{"id":123011,"date":"2008-03-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008"},"modified":"2019-01-10T13:44:16","modified_gmt":"2019-01-10T08:14:16","slug":"the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"The Assistant Commissioner vs Mallappa Dundappa Zhalake on 10 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The Assistant Commissioner vs Mallappa Dundappa Zhalake on 10 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: V.Gopalagowda & Nagaraj<\/div>\n
IN man man 0003'!' or nAmwrAxA AT umuom\nmum THIS nm 106- my or \n\n-mm lln'l\"Ill _-'ll'l\ufb02'I'll_\".'lB 1_Ii;_It__)1l_Al'.A \n\nmanna' 'owns! drain-' an-nu-Iwwura--6-I   -o-V--vs-_-u\n\nmm nownm un.Jus11\u00a2n    A k%\n\n \n\n\"I\"1-ya. Anni {\"1-in-|r|.s-vs-'nn\u00a5:\\111yIe'.-.., \n111': n\u00a7\u00a7'o\\.J'J\u00a3u\ufb02\ufb02i'D\u00a7-l\\\"l\u00a7_iL * -\n\nChikodi.    \nA\u00a3ByAS:iAAm1\nAND:   %%%% A     A \nR\/o.H1r:-.kodi '_     \n\nCl1ikodi'f'a_lul;  A _ \n\nBelgaum Dim,     ....Respondents<\/pre>\n
       Adv.)<\/p>\n
A    Tmgmm.mt Appeal in \ufb01led under sec.54 of the
\nLA’-\u00bb’Act .”.’aga;,=1nst the Judmcnt and Award dated<\/p>\n
2’9..9.2a.’}=’;L’4j’*;aa%d in LAC Na.3;’1995 m the \ufb01le sf the<\/p>\n
civii A Judge (Sr.Dn.), _Chikodi, partly allowing the<\/p>\n
    petition for enhanced compensation.<\/p>\n
 *   This MFA coming on for dictating the Judgment<\/p>\n
 day’, :’u”‘i’Ii A J, \ufb01a1i’v’e:’*”m tlw fa’.um'”-‘m5.*-<\/p>\n
‘.4-\n<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
JUDGEIIT<\/p>\n
‘I’
\nAll I-ILND \ufb02.ll!lIoIiI.l, Id:-La Jlwslnnuwaslnnnswua<\/p>\n
n 4-‘hln annual H-an A4: l’1\\InIrninn’L;I}_aII:_-‘ <\/p>\n
(hereinaflaer referred as ‘Li\\O”) has the _<\/p>\n
correctness of the market vah_J,e.. .dete1miIlei14  uh’ ‘V<\/p>\n
learned Civil Judge(Sr.Dn.),  = i  ff <\/p>\n
meferned as ‘Reference  <\/p>\n
‘~*a~ Ms  by l=’.i.’s_. \u00a3ra\u00a7.’,:::gnued_<\/p>\n
fl: ‘2’ 1;\n<\/p>\n
jar lvll.-\u00a7\u00a2:I\u00a3’\\.l 1 I-Illa 4\\.dI2l:I.l.|\u00a7.rI.l II’-Ill In-Isa-A<\/p>\n
av-3
\ns.N.Ha;ti,  I439-‘\u00a7;!’Vi*eapondcI1t~cIa1man’ ‘ t,
\nwe nchicgv   dihhhm as to the \ufb01nding of
\nthe   as to the Rerenenoe made to<\/p>\n
  pc\ufb01riod of limitation; various dates<\/p>\n
11:: +114 \ufb02u Mn nvi-ant and<\/p>\n
u \u00a2;’u~.I1;u-n-I.\u00a2-uI- rural-‘\ufb01nal-‘A
\nl.. l..l.I.Jl.l..ulul.l.I.I.Lrl.IcI, I-Ill: lJJol’\\I-, unuaau nun<\/p>\n
:……..’:….\n<\/p>\n
“315:-rum’ .4u:._I v<\/p>\n
  ‘izhe land under acquisition anti also the<\/p>\n
 of the respondent-ckaimant to the atatumry<\/p>\n
