{"id":122355,"date":"2009-12-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009"},"modified":"2017-12-08T07:44:40","modified_gmt":"2017-12-08T02:14:40","slug":"krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"Krishnappa vs The Land Tribunal on 4 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Krishnappa vs The Land Tribunal on 4 December, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n<pre>IN TH E HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THES THE Am DAY OF DECEMBER 2009\"'*--.G\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.s.BoP4Aj\\;NAV.:  O \n\nWRIT PETITION NO.E:4O2'\/\u00abQQC-.48 (1:.R}V'-V   \n\nBETVVEEN:\n\nE KR1sHNAP1&gt;A.v'.  _\nS\/D.LATE.vENKATARAMANAPPA,\nAGED 45 YEARs_,\"R\/AT*.NQV.9s, , \nTERU BEEDI-11, HOS}{OTFj;., ; \"  , \nBANGALORE RURAL D1S\"I'F6_1CT;_ \" A  4_ \n\n2 SMT MUi\\.1.1Y_'AMMA\u00a7    V:\nw \/Q\\_,LATE{V13N.KATA.RAM.A;r.3APPA;'\nAGED  ,D.'96.-- '\nTERLIVB-RRDHI, Hos.K0f1*E. \n\n BA1'-IQALORE' RU RAL. DESTRICT.\n\n3 =.sM'I' JAYAMM =1)\/'Q LATE MUNE GOWDA\nw\/ G. LA*FE.V\"E1'-~lK\ufb01.{1'A\u00a7{A.R\/EANAPPA,\nAGED 50 YEARS..R.'\/AT.No.184,\n-- .. 4TH CROSS; MUNVESHWARANAGAR.\n.  Y'E3SHWAi\\1THPUR.\n' i.8ANGAL0RE:'.'\"'.\n\n  A. \u00b0SMT\"'::\u00ab.AROJAMMA\n\n\"'xx.i'zQ.sRi'N'1VAs.\nAGBDAD36 YEARS, R\/AT HAL.\n~ A NAGA REDDY COLONY, 7TH CROSS.\n.. v\u00a7:LLAp\u00a3&gt;A BUILDING,\nVBANGALORE2.  PETITIONERS\n\nO'  --(E&lt;y SRI.H.C.SHIVARAMU. ADV.)\n\n\u00e9\n\n\n\nEx)\n\nAND :\n\nI THE LAND TRIBUNAL\nBANGALORE SOUTH TAL-UK.\nBANGALORE.\n\n2 GOVINDARAJ U\nSENCE DEAD BY LRS.\n\n(A) B.G.UMASHANKAR\n\nS\/O LATE GOVINDARAJU   \u00bb.\nAGED 52 YEARS,   \nR\/AT NO.l229. Sm MAIN ROAD,1_ &#039;A\nK.N.EXTENSION, TRIVENI ROAD \nYESHWANTHPUR. &#039; _  \nBANGALORE.   &#039;\n\n(B) MURTHY S\/O LATE GOvINDARA;J.1_I\nAGED 50 YEARS&#039;=--_f&#039;_    \nR\/ATNO.259,6TH   \nMALLASANDRA, ASOIJTH &#039;IvIA_RI&#039;-:ET.   &quot;\nBANGAL.QRE_~57\u00a7.: &#039;  \n\n3   \n S \/O.I;A&#039;;E,y&#039;ENRATARAMANAPPA.\n&quot;AGE IvIAJOR..,_ A  &#039;  --- &#039;\nR\/AT % NADAGOWDANA&#039; GOLLAHALLI.\nEIDARAHAID.ImI&#039;OBI.I&#039;,\n. _ BANGALORE EAST TALUK.\nBANGALORE. V  RESPONDENTS\n\nI W{By SRIIRAMAGHANDRA R. NAIK, HCGP FOR R--1.\n\n V IR:2{AI_a&amp;r2IB) &#039;AND RAB ARE SERVED)\n\n TH:S--,v\u00a7zRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226\nAND ;?,27&#039;*&#039;OI? THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO\nQUA&#039;SH&#039;:.&#039;FHE IMPUGNED ORDER DT. 25.6.1996 PASSED BY\n\nA  = GIST RESPONDENT IN ITS ORDER PRODUCED AT\n .VAN&#039;:&#039;_.EEXURE~--J l.\n\nE THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR EWNAL HEARING THIS\n DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOVVING:\n\n&amp;\n\n&#039;EU\n\nto\n\n\n\n3\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>The petitioner is calling in question the order<\/p>\n<p>dated 25.63.1996 passed by the first <\/p>\n<p>NOLRF (B) N.G.3:122&#8217;7:79 produced at <\/p>\n<p>the petition.   ._<\/p>\n<p>2. The father of petritionezr    <\/p>\n<p>also husband of the second&#8217;~..pet.iti&#8217;oner._V&#8217;had&#8217;:..;fi&#8217;ieVd&#8217;\u00b0Form\u00bbV<\/p>\n<p>No.7 seeking occupancy;.&#8212;rights&#8211;\u00bb.._ in &#8220;revs.pec\u00a7t of the<br \/>\nproperties measuring&#8217;  in Survey N0.<\/p>\n<p>34, 1 acre  and lacre 16<\/p>\n<p>guntas I situate at Nada Gowdana<br \/>\nGollahatljj\/.i~  Bangalore East Taluk. In<\/p>\n<p>respeczet of the._VS:aid iproperties, at the first instance, the<\/p>\n<p>. &#8216;o.c_cu.paney*~.vright was granted in favour of the said<\/p>\n<p>2VeI1katar&#8211;ar1:.ai&#8217;1appa. However the same came to be<\/p>\n<p>qttitesttbne\u00e9d before this Court, in W.P.No.24596\/81. by the<\/p>\n<p> it original second respondent herein. This Court had set<\/p>\n<p>Aitatside the order and rernitted the matter to the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>J;\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><br \/>\nfor fresh consideration. Pursuant therein the present<\/p>\n<p>impugned order is passed.