{"id":121629,"date":"2010-12-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-12-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010"},"modified":"2018-09-05T23:29:21","modified_gmt":"2018-09-05T17:59:21","slug":"r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010","title":{"rendered":"R Ravindra vs Smt Puttamma W\/O N Muninanjappa on 7 December, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
R Ravindra vs Smt Puttamma W\/O N Muninanjappa on 7 December, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: H N Das<\/div>\n
 \n\nIN THE', HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 7*\" DAY OF DECEMBER, 2010  \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE 1-LN. NAOAMORA._1$:;VVOA--LS: ._ 3\n\nR.F.A. No. 353\/2633   f; \n\nBETWEEN I\n\n1. 3%-iga-aRAV}'NDRA A\n\nS\/O. P DORESWAMY\n\nMAJOR    ' \nR\/A.No.39.ss,_7'T*'CROSS} _ _ _ \n.1 \"T STAG-E1 B.%';'NAS}iAN..KAR4I ;. V ' \nBANOA.LLO%R--R9\"7'<3.\u00bb  'T  \n\nSri.7--K O 'SHAIVIT-E1ARA--JOE"GOWDA\nS\/O. 'CHIKKAM'ALI .EOOw"OA\nMAJOR, . .  " \n\nR;A._No. 13. HFLOOR, HOSUR ROAD\n\n.- \u00bb R_  T3.R_.(:. POST,"--DA1__R'{ COLONY\n _ ""BA':\\TGAL,QRE -- 29.\n\ngs.)\n\n3. 1 'Sn. RCjT;R13TTAsw.AMY GOWDA\nas\/O,*CseI:I1<1<AMALL13OOw1)A\nMAJOR\n\nA'  R\/A; No. 13,1.IFLOOR,HOSUR ROAD\n\nV "'D.R.C. POST, DAIRY COLONY\n\n*~RANOALORE--29\n\nT"\n\n\n\n9%,"\n\nSri. G MAHIMAIAH\n\nS\/O. GURUDAPPA\n\nMAJOR\n\nR\/A. NO. 5, an BIKE,\n\nSri. KRISHNA ROAD\n\n6"' CROSS, 2"" STAGE   \nBANASHANKARI \nBANGALOREM70\n\nSri. D RANGASWAMY\nS\/O. DASAP?A\nMAJOR  _  __  \nR\/A. NO. 2, HOSUR MAjiiN R--f_AOOf ~  \nCHANNAKESHAVANAGARA7' \nSINGASANDRA POST.  O  A\n\n.BANGALO_RE_~\u00bb-68.   V"  ARRELLANTS\n\n(By Sri. G V SMASH1i\u00a7UI:y1AR_,;T--\u00ab.AOy:;'_FOR,ARRELLANT NO. 1\nSr}. M N UMESH, AE\u00a7y,. FOR APRELLAM Nos. 2 TO 5)\n\nAND :\n\nSmi. RUTTAMMAR' \nxgv\/O.,N MUNl_NAN'}AP?A\n\n!L_AGR.O ABOU'T'6{}--YEA_RS\n\nVA; K.\/\\NNAMANG-ALA VILLAGE\n\n'   B\u00a3D'A_RA}!.VAL.LI HOBLE\n._  .1g.AN'G'A_1,O,Ri3 SOUTH TALUK\n'_BANGALURB\n\nSri.. \\A\/"1.BASAVARAJU\n\n~ : ,S\/OVJLATE VEERABHADRNAH\n\nAGED ABOUT YEARS 50 YEARS\n\nV R\/A. CHANNAKESHAVANAGAR\n\nSINGASANDRA POST, BANGALORE -- 29.\n\n*-..\n\n3-.)\n\/71 \n\nIf .\/\n\n\n\n3. Smt. M CHANNIKAMBIKA\nW\/O. BASAVARAJU\nMAJOR\nR\/A. CHANNAKESHAVANAGAR\nSINGASANDRA\n\nB ANGALORE A 29.  RESPONI)'EN'"fS _\n\n(By Sri. M SHIVAPRAKASH, ADV., FOR R~\u00abI _. --\nSri. M SIDDAGANGAIAH, ADV., FOR R-2 & 3)  \n\nTHIS RFA FILED UNDER SECTIfOR*'I'  \nORDER 41 RULE 1 CPC AGAINST THE EUDGMIENT 'AND?