{"id":12261,"date":"2009-08-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009"},"modified":"2016-07-05T21:07:06","modified_gmt":"2016-07-05T15:37:06","slug":"smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt M B Nalina vs Sri Venkatesh Naidu on 7 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt M B Nalina vs Sri Venkatesh Naidu on 7 August, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Manjula Chellur Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA, BANGEXLORE\nDATED 'I'H\u00a5S THE '?TH DAY OF AU{}US'f', \n\nPR ESENT\n\nTHE HQNBLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJULA-.CPIE,Li;ijR  %  \n\nAND\"\n\nTHE 1-mwam MR. JUSTICE\u00a7i.__$1? EENiVASE ::?;G\u20ac\u00a2ii~\ufb01A' \n\nMISCELLANEOUS FIRSTEAPPEAVL 'NO.7.9\u00a7  '\" '\n\nBETWEEN :\n\n1. 31111:. M. B. Na1ina  ' __ -\nAged a\u00a53o1;11';_37 years  '\n\nwe was K:   %  \n\n2.   \" V'\n ged \u00e9%}_Q1it';$,6 'y;far\u00a7 . _'\n 0' Lathe   Murthy\n\n3.  \" \n; ' Aged abautll years\n\n~  9110 Late   Murthy\n\n  1:103. 2 and 3 are\n' Rfqamsented by their\n\n  Mcthafaiz\u00e9 Natural Guaxtiian\n\nSr,1i.L'i'y'I; B. Nalina, 1*' apfxllant\n  residing at N'0.355[ 16\n\n\" }F_*'3~Cmss, Lakshmipura\nG\ufb01vigumm Extension\n\n1. Ba{1ga1ore----56{} 019  APiF'ELLA?\u00a7'FS\n\n(83; Sri. R. Krishna Raddy, Advocate)\n\n\n\n'\\'\\\u00a7'm:;, ' I?\n\nix.)\n\nAND:\n\nv Sri. Venkatash Naidu, Major\n\nS\/o Sri. Ranumantha Naidu\nResiding at No.31, Vidyapeeia\n\nBanashankari I Stage \nBa:1ga1o1\"e--56O 050 =\n\nThe New india Assurance \n\nCempany Limited  \nNo.41\/2A, Nithyanandanagar _\nMysore Roaei, Nayandahalli ,  \"_\nBa\ufb02galore '   f     \nRcgaresented by Br\u00e9iicli Maj1aiger' I  \n\nSn\". 8. J. 1?r;L.1;ash:,\"Majo\u00a7 \"  _\nS[oSn'.;Lii1:\ufb013EJ'a;'\u00e9i_ah  \nResidjjzsgat 1'9_1a;_hax'\u00a2er;'R.0afi  V\n13\u00a2;}.ui., Naggman.ga3a'.'Tamk; '\nMax;dya.VAD\"ist:\u00a7c:t ,  \" \n\n Lt?,d.,\nPQB.  Rpad \nMandya Town, Kvlan\u00e9ya District\n\n_RepI\ufb01'Sent:2d_'::_y its Bianch Manager\n\n   %%%%% --\u00ab =\n\nT\ufb01ga\u00e9 about '?(} years\n\n  TS','--.(\u00bb>'1\u00a7itf; Jaware Gowda\n\u00a2\u00a7<"esid;ing' No.355\/ 16\n\n 1"  Lakshmipura\n Gsgwipaaiam. Extension\n\nBa1:ggaiore--560 019 RES?ONDEN'\u00a7'S\n\n{By Sri. R. Rajagopalan, Advocattz for Respondent no.2}<\/pre>\n
. V’ ~{.E\u00a7ri. ‘1’.P’. Rajendfa Kumar Sungal fer Regponcient no.3)
\n (Re$p<::n.de;:1ts 1103.4 and 5 are served}
\n7 { Respondent no. 1 service hald suf\ufb01ciant)<\/p>\n
wfrkfr<\/p>\n
This MFA is \ufb01led under section 173(1)  Act
\nagainst the \u00e9udgmcnt and Award dated 28.'7.2{)(_)i3. Vpasgc\u00e9z in
\nme No. 2186\/2003 on the file of XIX A\u00ab3.d1.'*r–,_;and<\/p>\n
Member MACT, Metxopolitan Area, Bangaioye V
\npartly allowing the claim pctitiqp for :c0'mpt;t1sati'– An __a:'1:3\u00bb <\/p>\n
seeking enhancement of cc3mpct;.'sati{)nz \u00ab_ <\/p>\n
This MFA comm' g on for  t}1}\u00a3 s_–.c1ay, 2
\nCHELLUR J. delivered. thc.i'o1l9wi11g:._ ' V   1 % _ <\/p>\n
 '
\nT his appeal  and Award in
\nMVC No.21a6j;;200:\u00a7::'   'at Bangalore.<\/p>\n
2.,  to the \ufb01ling of the
\npzcssm:      .\n<\/p>\n
   of one deccase\u00e9 K. Narasimha
\n  5:. 3 am the children of dccttased<\/p>\n
