{"id":123110,"date":"2008-09-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008"},"modified":"2015-04-24T11:46:45","modified_gmt":"2015-04-24T06:16:45","slug":"ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Ass Mohammad vs Mohammad Hanif And Another on 25 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
Ass Mohammad vs Mohammad Hanif And Another on 25 September, 2008<\/div>\n
R.S.A. No. 1592 of 2003                                    -1-\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH\n\n                                       C.M. No. 4604-C of 2003 and\n                                       R.S.A. No. 1592 of 2003\n\n                                       Date of Decision: 25.9.2008\n\nAss Mohammad                                               ...Appellant.\n\n             Versus\n\nMohammad Hanif and another                                 ...Respondents.\n\n\nCORAM:-      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.\n\nPRESENT: Mr. O.P Sharma, Advocate for the appellant.\n\n             Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate for the respondents.\n\n\nAJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.\n<\/pre>\n
             Being unsuccessful before the courts below, the plaintiff<\/p>\n
has approached this Court by way of present regular second appeal<\/p>\n
against the judgment and decree dated 20.2.2002 passed by the lower<\/p>\n
appellate court affirming that of the trial court dated 15.9.1999 whereby<\/p>\n
the suit of the plaintiff for declaration and permanent injunction was<\/p>\n
dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
             Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the plaintiff was<\/p>\n
mortgagee in possession of the agricultural land comprising in khewat<\/p>\n
No. 54 khata No.85, rectangle No.65, killa No.5\/1 measuring 4 kanals<\/p>\n
18 marlas situated in the revenue estate of village Fatehpur Taga<\/p>\n
(hereinafter referred to as the “suit land”) as the same was initially<\/p>\n
mortgaged with possession by the predecessors-in-interest of the<\/p>\n
defendants with his predecessors-in-interest. It was pleaded that the<\/p>\n
suit land was not got redeemed by the defendants or their<\/p>\n
predecessors-in-interest and the period of limitation for redemption of
\n R.S.A. No. 1592 of 2003                                  -2-<\/span><\/p>\n
the mortgage had already expired and the mortgagee rights of the<\/p>\n
plaintiff had matured into proprietory rights with the passage of time. It<\/p>\n
was further pleaded that the plaintiff was entitled to be recorded as<\/p>\n
absolute owner in possession of the suit land by way of a mutation in<\/p>\n
the revenue records and the defendants had no right, title or interest in<\/p>\n
the same. The plaintiff made several requests to the defendants to<\/p>\n
admit his claim but they refused to do so and that gave rise to the filing<\/p>\n
of the suit seeking a decree for declaration and permanent injunction.<\/p>\n
            The claim of the plaintiff was resisted by the defendants by<\/p>\n
filing a joint written statement and raising various preliminary objections<\/p>\n
therein.   It was pleaded that defendant No.1 was the owner in<\/p>\n
possession of the suit land which came to him in the preemption decree<\/p>\n
dated 24.10.1983 passed in Civil Suit No. 286 of 14.5.1981 titled as<\/p>\n
Mohammad Hani Vs. Suraj Mal and prior to him one Suraj Mal was<\/p>\n
owner of the same who purchased from defendant No.2. It was further<\/p>\n
pleaded that the suit land was redeemed on 2.6.1964 by defendant<\/p>\n
No.2 on payment of Rs.250\/- to the plaintiff as redemption money who<\/p>\n
executed a receipt in token thereof in favour of defendant No.2. It was<\/p>\n
also pleaded that on redemption possession of the suit land was<\/p>\n
handed over to defendant No.2 and the plaintiff had no concern with the<\/p>\n
same.\n<\/p>\n
            The trial court vide judgment and decree dated 15.9.1999<\/p>\n
dismissed the suit of the plaintiff holding that the suit land was got<\/p>\n
redeemed by defendant No.2 on payment of the redemption money to<\/p>\n
the plaintiff vide receipt Ex.D1 and the revenue record showing the<\/p>\n
plaintiff as mortgagee-in-possession was liable to be corrected.
\n R.S.A. No. 1592 of 2003                                 -3-<\/span><\/p>\n
Further, it was observed that defendant No.1 had become owner in<\/p>\n
possession of the suit land by way of preemption. Feeling aggrieved,<\/p>\n
the plaintiff filed an appeal before the lower appellate court which vide<\/p>\n
judgment and decree dated 20.2.2002 affirmed the findings recorded by<\/p>\n
the trial court and dismissed the appeal.\n<\/p>\n
              I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and<\/p>\n
perused the record with their assistance.\n<\/p>\n
              Learned counsel for the plaintiff-appellant has submitted<\/p>\n
that the courts below have erred in relying upon the receipt, Ex.D1,<\/p>\n
executed in 1964 regarding the payment of the mortgage amount as the<\/p>\n
same was not a registered document. He has relied upon a Division<\/p>\n
Bench judgment of this Court in Gurdial Singh and others v. Kartar<\/p>\n
Singh and others<\/a>, 1963 PLJ 341 in support of his aforesaid<\/p>\n
submission.\n<\/p>\n
              Learned counsel for the respondents has controverted the<\/p>\n
aforesaid submission and urged that vide notification No. S.O.<\/p>\n
75\/C.A.4\/1882\/ S.1\/67 dated 5.8.1967 provisions of Section 59 of the<\/p>\n
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (in short “the Act”) where the mortgage<\/p>\n
was to be by a registered document were extended to the State of<\/p>\n
Haryana with effect from the date of its publication and, therefore, the<\/p>\n
mortgage which was redeemed prior to the aforesaid date would not be<\/p>\n
governed by the provisions of Section 59 of the Act.<\/p>\n
              I find considerable force in the submission of the learned<\/p>\n
counsel for the respondents.\n<\/p>\n
              Section 59 of the Act reads as under:-\n<\/p>\n
                    “59. Mortgage when to be by assurance.- Where
\n R.S.A. No. 1592 of 2003                                  -4-<\/span><\/p>\n
                   the principal money secured is one hundred rupees<\/p>\n
                   or upwards, a mortgage other than a mortgage by<\/p>\n
                   deposit of title deeds can be effected only by a<\/p>\n
                   registered instrument signed by the mortgagor and<\/p>\n
                   attested by at least two witnesses.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
                         Where the principal money secured is less<\/p>\n
                   than one hundred rupees, a mortgage may be<\/p>\n
