{"id":123738,"date":"2010-11-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010"},"modified":"2016-11-12T19:44:19","modified_gmt":"2016-11-12T14:14:19","slug":"the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"The State By Holenonnur Police … vs Balrama @ Suresh S\/O Vasu Naidu on 30 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The State By Holenonnur Police … vs Balrama @ Suresh S\/O Vasu Naidu on 30 November, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao S.N.Satyanarayana<\/div>\n
 \n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAN\n\nDATED THIS THE sow DAY or NOVEMBE1\u00a7_2'()\"1-bl.-. kt\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HoN'BLI.: MZRJUSTICE  \n\nAND T\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUsTIcEfsf;N.sATYAN.\u00e9RAyxANA\n\nCRIMINAL APPEAL No.1I5s[9fm: 2065 (A)\nC \/w CRIMINAL APPEA1._1\\f()..13\u00a7\u00a7 ..<v)F 2005 (C)\nIN CRIMINAL APPEAL IIo.I539 1\/"2oo5:,__ "   V \nThe State by  n "       '\n\nHO1\u20ac\ufb02OI1\ufb02uf_PQ\ufb01C\u00a7). 'S%:E1\ufb01Q1':,,:   "   __ AppELLANT_\n\n(By 8:1.  .   SPF}\nAND: '      I'\n\n1. Balrama @..Su.res;h,'~., ' 'V\nS\/r;:'Vasu  '\n      _____ \nV' 'Nai(1u"'by _caste, Agrticulturist,\n L   Camp,\n .BHADIIzIvA.TIiI TALUK.\n\nDeVen_ci1'2I{ipa,\n. S\/0 Va:-31,1 Najdu,\n  xAged 39 Years,\n~ N'ai-(11.1 by Caste, Agricult1Irist,\n' '.. R,'c-A'Agarada1'1a11i Carxiap,\n;_3HADRAVATHI TALUK.\n\nrd\n\n\n\n   \n\ni'Q\n\nRavi @ R3.vik1,1mar,\n\nS \/ 0 Vasu Naidu,\n\nAged 29 Years,\n\nNaidu by caste,\nAgriculmrist,\n\nR\/ o Agar:-xdahalli Camp,\nBHADRAVATHI TALUK.\n\nSmt.ShantharmI;.a,\nW\/o Narayanaswamy,\nS\/o Vasu Naidu,\nAged 40 Years,\n\nNajdu by caste,\nHousehold Work,\n\nR\/0 Agaradaha\ufb02i Ca:'I1';V),5-  ' j\nBHADRAVATHI vTAL'{\u00a7K.-- \n\nSmt.Manga1i1ifia;' 'V . '-\n\nW\/0 VaS1\u00a7l'N:5LidU';":'_V" V f   \n\nAged 60 Ye.a1?s.;"_ .\nNajdu  coasica, ' 31;;  'V\nAgriculturist', V  " \u00ab .\n\nR\/o Qaradahaiii':  %\nBHADRAVATHI TAL-UK. o\n\n(By. S.ri.A.  B 11ag\u00a7vaf: \n\nV .\u00bb \u00ab  Rad%1g1J;;:fiVsh.na, Adv.)\n\n*W*_*_*_$M*m*\n\n \n\n. .. RESPONDENTS.<\/pre>\n
    \ufb01led Imdor Section 378(1) & (3) of the
\n ()’i””–(31fi;1’1’1’i’rx:”\u00e911 Procedure, aga,ins1: the Judgment dated
\n“–‘.-Ti,2Q_;O\u00bb1x.20O5-V\ufb01assed by the I)ist.r;ict 8: Sessions -Judge, Fast
\nV ”  Shimog21, in S.C.No.25\/2002 — a(:qui.ttir1g the
\nV13:”4″_j.,;f<i\u00e9\u00a7poi}.d'ef1ts\/accused for the offence punishable under
\n  VT . V __ j  30443 of {PC read with Section 34 of IPC.<\/p>\n
IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 132\/ 2005:\n<\/p>\n
BETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
1.<\/p>\n
Balrama @ Suresh,<\/p>\n
S\/0 Vasu Naidu,<\/p>\n
Aged 29 Years,
\nAgriculttz\ufb01st.\n<\/p>\n
Devendrappa,
\nS\/0 Vasu Naidu,
\nAged 42 Years.\n<\/p>\n
Agriculturist.\n<\/p>\n
Ravi @ Ravikuxnar,<\/p>\n
S\/0 Vasu Naidu, .\n<\/p>\n
