{"id":122622,"date":"2010-09-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010"},"modified":"2019-02-21T18:07:52","modified_gmt":"2019-02-21T12:37:52","slug":"dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Dhanalakshmamma @ Radhamma vs J Vasanthi on 8 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Dhanalakshmamma @ Radhamma vs J Vasanthi on 8 September, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 8%! DAY OF SEPTEMBERV:2'5j1.\u00a7v\u00bb.,\n\nBEF ORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE 'GOWL*&gt;A Q \n\nWRIT PETITION NOS. 5310\/20:1.Oz&amp; 8620\/I20  \" \n\n(GIvI--RASPI.EKAI:&gt;' \n\n ' W20 SHRI. G JAYARAM\n' - \" '-AGEDOABOTJT 46 YEARS\n R\/'A\"i'..NO.IV'5'0,\n. \"'TvEEIeAEIAIADRAIAH GARDEN\n PIPE LANE, MALLESWARAM\nBANGALORE A 560 003\n\nV  G JAYARAM\n\nV'  _.E*'ATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN\nTO THE PLAINTIFF\nAGED ABOUT 57 YEARS\n\n\n\nand 3 herein are the additional defendants in\n\nO.S.No.7212\/96. Both the suits are for \n\nThe petitioner contends that, the property in'ir_oIV'eei   \n\nthe suits is one and the Seine,\" Whereas' first 7\n\nrespondent i.e., plaintiff in  <\/pre>\n<p>that. the properties involved &#8220;&#8216;in.&#8221;&#8216;the tWo.V_s&#8217;ui.tfs Vare\ufb02distinct<br \/>\nand separate, for which, su_.p&#8217;p&#8217;o:&#8217;rti\u00e9isjialso derivevd from the<\/p>\n<p>record of the Bangalore <\/p>\n<p>2. ;&#8217;Petitiori&#8217;e1f    vMisc.No.23\/06 under<br \/>\nSection&#8221;  Before  Prl. City Civil Judge,<br \/>\nBanga1o&#8217;re&#8221;City,.  of one of the suits and<\/p>\n<p>for being made over Atovthe Court where the other suit is<\/p>\n<p> ~pendiiigi&#8211;for,.trialVanddisposal. The said writ petition was<\/p>\n<p>      thereafter, petitioner \ufb01led<\/p>\n<p> under Section 24 of CPC to transfer<\/p>\n<p>V.,&#8217;fo.s.Noe.7_2i2\/96 \ufb01led by her, pending in CCH No.38 to<\/p>\n<p> p&#8221;&#8216;\u00a2cHfifp&#8221;.,&#8217;Ne.8. wherein O.S.No.6340\/97 is pending or<\/p>\n<p>if   yi_s&#8211;versa for disposal in accordance with law. The said<\/p>\n<p>i<\/p>\n<p>Z ,<\/p>\n<p>\/&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>petition having been found to be devoid of merit was<\/p>\n<p>dismissed by the Prl. City Civil and Sessio&#8217;ns&#8221;-liiidge,<\/p>\n<p>Bangalore. Aggrieved, the plaintiff in O.S.No\u00ab. <\/p>\n<p>filed these writ petitions.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. Heard the iearnedfce-.unse1~..and the <\/p>\n<p>papers.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. The learned .i?1&#8217;il.&#8221;.__VV\u00bb  Judge has<br \/>\nmisdirected  gin   impugned order<br \/>\nrefusing to. one and the same Court<br \/>\non three   by; making a reference to the<\/p>\n<p>record of   and hoiding that the suit<\/p>\n<p>seheduie prope1jty&#8217;in thewtwo suits are different. Secondly,<\/p>\n<p> i\ufb02vthat&#8221;;    at different stages, there is no<\/p>\n<p> t.o-grant the relief. Thirdly, in View of the<\/p>\n<p> _ rejection&#8221;of-JViisc.23\/O6. the petition is not tenable.<\/p>\n<p>if u _  Section 24 of CPC is with regard to the general<\/p>\n<p> power of transfer and Withdrawal. Sub&#8211;section (1) thereof<\/p>\n<p>\/.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>provides that, on the application of any of the parties and<br \/>\nafter notice to the parties and after hearing such of them<br \/>\nas desired to be heard, or of its own motion without_psuch<\/p>\n<p>notice, the High Court or the District Court<\/p>\n<p>stage transfer any suit, appeal, or other._:: <\/p>\n<p>pending before it for trial or to<\/p>\n<p>subordinate to it and competent to try orgldiisposell <\/p>\n<p>same. It also enables the   s&#8217;uit,HappealV<\/p>\n<p>or other proceeding per1dingCourt subordinate to it<br \/>\nand try or dispose of th&#8217;?