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. The ease of the petitioners is that._4.atter~.._the<\/p>\n<p>remand, when the matter was pe11ding:__befofr&#8221;e.f<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal. the said Venkataifarnelnappa&#8217;.Vand&#8217;V <\/p>\n<p>thereafter the petitioners  ~ are  <\/p>\n<p>Representatives herein we;~.e&#8221;11.ot broughtp on  It is V<\/p>\n<p>contended that the third re&#8211;sp&#8217;ond&#8211;ent. whov..is..o11e of the<br \/>\nsons of Venkataramanappa..iI&#8217;\u00bbivitthoutithe knowledge of<\/p>\n<p>the petitioners hei&#8221;ei_n a.p&#8217;;:te_areV&#8217;d&#8221;:bvefore the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>and abasetd theV&#8217;st.sat&#8217;e.n1e1&#8217;1t: said to have been made by<\/p>\n<p>the third  Tribunal has rejected the<\/p>\n<p>claim _ in Viespeet or two Survey Numbers and has<\/p>\n<p>   right only in respect ot Survey<\/p>\n<p>nie.asuri11g 1 acre 7 guntas The petitioners<\/p>\n<p>have therefore questioned the said order. It is no doubt<\/p>\n<p> .. true the outset the order impugned In this petition is<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;\ufb02hdated 25.6.1996. However, the petitioners have<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;explairaed the reasons for approaching this Court<\/p>\n<p>it<\/p>\n<p>g-I<br \/>\nrs<\/p>\n<p>belatedly by stating that they were not aware of the<br \/>\nproceedings.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. At the outset, the very nature of the conter:.tion<\/p>\n<p>put forth is that they were not made  <\/p>\n<p>proceedings after the death of__the__fatl_&#8211;1&#8217;er&#8217;thvird\ufb02 <\/p>\n<p>respondent. has also been irn&#8217;pleade&#8217;d to A&#8217;this&#8217;lpiet.itiion<\/p>\n<p>with allegations made aggainst. h&#8217;irn.\u00bb_ llen.e&#8217;e=\u00bb.ir&#8217;1l that&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>background a perusal of  woul-d.&#8217;yindicate that<br \/>\nduring the pendencyl&#8217;theprrjceleldiengsybefore the Land<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal,  1 Rule 10 was<\/p>\n<p>made   hirnseli&#8221; indicating only<br \/>\nthe narne&#8217; of  the third petitioners herein.<\/p>\n<p>In fact.  zip-plieat-ion was supported by affidavit<\/p>\n<p>  respondent; as if he has been authorised to<\/p>\n<p>  which is available along with.\n<\/p>\n<p>Anne.:'&lt;ure&#039;&#8211;\u00b0H would indicate that the third respondent<\/p>\n<p> A. h.irnseli&quot; had mentioned about the other applicant being<\/p>\n<p> younger brother that is the first petitioner herein.<\/p>\n<p>&quot; llowever, perusal of the app1icat.i.on at Annexuremi-*1<\/p>\n<p>,4:\n<\/p>\n<p>II<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>would indicate that. his name  not indicated therein.<br \/>\nFurther the originai second respondent herein had<\/p>\n<p>objected to the said application as at AI1nexure..~_iE;_V In<\/p>\n<p>fact. in the objection, the contention raised&#8221;w_a&#8211;S__&#8221;t;h_at_<\/p>\n<p>there are other legal  1*epres&#8217;evn.tatiVes&#8217;~AV &#8220;Of. <\/p>\n<p>Venkatararnanappa.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. In that Cont.e,xt,&#8221;a&#8221;&#8211;perusa1&#8217;of the&#8217;A=ord.er&#8211;3sheet.i&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>maintained by the __Land T.riubun&#8217;a1_v wouI\u00abd.V_inAd\u00a7icate that<br \/>\nthe said appiictationtt\u00e9was  Ct)i3Sid\u20acTati011 before<\/p>\n<p>the TribunaI,_:V&#8217;f__)n  was adjourned<\/p>\n<p>for (::o11sid&#8217;efa,ution4.V&#8211; .S&#8217;u.bsequeVntIy, the order sheet does<br \/>\nnot indicate tuhatliae\u00e9&#8221;aairi&#8221;&#8221;a1pplicatioI1 has been disposed<\/p>\n<p>of,&#8217; in t.huat.vxeo1&#8217;11te\u00a7{t. from 25.1.1996, the matter was<\/p>\n<p>   and on the said day, the<\/p>\n<p> it has been pronounced by the Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p>A&#8217;\u00ab\u00abperi_1sa,i\u00ab:&#8221;of the order would indicate that reason for the<\/p>\n<p> .. Tribunal to grant. occupancy right in respect. of only one<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; &#8216;*._VSuArvey Number is that the third respondent herein had<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;himself stated that the claim is only in respect of one<\/p>\n<p>3%<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">51<\/span><\/p>\n<p>ll<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Survey Number and the other properties are not<br \/>\nclaimed. The statements as made by him was recorded<\/p>\n<p>and the Tribunal has passed the order. Cont:rary_to_V the<\/p>\n<p>said position. the statement of Venkatarama-n_appa;_<\/p>\n<p>Whicli was originally recorded bypthe  COp3.