Aged 32 Years\u00bb.   — if
\nAg\ufb01culttlxist. P  ‘i- 1 A<\/p>\n
Smt.Shar;t’f1’\u00e91_.111ii2aV;,_ ”   _
\nW\/0 Naraya1’:.asyvan1y.,V  ._  P
\nAged ”\n<\/p>\n
Smt.Ma1&.ga1nin  A’ 4 *
\nW\/0 Vasu-Naidwii,  ” A
\nAged 6OY_ears, V’ _ V
\nNaidu by Caste; .\n<\/p>\n
A,f;\u00a7?.’.iC11}”E1]I’iS’E, ”  P<\/p>\n
 .  _ AR”\/’0 ‘Ajga.rada11a}1iC\u00e9\ufb01nf).\n<\/p>\n
4.112: x ‘I
\n “S4fa.f\u20ac A.0f_Kaf1’1\u00e9Ltaka,
\n*  By” \u00abH_0.k_:h’c_~nI1ur Police Sta1di_0;n.
\n A'{\u00a7]f3y’ASri.G.BI1avaniSingh, SPP}<\/p>\n
_V ‘  TALUK.\n<\/p>\n
 .(P3y_ V$fi.}’L;H’.f3’1a’\u00e91gwa1’1 and<\/p>\n
‘ _ VSri,\/?;.’?~i,Radh3,krishna, Adv.)<\/p>\n
*W*_>f\u00a2_”$_*w*w=!=<\/p>\n
.. APPELLANTS.\n<\/p>\n
. .. RESPONDENT.\n<\/p>\n
This appeal is \ufb01led under Section 374(1) of the (lode of
\nCriminal Procedure, against the Judgment dated <\/p>\n
passed by the District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track’<\/p>\n
Shiznoga, in S.C. No.25\/2002 w convictiI1gh_tl’ie. <\/p>\n
\/accused Nos.l to 5 for the offences. punishable: “under.<\/p>\n
Sections 498\u00bb.\/X and 306 of we readlw:1;h\u00bb o’se::ti_ml 3&1 Veg jl1i?:(.j<\/p>\n
and sentencing the appellants \/a(:c.usedA.f\u00a3_\\Tos.Vl t,Q’VVu;l\u00a7derg_(f.<\/p>\n
rigorous imprisonment for twogijzeeirs “ands  \ufb01ne of’
\nRs.l,O0O\/–, 1’11 default sirn-ple iriip\ufb01sloiirhent  rnoriths for
\nthe offence punishable of IPC each and
\nrigorous ilnprisonment l’orv:._live—   with line of
\nRs.2,000\/– each  sirriple’  for one year
\nfor the offence’ 1;i;I:ii’sliablei,’j’.–uiiderlSeetion 306 of IPC and
\nfurther   ajjjplellanltl\/accused No.5 to undergo
\nsimple  and fine of Rs.1,000\/– in
\ndefault, sirnjile  for six months and \ufb01ne of<\/p>\n
Rs.1,00Q\/'”– in deiau_ltl,Vlsi.Iriple imprisonment for six months for<\/p>\n
1-lthe’Aoffetnce5\u00bb–.”putiishablelllltlinder Section 498-91 of {PC and simple<\/p>\n
  years and line of Rs.2,0O()\/W in default,<\/p>\n
V simple”irnpris”onrner1t for one year for the offence punishable<\/p>\n
V under l”‘Sec-.tion”l306 of IPC, the substantive sentence of<\/p>\n
” ” ‘in1’p3tjisTonrr1eiit shall run concurrently.<\/p>\n
.l  l”v.:Tiiese Appeals coming on for Final I–iearing this day,<\/p>\n
 ni\ufb01reeilihar Rao J., delivered the following:<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
2. One R2m1es1’1, PM\/.2 is the brother, _,__P.W.3<\/p>\n
Rajartzarzil-{yank is the fath<;:1* arid P.W.15, D11a.n21ketya\ufb01–:tfI3t is<\/p>\n
the Itxother of the deee23.sed. With the 10!.'<\/p>\n
p\u00a3=1h<':hayathdars, thtfy i<)eE=; the (ie<:<:-aE\u00a7erc\u00a7a1'1–\ufb01_i t,_hef'e'i.;i_I_d–.t'o HL}'1Cb:'<\/p>\n
house of the accused. After r.a<:g()t.'ie1t.i'11_g"'with the as,si.st;1i'1s:e"9f<\/p>\n
pzmchayathdars, deceased s.xraS-._ '\u00a3eit ir1t.E1'e_"}1dt1SE:"' of the<\/p>\n
accused. A couple of '"(.\u00a7.ays xtiiereatteag ttlehcieeeased has
