{"id":123022,"date":"2010-08-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010"},"modified":"2016-06-23T16:31:58","modified_gmt":"2016-06-23T11:01:58","slug":"the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"The Mysore Sugar Company Limited vs Y B Siddaramu S\/O Boraiah on 11 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The Mysore Sugar Company Limited vs Y B Siddaramu S\/O Boraiah on 11 August, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: J.S.Khehar(Cj) And Chellur<\/div>\n
\u00a5N THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA, BANGALORE\n\nDATED TEES THE 3. 1'31 DAY OF' AUGSSF, 2010 \n\nPR ESENT\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. .1. S. KHEHAR, cnmp' \n\nAND\n\nTHE HONBLE MRS. JUS'1'\u00a5CE'. MANJULA' {:;HELI.{;1\u00a72  1'  \n\nwan' APPEAL N()S.398:'3 dz? 2Q09?{s\u00a7:R ESj\"-    7\n\n&' .\n\n2937-2990 0572010 (S-Rigs;  V\nBIETWEEN    \n\nThe Mysore Sugar\nCompany Lixnited\nSugar Town.\nMandya--5?1'-402 V\nRepresented by   1 = _  -  '\n\nti:1eC.A.().       APPELLANT\n\n(By M3:. ;,J. 1f*ram}:$;1--- ' '\n\n1. Yg\ufb01; \n   _____ \n\n . tX\"ge<i:":\u20acii;*. R..._Nq..s33Q:\u00a7\n\n2. \u00a32, samjag' '\n\nWu\/0 Bommaiah\nAge\u00a3i.,a\u00a73out 54 years\nA \u00abH. R,\"No.43582\n\nShingarappa\n\n S] 0 Venkatappa\n\n' Aged about 52 years\nWorking as Boiler Mazdoor\nP. R. Nc;.15195\n\n\n\n4. K. S. Ravi Kumar\n\nS] o Shixzarzagajah\n\nAge\u00e9 about 28 years\n\nWorking as Mill Mazdoor\n\nP'. R. N-9.15253  \u00bb\n\n5. Haseena Begum\n\nW] 0 Nisar Ahameci\n\nAged about 45 years\nworking as Mill Mazdoor\nP. R. No.4{)486\n\n6. Bhagra C\n\nW] 0 Chcnnappa\nAged about 38 years   \nWorking as Mi11'MaZdj00r ' ~.\n\nRR.   \n\n7.   .\n\n8. J. ii'amu \"~\n\nW\/o    \nAged} abo%1t'VE\u00a7t3 ye\u00e9agrs _  '\nWorking. as ,M'i::\"e;;azdoar'  .. '\nP. R. P~l0.\u00a3--5284  ' \n\nS 130 Javare \nivsg\u00e9d ;a1bout 54 \n\n ' Vworkiag asx\ufb02oilttr Mazckpor\n\n \n\nS\ufb01o Shiva\ufb01ngaypa\nAgeuzi about 55 years\nWorking as Manufacuuing Chemist\n\nV'   9:48. No\/$138\n\n'   Mahcswarappa\n\n+3,\u00bb\n\n S\/0 Ramappa\nAged about 36 years\nWorking as Mcmlcler If\nF. R. No.19 185\n\n\n\n1 1.Sh\u00a2shag1'n' S\n8\/0 Shiva Madaiah\nAged about 31 years\nWorking as Mill Mazdoor\nP. R. No. 15260\n\n12.Kris11na Babu T.K\nS\/0 Kempa Lakkaiah\nAged about 31 years\nWorking as Mill Mazdoor\nP. R. No. 15215\n\n13.01. M. Nagaxaju\nS\/0 Motagypa\nAged about 53 years\n\nWorking as Boi1e1f MazdQo--r   Vv\n\nP. R. No.1E\">1-43..  \n\n14.x. B. Somaiah  \nS10 Lats Boxaiah  \nAge\u00e9 about 46'*j,:eai5;  \"\nWorking as (:1:-:14:  \n\nP. R. N(}.43599 V' V\"\n\n15.AI3thony Steven \nS\/:3 S;*i:t1ivas\"   \nAgedfgabdmt 30 years\n\n .. V.  as Dvfi\ufb01i\u00e9vr\n \u00bbP.'\u00abR, N9.4?0\u00a7'?._\n\n16.Shi:;k:a1\"  \u00ab  _ ,\n\nS\/Q Ghikkaihimmaiah\n_ Age\u00e9i a\u00a5:;\u00a3;>utv32 years\nV._Wc>rkingA-'as Fire Man\n\n3   'P R. N<5."15215\n\n"   working in\n\nMysore Sugar Compamy\n\n  -\u00abLimited, S21ga:rTown\n\nMandya~57 1 402\n\n\n\n24.Shanmu am\nS \/0 Sun ax\nAgc\u00e9 about 39 years\nWorking as Welder\nP. R. 530.1920?