\n<\/p>\n<p>6} ._  ,pp1=:\u00a7yr1s1ons, it is made clear that, at<\/p>\n<p>any stage&#8217;g__of the  if the Court deems it<\/p>\n<p> appro\u00e9plriate either:__or1_&#8217;the application or otherwise, a suit<\/p>\n<p>  proceeding pending before it or before any Court<\/p>\n<p> can be withdrawn and made over for trial<\/p>\n<p>{and  by a Court competent to try and dispose of<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217; &#8220;fthei matter. Merely because the two suits are at different<\/p>\n<p>  stages, the learned Prl. Civil and Sessions\\I%1iige could not<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>have disallowed the prayer in the Misc. Petition. The<\/p>\n<p>dismissal of an earlier petition i.e., Misc.23\/O6 does not<\/p>\n<p>operate as res judicata. Depending uporil&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>situation, the power under Section 24 _&#8221;&#8216;oe&#8217;eXerei.se.d_&#8221;&#8211;..<\/p>\n<p>irrespective of the decision taken earlier &#8220;siiice-__su,o,.V_prriotti,<\/p>\n<p>the power has been confer1j\u20ac:d4_ upon the <\/p>\n<p>exercising such power,   &#8216;arise for<br \/>\nconsideration from be   view. If<br \/>\nthe trial and disposal&#8230;   be expedited<br \/>\nwithout any    to either of the<\/p>\n<p>parties:;i&#8221;the&#8221;s.aid  be_&#8217;e3s:ercised, despite the order<\/p>\n<p>is contraolrder   _\n<\/p>\n<p>7.  parties the suit do not agree that the<\/p>\n<p> prop&#8217;erty_lA&#8217; irivo1ve&#8217;d.._.iI1.v the suits is one and the same.<\/p>\n<p>PI.:ai&#8217;1itiff.__V&#8217;iri&#8217;\u00ab.lC..S.No.7212\/96 contends that, the suit<\/p>\n<p>schetiiilel  therein is the property involved in<\/p>\n<p>97, whereas the plaintiff in the later suit<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;idcontends otherwise. There may be a record of the<\/p>\n<p>\/<\/p>\n<p>\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>Corporation indicating that, the properties are one and<\/p>\n<p>the same. As along as there is no agreement between the<\/p>\n<p>parties and a finding has not been recorded&#8217;__&#8217;__&#8217;b},{:VA&#8217; a<\/p>\n<p>competent Court after adjudication of  is <\/p>\n<p>open to record a \ufb01nding in the ti:_ans.ferj;<\/p>\n<p>property involved in both th&#8217;e._suits&#8217;.i_s&#8221;one the <\/p>\n<p>It is for the Court wherein  znattersuiare ceased, to<br \/>\nrecord \ufb01ndings basedmipon fithye .C&#8217;.evid&#8217;e1ice that, may be<\/p>\n<p>brought on record duriyngthe cou.rse&#8221;of&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>8} tttt  In &#8216;rides by the petitioner and<br \/>\nthe counter-by the&#8217;.V&#8211;~re&#8217;s\u00abp\u00bbondent, without going into the<\/p>\n<p>conte.ntious&#8221;4is.su&#8217;e.that, the property involved in both the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; ffsuits {is?..,&#8221;one..,and Ctheffsarne and since the plaintiff in the<\/p>\n<p> Eater Vsuitais defendant in the earlier suit and as the two<\/p>\n<p>suits are &#8216;pending in two different Court Halls of the City<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Civil Court, in order to facilitate the expeditious triai and<\/p>\n<p> ._fdi_sposal of the suits, it would serve the ends of justice to<\/p>\n<p> -withdraw o.s.No.7212\/96 from Add}. City Civil and<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;\/L<\/p>\n<p>(<\/p>\n<p>Sessions Judge, Bangalore City (CCH No.38) and make<\/p>\n<p>over the same to Addl. City and Sessions<\/p>\n<p>Bangaiore City (CCH No.8), with a directionof<\/p>\n<p>the suits alongside each other\ufb02mand  <\/p>\n<p>petitions stand disposed of as folglows-:&#8217;~  3 <\/p>\n<p>The writ petitions\u00bb stafid  The<\/p>\n<p>impugnedvoid\ufb02er ,,gtgiashed.&#8211;  prayer in<br \/>\nMisc.798\/    Prl. City Civil<br \/>\nand  &#8216;Bangalore City, stands<br \/>\niS<\/p>\n<p>T &#8216; 1?.iWe3i  T O.S.No.7212\/96<\/p>\n<p> pg  &#8220;the \ufb01le of Add]. City civii and<\/p>\n<p>seeeioiis grudge, Bangaiore City [CCH No.38)<\/p>\n<p>add aeeigiied to the Addl. City Civil Judge<\/p>\n<p> No.8), wherein O.S.No.6340\/96 is<\/p>\n<p>L The trial Court<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; pending.