{"id":12144,"date":"2010-01-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010"},"modified":"2014-05-21T11:04:43","modified_gmt":"2014-05-21T05:34:43","slug":"sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sumathi W\/O Late C Harisha vs P Y Chandra S\/O Giddegowda on 29 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sumathi W\/O Late C Harisha vs P Y Chandra S\/O Giddegowda on 29 January, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.K.Patil And Gowda<\/div>\n<pre>BETWEEN:\n\n1.\n\n1NnmHmacmmTmHmmmwAArmmmumm\nDWH$TmSHm2W\"mWOFMWWmI2MB\n\n:PRESENT:\n\nTHE HONBLE MR.JUS'l.'ICE N. K. z&gt;_A--.*\ufb01I'.A*jV\"L:%~% {T  _\n\nAND\n\nTHE I-ION'BLE MR..zUs'rIcE  \n\nM.F.A.No. 8510.gf 2OO\u00e9\"--{MV}, 7-V': \u00b0 \n\nSumathi, '  -_\nW\/0. Late C. Harishag' '\nAged aboutA23 ye.33:s., _  '\n\nKurn. Raiish\u00e9iia, .  1' V\n\nD:\/0.  'Fi\u00e9iri_S}1,V.\u00e9t, _\nAged -.ab0u't.O-2 Vy\u00a7ea1f's'~,---._ ~\nMi3i1or,\u00ab. rep-rcs\u00e9:}1ted_ by ner\nmoth\ufb01r \/ guard.1an f1Vrst\nappellant.' .V  \n\n-  ' \" \"\"\" \" 'V\n1 * --. _ \\z\"J_\/ Late Chandregowda,\n\" .  abo1_,\ufb01L43 years.\n\nA  vaf\u00e9 'jn\u00e9lislding at\n\"V1naya\"ka Badavane.\nChe'cranahaJ11 Road,\n\nV\u00bb *  Near Sangalirayana Chathra,\n\n \"111 Ward, K. R. Nagar,\n' \"Mysore District.\n Appellants\n\n34\/;\n\n\n\n[By Sri. C. M. Jagadeesh, Adv.)\n\nAND:\n\n \n\nl.\n\nP. Y. Chandra,\n\nS \/ 0. Giddegowda,\n\nResident of Shankarapura   \nChannarayapatna Depot, 1\nI-Iassan District.\n\nManaging Director,\nK. S.R.T.C. .\nChannarayapatna; .__\nHassan.  \n\nHassan I)i{=isi.on,:=__ g \nHassanh  'V '\n\nThe Divisional Co1'I\"u*ollei'     \" \n\n. Respondents\n\n(syd0'is1~:,'[i%'M.li%:;ira:;s;i:arai1;\u00bbiAE1v. for 12.2, R3,\n 1 4-\u00bb notiee'A'dispens_ed.'with V \/ 0. dated 03-12-2009)\n\n\" .  &gt;2: =i= are\n\n uMFlA'is__\ufb011evd U\/s. 173(1) of MV Act against the\n\n  award dated 2605-2006 passed in MVC\n _ N02\/_ -the file of the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) &amp; JMFC.\n IV'.vAC'l',..H'-Jnsur, partly allowing the claim petition for\n\nCon1pens.at.i'iori and seeking enhancement of compensation.\n\n.'l'\"'his appeal coming on for Hearing, this day,\n\nA \"it   Patil J , delivered the following:\n\n%.-\u00bb~\u00ab--\u00bb-*'\"\n\n\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>This is a claimants&#8217; appeal directed <\/p>\n<p>impugned judgment and award dated   <\/p>\n<p>in MVC No.2\/2005 on the file of the &#8220;c*ii;;1&#8243;iJu;c1a&lt;\u00a7\u00a2r (sf.Din)hiia  <\/p>\n<p>JMFC, Add}. MACT, Hunsu:r,_ [heireinaiter ireferredii <\/p>\n<p>&#039;Tribunal&#039; for brevity].\n<\/p>\n<p>2. The Tribun\u00e9aiiihibir i\u00e9jv\ufb01\ufb01g\ufb01i\ufb01nt and award,<br \/>\nawarded a  of &#8216;deducting 40%<br \/>\ntowards    the part of the<br \/>\ndeceasech&#8221;&#8216;viifiih&#8217;infe1*est.Vgat&#8217;E\u00a7%&#8217;~~p,.ai as against the claim of<br \/>\nthe claimants &#8212; on account of the death<\/p>\n<p>of the deceased late AS1_r\u00bbi.&#8221;~\u00a5.;*iarisha, in a road traffic accident.<\/p>\n<p> he\ufb01rigxiaiace ofVth&#8211;e&#8211;\u00ab&#8221;appe11ants is that the compensation<\/p>\n<p> i__aiwjarded._gVE)5}&#8217;i&#8217; Tribunal is inadequate and hence, it is<\/p>\n<p>required.  