\ncommitted suicide by t'1;1r1.gi;1;2;.   15 and others<\/p>\n
visited the t10use~ o';\u00e9'.._t,I_1~t: z1\u00e9':e1:__.s;ee1.    u <\/p>\n
3. P.W’.2 }’i\u20ac-is  .t:.t’1\u00a7;- before the police on<\/p>\n
25;. .i2.2OG.._1_. : II:(\u00a7_1fi<:.$-t_4wa\u00a7\u00e9;'._h'e.l(:'t.' The post mortem discloses<\/p>\n
that the death is_dV{1e  :_e%\u00a7_L.z_it: ofha11g_____\u00a7ing. The death is said<\/p>\n
-re be SuL\u00a7–.i.Ctda1 (ieat’hV..  the ease of the p1:’0seCuti(>r1 that the<\/p>\n
‘aectt\u00e9ed p,e’I”s(;I1ev.ha;rasse(_i the deceased and st1bject:ed the<\/p>\n
(ieecE’aSee1 to e–if;.1e3tjy i’e.1:’ not ggivitug; \u00a7;_{()1d{“‘:H chain to the child by<\/p>\n
 ‘her parc:=.I1t.s;. I’3ee211.1se at the 1:121ra.ssrI1er1i. and Cruelty, the<\/p>\n
 _(}e\u00a7\u00a3:6:aQS'(et<i3 is 3-said to he-we C<::mmit,ted suicicie and within a<\/p>\n
V' .___"pe:*_i\u00a7.a(i of seven years from the date of marriage.<\/p>\n
4. The Accus<ed is (?h\u00e93.1'g(.'.(f for (:on1.m.i.tt1'.ng t.}.1e_..ol'fe1'1(:e<\/p>\n
punishabie 11\/ s 304 and 3{)6 {PC 1'\/W sec.34 of EI3'(1;fV"i7i'ie_T1fiai<\/p>\n
Cour'? a(:quitt.ed the accused persons ib1i '21:1._V  "\u00abWcti{{er_. .cf)’1::-‘yit:teti\u00a3 ‘i.}:1ef<\/p>\n
accused for ()’\u00a7fCI1C(‘tS p1m:is’r1a.l)!e 1,1\/s\u00ab_4\u20ac}8\u00a5A a.i’1t.i ‘8.(}(3’0_ i”~..IP’C_.<\/p>\n
The State is in appeal ‘c}ig.\u00a7E\u00a3,iI1S1 111$:.”a(?(1uii.i:alVOf\u00a7\u00a7;{;(1(\u00a7’t1S\u00e9d for ah
\n0f\u00a7_’er1Ce pum’s1’1abk-2 11\/ 3’E.}.\u00e9_;4E3 \u00a3;)}”iI'{3 a\\1″1;_i t.he’\u00e9i.(:(;’1;1s(~3(1 are in<\/p>\n
appeal for conviction for \ufb01fe:-:<:e\u00a7s':p'L1:;_1,\u00e9;1ja1\u00a71<:. u \/ s 498~A and<\/p>\n
306 1'\/w S\u20acc.34 gr i'E?\u00a7i'\u00bb;\n<\/p>\n
5. The evi.(\u00a7<:n(\u00e9<x:V;"\u00ab:Qf  13 discloses that the<\/p>\n
a<:<:usA:11.s1b’:*._;m?.’;;ivir1g goid chain to the chiid<\/p>\n
and du1*ir1g vhsr” stay {:2-:r’i1?A\u00e9i= 1:0 her pregr12m(:y and deiivery,<\/p>\n
V4.-vdcrcctassiti Wzzss S11b’;’ET{‘}._.(i{T\u00a7,. {<3 <':n1e1t;y and ha.rass_rI1e11t for non<\/p>\n
.})\u00a7fi.}\u00ab'IjIi{fI]1' <)_l'~rr:r:)j*i{ty and ve.1Eu23.b1es and also for not giving a<\/p>\n
 _  T.raC:*…(.m='  Court, \ufb02fiiii mat the (1err1.23J1(i made by the<\/p>\n
 ' accused did riot c0nsii.t11E"e dowry as ciefineci under the Dowry<\/p>\n
 I Pif'e':hi'bitsi0n Act. ".E'.';.1.s1'cf'()r\u20ac:, Eitfqlli\ufb02f\u00e9d the acctusml for an<\/p>\n
 .___"C3.'i'i'\u20ac:i1;(:e: pu:'1.is.E1ab](: 1.2\/s f3(}4~EE:?\u00bb 3'\/'W S<:(:'3-4 of IPC.<\/p>\n
8. On close sCrut.ir1y of the evidence. we {End mat .t-here is<\/p>\n
lot of inco’;:1sister1oies betweetl the aliegations in t1ti\u00e9{‘I?:fL:I{“s,r1d<\/p>\n
in the oral evidence of P.Ws.2, 3 and 15.\n<\/p>\n
that the accused <ie::nanr\u00a2;; 1.bc:.;giVe.n V  gift,<\/p>\n
whereas I–‘.W.3–fat}’1e_r oi? the de,(o:e:_;1se.(_i does ” not speak<\/p>\n
a1’1yth_i:ng about the demami <)i""iT.fa<:t()r by Vi,'11se_V}ao<\u00a71jVse<i. He