&#8217;a: <\/p>\n<p>which is available at AI1I1\u20acXui&#8217;._\u20ac~K&#8221;&#8216;w&#8217;:)L1ld_ &#8216;i1idicia:teyt;i,i_at:<\/p>\n<p>Venkataramanappa had &#8216;elairrledd&#8217;~occupa._neyv\u00ab\u00bbrigl=its <\/p>\n<p>respect of 3 Survey&#8217;Il?&#8217;:oArInf\u00a7No.7 had<br \/>\nbeen submitted.   _When the claim<br \/>\nwas made  name by filing<br \/>\nForm No.   representatives<br \/>\nwould be  same and in any event, the<br \/>\nthird resporivdentkhlad&#8217;not claimed right to the properties<\/p>\n<p>filing Form &#8230;.. ..No.7&#8242; in his individual capacity.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; after the death of Venkatararnanappa, the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;border  by the Tribunal without appropriate order<\/p>\n<p>to bi&#8217;iIi;%f, the legal representatives on record would be a-n<\/p>\n<p> .irre_gu1ar order.\n<\/p>\n<p>J;\n<\/p>\n<p>.-I-&#8216;9<\/p>\n<p>to<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">8<\/span><\/p>\n<p>6. Therefore, the procedtire  comemplated in law<br \/>\nhas not been complied with and as such the order dated<\/p>\n<p>25.6.1996 impugned in this petitiorl  be<\/p>\n<p>sustained. The same is accordingiy q}_\u00a7_ashe&#8217;d-i.<\/p>\n<p>matter stands remitted to the &#8216;1_,a11_(:1 &#8220;I&#8217;r_i1E)ii1&#8243;1e1&#8217;i~ restQre&#8221;. <\/p>\n<p>the case in NQLRF (B) N.G.3:Vi.221?:i7\u00a7 tori <\/p>\n<p>Land Tribunal is further (ii1&#8217;_v.\u20acCIV8d to lziiringi&#8217;tviieipestiitiioners. i&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>1 to 4 herein on 1&#8217;\u20acCQ_i&#8221;d. the.r.e\u00a7;it&#8217;.er\u00ab.issLie&#8221;110.tice\u00a7 to all the<br \/>\nparties and 1&#8217;ec0nsidei: in accordance<br \/>\nwith law.   are ieft open to<br \/>\nbe    &#8216; <\/p>\n<p>In   above, the petition stands<\/p>\n<p>disposed 0i&#8217;.O&#8221;Orde&#8217;r as to Cost.\n<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-*<br \/>\nJUDGE.\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Krishnappa vs The Land Tribunal on 4 December, 2009 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN TH E HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THES THE Am DAY OF DECEMBER 2009&#8243;&#8216;*&#8211;.G BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE A.s.BoP4Aj\\;NAV.: O WRIT PETITION NO.E:4O2&#8217;\/\u00abQQC-.48 (1:.R}V&#8217;-V BETVVEEN: E KR1sHNAP1&gt;A.v&#8217;. _ S\/D.LATE.vENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED 45 YEARs_,&#8221;R\/AT*.NQV.9s, , TERU BEEDI-11, HOS}{OTFj;., ; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-122355","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Krishnappa vs The Land Tribunal on 4 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Krishnappa vs The Land Tribunal on 4 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-12-08T02:14:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Krishnappa vs The Land Tribunal on 4 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-08T02:14:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":902,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009\",\"name\":\"Krishnappa vs The Land Tribunal on 4 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-08T02:14:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Krishnappa vs The Land Tribunal on 4 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Krishnappa vs The Land Tribunal on 4 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Krishnappa vs The Land Tribunal on 4 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-12-08T02:14:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Krishnappa vs The Land Tribunal on 4 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-08T02:14:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009"},"wordCount":902,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009","name":"Krishnappa vs The Land Tribunal on 4 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-08T02:14:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishnappa-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-4-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Krishnappa vs The Land Tribunal on 4 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122355","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=122355"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122355\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=122355"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=122355"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=122355"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}