{"id":123975,"date":"2009-07-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009"},"modified":"2018-03-03T07:02:34","modified_gmt":"2018-03-03T01:32:34","slug":"sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri A R Jayaram vs Smt Sumathi on 2 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri A R Jayaram vs Smt Sumathi on 2 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: B.V.Nagarathna<\/div>\n
1N Tm: HIGH COURT 012* KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 02% my 0:2 JULY, 2009f ~ ,\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRs..;{JsTIc1:\u00ab:\u00bbB.xr,:~1A\u00a7\u00a7}\u00a7\u00a7*\u00a2A*\u00a7'\u00a51+;r#A.'.'_j,  V\n\nH.R.R.P.No.27\u00e9::!2~No.959, ETH MAIN\n\u00ab_ M BLGCK, VEVEKANANDANAGAR,\n\n\" \"w.MYSQi?E\n\n RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
(B3,? .. s UDAYASHANKAR PANDFFH, ADVKFOR<\/p>\n
REjsPmnf)EN’r 33 SRI.M.J.JA(}AN MORAN $5
\nSRl:B.S.SRIKAN’I’H, ADVS. FOR C\/R)<\/p>\n
THIS HRRP FILED {US 115 OF’ CFC AGAINST THE<\/p>\n
 ‘”<jRDEI:2 DATED 99.09.2903 PASSED IN R.R.m.26\/2008 ON
\nTHE FILE 0;? THE III AI}DL.DIS'i"'RICT AND SESSIONS<\/p>\n
JUDGE, MYSORE, ALLOWING THE REVISION PETITIOR
\nAND SETTING AS\u00a5DE THE ORSER DATED 12.03.2003
\nAND 27.61.2006 PASSED ON IA.N\u20ac).4 AND 5
\nRESPECTIVELY IN I~IRC.NO.}.?]2{)% CIN THE F\u00a7LE OF THE
\nH ADDL. I CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) MYSORE, ALLQWENG THE<\/p>\n
HRRi?.N\u20ac3.27Q.2GE38<\/p>\n
IA.NC).4 FILED {US 43 OF KR AC1' SEEKINGT"'\u00bbFOR
\nREJECTION AND NON~JURIS}f)IC'TION OF THE co::R_T..A:gD
\nDISMISSING ma IA.NO.5 FILED 11\/0 47 RULE.'..14oFL-(:96;<\/p>\n
SEEKING FOR REVIEW OF THE ORDER DT. 12;0.3.Q3–.V?'Fj"-  1 ~<\/p>\n
This HRRP coming on for ADMISSIOISE "<if1"i"\u00a71jvi.<; "t1.*\u00ab1j\u00a7'2,Vti3;:'&VV<\/p>\n
court delivered the following-<\/p>\n
\n\noRDEi;T3\n\nThis revision pc\ufb01tion     tenant\ncha\ufb02enging the {under  by the 1%\n<\/pre>\n
Add1.Civi1 Judge; (Jr.Dn}:.i”.?*43′.$?\u00a7I%;_ ‘1’;\/;}:2;’fqo.26\/2006 by
\nwhich the: otdg\u00e9f   i.A.No.IV and an
\norder dated     by the 11 Addmiv\ufb02<\/p>\n
Judge   ‘\u00a33e_ezI SHct aside.\n<\/p>\n
2. flfhe  if the case for the purpose of<\/p>\n
 *  sags r\u00e9\u00e9ism petition are that the respondcznt had<\/p>\n
 2000 on the \ufb01le of the If Addl. Civil<\/p>\n
Jii:igefJr..f}:\ufb01}’i,_ fioiysore invoking Sec\ufb01on 2I(1)(a) 8:. (11) of the<\/p>\n
 Rent Contml Act, 1961. During the pe\ufb01dency of<\/p>\n
V’ t}_A;:e; eviction pinceading, LA.No.IV was preferred by the<\/p>\n
‘  I\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01fi\u00e9yner herein under Section 43 of the Karnataka Rent<\/p>\n
”  1999. The said appiication was aiiowed on 12.3.2003.<\/p>\n
Be\u00e9ng aggrieved by the said order I.A.No.V was \ufb01led by the
\nrespondent herein li\ufb02dfit’ Order XLVII Rake I. CPO sceidng<\/p>\n
mview of the said arder. Thc trial court dismissed the said<\/p>\n