\n\n25.Y. (3. Shivashankara\nSfo Chikka Lingaiah\nAged about 39 years  \nWorking as Fire Brigade \nP. R. No.14984  '\n\n26.}3ore Gowda\nS\/0 Rams Gowda\n\nAges} about 30 years _ V\nWorking as Pan'--Mazdir"'  -- \nP. R. No.439:6"\u00bb_ '_< - 1. \n\n27.6. 3.  'L -I  \n\nS] 0 J3.vare,\u20ac';mVd3=.  \nAged about 3'? yeaig. H \nWorking aS"--Att\u00a3*:3:1der" -\u00bb_ 'A\nP. R. No.245E)\u00a7?~ '- '\n\n23.9. S. Shxeedhaxa' _    \n'S.\/0 Shae:-}3an':na V "  '\n Aged ai.2oi1t5..\u20ac~1~4 ygars\n'i.3._'o:*mg as Fsttendsr\n     \n\n L"-2\u00a7,.shaxi1ca__"ra"% mm .55 \n\nT SE10 Nar'asai;ah* \n-.   about 452 years\n_ " V .WQr1\u20acing aswaigh Bridge Attendar\n ._P';AR._Nd;~43$75\n\n  Vimala Kumari\n\n. _W,l+:;-Bamodharan Nair\nAgcci about 4'7 years\n\n L "~  " orking as Attender\n\nP. R'. No.3438(}\n\n\n\n(7%\n\n3 1. N. Kannan\nS\/0 Late Nataraj\nAged about 43 years\nWorking as Attendsr\nP. R. N034386\n\n32.C1i::am1a13kaia}:1\n8\/ 0 Chizmarah\nAged about 34 years\nWorking as Wire Man\nP. R. No.209'7O\n\n33.Y. K. Manjula\nW\/0 Y. N, Krishna\nAgezi about 42 years\nWorking as Mill Mazcioog"\n\n:9. R. N04708:   \n\n34. M. Shanthamma\n\nW\/0 Sidda1;$fpaji'::\u00a7:,:  'V \nAge:;{i_abou_t A53-vycars --.\n\nWorking as 7\n\n\n\n \"<hsw~' 9%\n\nThese Appeals eonxizag on for  Hearing on\nthis day, Chief Justice, delivetned the fcallowing: \n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
The respondents’ salaxy was allegedly  <\/p>\n
at a higher stage than they were aictuzlllyrexitiiied. <\/p>\n
appellant therefoze, desired to redizee tile\u00bb. eame   bf
\ntheir entitlement. For the   ap\ufb01aellaxzt
\nissued notices dated ‘:s.\u00e9\u00a7i;” 14;   The only<\/p>\n
submission advanced by.ss-~tl1e~.  ;-cssnsel for the<\/p>\n
appellant }!:as,Autl3.;\u00a7itli\u00e9gthe\ufb01jlthtindl respoinding to the aforesaid
\nnotices, itis ‘asserted-,..–.re$pondents approached this<\/p>\n
Court by fi\ufb01pg 200’? (as also other writ<\/p>\n
‘_.VpetitiQI:_;?;e)l;  it “wssV1ss:stended at the hands of the<\/p>\n
V.   Wages were \ufb01xed at a higher level,<\/p>\n
uidjlafexellf ._V_  V V  the respondents, Without any<\/p>\n
 _teis:ef:–1es\u20ac:titat\u00a7en by the respondents. Accordingly, it was
\nW M ” ‘_””-\u00a7d”S’\u20ac2f\u00a7I’tCd.'{Lz.7i\u20act.1t. it was not open to the appellant to reduce the<\/p>\n
2. While considering the aforesaid submission the<\/p>\n
learned single Judge relying on the Judgment rendered by<\/p>\n
31<\/span><\/p>\n
the Apex Cows”: in the ease of Sahib Ram V. State of Halyana<\/p>\n
–~ 1995 Suppl. (1) sec 18 arrived at the conclusion…
\nwas not open to the appellant to e\ufb02ect any  ~
\nrespondents on account of the facthithat\u00e9 the   i’;}:;e  “‘
\nrespondents had been \ufb01xed   <\/p>\n
without any misrepresentati\u00a7 n’_V at “then har\u00a7c3;S.\u00a2: nof tihev\u00e9<\/p>\n
zespoudents. in the  2 \ufb01l\ufb01e Vvfmatter,
\nW.P.i13\/2007 (as also  pe\ufb01\ufb01ens) was
\nallowed.    ‘V   ”\n<\/p>\n
3.    advanced by
\nthe respon{1.eu;Vits;    in the aforesaid
\ngaazagraggh,  Jzidge granted iiberty to the<\/p>\n