  on the market value of the land under<\/p>\n
;\u00a7;:q\u00a2a:ug:;,  is disputed is the rate at which the<\/p>\n
  _._I_-.n. ..-_’l
\n1IlHl’KI’.l’l. H].\n<\/p>\n
..f ti-5.. ;….-u-I-‘:43 ‘nu-u-st’ ‘an-can ‘titan-I <\/p>\n
‘E 16 uuqunuu luuu nun uusu uwu:u.u.u;uu””<\/p>\n
by the learned Refexenoc Court.<\/p>\n
.–~F”*”‘<\/p>\n
3. It is the contention of the learned AGA that the<\/p>\n
learned Reference Court ought to have taken per  of<\/p>\n
Sugar Cane less than 40 tone. ‘the <\/p>\n
S;N-HH the 1_A.9_T’.r1.–d. Ilnnel ” <\/p>\n
V umpiafu<\/p>\n
.g.1;.._ “Ii.-.._ .37<\/p>\n
._I….2……. __<\/p>\n
cieuluaut is t1″u’aJ’., I’:IEi’v’if’1\u00a7 h\u00e9id,    <\/p>\n
acquisition was of Class-I     L.<\/p>\n
ought to have taken the yiexldaof. more
\nthan 50 tons per   40 tons for
\nthe p1.I.rpe;-se -1′ .,_.xi. 0  1.    d ‘V V<\/p>\n
land by  Further, 1:\n<\/p>\n
is the   that the Reference
\n  some additional amount
\ntowaxtielcoet of’ by crushing the sugar<\/p>\n
  I  Il\ufb02d<\/p>\n
ya-gr EIAIVVJJ .2-ya auto\u00bb: no-no 3-in Iu\ufb02hl\\iI-DI III I is: I-snarl-5:6 I-I<\/p>\n
 . . . . .  W<\/p>\n
 tine   value of the said  contention<\/p>\n
xueounsel for the respondent-claimant is<\/p>\n
V –V   learned Reference Court took only one<\/p>\n
qummlior  as the yield obtained by crushing 1<\/p>\n
—  hint? “of sugar we .*:=.e*..;-.-=-I’… of takhig mm’ “M-” “M<\/p>\n
In-371.1 ‘II ‘III I-I-XI-I-I |.l’I\u00bb.I\ufb02-I<\/p>\n
A llquintai ofjaggery as such yield, the Reference court did<\/p>\n
not commit any error in not deducting any further<\/p>\n
I_l<\/p>\n
4. As com<\/p>\n
be seen  Para-9 of  <\/p>\n
Judgment, based on Ex.P4, tl’Jl93.._\u00a2_3xtf’\ufb02Ct4  ‘V<\/p>\n
respect of the land in question for the <\/p>\n
Reference Court found  larid  <\/p>\n
QR
\nvi In-I-I<\/p>\n
f<\/p>\n
t<\/p>\n
.1-mm:     yiezez
\nnoti\ufb01cation reveais   grown in
\nClass-II  leaned   er 75 tons and
\n   category
\nof   tone maximum 30 tons.\n<\/p>\n
H1 . nnininn that H1\u00bb Inn!-nail<\/p>\n
‘I”h-In H’a,9rin’n an um air A 7 I3<\/p>\n
Referen  -vwae’ not justified in mun’ ‘ ‘ g per acre<\/p>\n
   at 40 tone, which is not even<\/p>\n
    of Class–II category land.<\/p>\n
  though the Reference Court has<\/p>\n
%  eesewed at pa1’a–l0 of the impugned Judgment that it<\/p>\n
  established fact that one ton of sugar cane will<\/p>\n
  1 nun’:-sl-cl nf annnvur I-‘I-Inna -In run ‘tamed fr\\-ll I’}1’I\u00a2
\n33 ‘IV  l\\’I lalll\ufb01l<\/p>\n
JUJLI. J. quuunl U1 jag;-I..a~I._y, unau<\/p>\n
\ufb02nding inasmuch as no materiai was piaoed bd”om the<\/p>\n
(-“””A’<\/p>\n
5.