\n\nDECREE DATED 27.11.2002 RASS.E'D..IN O';-S, NO. 8.1 2I'~L9'}5..C)N\nTHE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL I'UDGE\u00bb(SR.DN.) 13A-NGALORE\nRURAL DIST, BANG-ALQRE, DE.CRE.E'I'NG THEMSAUAIT FOR\nRELIEF OF SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE:  _  '\n\nTHIS RFA COMING  DAY, THE\n\nCOURT IQWING;\n\nFRQUDOMENT\n\n._':'4'3?h%S___\u00e9I[Ip_e21E iS"("1iE7\u00a7E.II!.f3(i against the ju(igmcI1t and decree dated\n\nRV'-R27.:II}2f)();2..4Lin S12\/I995 passed by the Principal Civil\n\nJudkggq'}3:1ngziiorrst.5'Rural District, Bangaiorc decrecing the Suit for\n\n  'S_pccific per1\u00b0jO1*ma11cc Of agreement Of S316.\n\n\n\n2. Appellants and respondent No. 2 are defendants<\/pre>\n
respondent No. l is the plztinti’fl’ before the Trial Cout;t….._l”n.:th-is; <\/p>\n
judgment, for convenienc.e., the parties are 1_’el’erred to–‘thei:fAstla’t-us  ”<\/p>\n
before the Trial Court.\n<\/p>\n
3. Plaint.iff contends that det’et}d’ant No.”-lyis.t_l1e._vlt:ts_band or
\ndefendant No. 2. Defendant Nos..] ‘ 2_ and *ahe?ir”twoCEmino1′
\nchildren, entered into an agreement Q\ufb01sale’-on”-.l..5.06.I992 agreeing<\/p>\n
to sell 2 acres 5 guntas o1″”}–:ntd,iln.L st1r:vey’–tlvE’J’o\u00a7r-.102 situated at<\/p>\n
Kannamangala Village, Bigetrahnlhli–,Hoh1l.,  South Taluk<\/p>\n
(hereinafteit 1’e_l’errAed\u00bb.[te_has  property’) for a total sale<\/p>\n
consideration’ of’ Rs.1;’80,62’5s(-l;”\u00ab~.Qnl.the date of agreement of sale<\/p>\n
del’e.ndar.;t Nos. E.l2tn’.1t:2′ neknowledgecl the receipt of Rs..l,63,625\/–<\/p>\n
 ‘sertd putvdllthe ip’dl:’a1it_1″ltilT_1′._’ in possession o’l:’p1aint’ schedule property in part<\/p>\n
t_3ei’f’orrnane”e.\u00bb :o\u00a3V.:1gr’eve*1’nent of sale. Subsequently there came to be<\/p>\n
V V’ ;ntother'”.<1gre__e'nnent between the plztintiff and defendant Nos. 1 and 2<\/p>\n
 l..67()6.l9"}3 enhancing the sale consideration by another sum of<\/p>\n
lRs."\u00a7_7','(}{}{}\/m and acknowledged the receipt of enhanced sale<\/p>\n
— 1’19–m<\/p>\n
eonsicieration. Though the plaintiff has paid the entire,<\/p>\n
consideration, the sale deed was not executed due to nc)1t–a.’~sailabi__lity , A’<\/p>\n
of clearance from the concerned revenue authorities. ~’..l_’h(>trgh”the<\/p>\n
plaintiff was ready and willing to perform her.p_a1’t olf’ohligat’ic)nsi, the <\/p>\n
defendants went on postponing to executefythe. Salejdeed:  f<\/p>\n
04.10.1995 the plzlintiff got issued a layVtye.irs_ notiee.”_iACalli.r:gV’tiprdi<\/p>\n
defendant Nos. l and 2 to exeeu._te”~.tthe 1’e_t:;i_st.ered’-.1sa~!e”‘cieed.<\/p>\n
Defendant Nos. l and 2, though aeil\u00e9nowledgedi  r’eefeipt of<\/p>\n
plainti.f1″s lawyers notice, h’aye~.failed to eorn.ply..the dernand made<\/p>\n
therein nor sent any reply. The pl.ainti’t’t’,”hav_in?g nevothei’ alternative,<\/p>\n
filed O.S.:’;_No., 8li}2r’ilt99Si”agaisrit~—defendant Nos. 1 and 2 only for<\/p>\n
