{"id":122209,"date":"2010-12-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-12-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010"},"modified":"2016-09-14T11:25:32","modified_gmt":"2016-09-14T05:55:32","slug":"sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri Yogananda vs Smt Bhanumathi on 6 December, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Yogananda vs Smt Bhanumathi on 6 December, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda<\/div>\n<pre> \n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 6th DAY OF DECEMBER. 2019'\nBEFORE \"  \u00b0\n\nTHE I-ION'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.SREENIVAS.E' c;D'x'x?13A ' --\nMiscellaneous First Apjgeal Neg'; 77OiI)\u00ab7 (Sf   K 2\n\nBETWEEN\n\n \n\nSri Yogananda\n\nS\/0. Narasimha Murfthy\nAged about 31 Years,  --_ E. D  \nR\/at. No.94 \/ C, Jaragar1.\u00a2__\"r1a11i.,.V7'    \nJP. Nagar Post;  _    \nBangalore -  3 . '\n\n(By  As  A dxf.'}\nAND \" ' M\n\n1.'  '' Smt. Bhanumathi.\n\"  ,N0.__32, S'a?i..17l-?ggiriNivasa,\n S u._b1?amanyapura,\n_ \"V-Na.g'app_a Block.\n\" \" Nea1'~ .Maruthi Layout,\n_B'a151ga10re -- 61.\n\"-. ((}w'ner of Scorpio bearing\n\" _ No.KA--41--M-1451]\n\nH * . M \/ s. Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.,\n\nN0.105--A, Cears Plaza. 136.\nResidency Road,\nBangalore-25.\n\n(Insurer of Scorpio bearing\nN0.KA~41-M--145 1]\n\nReptd. by its Manager.\n\n\ufb01r\n\n\n\n \n\n Respondents<\/pre>\n<p>{By Sri. A N Krishna, Adv. for R1,  pp<br \/>\nSmt. H. R. Renuka, Adv. for R2}<\/p>\n<p>This MFA is filed U\/S 173(1) of Mvrr.jAct,:faigaaripstp<br \/>\nthe judgement and award dated 26.02_.2&#8211;OQ&#8217;8, passed _i&#8217;1i\u00ab .V<br \/>\nMVC No.2591\/2007 on the file&#8217; of&#8221;iX A..ddi.ti_o&#8217;na1 Judge&#8217;, &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>Member, Mact-7, Court of Small Gaj;f.seeS.,&#8217; AMetropo1i~tar&#8217;1<\/p>\n<p>Area, Bangalore, SCCI-I-7&#8242;, part.1y:&#8217;&#8211;_a]iowing&#8217; the&#8217;<br \/>\npetition for eompensation&#8217;and seeiiirigw e&#8217;n.h&#8217;a.noernent of<\/p>\n<p>compensation.\n<\/p>\n<p>This appeal co1&#8217;r..1ing_\u00ab&#8221;fon&#8221; forVj&#8217;AdmisAsion\u00a7&#8217;VVthis day,<br \/>\nthe Court, delivered fh&#8217;EpfOi]QVfJiif1g&#8217;f-.:VV:&#8221;  &#8221; <\/p>\n<p>Thistppappgeal is eiaiinant for enhancement of<\/p>\n<p>corngyensation award ed. _by_ the Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p>2. _  v&#8221;f&#8217;h_eA1_app7ea1 is admitted and with the<\/p>\n<p>   of learns-d~Counse1 appearing for the parties, it<\/p>\n<p>V   for final disposal.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.&#8221; &#8216;*&#8211;Fo&#8217;I the sake of convenience parties are referred to<\/p>\n<p>  A&#8217; as they are referred to in the claim petition before the<\/p>\n<p>if &#8220;E fribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. Brief facts of the case are:\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>That on 10.03.2007, when the claimant<br \/>\nwas riding his motor cycle bearing registration No.<\/p>\n<p>KA&#8211;05&#8211;EG 2476 on Aralu Mallige Partha Sarathi____road<\/p>\n<p>near Girinagara traffic police station, a Scorpio-ijbeharing<\/p>\n<p>registration No. KA&#8211;~4l&#8211;~M~l451 came in  V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>negligent manner and dashed a;gainst his <\/p>\n<p>as a result, he fell down and t1sustain_ed&#8217;~ .griey&#8217;ous&#8217;._V<\/p>\n<p>injuries. Hence, he filed  &#8220;p&#8217;etition:  the<\/p>\n<p>MACT, Bangalore,&#8217;  seekingilj\u00e9 &#8216;compensation of<br \/>\nRs.6,00,000\/~. The   judgment<\/p>\n<p>and award  of Rs.1,84,400\/..\n<\/p>\n<p>with interest   1 ,69,400\/&#8211;.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. 51&#8242;-\\.