\ni
\nI’
\nE
\n:\n<\/p>\n
i<\/p>\n
1!.’-nnnlhtl\ufb01n In I 153! V AC JCCW 1. RI
\nU.l’Gl.IUC CUl\ufb02’L Hy C.ILIlUl.’  ll.l.1LI. G  ‘lh\ufb01\ufb02<\/p>\n
conclusion. Sri S.N .1-Iatti, the learned counsel”<\/p>\n
respondent-claJman’ t placing his   ”<\/p>\n
contents of book titled   tan L<\/p>\n
S=C=KI_1b1_1-_d, Retd, Jo,int   <\/p>\n
_ 1.-u_1_ r|_.=…-|_’_”_.<\/p>\n
 and p ‘ 11 1edt”–vt.b’y Ki.ibnaau.”‘t  nan,<\/p>\n
Dharwad wherein t11e~..autt_1oi*’  at ‘i5age~397
\nthat by crushing 1 tonof.  1.00 to 1.40
\nquintals of   submitted that
\nthe  errr_s.r in ta..|d_n.g
\noniy   yieid   of
\ncane.    Reference Court was not
\njustj\ufb01ed   of sugar cane only at 40 tons<\/p>\n
 ‘pee and 1\ufb01vas’not justl\ufb02ed further in taking only<\/p>\n
 nnp ti ‘3-\n<\/p>\n
V =3?’ ta!  as the yield -…m n…..r-e Ln of !.!l.!\u00a3’\ufb021′,,…’.<\/p>\n
cane, javcvA.7~a1we of the considered opinion  the<\/p>\n
  contention of the learned AGA that the Reference Court<\/p>\n
dd ‘atougtit to have deducted some amount towards coat of<\/p>\n
   -gireparation of jaggery by crushing the sugar cane gmwn<\/p>\n
nit!<\/p>\n
doubt it is true that the respondent–ciaimant must have<\/p>\n
(\u00a7f’\\.-r–..—r<\/p>\n
Ch<\/p>\n
incurred some expenditure in addition to the coat of<\/p>\n
cultivation, (which came to be deducted at fthe<\/p>\n
n’nr\\un nnnllal -iI1nnrnn\\ fntnnnrl -runnvucn-II-I111 AP    <\/p>\n
vs _<\/p>\n
lfv.’<\/p>\n
1′ .\n<\/p>\n
crushing each ton of sugar cane. _Eu_t, ir11.view.fef  ” = ii<\/p>\n
that the learned Reference   <\/p>\n
cane at low rate of 40 Iaone age .   the <\/p>\n
yield of jaggery at the of one   ton of<\/p>\n
to _ ‘manna nvniu\ufb02r\ufb01 1r1:\\’.I- ‘H\u00a7la.,u’rn-I-‘i’ar””‘I ‘
\n‘\ufb02u-I-l\\l, lull-I-AI’-d UVKJI-I-I?-I 1.3:!’-“.’_ II?-teal’ <\/p>\n
3<\/span>
\n3<\/span>
\nD
\n3<\/span>
\nD
\n1-\n<\/p>\n
Reference  in   of any
\namount   of jaggery  <\/p>\n
dctmms&”z}.~’tt;ell:\ufb01e:rket\u00a7aju\u00a2 Glue acquired land.<\/p>\n
5.e\u00a2s  learned AGA has placed
\nhis    clecieion of the learned Single Judge<\/p>\n
l   5615105 which  to be<\/p>\n
#1V.!.j…..V_’A…,..:’.’H.  nnnnn ..’I_.I__ .___.._ _ ..-_…._\n<\/p>\n
 -\u00a3o3.4\u00a3UUD, 1 In 11 $7 I1 8|\u00bb-[“1<\/p>\n
 .: 2.. – 1.\n<\/p>\n
-1.-\n<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
Re;’200.] 4  allowed as deduction towards preparation<\/p>\n
   by the claimant himself by crushing the sugar<\/p>\n
ll  grown in the land under acquisition in addition to<\/p>\n
…1;he deduction of 50% of the goes \ufb01g he<\/p>\n
_I4.\u00a3_-_L.!_<\/p>\n
.A._______.1_ ___4. -1.’ __ ._ -1.’ _..___._ ___..- I”\\__ ._…__.IL-I
\nHJWHIUS (JOEL 1 cmu L10 1 U1 Eugen’ cane. LII]. Cl:l.I’UIUl<\/p>\n
reading of the said Judgment, we have not been able to<\/p>\n
 % sk\/bpyzsans;\n<\/p>\n
7<\/span><\/p>\n
\ufb01nd out as to under what circumstances, on what ha\u00e9\ufb02ia.<\/p>\n
“id for what re….,..n-mus the -..itil dgduc\ufb01on was   _.__ A’ <\/p>\n
the learned Judge. “‘i”neref’1”, ti-1e “-‘d Judgndnt ‘kg of   <\/p>\n
no help to the learned AGA to :  i’<\/p>\n