\nonly says that the 21C(:Lfse_.(i v2efe" tjer\ufb01:-1_r1ciingV"money. The
\nexact quantity of money 2111c? :'1:–ittir\u20ac: degxland is not stated<\/p>\n
in the evidence of i:';;Y\u00a7'Z;i%.\n<\/p>\n
7. The P.Ws.5; 6v\u00e9;.{ci.o to be panehayathdars. who<\/p>\n
went along xifisth P.W._3V22:.r}:'<\u00a7eFi:}'1<t:'s to leave the deeeasecl at the<\/p>\n
house the a,(":Ct1'\u00a3s"\u20ac<i_._ 'if.he:\u00a7r <:v\u00a7<1e-nee does not disclose what<\/p>\n
title-:.._eaL_:.1se fozr m.ai.r3:n()r1iai dispute between the<\/p>\n
accused' on \u20ac:'ij;eVA'oI=or1e hz-1_r2.c\u00a7 2:-met P.W.:\u00a7 and deceased on the<\/p>\n
 etller  .'1"4'11ei-z" evider.:.ce only disclose that they had to<\/p>\n
 4' deceased to the house of the accused, since the<\/p>\n
 ___"aee1Vi;se(1 persons did not visit the house of P.W.3 to take the<\/p>\n
S}<\/p>\n
deceased to their }'1()'t.lS(3 everl after ten months after .\\}!.f\u00e9;5t.ef:3′ <\/p>\n
ax\u00e9vised the accused not tea do so anti”ti;-trea’_t. the’tie-r:e2:1sed”as ‘<\/p>\n
Wiie. ‘I_’ hey are iI1dcpende’nt wit.r1t-:sseS.Vai:dA’their _ev<ie;ien"e:e.d'ees<\/p>\n
not disclose any (ier'e=a.:1ci of m01<1_ey._o1' (\u00a7\u00a7emaI.1(i",fd1j"i'fact0f;<\/p>\n
Their evidence is vague 3721151 t:h.;::'.ir  <."t\u20ac)'\u20ac:'s3A net. disciose
\nWhat exactly the cause .f(.1;\u00a7'.'$  between the
\nparties. it is  t11e\u00a7i:,Az:  accused persons
\nthreatened to   but 13.Ws.5, 6 and
\n1:5'; z:,(iaris<:;ti"t;'t:V('f    to treat the deceased
\nas wife, e1\u00a7an_mVe ' adviseci them not do so.<\/p>\n
Thereibre. the  e'1ide.:1:::e."-<:\u00bb:t" i:'1clependez1t witnesses does not<\/p>\n
'vi._C.1iSc1Q\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7e'taete- (iii dei"ine(i u\/s 4984-X of WC.<\/p>\n
8.  ‘5fE_’he was not. willing to marry the accused in<\/p>\n
V the be’g;\u00a7iI1n’ir1g\u00ab”at the time of proposa;i, because the accused<\/p>\n
sfaxriritc\u00e9ring and he  i’:’Eite:”a.t;<:. it is, thereifcre argued by<\/p>\n
_'_S:*\u00a7}':i-XE'i';\u00a7j3ha,gavaz1 that. :i:1::_<~ cf\u00e9mtetesczti was iimstrated by li_vi:ng<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
c(>:;di1:i()z1s amii migllt Iiiava\u00e9 {:o’1I1mitted suicicie and I’1()f.__(‘1E,1(‘) to<\/p>\n
dowry 11a1’assmem..\n<\/p>\n
9. On going through the ev\u00a7(i(:’.11(:e, we find   <\/p>\n
acquittal recorded by the ‘.I’ria1 (201.’13f<i; is. \u00e9stmrid ar1.(1 p.1_j0.pc1* aiari<\/p>\n
does not cal! for .11z.\u20ac..erfcr<%':1(i\u00a7).::1.V’iC:ti(.rI1. ” 1.1\/’S<\/p>\n
498wA 21nd 1306 r\/w S<t(:"\u00a3.i.<}:'1 34% <$*i'\u00bbl_F{T3 is z4\u00a3I1.t:<\u00e9i'1:1i)1(\u00a7,  in View of
\nthe evi(i1eI1Ce discusst\u00e9ti  'ab<_)\\f\u00e9\u00e9.  \u00a71cfreibrc:, "E116 order of<\/p>\n
convicttiorl is set. aside.\n<\/p>\n
10. Hence the  \ufb01lkrci  dismissed and the<\/p>\n
appeal \ufb01lg\u00e9d by”  ac\u20ac?i\u00a7is(::(i’..\u00a7:s aiimxfeci.<\/p>\n
