/O Dasegowda vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-15T12:42:14+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Puttagangamma W\\\/O Dasegowda vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 December, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Puttagangamma W\/O Dasegowda vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Puttagangamma W\/O Dasegowda vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-12-15T12:42:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Puttagangamma W\/O Dasegowda vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 December, 2010","datePublished":"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-15T12:42:14+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010"},"wordCount":1303,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010","name":"Smt Puttagangamma W\/O Dasegowda vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-15T12:42:14+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttagangamma-wo-dasegowda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-6-december-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Puttagangamma W\/O Dasegowda vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 December, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12135","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12135"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12135\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12135"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12135"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12135"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}