decree of specE’if_icltperforinaneey  agreement of sale.<\/p>\n
 p  D”e=feii’d.ant Nosihwl and 2, after service of suit summons,<\/p>\n
entered appea_raneebefore the Trial Court and filed written statement<\/p>\n
inter alia tienyiiioiiig the execution of the agreement of sale dated
\ni   l6.06. 1993, receipt of sale consideration and delivering<\/p>\n
 y:po.ssess_ii.ion of the schedule property to the plaintiff. The defendant<\/p>\n
\u00ab\ufb01t.-\n<\/p>\n
(1<\/p>\n
Nos. 1 and 2 further contend that there was a loan trans.:1VCt’i.on~._<\/p>\n
between the plaintiff and defendant Nos. 1 and 2  -1- V<\/p>\n
connection they have affixed their signatures to certtlin’ ‘stai\u00a7{tpbp211)er_s<\/p>\n
by acknowledging receipt of Rs.80,()()f)\/;2_l’rorna tthef’eaplhfaiinltiifl” if<\/p>\n
defendant Nos. 1 and 2 in their wt-itten..__staterne_nt furth1erl’s.tjated that<\/p>\n
they have sold the schedule property i}1fffl’V’z’t?\\g:’:()1a-‘JTV'()f i’i.\\’\/e under
\na registered sale deed dated   “th_esel grounds de:t”en(iant<\/p>\n
Nos. 1 and 2 opposed the claiin;\u00bbet7 piiaintif1?._ _ ‘ V\n<\/p>\n
5. From the \u00a7\\;u1″i’tr;\u00a2Lyj’i sta=tem\u00a7:rtt?the..plaii1ti’ff,ea_1ne to know that<\/p>\n
the defend’ant –.Nos.illiaiid”2_lhaye=..so3.d the schedule property and<\/p>\n
therefore she filed :1 application to impiead the purchasers<\/p>\n
__as partitssli to the” proceedings. The Trial Court allowed the<\/p>\n
f’~.iii1.plea1,d_ir1g_V fappliueatvicin filed by the plaintiff and consequently the<\/p>\n
purehaseits la1’el_”_iipplzeaded as defendant Nos. 3 to 7. The additional<\/p>\n
det’endant l’~3os.”?\u00a7 to 7 filed separate written statement inter alia<\/p>\n
 “:CCIi1E’CF1Cl.lI}g that the agreement of sale relied on by the plaintiff as<\/p>\n
._f_alse andplaii1tif”t’ is not in possession of the schedule property. The<\/p>\n
\/”7′<\/p>\n
5 \/’<\/p>\n
defendant Nos. 3<\/span><\/p>\n
purchasers for valuable consideration without notice of ttgr};e’1neht—-t)f”  <\/p>\n
sate in favour of the piaintiff.\n<\/p>\n
6. On the basis of pieadings, thev.’Trial”Ctrttrt-I <\/p>\n
foilowing 8 issues for its consideration.\n<\/p>\n
I.\n<\/p>\n
11.<\/p>\n
iv.\n<\/p>\n
Whether the plaintiff pfts~.:\u00a7sthat defenda-nits  and 2
\nexecuted an agreernent_\u00abdateti  to sell<\/p>\n
the suit schedule ‘Tpr_0pe”rty’b fer_h’es-‘j’V*cQnsi.cleration of<\/p>\n
Rs. ,s0,’ej2,y.f\/–?\n<\/p>\n
Wlzetheirythe’p1a\u00e9’ntiff_p’r0’ves that she paid advance of<\/p>\n
Rs4.1;63,(5’25\/iron the same day and further advance of<\/p>\n
    eA.Rs.17;'(}(1_V()V\/eon 36.06.1993′?\n<\/p>\n
bh :Whe’t–he.r the plaintiff was put in p().$S\u20ac3SSi()1} of the
\n \u00abt5r*<Jpe~t;"E'yV.t)n the date of the agreement'?