2<\/span><\/p>\n
\/’es<\/p>\n
HR\u00a7\u00a7P.N<3.2"?O. 253138<\/p>\n
app\ufb01cation also-. Being aggrieved by the  the<\/p>\n
respondent herein \ufb01led revision petition under <\/p>\n
of the Karnataka Rem Act chaiienging    <\/p>\n
12.3.2003 passed o1:1E.A.No.IV oniyiiii \u00bbr2.R.r'\u00a7o..i2.6) i\u00e9t;-oo.'–.i'=1'\ufb01e.<\/p>\n
first revisional court after hea1ing.""boii1TA'\u00e9idoS  <\/p>\n
aside not only the order  order <\/p>\n
ciated 27.1.2006 passed on    by the
\nsame, the tenant has  r;\u00e9ir\u00a7\u00a7$iof1'\u00bb\u00bbpo\ufb01tion.\n<\/p>\n
3. 3 have   cooizooi  the petitioner and<\/p>\n
the lcazned cou.i1s;%:’A1.V for f,E1e iospo:n.dc\u00a31t.<\/p>\n
4. I.caIoz;\u00e9d..co1:1iVsi2.I’fof”‘~!.3Vi\u00e9 J:pet1’tio1::c:r at the \ufb01rst instance<\/p>\n
contega\u00e9rrgi th@. the  revisional court was not right in<\/p>\n
  alsiizi\u00e9” not  order dated i2.3.20(}3 passed on<\/p>\n
1.,A.,\u00a7z\u00a25;1$f’i;.\u00a7;t 45;s\u00a7i.~o:der dated 27.1.2005 passed on \u00a3.A.No.V<\/p>\n
by’tho   since the revision petition R.R.No.26\/ 2006<\/p>\n
 ‘~..\u00ab._ :\u00a5as on’3}\u00a7_ 3~agai31st the order dated 12.3.2003 passed on<\/p>\n
   In support of his contentiozl he has relied upon a<\/p>\n
 …_ cieo\u00a7isioz1 of the Apex Court reporto\ufb01 in AIR 19??) SC 1185<\/p>\n
‘  ,.  A another decision reportcd in AH? 15328 Calcutta 418.<\/p>\n
5…\n<\/p>\n
\u00a7~IRRP.i\\\u00a7Q.27G.2\u00a7G8<\/p>\n
of the said ontier. The said review application was I’t’5\u00a7Qt6d<\/p>\n
on 27. 1.2006. However, the respondent challenged<\/p>\n
dated 12.3.2003 passed on I.A.No.IV on1y_.1;e?fe:1fe’:the” gm’<\/p>\n
zevisional court, but did not  the~i’ <\/p>\n
27.1.2096 passed on I.A.I\u00a7\u00a5o.V  <\/p>\n
application came to be re3’eetet’i’;~. Nevexttiieieseritultie first Vt<\/p>\n
zevisienal court has set’}-aside  ‘\ufb01nders.\n<\/p>\n
8. From the above ‘fa-\ufb01ts, lit  appageet that when the<\/p>\n
order was passed on vi..wA.j\\io.V–.ett   rejecting the<\/p>\n
review  the latter order did not
\nn1e;rgeV:’v–wi’i.h}   011 the other hand the<\/p>\n
rejec\ufb01on o;\u20ac__a re\\ii;ew’e.oi:JyT’re~af\ufb01r111s or con\ufb01rms the order<\/p>\n
 pas\u00e9edv  the ‘\ufb011etV___i;t$.etance. Under the eimuzzastances the<\/p>\n
~:fes\u00a7;o;:1ei_ent\u00ab.vA:Ve11ght to have cha\ufb02engeci the order dated<\/p>\n
aiggfvtaefom the \ufb01rst revisions} court. Therefore,<\/p>\n
t}ne’.44″:aesip:o1itient ought to have ehalienged both the orders<\/p>\n
K x ‘  ‘t;efe;e the \ufb01rst revisional court and in the absence of the<\/p>\n
 it was not right in setting aside both the orders of the<\/p>\n
9. In suppon: of the above reasoning, the Judgment ef the<\/p>\n
Apex Court in the ease of Kanohar 8: Others V3.<\/p>\n
\/1-\n<\/p>\n
E~ERR?.N0.2″}’O.2008<\/p>\n
Jaipalsiug as Others} reported in 2008(2) (‘:ivi_l___ Law
\nJournal 59Oi11 the following terms:  T<\/p>\n
“It is also incurred to contend th,tiii”in” .