appellant ‘\u00a3o’__’ Vpase’  * pzospectively re~f2xing the<\/p>\n
 emaI}1__i@eI:ts of \ufb01:e*_:VV:Iesp{>ndents. The aforesaid liberty was
\n a\ufb01crgied ti]jie..va;3pe1la:1t by requiring them to follow the<\/p>\n
 in iaw. ~<\/p>\n
4., ‘\ufb01iuxing the course of hearing of the instant writ<\/p>\n
A  learned counsel for the appe}}ant does not contest
\n pftapositioxx of law on the basis whereof, the learned<\/p>\n
” eifxgle Judge has! accepted the contention of the<\/p>\n
WW<\/p>\n
\u00a32<\/p>\n
respondents. It is aleo apparent that no further aeti'<':vIV:i".<
\nbeen taken by the apgaeilant to pass a:\u00a31 appmpziate' 0Vxt:3,ei~ "<\/p>\n
ae to re—\ufb01x the emoluments of the Iesipetidenteu  <\/p>\n
5. Despite the aforesaid Vfae_tna1tpeei–?ion tht1t’..e11ierg;e.e’~ V<\/p>\n
from the pieadings of this case,  eei\ufb01exitiefz atiyatlced
\nby the leaxned eoux1sei’.”~V.for    tttat the
\nentertainment of the   hands of the
\nlearned singie Jae’;ee:jwas::ApIebtet~\u00a7itu;:e}’\u00bbvt’ possible for as
\nto accept  etiyaeeed by the learned
\ncounsel:  the fact, that through
\nthe imf,.ng:\u00a7ee   13\/ :4\/15. 12.2006, the<\/p>\n
em01ument\u00a7e’…_Vg;fv  t11_e t\ufb01sttfjondents had actuaiiy been<\/p>\n
 ‘~  reeeveiyhadv also been ordered, in respect of the<\/p>\n
 What has been desez\u00e9bed as no’t:ice(s) by<\/p>\n
 was] were orders adversely a\ufb01ecting the<\/p>\n
‘V civii   the respondents. Relevant extract of the<\/p>\n
x V’  order is being xe–produced hereunder:<\/p>\n
“The above subject was placed before the
\nBeam} of Directors on 14\u00bb 12~20{)S. As per the
\nBoard reeolution under reference (2) the Bears}<\/p>\n
has gassed the fellewing resoiutiotl;<\/p>\n
CT<\/p>\n
\u00a33<\/p>\n
a) It is xesohzed that the irregular bene\ufb01tw  <\/p>\n
of Increase in pay already extended\u00abV.oto’   ~<\/p>\n
no11–co13\ufb01r1:11ed employees and
\nempioyees which was go: as  V
\nTripartite wage
\nrecommendations be  2 n<\/p>\n
the pay \ufb01xatioii__'”do11eA’as  <\/p>\n
recoz33men(I\u00a3i[i’0x1sV’d””of  d  fti\u00e9 – ,. ; Tri\ufb01\u00e9i\ufb01fe<\/p>\n
Wage Conf1ai9;tee* _  dd % ‘relevant
\nEiat\ufb01gy  . A’   H   <\/p>\n
b)  if\ufb01isi1″eeoIvefi\u00ab:.”to._.recover the<\/p>\n
  V”   paid $0 such<\/p>\n
____ H ez;:{pio;{ees as  such irregular<\/p>\n
_’  fxg\u00e9\u00e9tiou fi’s.’;fefe::*ed above.<\/p>\n
L d d   hereby informed that<\/p>\n
 Exes beeii: taken to withdraw the<\/p>\n
E  \u00a53e1r.:s..e\ufb01t of Increase in pay given to<\/p>\n
V  .gg.;;”‘vide ref.(1) above. The details of the
\n  amount aetua\ufb01y drawn;\n<\/p>\n
 tile difference amount to be recovered<\/p>\n
 .wI}ieh was paid are as enclosed.”<\/p>\n
A ‘id’  :Since the Wages payable to the respondents were
\n  to be reduced, and the alleged excess paid to them
\nddtvhad\u00e9s ordered. to be recovered, and that too Without following<\/p>\n
the rules or intezest of jus\ufb01ee, we are satis\ufb01ed that the<\/p>\n
I4<\/p>\n
leaxne\u00e9 single Judge was fully justi\ufb01ed in emcrtaining the<\/p>\n
W\ufb01t patition an\u00e9 \u00e9isposing ofthc same 911 merits.<\/p>\n
