{"id":122588,"date":"2009-09-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-31T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009"},"modified":"2014-04-09T21:23:29","modified_gmt":"2014-04-09T15:53:29","slug":"mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"Mohammad S\/O Imamsaheb Pendari vs Fatima W\/O Babusaheb Jamadar on 1 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mohammad S\/O Imamsaheb Pendari vs Fatima W\/O Babusaheb Jamadar on 1 September, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n<pre>BETWEEN:\n\n116 ms ma:-1 coum or xAaxA*rAI\u20ac;\u00e9.\" %  gyf f v \n\ncmcurr amen AT DHARWAB..A. :\ufb02.  \n\nmrmn '11-us THE 15? my oi:-f sn:\u00a7';*:ra\ufb01z3\"E;R;-  \u00e9  7\n\nREM\u00bb    _  \nTHE HOIPBLE MR.  A.$}.'\n\ufb01.F'.A {CPO}  \n\nAGED ABOUT 5:2. YEARS,   '. ;.\nGCC : ;y::.%:a&gt;--I&lt;;ULf1*U1EHv\"LAND HOUSE\nOF' CPLANNAPPA'vVEERA?PA~\u00abSHIRAGUPPI\nSITUATED AT TER.\u00a5fi.A_L; TQ -JAMKHANDI 53730:\nDIS'I':Bi'.,GALKOT =   \n\nMoHAMMA:&gt;\"S}5 ibi\u00e9\u00a7:;\u00a2$AH\u00a7:B- ;?:';\u00a7_z~I1i;{A.12.;'\n\n \"    ..APPELLAN'I'\n{By gm H.AR1sH\u00bbS,_ MAIGUR, ADV.)\n\n \u00bbAN::3._\n\n  -..;~'\u00ab'p;*r:'\u00a7s1iA__ Mai BABUSAHEB JA.MAI3AR\n\n_ AGE!) 'A393? 57 YEARS\n'=--0c--._\u20ac: HQUSEHOLDWORK R\/O CHINAGUNDI\nTQ. JAMKHANDE, \u00a3')iS'f'. BAGALKUP ---- 58'? 361\n\nV'    :Ea;HAJA:~\u00abIBi W\/C1 BABALA JAMADAR\n\nAGED ABGUT 52 YEARS\nOCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK R\/O CHINAGUNDI\nTQ. JAMAKI-{AND}, DEST'. BAGALKOT --- 587 30$\n\n\u00e9\n\n,.--\n\"s\n\n\n\n3. MASHAMA w\/0 HUSENI PENDARI\nAGED ABOUT 57 YEARS  \" V \nocc HOUSEHOLD WORK R\/O CHINAGUIXEIX   '\nTQ JAMAKHANDI   ._ : \"  \u00bb\n9131* : BAGALKOT - 537 301\n\n4. RAMAPPA s\/o GURUPADAPPA Ta;\nAGES ABOUT 52 YEARS   \nocc LEGAL REPRESENTATIYEA __   \n'rQ JAMAKHANDL msq' : BAGAL!{QT -- 587 301 \n\nKKAAPPANAEIAR = V' \"\n\n  Ri%:ist3CND\u00a7:NTs\n\n(By SRE SANTOSH M. BABA;J:;'A:3vf' :\"~*o;_?2:  \n312; MC. HUKKERE, Am, FOR-.I\u00a7~{1)  ~ *\n\nTHiS;'AI~'f?EAL\" :12; F'I'LF,.E_Z$\"U__\/\"S V-.--{+3..gz) m or CPC AGAINST\nTHE 0293132  QATEID'-. \"'z.5.~m\u00a7;20c}\u00a78 PASSED IN CIVIL\nMISC.Pf3.*I'I'TfQ1\u00a7lii,NO\u00a731'20GEi{C*N Ti-:'E:\"F;L1': 09' THE DESTRICT AND\nSESSIQNS ,1U3'G'\u00a7',,~.;3A:r3Am{Qf1f. \u00ab -\n\n'rI\u00bbiis.LA;&gt;1&gt;EA:. C\u00a7\u00a3\u00a7hiI':l%\u00a5x'34\u00a5CV&gt;N FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE\nCOURT DE1,'r'azEme:p -f:*m_ FGLLOWING:\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p> %&#8221;&#8216;%%1*h\u00a2#&#8221;%%\u00a7;57p\u00bbe11ant herein is the defendant in<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;v._&#8217;O.S.No.1?%4[9I. The said suit which was \ufb02ied by the:<\/p>\n<p>A &#8216;~:}fc&lt;\u00a7:ii\u00e9$\ufb01ng respondents henein. seeking for a desclaraision was<\/p>\n<p>&#039;  d\u00e9creed by the tnlal Court. Aceemdingly, the appcllant<\/p>\n<p> igemin \ufb01ladia regular appeal in R.A.No.14-4\/2001. The said<\/p>\n<p>i<\/p>\n<p>an\u00bb<br \/>\n\/a<\/p>\n<p>appeal \ufb01icci by the appcnam herein baron; <\/p>\n<p>Appellate Court was dismissed for default  K <\/p>\n<p>since the learned counsel for the;  <\/p>\n<p>appear before the Lower   &quot;\n<\/p>\n<p>restoration of the regular   a VV<\/p>\n<p>Misc.pctit:ion in    Jed&#8221; Mvi\u00e9cfgvacti\ufb01on is<\/p>\n<p>dismissed by order da\ufb01d :  as such the<\/p>\n<p>appellant is  2  <\/p>\n<p>2}  w.T&#8217;};j;e  in the appeal memo is<\/p>\n<p>miter\ufb01ic\ufb01    for the appe\ufb01ant.