enhanced by modifying the judgment and<\/p>\n<p>Waward ofthe Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p> 3. The brief facts of the case are:\n<\/p>\n<p>\/\u00ab\/\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>The appellants No.1 and 2 N\u00bb claimants are the wife<\/p>\n<p>and minor child and appellant No.3 is the m0th.er_l:&#8217;0t&#8217;the<\/p>\n<p>deceased. They have filed a claim petitidri  <\/p>\n<p>compensation against the respondents on&#8217; acce:i;xnt&#8217; 04_f;th.e it<\/p>\n<p>death of the deceased <\/p>\n<p>deceased was working as a dri\\_fer_0f gbods.temp~Q&#8221;a1idl was&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>earning more than Rs.-31.000&#8242;,\/-&lt;* lvmenthllas. salary and<br \/>\nRs. 100\/\u00bb per day as   bread earner<br \/>\nin the family},  thielll &quot;depended on his<br \/>\nincome.  day, on 2443-04 at<\/p>\n<p>9.45    coming from Uppina<\/p>\n<p>Angadi village   taluk, Hassan, in his own<\/p>\n<p>Vehicl_e,_ Terh&#039;pQ_V&#039;beVari1Aig Vl&#039;\u00a7.t).KA&#8211;O9\/9707, driving the said<\/p>\n<p>  iiffiaa &#039;m0dei&quot;ate&quot;speed on the left side of the road by<\/p>\n<p> norms, when he reached the place<\/p>\n<p>  near-&#8230;Rateml_aii&#039;1e on N.l~l.48 on B.M.R0ad, at that time, the<\/p>\n<p> &quot;&#039;&#8211;._Vilrstprespeildent being the driver of the KSRTC bus bearing<\/p>\n<p> a.li*\u00ab::gi&#039;st.r*ation No. KAml3\/F4104 coming from Hassan in a<\/p>\n<p>rash and negligent manner with high speed dashed<\/p>\n<p>\/w,\/~<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>6. We have gone&#8217; through the grounds urged in<\/p>\n<p>the memorandum of appeal and heard the_4vv,iearned<\/p>\n<p>Counsel appearing for the respondents  <\/p>\n<p>considerabie length of time.\n<\/p>\n<p>7. The learned C,ou_nse1&#8243;-ehdappearingd for&#8217;: <\/p>\n<p>respondents No. 2 and 3,  outset. that,<br \/>\ncontributory neg1igenCt:._.T&#8217;J\u00a7edd.&#8217;aid  Igart Of the<br \/>\ndriver of the KSRTC    the Tribunal<br \/>\nought to   _.;:347t;1.\u00a7:&#8217;:&#8217;;\u00e9\u00e9tid&#8221;isubmission cannot<br \/>\nbe    of fact recorded by the<br \/>\nTribune}, ._ the oral and documentary<\/p>\n<p>evidence. &#8220;&#8216;Hence;&#8217;* the s-aid. submission is rejected.<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;After &#8216;Vcafeful evaluation of the materia} on<\/p>\n<p> .1-eoord  &#8221;  of the impugned judgment and award,<\/p>\n<p>we =-..are_.~  View that the Tribunal after critical<\/p>\n<p> of the oral and documentary evidence has<\/p>\n<p>  \ufb01xed the contributory negiigence of 40% on the<\/p>\n<p>part of the deceased. Hence, we uphold the same.<\/p>\n<p>%\/<\/p>\n<p>However, the Tribunal has committed error in taking the<br \/>\nnet income of the deceased at the rate of Rs.3,000\/&#8211; per<br \/>\nmonth. It is inadequate. Hence, it needs reassessment.<\/p>\n<p>Deceased was a young and energetic driver, drivingiiis<\/p>\n<p>Tempo. He was aged about 25 years. ffiie <\/p>\n<p>occurred in the year 2004. We cansafegly assestsi, inco_i:r1e&#8217;i&#8217;of it &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>the deceased at Rs.4,000\/&#8211; per  <\/p>\n<p>i.e. Rs.1,333\/&#8211; is deducted tVow:ars:is hisVpersonaigexpensesf&#8217; V<\/p>\n<p>Hence, net income comes to'&#8221;R&#8217;sVr,:2.66_7\/&#8211;. d&#8221;&#8221;I&#8217;he&#8221;&#8216;deceased<\/p>\n<p>was aged about 25 years..i.&#8221;Pro1u5e&#8217;r  is &#8216;I8&#8242; in the<br \/>\nEight oftiie   decision in Sarla Verma and<\/p>\n<p>others &#8220;.113; \u00ab.D\u00e9lhi Corporation and another<\/p>\n<p>reportevd in 4&#8217;20V_O9,1\u00a71(.