\n<\/p>\n<p>[Add]. City Civil Judge<\/p>\n<p>functioning in C.H.No.8) is hereby directed to<\/p>\n<p>C\/,<\/p>\n<p>I<\/p>\n<p>iii)<\/p>\n<p>iv]<\/p>\n<p>try both the suits separately alongside each<br \/>\nother and dispose of the same expeditiegdhslzy.<\/p>\n<p>P.W.1 in O.S.No.6340\/97 shal1:.~\u00ab~~-hepethorosco-<\/p>\n<p>examined by the \ufb01rst defendanft_:&#8221;~the.:fei&#8217;n  <\/p>\n<p>plaintiff in O.S.No.72\u00a5l2 on   <\/p>\n<p>of hearing or on the adjourned date  the case&#8221; ;<\/p>\n<p>may be.\n<\/p>\n<p>Plaintiff in-.._._.&#8221;fpt:he   adduce further<\/p>\n<p>evid6_1&#8217;_1ce aI).d_..,.Con1P1\u20acte'&#8221;&#8216;hei&#8217;-aside of evidence<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;rno.1&#8217;V1th_sV  date, the cross-<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;      completed.\n<\/p>\n<p> 1&#8242; Zn&#8217;  the plaintiff [petitioner<\/p>\n<p>lhereinlh.&#8217;-shallfladduce and complete her side of<\/p>\n<p>evidence&#8221;&#8221;alongside the evidence of plaintiffs in<\/p>\n<p> (4\u00a7&#8217;.V{?l,l\u00a7Io.634\u00abO\/97. Soon after the evidence of<\/p>\n<p>~f_pEa_intiffs in both the suits are completed. the<\/p>\n<p> defendants in the respective suits shall adduce<\/p>\n<p>and complete the evidence within two months<\/p>\n<p>\\%<\/p>\n<p>E}<\/p>\n<p>Court shali proceed further for disposal of the suitswithin<\/p>\n<p>the period indicated supra.\n<\/p>\n<p>hrp\/bms<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Dhanalakshmamma @ Radhamma vs J Vasanthi on 8 September, 2010 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 8%! DAY OF SEPTEMBERV:2&#8217;5j1.\u00a7v\u00bb., BEF ORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE &#8216;GOWL*&gt;A Q WRIT PETITION NOS. 5310\/20:1.Oz&amp; 8620\/I20 &#8221; (GIvI&#8211;RASPI.EKAI:&gt;&#8217; &#8216; W20 SHRI. G JAYARAM &#8216; &#8211; &#8221; &#8216;-AGEDOABOTJT [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-122622","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Dhanalakshmamma @ Radhamma vs J Vasanthi on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dhanalakshmamma @ Radhamma vs J Vasanthi on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-21T12:37:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dhanalakshmamma @ Radhamma vs J Vasanthi on 8 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-21T12:37:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1010,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Dhanalakshmamma @ Radhamma vs J Vasanthi on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-21T12:37:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dhanalakshmamma @ Radhamma vs J Vasanthi on 8 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dhanalakshmamma @ Radhamma vs J Vasanthi on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dhanalakshmamma @ Radhamma vs J Vasanthi on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-21T12:37:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dhanalakshmamma @ Radhamma vs J Vasanthi on 8 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-21T12:37:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010"},"wordCount":1010,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010","name":"Dhanalakshmamma @ Radhamma vs J Vasanthi on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-21T12:37:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhanalakshmamma-radhamma-vs-j-vasanthi-on-8-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dhanalakshmamma @ Radhamma vs J Vasanthi on 8 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122622","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=122622"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122622\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=122622"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=122622"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=122622"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}