-sop there&#8217; &#8216;is&#8217;: no&#8217; dispute regarding occurrence of<\/p>\n<p> negligence and liability of the insurer of the<\/p>\n<p> the only point that remains for my<\/p>\n<p>consideration in the appeal is:\n<\/p>\n<p>n T Whether the quantum of<\/p>\n<p> compensation awarded by the Tribunal is<\/p>\n<p>  just and proper or does it call for<br \/>\nenhancement?\n<\/p>\n<p>fffs&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>two occasions and he recently examined the claimant<br \/>\non 6.02.2008 and found that there was discharge of<br \/>\nsinus present over the right knee lower Sm of the right<\/p>\n<p>leg and that there is gross swelling present on .rig.ht<\/p>\n<p>knee leg and ankle and that the  .\n<\/p>\n<p>walking, movement of right knee. and _righ&#8217;t::l&#8217;_:;1n&#8217;l{le&#8217;..are 0&#8243;&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>restricted and painful. He assessed r~60%. <\/p>\n<p>the right lower limb and  thehwhole\n<\/p>\n<p>8. Considering the_natu.r&#8217;e  liiijuriesl,'&#8221;Rs.;:\u00a3l0,000\/&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>awarded by the and suffering is<\/p>\n<p>just and&#8221;ipro\u00a7;ger arid &#8216;there is&#8221;&#8221;no&#8217; scope for enhancement<\/p>\n<p>underzthis_ headed&#8217;  . lg  .. n  it <\/p>\n<p>9.  The claimant in his evidence has stated that he<\/p>\n<p>\u00bb received\u00ab.hos~pita1 expenses through medi claim scheme<\/p>\n<p>H  medical bills for Rs.l,185\/&#8211;and<\/p>\n<p> the has awarded Rs.5,000\/~ towards medical<\/p>\n<p> and, incidental expenses such as conveyance,<\/p>\n<p>nourishment and attendant charges, thereby awarded<\/p>\n<p>only Rs.3,815\/&#8211; towards incidental expenses which is<\/p>\n<p>on the lower side. He was inpatient in the hospital<\/p>\n<p>%.\n<\/p>\n<p>assessed the disability at 60% to right lower limb and<\/p>\n<p>20% to whole body.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>13. Learned Counsel for the appellant subrrlitsas<\/p>\n<p>the doctor has stated 20% disability to the&#8217;..&#8217;:Whole&#8217;lhi:bodyA <\/p>\n<p>the same has to be taken as funetioiial disability. V  <\/p>\n<p>14. Learned Counsel for the Insurance. &#8220;&#8216;Cor{iepan\u00a7,*l<\/p>\n<p>submits that on recent examination Vthej&#8217;dLocVtVQIt:\\\u00a7<\/p>\n<p>stated that swelling which -presentllinthe  earlier<br \/>\nnow disappeared and j.l,O&#8211;?\/go  taken by the<br \/>\nTribunal whilewgrking  loss:-of  income is just<\/p>\n<p>and proper. V V&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>15. Consideririlgg   all situation justice would be<\/p>\n<p> j meit~:.:by_tA&#8217;tal&lt;ing&#039;&quot;fu.;1_ctional disability at 15%. Muitiplier<\/p>\n<p> &#039;ap&#039;plicable;*to&quot;his age group is &#039;16&#039;. Therefore, future<\/p>\n<p>ieeeeieiiaeeegeiwerite out to Rs.1,29,600\/&#8211; [Rs.4,500\/&#8211; x<\/p>\n<p> 15%  X16) and it is awarded as against Rs.86,400\/&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>  &#039;iIf&#039;i4exi2etded by the Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p>  Considering the nature of injuries Rs.l5,000\/&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>awarded by the Tribunal towards future medical<\/p>\n<p>expenses is just and proper and it does not call for<\/p>\n<p>enhancement.\n<\/p>\n<p>17. Thus the claimant is entitled for the <\/p>\n<p>compensation:\n<\/p>\n<p>1) Pain and suffering  1{e;tdd&#8221;4f3,o0Q&#8217;,*;  <\/p>\n<p>2) Medical 81 incidental]<br \/>\nexpenses  ._\n<\/p>\n<p>3) Towards loss of.in_c0me&#8217;._ &#8216;   a<br \/>\nduring laid up period &#8221;  Rs.  i~.8&#8242;;&#8217;O0O\/-<br \/>\n4} Towards loss of amenities  &#8221; 203.000\/-<br \/>\n5} Future lossof ilicome it Rs.&#8217; &#8216;1~_.29,600\/&#8211;<br \/>\n8} Future medial efxpenseeg  Rs. 15,000\/&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>  ;; &#8216;ro\u00a7.a1&#8242;&#8221;&#8216;l&#8221;  l7vst}i&#8221;e.