\n Whether the plaintiff proves that she was always ready<\/p>\n
 and wiliing to per_f0rm her part of the contract'?<\/p>\n
to 7 further contend that they are bt).nt1t'i7iude~.t_<\/p>\n
property was mid to one R. Ravindrz\u00e9V_in','''' ;. '
\nShantharaja Gowda, KC. Puttaswamy"\ufb01dwdai, G,<\/p>\n
Mahirnaiah and D. Rangaswamy under re_gis.tered'dee_d :3 A<\/p>\n
dated 07.05. I995?\n<\/p>\n
vi. Whether the plaintiff is for ‘dcctV~\u00a7\u00a7e_’:t>r i\u00a7peeii’ic
\nperforniance oft ‘;tgree1ng;h ._   \u00ab . M _
\nVII. Whethenthe   decree for<\/p>\n
VIII. H ‘ I i i V<\/p>\n
7. ‘t3_ei’t)_:’e  the plaintiff examined three<\/p>\n
witnesses as  it to   marked Ex.P.l to Ex.P.tl 8. The<\/p>\n
_defendztritsuexainineki–one witness as D.W.I and got marked Ex.D..I.<\/p>\n
Lto  _Th.e T4r’i’a.IV Court, after hearing arguments on both the side<\/p>\n
and by..;:onVSide:.tingthe pleadings, orai and documentary evidence.<\/p>\n
passed the i1″t1pu’_gii\u20acd judgment decreeing the suit of the plain.ti.fE’ and
\n V directed. the Vdei”endant.s to execute a registered sale deed in favour of<\/p>\n
 “p.iai’n’tii;’t’. Hence, this appeal by the defendants<\/p>\n
\/\/”\n<\/p>\n
Whether the defendants prove that the suit <\/p>\n
9<\/span><\/p>\n
8. Heard arguments on both the side and perused the <\/p>\n
appeal papers.\n<\/p>\n
9. P.W.l is the husband of pla’intit’if..rrP.\u00bbW’.l ‘h.is.:i\u00a7;\u00a7yidene’eV<\/p>\n
deposed that he was involved in the negotia”tion:5′”with deI’e’ndiantiNc;.tp if<\/p>\n
1 when they entered into an agreem’e_nt—of
\nalso the subsequent agreeme__nt   the
\nagreement of sale dated E6.()i6′;’1xi’.,5\u00a79.3  Nos. 1
\nand 2 and their two n”t_ino_r ehiJdi’e’u~   the schedule<\/p>\n
property to”e,_the–_ pl:1,i1i1itiitI’.'{‘;w- _Ti:i\u00bbs”agreement specifies the existence of<\/p>\n
eariier agreem’ent”dVated_ i4ii.t5.(}6i.i-992, the receipt of entire sale<\/p>\n
_eonsideraitione’.and 2tl’scsi..dei.iveri11g possession of the piaint seheduie<\/p>\n
Aip_t'()pt:3i{y_VE(; tl1e\u00ab.p}a.iri–tiff. The defendant Nos. 1 and 2 in their written<\/p>\n
stattetnenti’contended;that they have not executed the agreement of<\/p>\n
sale dated ‘h5!.(}t3i..il992 and 16.06.1993. On the other hand the<\/p>\n
__i”d’efendany_t Nos. 1 and 2 contend that they borrowed a Eoan of<\/p>\n
 –R”s;.\u00a7\u00a7t;{.(i)i()i(A)A\/M from the plaintiff and in that cormeetion affixed their<\/p>\n
\/74
\nIf
\nit .\/<\/p>\n
I0<\/p>\n
signature on some blank stamp papers and handed over the sa{ne_ito_ <\/p>\n
the plztintift’. In support of this defence taken by det’endz1iit”‘No.\u00e9,{V;~_i’  \u00bb it<\/p>\n
and 2 in their written statement they have not stepped”-intofthe i<\/p>\n
witness box. A pleading not supported by e-v’i’de–n.ce  liabiletto ibef,<\/p>\n
rejected. So also, any evidence without there being’ple21dii:1g;~is” liable.’ T6 ‘<\/p>\n
to be discarded. In the instant case, thee’d-e.t’endairtV_Nos. I
\nnot stepped into the witness box and haiVe_in0t proivedltihe defence<\/p>\n
taken by them in their written sta_t”emert’t. T}1ei”de:i’endant Nos. 1 and 2- .<\/p>\n
have not denied their signature oi1t.iExi.P;iiB7_1t;’–tAhey \u00abcontend that<\/p>\n
they have signed so’i.ne\u00ab..bl’_anl<  pa_piersf~.iVn. respe.c.t of a loan<\/p>\n
transaction. But, the _t)le'2e-hf'defendant 'Nest and 2 is not proved by<\/p>\n
placing any evid<:t_1_ce onij::Co'rd."  Trial Court by considering this<\/p>\n
d.t)curnenta5\u00a7y and oi'al'iev.idenceV on record rightly con.cl.ude.d that the<\/p>\n