For the reasons recaded hczt\u00e9p a}_:$t}v::,”\u00ab_w’\u00e9 u V135  <\/p>\n
Inc\ufb01tB1\ufb02mszqnxwdandthssammig1n\ufb01%hfk\ufb01sn\ufb01$$\ufb02i” ‘A
\nSince the main Writ  b\ufb01fg\ufb02
\nmerits, the application  not
\nsurvive for comideration. 4’ V Vv  Z ‘A
\n    fusfice<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
JUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The Mysore Sugar Company Limited vs Y B Siddaramu S\/O Boraiah on 11 August, 2010 Author: J.S.Khehar(Cj) And Chellur \u00a5N THE HIGH COURT OF’ KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED TEES THE 3. 1’31 DAY OF’ AUGSSF, 2010 PR ESENT THE HONBLE MR. .1. S. KHEHAR, cnmp’ AND THE HONBLE MRS. JUS’1’\u00a5CE’. MANJULA’ {:;HELI.{;1\u00a72 1′ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-123022","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Mysore Sugar Company Limited vs Y B Siddaramu S\/O Boraiah on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Mysore Sugar Company Limited vs Y B Siddaramu S\/O Boraiah on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-23T11:01:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Mysore Sugar Company Limited vs Y B Siddaramu S\\\/O Boraiah on 11 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-23T11:01:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":769,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010\",\"name\":\"The Mysore Sugar Company Limited vs Y B Siddaramu S\\\/O Boraiah on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-23T11:01:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Mysore Sugar Company Limited vs Y B Siddaramu S\\\/O Boraiah on 11 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Mysore Sugar Company Limited vs Y B Siddaramu S\/O Boraiah on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Mysore Sugar Company Limited vs Y B Siddaramu S\/O Boraiah on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-23T11:01:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Mysore Sugar Company Limited vs Y B Siddaramu S\/O Boraiah on 11 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-23T11:01:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010"},"wordCount":769,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010","name":"The Mysore Sugar Company Limited vs Y B Siddaramu S\/O Boraiah on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-23T11:01:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-mysore-sugar-company-limited-vs-y-b-siddaramu-so-boraiah-on-11-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Mysore Sugar Company Limited vs Y B Siddaramu S\/O Boraiah on 11 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123022","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=123022"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123022\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=123022"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=123022"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=123022"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}