{"id":123361,"date":"2010-12-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-12-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010"},"modified":"2015-12-07T20:55:05","modified_gmt":"2015-12-07T15:25:05","slug":"sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri Siddarame Gowda S\/O Sri &#8230; vs Smt Sharada W\/O Sri K Seetharamu on 28 December, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Siddarame Gowda S\/O Sri &#8230; vs Smt Sharada W\/O Sri K Seetharamu on 28 December, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n<pre> 'Mysore Fafuk.  \"\"\" \"\n\nE  By  TE   IIE'a.:a  n a S h a rma , Ad v .)\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 28\"' DAY OF DECEMBER, 2oIoT':\"\"\u00bbT.\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE mu. vENuGoPALAV:A'e.QI\ufb011.I3A_ E'\n\nWRIT PETITION     \n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1. Sri Siddarame Gowda,\nAged about 57 years, \nS\/o. Sri Mancbegovv\u00a2'fa...A_ \n\n2. Sri S.Kumar,  .\nAged about 3.1- years;\" \nS\/o. Sri Sid~vd'a'Ea_\"rnegowda;\"\n\n3. Sri fS.MahjAu}_ _ .4\nAged' about 28'fyears; A\nS\/0. Sri Sidd'aVra'ITj'egO~w'Ci'a5'\n\nAliare re'Sid_:E'ng..at GaIT\u00a7ra|achatra\nV.i_%!\ufb01Iage,. Ilawai\u00bb--.aAHobli,\n\n PETITIONERS\n\nAND;\n\n Smt._Sharada,\n\n* VTA.ged'\"about 38 years\n\n  Sri K.Seetharamu,\n Residing at Gangraiachatra\n\n Viliage, Ilawala Hobii,\n' Mysore Taluk.\n\n\n\nI3\u00bb)\n\n2. Sri iciL1c1Vi;iVci&gt;11_ Olga new case and tak.i.r1g away the\n0 'defence;\"--iywhiciii \"will Cause 1'e'udice to the\n\n defends  = 0\n\n  0n  \u00abb.a__si:\u00ab. of existing pleading, the petitioner\n\n iseekingan.add_itional relief and substitution of a word in\n\nthey\u00e9.p--rayer'\u00e9-'coltinin. The amendment proposed reads as\n\ngfollov\\is \n\n00 ..'.fI)&lt;3ti]2:1&#039;wd21 81 Pl211'ni,i\u00a3.'f in favour of 15*'-\ndel'e1i1da11t rel.a11'ng to plain! sche.du1e property is\n\nljgi\ufb02\n\nW;\n\n\n\nesseiitietliy \u00a31 docttniem of Mortgage of Condtionai\n\n5321162\".\n\n(21) to cieiete the wot'ci Tevsale' in p1'Ely\u20ac'I' (}HC')i'\"c}.Ii1'i'}\"'af23tv.V}'V\n\nand to ineo1'p0i'a'te the same with 'Re--Qo*r1\\rey;a:\u00a7i'(:e7}L\": \"\n\n4. Heard the learned coLins'e'i\"\u00ab:&gt;n \".both_\ufb01Vsin'es'andni\n\nperused the writ papers.\n\n5. Rule 17 of Order  empowerisivthetvvfcourt to\npermit amendment of   of proceeding.\nHowever, the _proviso.. certain\nrestriction.   'permitted if it is\nestablished  V:di'i'ige:,nce the party could not\nhave raised.  the commencement of trial\n\nand if the\"prolposxed required for deciding the reai\n\n ques,tq\u00a7on in con'tro,iiersy: between the parties i.e., to avoid\n\nin   'proceedings.\n\n   petitioner has sought additional reiief on\n\n basis\":of the existing pleading. If a party can seek\n\n the basis of the existing pleading, there cannot be\n\n  prejudice to the opponent. In certain circumstances,\n\nIf\"\n\n\n\nin order to minimize the litigation, if the party is entitled to\n\na particular relief, which has not been specifically prayed,\n\nthe court in the interests of justice moulds the:w\"*i'--e.lief__;__:' \n\nthe circumstances, there is no introduction,\u00a2f._an.y new\"  \n\ncase muchless causing any surprise to the i*,esvpo'n.d\u00bbent,s_._'\n\nThe defendants have not yet _cross=--e&gt;'{amined~\"--l.PW--Ai. \n\nrespondents have the opportun'ity\"to_ filev\"'add'itiona'l\u00a7 vilritten<\/pre>\n<p>statement. If any additional  consvilderation,<br \/>\nthe same can be raised.&#8217; injustice or<br \/>\nprejudice of an   be inflicted upon<\/p>\n<p>the respon\u00e9ients&#8217;_.byylbiJe:rndistti&#8217;ragjr th:e&#8221;&#8216;incorporation of the<\/p>\n<p>p ro posed a~.mendVri&#8221;i:&#8217;e.nt.    &#8216; <\/p>\n<p>_7_.V Fi&#8217;oVmvtt;&#8211;el&#8217;peVru.sal of the pleadings, to decide<\/p>\n<p> ,.,the&#8217;-real2,.que&#8217;stion in&#8221;c&#8217;o&#8217;ntroversy between the parties and to<\/p>\n<p>  proceedings, the amendment proposed<\/p>\n<p>i.e.&#8217;,.__for subis\ufb01itution of a word in the prayer column and<\/p>\n<p>ll&#8217;-.,_*.i,ncorpor,a_tiion of additional prayer, can be permitted, by<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;lc1_ir.e,c&#8217;tiA_ng the plaintiff to pay compensatory cost to the<\/p>\n<p>K&#8221;&#8211;\ufb01llldeyfendants i.e., for causing delay in disposal of the suit.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The trial court on account of a misdirection adopted,<\/p>\n<p>without considering LA No.6 in the correct perspective&#8221;,:&#8217;h:a3<\/p>\n<p>passed the impugned order, which is irrational.&#8211;jr&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>In the result, the writ peti&#8217;LfAion:.,is,fj.aliowe&#8221;d&#8212;.and..___&#8217;_tlhef<\/p>\n<p>impugned order stands quashed.  