p'ltainti.:i'i'–.h'a:':_V pi'.oved~-.the execution of agreement of sale dated<\/p>\n
   I find no _\u00a7usti.fiab|e grourtrl to interfere<\/p>\n
 with this i"indi"nAg tifthe Trial Court.\n<\/p>\n
Ki<\/p>\n
10. Learned counsel for the defendants contend, that <\/p>\n
in his evidence deposed that he is the power of atterney li’i3r of plztilriiifi’. But the suit is filed only agaisilt defendant Nos.<\/p>\n
land 2 and minor ehiidren are not made  parties. In the absenee..of..’_ii~.t_<\/p>\n
two contracting parties to the agreement of sale the suit is ?–i\u00a7i1bie” *’<\/p>\n
be dismissed. Again I decline to accept this contention of”the’–1e_arned ” _<\/p>\n
eounsei for the defendants. Both in Ex.P.i —-3the;’a,greeinent~oif  <\/p>\n
and also in the registered sale deed in faiiourtot’ thedei’endantsVw.as\u00ab–vper <\/p>\n
Ex.D.1 it is clearly stated that the sehedalieV’:pr\u00a7)t>ei’ty
\nin favour of one Kaiyanamma –i the:rnotiner\ufb01oi%defendian,t_No. .1 under
\nre–grant order dated i4$:;~12.l98-.i”‘ of Enams
\nAboiition Act. A1’te-r\u00a7”th_e No.1
\nbeing the on1y..S.on””i1a::\u00a7–   schedule property.<\/p>\n
Thisadmitted’..evider1ee”‘i’;i’:’E’XL?.l”t~and..Ex.;D.1 clearly establishes the
\nfact that in the agreementi.ot'”the”w’it’e and children of defendant<\/p>\n
No.1 have joined  oartief; 1-‘or conveying better title in favour of<\/p>\n
pi’z1inti1’f’.._”{n:.  r:_irct1in.\u00e9’tan.e_esi it cannot be said that the minor<\/p>\n
ehi_idi’en*of dei”end-ant~–.Nos.l and 2. are having independent right in<\/p>\n
the piiaiiitieeiietiiijilenproperty. The l10l1~i1’lCiU$iO1’l of the minor chiidren<\/p>\n
i”~’who are parties. to’i’E\u00a7.x.P.i A the agreement of sale is not fatal to the<\/p>\n
~ jVe’ay.e’-\u00bbo!’ ;)1aii1ti1″if.i1’If’ for any reason, the minor ehiidren are having any<\/p>\n
\/\/,3
\n\/<\/p>\n
9′<\/p>\n
f .\n<\/p>\n
right. they will work out their remedy in accordance with law,-.__<\/p>\n
Merely because the minor children of defendant Nos. 1 and 2, z1re”.not.i”–_<\/p>\n
made as parties to the proceedings, cannot be a ground to dis;.niise; the’ <\/p>\n
suit.\n<\/p>\n
12. Learned eotmse! for the del’endants:”eont’e1idthatiit   :3 ‘<\/p>\n
–~ the agi’ee1nent of :-_:ale dated 16.06. l.99_3″*there is”-I-1Vrefe1’eijee{to..the
\nearlier agreement of sale dated l_5.06.l99_2.  further’ stated iniithat<\/p>\n
under the agreement of sale dated’lli5.–{)6i’;   of schedule<\/p>\n
property was delivered .favoLf:’riiiol”the   plaintiff <\/p>\n
not produced—_the  hale dated l5.06.!992 and<\/p>\n
therefore the plaintiff has it’:tiI’e.d:}to prove that she. was put in<\/p>\n
vpos\u00e9sessionioil’ the plainrteehedule property. In the plallftt plaintiff<\/p>\n
sipec.it’iiett~llVy .pleaded”‘*.t_hztt on the date of Ex.P.l — the earlier<\/p>\n
ag1’ee:’ne.n*t.rol’ .\u00a7al:\u00a7f’wa’$: destroyed. To this effect P.W. !. deposed in his<\/p>\n
 evidence.i\ufb01xeeptha suggestion in the eross~examination of P.W.l_,<\/p>\n
._Tniitl1Ving.;Iti\u00a7 elicited to dishelieve the explanation offered by the<\/p>\n
 pli;i.in’til’ti.i Eveai the szuggestion put to P.W.l is; denied. In the%<\/p>\n
><-._,<\/p>\n
\/:9'
\nf…-'<\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
agreement of sale M Ex.P.l it is specifically stated that the plaintiff<\/p>\n
was put in possession in the year 1992 and she can continue in
\npossession and enjoyment of the same. Further it is seen front
\nrecord that subsequent to 1992 the name of plaintiff  :_.