 Deceased Narasimha Murthy was aged<\/p>\n
A   at the time of the accident. He was Working<\/p>\n
 2  a:;:S VV’;\u00a7’\ufb01:;.,io1′”:'”f3:1ginccr at KPTCL zhrawiug a salaxy cf<\/p>\n
‘u\u00a5<?s.1\u00a3*5,.f}6'(\u00a7\/~ at the me cf his death, According to me<\/p>\n
 AA ; c\ufb01pp\u00e9\ufb01sants he had another 15 years of scrvicc and was the<\/p>\n
VV "'ucly bread earner of the: famiiy.<\/p>\n
611 17.2.2093 the deccasezi was travcliing in 3 Toyota<\/p>\n
Quaiis bearing I2c.KA~OS~MA~2543 from Knnigal ta<\/p>\n
Bangalore 013: N21-i. 48. The said Qua-111$ driven by . it\u00e9 '\u00ab:3._1*ivc:r<\/p>\n
met with an accident as it co\ufb01ided with anQ\ufb02:;c:"'A \u00a7':~'?N."f
\n5526 at Majjige Lakkammana;aa.}yia.__ln t_':1\u00e9:"'sai\u00a3_:i ,\u00e9i\u20ac:citi\u00a23nt, I:'1c_ <\/p>\n
died at the spot \u00e9ue to fatal inj\u00a7i;i\u20ac:$g;" T   <\/p>\n
a claim petition was    <\/p>\n
Rs.25,0(},00O\/~ for the   \u00e9eceased
\nNarasimha M1.1rthy.V  _A  AL 2 A H<\/p>\n
3. T136 matter  i.;*;Spondents who are<\/p>\n
the  “f}1%%v”:L\u00a3%?0′–~v\u00e9$hjc1es involved’ in the<\/p>\n
    of the entire material<\/p>\n
111ti\u00a7;3;;3.xtV:zai\u00a7;*V  negligence against thf: driver of<\/p>\n
tl:e.V’i’oyc;\u00a7\ufb01a A\u00e9e-t1\u20ac:\u00ab1″‘..<iix*e:cteci the insumd and the insumr<\/p>\n
"!<:;'p;\u20aci3=' tin; comfj\u00e9h\ufb01\u00e9ttion awarded. We need not make<\/p>\n
V    as the opini-311 0f the Tribunal has reached<\/p>\n
"  as actionable negligencfz of the driver of the<\/p>\n
o\ufb02isj\ufb01ing Velxiclc.\n<\/p>\n
3″”\n<\/p>\n
:3, Then coming ta the: quesfimn of quantum of
\ncompensation, the 15* appellazit was examined as raw; arm<\/p>\n
thrcaugh her $c:vem1 dccuments were market?” So far as<\/p>\n
dependency anti the relationship bctween the dc(;g\u00e9a$\u00e9:i_ and<\/p>\n
the appellant — Ex.P–? ratien care’: was pmd_rg4\u00e9\u00e9{\u00a7–\u00a7<\/p>\n
\ufb01t) serious dispute regarding the same.  <\/p>\n
Manager Of BESCOM, was  <\/p>\n
nature: of work, salary   detaii3;  ‘
\nNarasimha Murthy at KP’rc L;L\u00bb.:’,:Ae.\u00a2or\u00e9ii1;\u00a7 \u00a36  salafy
\nthat was paid to de\u00e9lg\u00e9zscd  per Ex.P–9
\nwas in the month of   <\/p>\n
6.   as V.  Vdeccascd as Junior
\nEz1gi11eei5<'Vat":::\u00a5{.\u00e9"I;C':L  goint of time there. is no
\ndislfsi\u00e9t\u00e9 "  grass and net as disclesed
\nin   \u00e9e\ufb01ous \u00e9ispute. The appellants<\/p>\n
hays quL2%'::-.tion\u00a2(i._   of compensation awarded by<\/p>\n
 'If1;\u00e9.b;malAA:\u00a7tv\u00a7?$.'\u00ab11,96,{}{){)i~ towards loss of dependency<\/p>\n
'  other ccmventienal amounts 9f Rs.,20,00{}\/-<\/p>\n
" .' \u00a20ht5n<ii:j2\u00a71'ti1at it is inadequate and on the lower side when<\/p>\n
 is the age and salaxy of the deceased at the<\/p>\n
" \u00bb n 'T xtlev\u00e9nt point of time.\n<\/p>\n
?. Learned c@uns:::}. fer tha appeilants rsiies on the<\/p>\n
Iat\ufb01st Judgment ef the Apex Ciourt in the case sf SMT,<\/p>\n
SARLA VERMA we omees Versus DELH\u00a7 TR.a”1=asI>0m*
\nCORPORATION AND ANOTHER reported in <\/p>\n
e??(s.c.).\n<\/p>\n
8. So far as the ratio  i:’iL::W1i, in   <\/p>\n
regax\u00e9ing the multiplier that   and:iS0bvVa}$V0
\nwith regard to the assessreezifof  on
\nage of the deceased” xyith ;1efe\u00ab:ee1;ee’~ if;  ‘pms;peets in his