&#8217;-vA3_ 134.38. Accordingly, we redetermine<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;st.&#8221;&#8216;1ossi&#8212;-.of:,,.deper1dency'&#8221;&#8216;at Rs.5,76,072\/~\u00ab (RS266?\/~\u00bb~ x 12 x<\/p>\n<p> ya  ~  -I)   <\/p>\n<p>  diihe Tribunal has rightly awarded Rs.10,000\/-<\/p>\n<p>A ftowdards loss of consortium. Since, it is just and<\/p>\n<p>d  regasonabie, it does not call for interference.<\/p>\n<p>%\/<\/p>\n<p>10. The Tribunal has failed to award any<br \/>\ncompensation towards loss of estate. We deem it \ufb01t to<\/p>\n<p>award \u00a30,000\/- under this head.\n<\/p>\n<p>11. The Tribunal has erred in  <\/p>\n<p>towards loss of love and a\ufb01&#8221;ec.tion. &#8220;l&#8217;he_&#8217;v.sari1e __is&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>inadequate. The appellants are the  minor&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>mother of the deceased. V\u00a7l&#8217;3:l&#8217;\ufb025_&#8217;VarC1&#8243; <\/p>\n<p>loss of love and affection to.&#8211;each'&#8221;-.appe1lan.t. J\u00a7The total<\/p>\n<p>compensation towards loss of_V1lor&#8217;e affection comes to<\/p>\n<p>Rs.15,000\/-. he <\/p>\n<p>   awarded compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.5,A0O0\/&#8211;lltoward&#8217;s trarislportation and funeral expenses.<\/p>\n<p>.&#8221;&#8211;Sin&#8221;cel,&#8217; itc&#8217;.is&#8221;l~inade(&#8216;]iiat&#8217;e, we deem it \ufb01t to award a sum of<\/p>\n<p> -R:s.._e]lO;(l(3&lt;.l\/&#039;&#8211;lVlVtow.ards the said head.<\/p>\n<p> 13., &#8220;Thus, total compensation towards conventional<\/p>\n<p>it ilvl[jehteaas is Rs.45,000\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>\/\/My<\/p>\n<p>14. The appellants are entitled to a total<br \/>\ncompensation of Rs.6,2I,072\/\u00bb\u00ab as against Rs.-$08,000\/&#8211;<br \/>\nawarded by the Tribunal. Out of this, 40% is deducted<\/p>\n<p>towards contributory negligence on the part iofrapthe<\/p>\n<p>deceased. The net total compensation &#8216;to<\/p>\n<p>Rs.3,72,6-43\/&#8211;.\n<\/p>\n<p>15. The appellants TV are \u00ab.a <\/p>\n<p>compensation of Rs.3,72,643}&#8217;;;&#8221;*ras  l&#8211;l&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>awarded by the Tribunal. _&lt;&#039;Theda-Ilenhancenientllvcomes to<br \/>\nRs.1,15,243\/- with interestlatld the date of<\/p>\n<p>petition till &#039;t.&#039;r1e&#039;dat,pe&#039;reali_sa.tior1.<\/p>\n<p>_Ti:1e dr&#039;espond&#8211;en&#039;t_slI&lt;\u00a7o. 2 and 3 are directed to deposit<\/p>\n<p>.&#8211; . ,.,.the-&#039;.t._&#039;leril1.anced &#039;compensation amount together with<\/p>\n<p>  period of four weeks from the date of<\/p>\n<p>receipt vol&#039;  of the judgment.\n<\/p>\n<p>  &#8221;  of the enhanced compensation of Rs.1,15,243\/&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>_  l&#8217;AI&#8217;x&#8217;,\u00a7;~:al\u00bb.l5A(Al),OOO\/- with proportionate interest, shall be kept in<\/p>\n<p> llllliixed Deposit in any Nationalised or Scheduled Bank in<\/p>\n<p>W<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">10<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the name of the second appellant till she attains majority<br \/>\nand thereafter renewable by five years with permission to<br \/>\nthe appellant No.1 to withdraw the interest accrued<\/p>\n<p>thereon periodically for the welfare of the appellarithkklo. 