that a particular sum shou1dJTkbe,ded-acted   of” k%<\/p>\n
the price of 1 quinlzal of  <\/p>\n
7. In view of our   we are of<\/p>\n
t.__\u00a2_: considered   deserves to<\/p>\n
be di””‘sae”‘ _V Ewing \u00bb:.’.4ei:.-‘.j:>1d’—-9.11’* marl; Aogcordingly, the<\/p>\n
same is: (lis111:is$\u00a2a.d,A   as .f6’\u00e9ost.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The Assistant Commissioner vs Mallappa Dundappa Zhalake on 10 March, 2008 Author: V.Gopalagowda & Nagaraj IN man man 0003′!’ or nAmwrAxA AT umuom mum THIS nm 106- my or -mm lln’l”Ill _-‘ll’l\ufb02’I’ll_”.’lB 1_Ii;_It__)1l_Al’.A manna’ ‘owns! drain-‘ an-nu-Iwwura–6-I -o-V–vs-_-u mm nownm un.Jus11\u00a2n A k% “I”1-ya. Anni {“1-in-|r|.s-vs-‘nn\u00a5:\\111yIe’.-.., 111′: n\u00a7\u00a7’o\\.J’J\u00a3u\ufb02\ufb02i’D\u00a7-l\\”l\u00a7_iL * – Chikodi. A\u00a3ByAS:iAAm1 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-123011","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Assistant Commissioner vs Mallappa Dundappa Zhalake on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Assistant Commissioner vs Mallappa Dundappa Zhalake on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-10T08:14:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Assistant Commissioner vs Mallappa Dundappa Zhalake on 10 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-10T08:14:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1120,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008\",\"name\":\"The Assistant Commissioner vs Mallappa Dundappa Zhalake on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-10T08:14:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Assistant Commissioner vs Mallappa Dundappa Zhalake on 10 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Assistant Commissioner vs Mallappa Dundappa Zhalake on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Assistant Commissioner vs Mallappa Dundappa Zhalake on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-10T08:14:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Assistant Commissioner vs Mallappa Dundappa Zhalake on 10 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-10T08:14:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008"},"wordCount":1120,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008","name":"The Assistant Commissioner vs Mallappa Dundappa Zhalake on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-10T08:14:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-assistant-commissioner-vs-mallappa-dundappa-zhalake-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Assistant Commissioner vs Mallappa Dundappa Zhalake on 10 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123011","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=123011"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123011\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=123011"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=123011"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=123011"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}