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;   The&#8217;  counsel for the respondents hcrwever<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  by contending that the Lowm&#8217; Appellate<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; {&#8216;,\u00a3)i3.rt  that the appeilant herein. was not diiigczlt<\/p>\n<p>in  the appeal. Therefore, the Lcawer Appcllatc<\/p>\n<p> V,  vviizas not satis\ufb01x-&#8216;xi with the reasons assigned and<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;mtingty, it has dismissed the Mis(:.Pt:tit:ion. According<\/p>\n<p>.4<\/p>\n<p>p.-.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">46<\/span><\/p>\n<p>ten the learned counsel for the zesponsients, me <\/p>\n<p>15.04.2008 does not call for interference. : &#8221;  = -.<\/p>\n<p>4. In the \ufb01ght of what has beezr; cpngs\ufb01\ufb01ag; E&#8217;-Izaiie<\/p>\n<p>perused the appeal papers. V I1: isep   <\/p>\n<p>the appeal was \ufb01sted on 06.  .. for &#8221; V<\/p>\n<p>the appellant herein hadznot -\u00bbpm$&#8217;eSs.\u00ab.of. appeal<br \/>\nby appearing before he   such the Lower<\/p>\n<p>Appe\ufb02atc ihad &#8221; It is also a fact<\/p>\n<p>that    appeal had been rejected<br \/>\nand hed &#8216;beep  Even assuming such a<\/p>\n<p>situation, &#8216;&lt;L.i\u20ac;nSi(}.e_rin:gA;&#039;&#8211;._ts11e*&quot;bfact that the appellant has pleatied<\/p>\n<p> &#039;  _  a poefVag;:bult1u*ist and was unable to contact the<\/p>\n<p> L&#039;  keep track of the caae, a pragmatic view&#039;<\/p>\n<p>ieq\u00a7&#039;1ires\u00ab  13%: taken, since in any event, the part;1e&#039; s are<\/p>\n<p> nag\u00a7e\ufb01g;_\u00a7im regard to certain rights relating 1:9 immovable<\/p>\n<p> \u00bb  Therefore, there should be an appropriate<\/p>\n<p>\u00e9ezljudica\ufb01on on merits on the case.<\/p>\n<p>$<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;..,<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span>\n<\/p>\n<p>5. Accordingly, the order dated 15.04.2903 is set<br \/>\naside. However with the conditions imposaw herein.  &#8220;I1:,this<\/p>\n<p>rcgaxti, it is made clear that the mstoration of &#8220;i:&#8217;v:T;i&#8221;efV&#8217;!.1_;:eVV*  and dum:1&#8242; g the time<br \/>\n\ufb02ame  \ufb01x&lt;&#039;:;-rd by V&#039;   ..~~Appe1late Court, the learned<\/p>\n<p>counsg}.  &quot;gthe appellant btzfozve the Lower<\/p>\n<p>  ~\u00a3.&quot;:g3u11; x\u00e9\u00e9 &#039;address the arguments and complete<\/p>\n<p> fli\u00e9 hag case. It is also made cktar that if that is<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01zrth n by  on behalf 0f the appellaztlt, no further<\/p>\n<p> indiiigeizgehv\ufb01voul\u00e9 be shwm to the appeilant. Since the<\/p>\n<p>x V&#039; .._1:$a&#039;rt&#039;i\u00a2s  represented before this Court, they 511$} appear<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;   the Lower Appellate Court on 12.10.2\ufb02 as the first<\/p>\n<p>Q<\/p>\n<p>#9<\/p>\n<p>daft of appearance and tm Lcwer Appellate Cour?   <\/p>\n<p>thcrea\ufb01cr rcguiatc the pmcazdings.<\/p>\n<p>In terms of the above, the appeal   {if  <\/p>\n<p>with :10 order as to costs in this <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Mohammad S\/O Imamsaheb Pendari vs Fatima W\/O Babusaheb Jamadar on 1 September, 2009 Author: A.S.Bopanna BETWEEN: 116 ms ma:-1 coum or xAaxA*rAI\u20ac;\u00e9.&#8221; % gyf f v cmcurr amen AT DHARWAB..A. :\ufb02. mrmn &#8217;11-us THE 15? my oi:-f sn:\u00a7&#8217;;*:ra\ufb01z3&#8243;E;R;- \u00e9 7 REM\u00bb _ THE HOIPBLE MR. A.$}.&#8217; \ufb01.F&#8217;.A {CPO} AGED ABOUT 5:2. YEARS, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-122588","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mohammad S\/O Imamsaheb Pendari vs Fatima W\/O Babusaheb Jamadar on 1 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mohammad S\/O Imamsaheb Pendari vs Fatima W\/O Babusaheb Jamadar on 1 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-31T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-04-09T15:53:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mohammad S\/O Imamsaheb Pendari vs Fatima W\/O Babusaheb Jamadar on 1 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-09T15:53:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":498,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009\",\"name\":\"Mohammad S\/O Imamsaheb Pendari vs Fatima W\/O Babusaheb Jamadar on 1 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-09T15:53:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mohammad S\/O Imamsaheb Pendari vs Fatima W\/O Babusaheb Jamadar on 1 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mohammad S\/O Imamsaheb Pendari vs Fatima W\/O Babusaheb Jamadar on 1 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mohammad S\/O Imamsaheb Pendari vs Fatima W\/O Babusaheb Jamadar on 1 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-31T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-04-09T15:53:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mohammad S\/O Imamsaheb Pendari vs Fatima W\/O Babusaheb Jamadar on 1 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-09T15:53:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009"},"wordCount":498,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009","name":"Mohammad S\/O Imamsaheb Pendari vs Fatima W\/O Babusaheb Jamadar on 1 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-09T15:53:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-so-imamsaheb-pendari-vs-fatima-wo-babusaheb-jamadar-on-1-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mohammad S\/O Imamsaheb Pendari vs Fatima W\/O Babusaheb Jamadar on 1 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122588","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=122588"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122588\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=122588"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=122588"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=122588"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}