filled  <\/p>\n<p>stands allowed. The plaintiff is&#8217;p&#8217;e~Vr_niittedVto. i&#8217;,_rjcorpo;rate the<br \/>\nproposed amendment&#8217;i;n&#8221;&#8221;the 1OV.lZl1,x2O11 by<br \/>\ndepositing or paying cost Lfendants,<br \/>\nin the trial coi;_j&#8217;rt&#8217;\u00a7&#8217;:;wT,i.:1Ve&#8217;cf-efen&#8217;dlan:ts::Va:reentitled to file their<br \/>\nadditional l&#8217;;er;,v&#8217;with&#8217;in 15 days from the<br \/>\ndate    is served on the<br \/>\ndefendants&#8221; orVtheir\u00bbAiljeairrzeidradvocates. Additional issues,<\/p>\n<p>including the&#8221;&#8221;baVr of..&#8217;!im&#8217;i-tation, if any, shall be raised within<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;-thre&#8217;-e..&#8217;we,e~.ks&#8221;i-from &#8216;th\u00e9date the additional written statement<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;i_s&#8221;fi!&#8217;_ed\u00bb.l&#8217;tr.i:a&#8217;i, court is directed to decide the suit as<\/p>\n<p>early\u00e9plas praictlcable and at any event, within a period of 8<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;months&#8217; from the date the suit is posted for trial.<\/p>\n<p>  The plaintiffs shall adduce and complete their side of<\/p>\n<p>T &#8216;evidence within two months from the date the suit is<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>posted for their side of evidence and the defendants shali<\/p>\n<p>adduce and compiete their side of evidence withinnthree<\/p>\n<p>months frem the date the plaintiffs close theAi.r&#8221;:si&#8217;d:ej&#8211;.:d\u00a7<\/p>\n<p>evidence. The trial court shail hear the  &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>decide the suit within the aforesaid-&#8216;|i)&#8217;er*\u00a3&#8211;9d. <\/p>\n<p>\u00a7&lt;s3&#039;\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Siddarame Gowda S\/O Sri &#8230; vs Smt Sharada W\/O Sri K Seetharamu on 28 December, 2010 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda &#8216;Mysore Fafuk. &#8220;&#8221;&#8221; &#8221; E By TE IIE&#8217;a.:a n a S h a rma , Ad v .) IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 28&#8243;&#8216; DAY OF [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-123361","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Siddarame Gowda S\/O Sri ... vs Smt Sharada W\/O Sri K Seetharamu on 28 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Siddarame Gowda S\/O Sri ... vs Smt Sharada W\/O Sri K Seetharamu on 28 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-12-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-07T15:25:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Siddarame Gowda S\\\/O Sri &#8230; vs Smt Sharada W\\\/O Sri K Seetharamu on 28 December, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-07T15:25:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010\"},\"wordCount\":399,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri Siddarame Gowda S\\\/O Sri ... vs Smt Sharada W\\\/O Sri K Seetharamu on 28 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-07T15:25:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Siddarame Gowda S\\\/O Sri &#8230; vs Smt Sharada W\\\/O Sri K Seetharamu on 28 December, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Siddarame Gowda S\/O Sri ... vs Smt Sharada W\/O Sri K Seetharamu on 28 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Siddarame Gowda S\/O Sri ... vs Smt Sharada W\/O Sri K Seetharamu on 28 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-12-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-07T15:25:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Siddarame Gowda S\/O Sri &#8230; vs Smt Sharada W\/O Sri K Seetharamu on 28 December, 2010","datePublished":"2010-12-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-07T15:25:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010"},"wordCount":399,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010","name":"Sri Siddarame Gowda S\/O Sri ... vs Smt Sharada W\/O Sri K Seetharamu on 28 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-12-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-07T15:25:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-siddarame-gowda-so-sri-vs-smt-sharada-wo-sri-k-seetharamu-on-28-december-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Siddarame Gowda S\/O Sri &#8230; vs Smt Sharada W\/O Sri K Seetharamu on 28 December, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123361","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=123361"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123361\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=123361"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=123361"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=123361"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}