\nof this nature, namely where a” ‘review-Speiiticn
\nwas dismissed, the doc\u00a2r1’ne’\u00bbof will I*\u00a2;;::)@_\u00a7~-i,,,..\u00ab 1;’
\na\ufb01y ‘3PPFia’1tion whatst\ufb01ver. V  ” – ‘~ * ‘<\/p>\n
It is one thing to ‘eg}}\u00abebIhat ihei reepor’wlerit
\nwas entitled to \ufb01le an appiimiioni for. review}? in
\nterms of Section 1.14 re\u00a21ci”:vit_h’O?*:ierXLVIIARuIe 1
\nof Code of Civil ~.ii\u00bbi;’S’ww\u00a3her ihing
\nto say that the decree paieeed’ ein’\u00bbfc’Ieour ef the
\nrespendent merged yiiih ::heVorc’\u00a3’er ‘df$niissing the
\nreview appligxzticin “‘Ma1tef–.Vm:’gI\u00a21’Vhave been
\ndifferent,  the ‘-.re’:i2iei.v ‘app’Eiee1Lfion had been
\nallow-3d”Ve1’t3zer;’. wfwlly or 1’21 part in terms whereof
\nan a;,npIi;:\u00a3i_zion”\ufb01:>r ‘ejceaziien ‘*g)f”\u00a3he decree could
\nhazge ‘bee}1’*\ufb01_led   of the modified<\/p>\n
;Zi\u20ac{3?’8″(_:’; 3′, _ V ‘V<\/p>\n
10. in feet  the.  Sushilktmtar Sen Vs. State of<\/p>\n
    1975 SC 1185 the e\ufb01ect of allowing<\/p>\n
 ’31’ ::ft\u00a7”z*i,e*\u00a2J_’ie.e;,}j;3i;lCzation has been stated wherein it has been<\/p>\n
   vacate the decree yassed and the decree<\/p>\n
 that”isv”‘s311)Vsequen\ufb02y passed in review whether it modi\ufb01es<\/p>\n
V’ ~.\ufb01:=:x}e.r.sesH er con\ufb01rms the decree erigiaally passed is a new<\/p>\n
  supexcc\u00e9\u00e9ng the original one. In the said (2213::<\/p>\n
” ‘”1f~\u00a2\u00a3erence is made to the decision of the Calcutta High Ceurt<\/p>\n
reported 311 AIR 1928 Calcutta 43,8 referred to by muresei fer
\nfie\ufb01\ufb01oner. In View of the said dictam, the \ufb01rst revisional<\/p>\n
court was not right 313:1 setting aside both the (‘)I’dCI’$ when<\/p>\n
\u00a32.\n<\/p>\n
HRRP.\u00a7’~Eo. 2″3O.;330S8<\/p>\n
there was no cha\ufb01enge made to {he ()I’d\u20acI’ dated 21.}-,_._20{)6<\/p>\n
passed on I.A.No.V, in View of the fact that the:*eV:’e:%\u00a7f\u00e9\u00a7:s:’V’no<\/p>\n
merger of the order dated 12.3.2003 in  <\/p>\n
27.1.2006 passed by the trial court.\n<\/p>\n
Under the cix*cumsta;\u00a33.e.e’:;.  ;e”<;*isi{::a1  :isV'<\/p>\n
allowed without going  'zxtgexrite " of  matter.
\nHowever, the respondeizfeise resc{r'v_ee1"' to chaiienge the
\norder dated 27. }..a'20\u20ac36   tria} court if<\/p>\n
he is so           '
\n            sal-\n<\/p>\n
“*e * ‘e e Iudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri A R Jayaram vs Smt Sumathi on 2 July, 2009 Author: B.V.Nagarathna 1N Tm: HIGH COURT 012* KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 02% my 0:2 JULY, 2009f ~ , BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRs..;{JsTIc1:\u00ab:\u00bbB.xr,:~1A\u00a7\u00a7}\u00a7\u00a7*\u00a2A*\u00a7’\u00a51+;r#A.’.’_j, V H.R.R.P.No.27\u00e9::!2~No.959, ETH MAIN \u00ab_ M BLGCK, VEVEKANANDANAGAR, ” “w.MYSQi?E RESPONDENT (B3,? .. s UDAYASHANKAR PANDFFH, ADVKFOR […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-123975","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri A R Jayaram vs Smt Sumathi on 2 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri A R Jayaram vs Smt Sumathi on 2 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-03-03T01:32:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri A R Jayaram vs Smt Sumathi on 2 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-03T01:32:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1100,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri A R Jayaram vs Smt Sumathi on 2 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-03T01:32:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri A R Jayaram vs Smt Sumathi on 2 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri A R Jayaram vs Smt Sumathi on 2 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri A R Jayaram vs Smt Sumathi on 2 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-03-03T01:32:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri A R Jayaram vs Smt Sumathi on 2 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-03T01:32:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009"},"wordCount":1100,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009","name":"Sri A R Jayaram vs Smt Sumathi on 2 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-03T01:32:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-a-r-jayaram-vs-smt-sumathi-on-2-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri A R Jayaram vs Smt Sumathi on 2 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123975","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=123975"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123975\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=123975"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=123975"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=123975"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}