, [ [ ‘   Azfgv. =  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The State By Holenonnur Police … vs Balrama @ Suresh S\/O Vasu Naidu on 30 November, 2010 Author: K.Sreedhar Rao S.N.Satyanarayana IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAN DATED THIS THE sow DAY or NOVEMBE1\u00a7_2′()”1-bl.-. kt PRESENT THE HoN’BLI.: MZRJUSTICE AND T THE HON’BLE MR. JUsTIcEfsf;N.sATYAN.\u00e9RAyxANA CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1I5s[9fm: 2065 (A) […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-123738","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe State By Holenonnur Police ... vs Balrama @ Suresh S\/O Vasu Naidu on 30 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The State By Holenonnur Police ... vs Balrama @ Suresh S\/O Vasu Naidu on 30 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-12T14:14:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The State By Holenonnur Police … vs Balrama @ Suresh S\\\/O Vasu Naidu on 30 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-12T14:14:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1618,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010\",\"name\":\"The State By Holenonnur Police ... vs Balrama @ Suresh S\\\/O Vasu Naidu on 30 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-12T14:14:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The State By Holenonnur Police … vs Balrama @ Suresh S\\\/O Vasu Naidu on 30 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The State By Holenonnur Police ... vs Balrama @ Suresh S\/O Vasu Naidu on 30 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The State By Holenonnur Police ... vs Balrama @ Suresh S\/O Vasu Naidu on 30 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-12T14:14:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The State By Holenonnur Police … vs Balrama @ Suresh S\/O Vasu Naidu on 30 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-12T14:14:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010"},"wordCount":1618,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010","name":"The State By Holenonnur Police ... vs Balrama @ Suresh S\/O Vasu Naidu on 30 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-12T14:14:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-by-holenonnur-police-vs-balrama-suresh-so-vasu-naidu-on-30-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The State By Holenonnur Police … vs Balrama @ Suresh S\/O Vasu Naidu on 30 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123738","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=123738"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123738\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=123738"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=123738"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=123738"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}