\nentered in the RTC extract for the years l’)92\u00a293_to   _<\/p>\n
Ex.P.8 and Ex.P.9. Ex.P.t’) is the mutation regi.ste;’_’e;~;\u20acraeit.._E’xri3′.9i  ‘<\/p>\n
Ex.P.l8 are the photographs and thei.1’iine;gatives\u00a7”This.doe_uriie’ntary<\/p>\n
evidence on record establishesnthe fact. :”tl1at”\u00bb.the plai.nti_ff is in<\/p>\n
possession and enjoyment of the ‘isChedulfe }gro’pefrtyil from the year <\/p>\n
1992. Learned counsel.::for_  the RTC<\/p>\n
extract is created doeurrient.p4in\u00bb,eo1lusion with the revenue authorities<\/p>\n
and therefore iiorelianee.cai11_be.._ipiaced on it. It is seen from the<\/p>\n
:_.~r’ec.._o_rd  i’roi1h”‘the____y_eai’ 1992-93 the name oil’ plaintiff finds<\/p>\n
ahplaeein. i2 of the RTC, the same is not questioned<\/p>\n
‘  seitherhh)f’deFei1da.nt.i5Nos. 1. and 2 or the other defendants. in the
\n\u00b0~._.ciretin1stanc.es’the finding of the Trial Court that the plaintiff is in<\/p>\n
 4._possessio’1~i.o’l’ schedule property in part perforrnance of agreement of<\/p>\n
?\u00a7~.jf–‘-i’
\n.”‘:\n<\/p>\n
i<\/p>\n
sale is supported by evidence and the same is in accordance with<\/p>\n
law.\n<\/p>\n
13. Learned counset for the defendants contend that after<\/p>\n
purchased the schedule property the defendant Nos. 1  –‘-‘ V<\/p>\n
interfere with their possession and enjoyment of.”th’e*– is_ehie’du1′<':_<\/p>\n
property and the:'efoi*e they filed a civil suit'—.in   <\/p>\n
decree of pernianent injunction E1I1d'ii1.('}~._$\u00a3llT1\u20acA'\u00a3'8iT:C toiV:hes{dve.t;jreed
\nvide judgment dated ?,5.07.'l997 as  'i"ihe.Tria1J?Court
\nfaited to consider this documented'. is not a party<\/p>\n
to the civiilsuit in.O'iSf'-No._724\/"1*99'5"and as such the same is not<\/p>\n
binding on her.s._Fiu:"_the'i'_itiis"  that in o.s. No. 724\/1995 the<\/p>\n
;jet'endarits though ih1"iIl'~l."i_'WI"'!'l..[\u20ac3l1 statement before the Trial Court<\/p>\n
i't7aiiedi"tOj c–ont.est._ithe__ matter. Thus there came to be an exparte
\n V judgmeniti in 'i'a\u00a7yotiAi:=ioi' the defend:-ints in 0.8. No. 724\/1995. The
\n Triai Courfifighitiy refused to take into consideration the judgment<\/p>\n
  and  iii o.s. No. 724\/1995.\n<\/p>\n
may be illegal but  on the date defendant Nos. 3 to 7 purchased the<\/p>\n
schedule property under Ex.D.l the name of plaintifl’ do find a <\/p>\n
in column No. 12 of RTC extract showing that she is in pr:::ssessiofr’1– ‘7’<\/p>\n
of the piaint schedule property. Admittedly __tl1e ydefendants..<\/p>\n
the RTC extracts before they purchased the s’::hed_uie”property’;  T6 ‘<\/p>\n
the defendants are aware of the fact tha.t”13.l.aintifl’-is in po;-tses;:s’ior1..0:~”<\/p>\n
schedule property. The defendants tho11gh’v.had_V the ‘l<;'no.wleVd\u00a7e of
\nearlier agreement with the plaintiffipurch_ai\u00a7.ei.l tlietiV$::he.*dule property.\n<\/p>\n
15. P.W.l in h’is__evideriee’deposed  has dug a<\/p>\n
borewell, cc:~_nstructed”._a reVsidential._hous_e., improved the land and is
\ngrowing crops’..__This orall  P.W.l is supported by the<\/p>\n
mutation extract W the’RTC extracts Ex.P.8 and Elx.P.9 and<\/p>\n
  as  Ex.P.lU to Ex.’P.l8. Again except <\/p>\n
sugigeystrionrin tired ero’sv;.siexarn.ination of P.W.l that photographs are<\/p>\n
trot relating to .[i’t@””‘SuiE. property nothing more is elicited. The Trial<\/p>\n
‘”*.C=ourt. on earefut appreciation of the entire material on record<\/p>\n