2<\/p>\n<p>till her majority and thereafter, the seeond&#8217;_;appellarit:lA&#8217; 1,6<\/p>\n<p>permitted to withdraw the interest periodi_c~a1ly&#8217;;.Vv V <\/p>\n<p>The remaining compensation <\/p>\n<p>proportionate interest sha&#8217;ilp:~V&#8221;&#8221;~.tbe V. releasedl&#8221;&#8216;:Vlp4in&#8221;&#8216; equal&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>proportion in favour uof the &#8220;najppellante'&#8221;No&#8221;.ll and 3<br \/>\nimmediately on deposit    second and<\/p>\n<p>third respondeiitsprl p<br \/>\nOffiee.. todraw the award, accordingly.<\/p>\n<p> &#8230;..\n<\/p>\n<p>JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>HEDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sumathi W\/O Late C Harisha vs P Y Chandra S\/O Giddegowda on 29 January, 2010 Author: N.K.Patil And Gowda BETWEEN: 1. 1NnmHmacmmTmHmmmwAArmmmumm DWH$TmSHm2W&#8221;mWOFMWWmI2MB :PRESENT: THE HONBLE MR.JUS&#8217;l.&#8217;ICE N. K. z&gt;_A&#8211;.*\ufb01I&#8217;.A*jV&#8221;L:%~% {T _ AND THE I-ION&#8217;BLE MR..zUs&#8217;rIcE M.F.A.No. 8510.gf 2OO\u00e9&#8221;&#8211;{MV}, 7-V&#8217;: \u00b0 Sumathi, &#8216; -_ W\/0. Late C. Harishag&#8217; &#8216; Aged aboutA23 ye.33:s., [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12144","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sumathi W\/O Late C Harisha vs P Y Chandra S\/O Giddegowda on 29 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sumathi W\/O Late C Harisha vs P Y Chandra S\/O Giddegowda on 29 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-05-21T05:34:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sumathi W\\\/O Late C Harisha vs P Y Chandra S\\\/O Giddegowda on 29 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-21T05:34:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1005,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010\",\"name\":\"Sumathi W\\\/O Late C Harisha vs P Y Chandra S\\\/O Giddegowda on 29 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-21T05:34:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sumathi W\\\/O Late C Harisha vs P Y Chandra S\\\/O Giddegowda on 29 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sumathi W\/O Late C Harisha vs P Y Chandra S\/O Giddegowda on 29 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sumathi W\/O Late C Harisha vs P Y Chandra S\/O Giddegowda on 29 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-05-21T05:34:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sumathi W\/O Late C Harisha vs P Y Chandra S\/O Giddegowda on 29 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-21T05:34:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010"},"wordCount":1005,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010","name":"Sumathi W\/O Late C Harisha vs P Y Chandra S\/O Giddegowda on 29 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-21T05:34:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sumathi-wo-late-c-harisha-vs-p-y-chandra-so-giddegowda-on-29-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sumathi W\/O Late C Harisha vs P Y Chandra S\/O Giddegowda on 29 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12144","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12144"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12144\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12144"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12144"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12144"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}