\noccupying a better  Ldepends upon, the
\nnumber of    \u00e9epartment, is<\/p>\n
mdieetee’; 1 7. V.  ‘<\/p>\n
 TV\u00a5;e.’vVh\u00a71;re% g0: n”e.,.I’h1e-ugh the saj\u00e9 Judgment. Their
\nLoxtislgifis;    after referring to several<\/p>\n
..,E’a\u00e9gmee17\u00a3s,=.,vef’the  Court on the ques\ufb01on of multiplier<\/p>\n
.  \u00abV has’ to  f5e’\u00ab\u00abvad0\u00a7ted, deduction towards iaersonal<\/p>\n
” __e.e3<peV:;sii\u00e9311aeV  ef the deceased, assessment of Ease of<\/p>\n
A \u00bb..depend.e;;ej:, assessment of eempensation under<\/p>\n
eeixventional heads and how to assess when cieeeased is a<\/p>\n
x _ \u00e9\ufb01;a1*ried employee 01" he has an aveeatien or occupation. with<\/p>\n
\\v'"'x\\<\/p>\n
def\u00e9znffe iaeeme have ma\u00e9e a scienti\ufb01c analysis anti<\/p>\n
"uitimateiy have indicated at yam 21 what shel\ufb02d be the<\/p>\n
1}. Now coming in the facts of the  case,<\/p>\n
appamn\ufb02y the date of birth of the deceased is 513 the<\/p>\n
accident occmred on '?.2.2(}03. He was agcri'a.hdi\u00a7t  <\/p>\n
as on the date: of his death.     L<\/p>\n
have mtirezd at 58 or 60, af.-3 tI::{: (i\u00e9c\u00e9\u00e9zsc\u00e9  'Lag;
\nQTOHP of 50 years, the   sheid
\nSarla Verma's case.  The  Viihekrerife and the
\ntwo children who wc\u00e9f\u00e9\u00e9  time of his cieath,
\nthe dcduc'\u00a7\u00a33l0:=r\u00a7: \u00a7:~f   expenses of the
\n    '<\/p>\n
}:'2_.1 certi\ufb01cate for the month of<\/p>\n
Nov.2(}\u00a7)2,_  was Rs.16,{)60\/- and the total<\/p>\n
df::<iv12.\u00a7:ti0\u00a5i  R S.2\u00e969\/-.As held in the above case,<\/p>\n
 " A V V'wheiiev\u00e9A1*.\u00a2\ufb011e income: of the deceased is in the taxable range,<\/p>\n
 Julie:  f\u00e9o .bc paid have to be deducted from the salary<\/p>\n
A  at the rate of Rs.1,00()[ ~pm. From EXP9 we<\/p>\n
alsoffxote R3200\/~ was paid as professiona} tax and total<\/p>\n
 r  included Rs.35{)\/ \u00bb= conveyance allowance which Wcmid<\/p>\n
 have {wan spent by \u00e9fsceased for hizcasclf. Thezefere it} the<\/p>\n
present case the tstai deductions would be Rs.I,S50\/-. Thts<\/p>\n
balance Wouid 001113 ta R3. 14,5101\u00bb. This w91;};t\u00a3'4'_:'i3\u00a7 the<\/p>\n
acme} salary as indicateti in the: Case of Sar}a,_  <\/p>\n
deceased was 45 years old Rs.4353,' –   <\/p>\n
salary towards the futme pros@oects. a%3 u\u00a7:1_e{}5"—-<\/p>\n
years of service at the rats? indicaiegi t1\u00a3'1T}f: .\u00e9i}:)(\u00a7:\\?{:
\nJudgment which ccames to  —  \/ 3"' has
\n:0 be deducted  'toWardV'v,s  {he personal
\nexpenses of $16 d<:*cg:_s:\u00ab;\u00a7\u00a7'\u00a2::A:iV.  1393 of dependerzcy
\nwould be    .14 has to be applied.\n<\/p>\n
when 4&3  <gO%1v'\u00e911tiona1 amounts, oniy
\n   against normal award of
\nRs.%\u00a5'L},\ufb01O0] ~–.  $16: apitacllants are tmtitled for<\/p>\n
t:n2_1anc\u00e9i::-.c:i2t. Qi7c6;a;5\u00a3i\ufb01sati0n as indicated bei-ow:<\/p>\n
-f%:;:\u20ac;s;,g.j9:’gigpegi\ufb01emsy-‘-~ Rs.12,5’75 x 22 x 14 w Rs.21,12,6(}O\/-<\/p>\n
V   iiassxfg\ufb01f  1:9 the Wife: 1{),OO0[-<\/p>\n
.’ A  “\u00e9:Lj;~3jf.;\u00a7tc: of the deceased lO,%O[~<\/p>\n
 ‘zyf Zove anci a\ufb01ec\ufb01on as father tau<\/p>\n
 .A ; L thercixildran 10,000\/\u00bb<\/p>\n