                   effected either by a registered instrument signed and<\/p>\n
                   attested as aforesaid or except in the case of a<\/p>\n
                   simple mortgage by delivery of the property.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
             Section 59 of the Act postulates that where the principal<\/p>\n
amount secured is Rs.100\/- or more on immovable property, the<\/p>\n
instrument of mortgage is required to be registered, signed by the<\/p>\n
mortgagor and attested by at least two witnesses. There is, however,<\/p>\n
an exception to this provision in a case where mortgage is by deposit of<\/p>\n
title deeds. Accordingly, on the same principles, similarly at the time of<\/p>\n
extinction of mortgage covered by Section 59, a receipt for payment of<\/p>\n
money under a mortgage other than an endorsement on a mortgage<\/p>\n
deed (which is issued by a mortgagee) mentioning not only the payment<\/p>\n
of the full mortgaged amount but also the extinction of mortgage would<\/p>\n
require registration.\n<\/p>\n
             Admittedly, the property in the present case is situated in<\/p>\n
Faridabad District within the State of Haryana where provisions of<\/p>\n
Section 59 of the Act had not been made applicable at the time of<\/p>\n
original mortgage. It was only on August 5, 1967 that the provisions of<\/p>\n
the said Section came to be extended to the State of Haryana by the
\n R.S.A. No. 1592 of 2003                                      -5-<\/span><\/p>\n
following notification:-\n<\/p>\n
                    “No. S.O. 75\/C.A.4\/1882\/S.1\/67.- In exercise of the<\/p>\n
                    powers conferred by section 1 of the Transfer of<\/p>\n
                    Property Act, 1882 (Central Act No. 4 of 1882), the<\/p>\n
                    Governor of Haryana is pleased to extend the<\/p>\n
                    provisions of section 59 of the said act to the State of<\/p>\n
                    Haryana with effect from the date of publication of<\/p>\n
                    this notification in the Official Gazette.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
                                             B.R. GREWAL,
\n                                 Financial Commissioner, Revenue and
\n                                   Secretary to Government, Haryana,
\n                                         Revenue Department.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
              In view of the above said notification and date of its<\/p>\n
enforcement, it is manifest that prior to 5th August, 1967, there was no<\/p>\n
impediment in creating a mortgage either orally or by an unregistered<\/p>\n
instrument.     The extinction of mortgage vide receipt, Ex.D1, on<\/p>\n
2.6.1964, i.e. prior to enforcement of provisions of Section 59 of the Act<\/p>\n
to the State of Haryana by an unregistered instrument was legal and<\/p>\n
valid.   The reliance on Gurdial Singh’s case (supra) by the learned<\/p>\n
counsel for the appellant is, thus, no help to him.<\/p>\n
              Both the courts on appreciation of the oral as well as the<\/p>\n
documentary evidence arrived at a conclusion that the suit land was got<\/p>\n
redeemed by the defendants on payment to the plaintiff vide receipt<\/p>\n
Ex.D1 and that defendant No.1 had become owner in possession of the<\/p>\n
same by pre-empting the sale made by defendant No.2<\/p>\n
              No illegality or perversity could be found in the judgment<\/p>\n
and decree dated 15.9.1999 passed by the trial court which was<\/p>\n
affirmed vide judgment and decree dated 20.2.2002 by the learned
\n R.S.A. No. 1592 of 2003                                 -6-<\/span><\/p>\n
lower appellate court in appeal.\n<\/p>\n
            In view of the above, there is no merit in this appeal and the<\/p>\n
same is hereby dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
            Since the appeal has been dismissed on merits, no<\/p>\n
separate order is being passed in C.M. No. 4604-C of 2007 for<\/p>\n
condonation of 324 days’ delay in refiling the appeal and the same is<\/p>\n
disposed of as such.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
September 25, 2008                             (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)\ngbs                                                    JUDGE\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court Ass Mohammad vs Mohammad Hanif And Another on 25 September, 2008 R.S.A. No. 1592 of 2003 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M. No. 4604-C of 2003 and R.S.A. No. 1592 of 2003 Date of Decision: 25.9.2008 Ass Mohammad …Appellant. Versus Mohammad Hanif and another …Respondents. CORAM:- […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-123110","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nAss Mohammad vs Mohammad Hanif And Another on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ass Mohammad vs Mohammad Hanif And Another on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-04-24T06:16:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ass Mohammad vs Mohammad Hanif And Another on 25 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-24T06:16:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1300,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Ass Mohammad vs Mohammad Hanif And Another on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-24T06:16:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ass Mohammad vs Mohammad Hanif And Another on 25 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ass Mohammad vs Mohammad Hanif And Another on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ass Mohammad vs Mohammad Hanif And Another on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-04-24T06:16:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ass Mohammad vs Mohammad Hanif And Another on 25 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-24T06:16:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008"},"wordCount":1300,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008","name":"Ass Mohammad vs Mohammad Hanif And Another on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-24T06:16:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ass-mohammad-vs-mohammad-hanif-and-another-on-25-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ass Mohammad vs Mohammad Hanif And Another on 25 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123110","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=123110"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123110\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=123110"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=123110"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=123110"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}