{"id":122479,"date":"2009-07-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009"},"modified":"2016-11-14T02:38:09","modified_gmt":"2016-11-13T21:08:09","slug":"binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Binoy Mathew vs P.H.Hameed on 2 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Binoy Mathew vs P.H.Hameed on 2 July, 2009<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 2101 of 2009()\n\n\n1. BINOY MATHEW,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. P.H.HAMEED,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.JOICE GEORGE\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH\n\n Dated :02\/07\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                        THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.\n              = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n                          CRL. R.P. NO.2101 of 2009\n              = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n                    Dated this the 2nd day of July,  2009\n\n                                 O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n
                                 ————–\n<\/p>\n
\n      This revision is in   challenge of judgment of learned Sessions<\/p>\n
Judge, Thodupuzha in Crl.Appeal No.317 of 2007 confirming conviction<\/p>\n
and sentence of petitioner for offence punishable under Section 138 of<\/p>\n
the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short, “the Act”).<\/p>\n
      2.    Respondent No.1 preferred a private complaint. His case is<\/p>\n
that  he is engaged in timber business           and petitioner purchased<\/p>\n
timber from him in August, 2004. For the sum of Rs.1,90,000\/- due to<\/p>\n
him petitioner issued four cheques (Ext.P1 series). Those cheques<\/p>\n
were   dishonoured    for insufficiency of funds as        proved by Ext.P2<\/p>\n
series.  Respondent No.1 issued notice to the petitioner intimating<\/p>\n
dishonour and demanding payment. Issue and service of notice are<\/p>\n
proved by Exts.P3 to P5 series. Respondent No.1 gave evidence as<\/p>\n
P.W.1 regarding the transaction          and    execution of the cheques.<\/p>\n
According to petitioner he has not purchased any timber from<\/p>\n
respondent No.1. His former Manager, Naveen (D.W.1) stealthily took<\/p>\n
the cheques along with other documents from his office           and those<\/p>\n
cheques are misused. D.W.1 admitted that he had been working as<\/p>\n
Manager of     petitioner but denied that the           cheques and other<\/p>\n
CRL. R.P. No.2101 of 2009
\n                                 -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
documents were taken by him         from the office of petitioner.    He<\/p>\n
claimed that he saw respondent No.1 for the first time when he was<\/p>\n
summoned to the office of        Deputy Superintendent of Police (in<\/p>\n
connection with the complaint preferred by petitioner). Courts below<\/p>\n
were not impressed by the contention raised by petitioner, accepted<\/p>\n
the evidence of respondent No.1 and found the petitioner guilty.<\/p>\n
Challenge in this revision is only regarding execution of the cheques.<\/p>\n
It is contended by learned counsel for petitioner that finding of the<\/p>\n
courts below in that regard is not correct.\n<\/p>\n
      3.    It is not disputed by     petitioner that Ext.P1 series are<\/p>\n
signed by him and drawn on the account maintained by him.<\/p>\n
According to him, he had no transaction with respondent No.1 at a<\/p>\n
time when D.W.1 was working as his Manager, he stealthily got the<\/p>\n
cheques and handed over the same to respondent No.1. D.W.1 has<\/p>\n
denied that.   There is no evidence to show that      respondent No.1<\/p>\n
stealthily got custody of the cheques (Ext.P1 series).   Petitioner, it is<\/p>\n
not disputed is   a business man. ln spite of signed cheques and other<\/p>\n
documents being allegedly stolen from his office he has not intimated<\/p>\n
his bank about that and requested stoppage of payment as per those<\/p>\n
cheques. He did not also put such a contention to respondent No.1<\/p>\n
when the latter served notice of dishonour on him and he was called<\/p>\n
upon to make payment. In the circumstances, contention raised by<\/p>\n
CRL. R.P. No.2101 of 2009
\n                                   -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
petitioner regarding his missing of cheques has only to be considered<\/p>\n
as the result of an afterthought. Nothing is brought out to disbelieve<\/p>\n
the evidence of respondent No.1 regarding transaction and execution<\/p>\n
of the cheques.    Courts below have assessed the evidence let in and<\/p>\n
found in favour of due execution of the cheque. There is no reason to<\/p>\n
interfere with that finding.\n<\/p>\n
      4.     Learned magistrate sentenced petitioner to undergo simple<\/p>\n
imprisonment for three months               and directed      him to pay<\/p>\n
Rs.2,05,000\/- as compensation. In default of payment, sentence of<\/p>\n
simple imprisonment for three months also was provided. Appellate<\/p>\n
court did not interfere with either conviction or sentence.         On a<\/p>\n
consideration of the circumstances of the case, nature of the offence<\/p>\n
and object of legislation I am satisfied that simple imprisonment till<\/p>\n
rising of the court will be sufficient in the ends of justice. There is no<\/p>\n
reason to interfere with the direction for payment of compensation and<\/p>\n
the default sentence provided.\n<\/p>\n
      5.     Counsel requested four months’ time to deposit the fine<\/p>\n
in the trial court.   Counsel submits that petitioner is unable to raise<\/p>\n
the amount immediately. Having regard to the circumstances stated<\/p>\n
by learned counsel     I am inclined to grant three months’ time to the<\/p>\n
petitioner to deposit compensation in the trial court.<\/p>\n
      Resultantly, this revision is allowed in part to the following<\/p>\n
CRL. R.P. No.2101 of 2009
\n                                   -: 4 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
extent:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                  (i)    Substantive sentence is modified as<\/p>\n
           simple imprisonment till rising of the court.<\/p>\n
                  (ii)   Petitioner is granted three months’<\/p>\n
           time from this day to deposit the compensation<\/p>\n
           as ordered by the trial court.\n<\/p>\n
                  (iii)  It is made clear that    it shall be\n\n           sufficient compliance of condition        (ii)  if\n\n<\/pre>\n
           petitioner paid the compensation to respondent<\/p>\n
           No.1 through his counsel in the trial court and<\/p>\n
           respondent No.1 filed a statement in the trial<\/p>\n
           court     through   his   counsel  acknowledging<\/p>\n
           receipt of compensation within the said period<\/p>\n
           of three months.\n<\/p>\n
     Petitioner shall appear in the trial court on 5.9.2009 to receive<\/p>\n
the sentence.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                             THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n
vsv<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Binoy Mathew vs P.H.Hameed on 2 July, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2101 of 2009() 1. BINOY MATHEW, … Petitioner Vs 1. P.H.HAMEED, … Respondent 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY For Petitioner :SRI.JOICE GEORGE For Respondent : No Appearance The Hon’ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH Dated […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-122479","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nBinoy Mathew vs P.H.Hameed on 2 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Binoy Mathew vs P.H.Hameed on 2 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-13T21:08:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Binoy Mathew vs P.H.Hameed on 2 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-13T21:08:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":782,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Binoy Mathew vs P.H.Hameed on 2 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-13T21:08:09+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Binoy Mathew vs P.H.Hameed on 2 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Binoy Mathew vs P.H.Hameed on 2 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Binoy Mathew vs P.H.Hameed on 2 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-13T21:08:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Binoy Mathew vs P.H.Hameed on 2 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-13T21:08:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009"},"wordCount":782,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009","name":"Binoy Mathew vs P.H.Hameed on 2 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-13T21:08:09+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/binoy-mathew-vs-p-h-hameed-on-2-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Binoy Mathew vs P.H.Hameed on 2 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122479","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=122479"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122479\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=122479"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=122479"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=122479"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}