&#8211;e.2.3o.6oo\/-<\/p>\n<p>18. Aeeerdtiugifgc\ufb01iieiejjpeaitie&#8217; allowed in part and the<br \/>\nJudgment&#8221;and.Vav.tard&#8217; Tribunal is modified to the<\/p>\n<p>extent statedherein&#8221;-ahove. The claimant is entitled for<\/p>\n<p> cjornpensation of Rs.2,30_.600\/&#8211; as against<\/p>\n<p>1  8?\u00a3.&#8221;&#8211;?:xt_)CV).AV2V&#8217;~ev-.&#8217;awarded by the Tribunal with interest at<\/p>\n<p>6%&#8221;&#8212;p.a&#8217;.&#8217; the enhanced compensation of Rs.46,200\/&#8211;<\/p>\n<p> from the date of claim petition till the date of<\/p>\n<p> wre&#8217;ai&#8217;is ation.\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8221;  The Insurance Company is directed to deposit the<\/p>\n<p>enhanced compensation amount with interest within<\/p>\n<p>two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this<\/p>\n<p>judgment.\n<\/p>\n<p>20. Out of the enhanced compensation <\/p>\n<p>proportionate interest is ordered to be  <\/p>\n<p>in any nationalized or schedu1ed&#8221;&#8216;Bank&#8221;_oin, .t1ji&#8217;e._narn&#8217;e of<\/p>\n<p>the ciaimant for a period of 6 ye2ars\u00bb{&#8216;&#8211;_Vand <\/p>\n<p>amount with proportionate&#8217;-.tntereet*i$*0f\u00a5ieVi*erimto be &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>released in his f8.VO1}I;.&#8217;~._ .\n<\/p>\n<p>No order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n<pre>Vb\/--       JUDGE\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Yogananda vs Smt Bhanumathi on 6 December, 2010 Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 6th DAY OF DECEMBER. 2019&#8242; BEFORE &#8221; \u00b0 THE I-ION&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE B.SREENIVAS.E&#8217; c;D&#8217;x&#8217;x?13A &#8216; &#8212; Miscellaneous First Apjgeal Neg&#8217;; 77OiI)\u00ab7 (Sf K 2 BETWEEN Sri Yogananda S\/0. Narasimha [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-122209","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Yogananda vs Smt Bhanumathi on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Yogananda vs Smt Bhanumathi on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-14T05:55:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Yogananda vs Smt Bhanumathi on 6 December, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-14T05:55:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010\"},\"wordCount\":849,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri Yogananda vs Smt Bhanumathi on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-14T05:55:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Yogananda vs Smt Bhanumathi on 6 December, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Yogananda vs Smt Bhanumathi on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Yogananda vs Smt Bhanumathi on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-14T05:55:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Yogananda vs Smt Bhanumathi on 6 December, 2010","datePublished":"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-14T05:55:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010"},"wordCount":849,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010","name":"Sri Yogananda vs Smt Bhanumathi on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-14T05:55:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-yogananda-vs-smt-bhanumathi-on-6-december-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Yogananda vs Smt Bhanumathi on 6 December, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122209","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=122209"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122209\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=122209"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=122209"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=122209"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}