V’  \u00a73T;i1n,\u00e9:ra1 and other incidental charges 10,000] \u00ab<\/p>\n
Rs. 21,52,690]-\n<\/p>\n
ma.\n<\/p>\n
Accmdingiy, the appeal is allowed in <\/p>\n
the compensa\ufb01on by” Rs.9,36,6()G\/ –.  of<\/p>\n
Compensation $13333 Carry i11tcres_t..a1;_50\/0 bf <\/p>\n
petition till the date of dep0sit:’a]:)y;’_’\u00a3h+t::9 \ufb02u?’ <\/p>\n
indie: Assurance (30. So    tits
\nTribunal aha}: disburse tn;  with the
\nprinciples laid  .T\u00a7 1\u00a7I1;as’s case in order to
\neusune the Welfare Qf of the deceased
\nand the    Whom Kum. Sanjana<\/p>\n
thf: 3″\n<\/p>\n
 “\u00a318  is granted eight weeks time to<\/p>\n
d\u20acp0sVixt $15 .f:IV}V:i\u00a3.f;i_41V7i(}\u20ac\u00a7d’:.:\u20ac;l\u00a7L11OtiI1iC.<\/p>\n
      Sd\/-‘
\nIUDGE<\/p>\n
sad-\n<\/p>\n
313983.\n<\/p>\n
sak<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt M B Nalina vs Sri Venkatesh Naidu on 7 August, 2009 Author: Manjula Chellur Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF’ KARNATAKA, BANGEXLORE DATED ‘I’H\u00a5S THE ‘?TH DAY OF AU{}US’f’, PR ESENT THE HQNBLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJULA-.CPIE,Li;ijR % AND” THE 1-mwam MR. JUSTICE\u00a7i.__$1? EENiVASE ::?;G\u20ac\u00a2ii~\ufb01A’ MISCELLANEOUS FIRSTEAPPEAVL ‘NO.7.9\u00a7 ‘” ‘ BETWEEN : […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12261","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt M B Nalina vs Sri Venkatesh Naidu on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt M B Nalina vs Sri Venkatesh Naidu on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-05T15:37:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt M B Nalina vs Sri Venkatesh Naidu on 7 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-05T15:37:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1211,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt M B Nalina vs Sri Venkatesh Naidu on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-05T15:37:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt M B Nalina vs Sri Venkatesh Naidu on 7 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt M B Nalina vs Sri Venkatesh Naidu on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt M B Nalina vs Sri Venkatesh Naidu on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-05T15:37:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt M B Nalina vs Sri Venkatesh Naidu on 7 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-05T15:37:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009"},"wordCount":1211,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009","name":"Smt M B Nalina vs Sri Venkatesh Naidu on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-05T15:37:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-b-nalina-vs-sri-venkatesh-naidu-on-7-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt M B Nalina vs Sri Venkatesh Naidu on 7 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12261","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12261"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12261\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12261"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12261"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12261"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}