_co_nc’!_uded” that defendant Nos. 3 to 7 are not bonafide purchasers<\/p>\n
–..J<\/p>\n
\/F’<\/p>\n
, ,
\n,2 If
\n1 2
\n‘xx<\/p>\n
wi\u00a3h0u\u00a3 notice of the agreement of sale in fzw0u1′ of piaiiniff. Thi_s:’–.__<\/p>\n
finding of the Triai Court is supported by cvidcnce on 1iec0i’c1\u00ab..:\u00a3nd”Edi.<\/p>\n
find no reason to differ wiih the saimz.\n<\/p>\n
16. For the reasons staked above, gih'<\u00a5i*appe:{11  "ii'i:s\u00e91'eby._:'\u00ab.<\/p>\n
dismissed with no 0i'de.r as to costs. V  _ .\n<\/p>\n
\nLRS\/081220}(}.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court R Ravindra vs Smt Puttamma W\/O N Muninanjappa on 7 December, 2010 Author: H N Das IN THE’, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 7*” DAY OF DECEMBER, 2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE 1-LN. NAOAMORA._1$:;VVOA–LS: ._ 3 R.F.A. No. 353\/2633 f; BETWEEN I 1. 3%-iga-aRAV}’NDRA A S\/O. P […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-121629","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nR Ravindra vs Smt Puttamma W\/O N Muninanjappa on 7 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"R Ravindra vs Smt Puttamma W\/O N Muninanjappa on 7 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-12-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-05T17:59:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"R Ravindra vs Smt Puttamma W\\\/O N Muninanjappa on 7 December, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-05T17:59:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010\"},\"wordCount\":2563,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010\",\"name\":\"R Ravindra vs Smt Puttamma W\\\/O N Muninanjappa on 7 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-05T17:59:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"R Ravindra vs Smt Puttamma W\\\/O N Muninanjappa on 7 December, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"R Ravindra vs Smt Puttamma W\/O N Muninanjappa on 7 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"R Ravindra vs Smt Puttamma W\/O N Muninanjappa on 7 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-12-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-05T17:59:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"R Ravindra vs Smt Puttamma W\/O N Muninanjappa on 7 December, 2010","datePublished":"2010-12-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-05T17:59:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010"},"wordCount":2563,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010","name":"R Ravindra vs Smt Puttamma W\/O N Muninanjappa on 7 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-12-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-05T17:59:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-ravindra-vs-smt-puttamma-wo-n-muninanjappa-on-7-december-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"R Ravindra vs Smt Puttamma W\/O N Muninanjappa on 7 December, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/121629","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=121629"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/121629\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=121629"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=121629"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=121629"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}