{"id":123978,"date":"2009-11-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009"},"modified":"2014-01-15T05:53:51","modified_gmt":"2014-01-15T00:23:51","slug":"madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Madeppa vs The Spl Lao on 3 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Madeppa vs The Spl Lao on 3 November, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.S.Pachhapure<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH\nAT GULBARGA  \n\nDATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMR.,s;R_{2t\u00a7O9A \nBEFORE      I.\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTIC_E~~.A.4S.FACVH\ufb01Af5URE  A ' \n\nCROSS OBJECTIO1\u00a7E4NO.I1'zi9\/12QCAL:V   fa'\nIN MFA NO%.345*7.\/2002 I;;:_I;\u00a7\u00a7;_ I 1]\n\nBETWEEN\n\nI. MADEPPA   ,\nAge:39 \"      W.\n39 YRS s__\/O RE.V_A,1\\I_'ASI.DDAPPA'= ~ \nSINCEDEAD BY LRS  S\/O MADEPPA\nR\/O GIAD}i;I_NGADALLI,. CHINCHOLLI\n I I.  \n(By Sri{'~,'f3;:nt : SACIF1'IN M.1_\\\u00a7\/IAHAJAN]\nAge:65 -- '   \nS\/'Q _ASI-DDAPPA\nA. 65 YRS,' R.\/O CADILINGADALLI\n..  CHINCHOLLI, CULBARCA  Cgos\u00e9 --O3JE:f:*rog-3\n\nA jiBy  M.MAI~IAJAN)\n\nLL ~  '  GULBARGA\n\n ', THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER\nFOR M AND MIP\n\n RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p>[By Sri: MALLIKARJUN SAHUKAR, HCGP)<\/p>\n<p>MFA.CROB. FILED U\/O 41 RULE 22 OF CPC<br \/>\nAGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND AWARDDATED<br \/>\n01.01.2002 PASSED IN LAC NO. 25\/99 ON~4f&#8217;rHE_&#8217;EILE<br \/>\nOF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE {SR DN),_;&#8221;&#8216;GU.Ll3ARGA,<\/p>\n<p>PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE 1&#8243;?E;T,ITI:ON&#8221;<br \/>\nENHANCED COMPENSATION AND  &#8216;EURf1&#8217;HEIz <\/p>\n<p>ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSA&#8217;I&#8217;iON;&#8211;.\u00a2 <\/p>\n<p>THIS CROSS OBJECTIaVO.NE&#8221;*.V_xCOMING &#8216;\u00abON&#8221;&#8216;~EOR<br \/>\nADMISSION THIS DAY, THE CO&#8217;URTVDELIV}3RF-D THE<br \/>\nFOLLOWING:     <\/p>\n<pre>\n\n'  ._'\"jIJ\n\n \n\n G    _\n\n with the\n  for the land bearing\n   acres 23 guntas of\n<\/pre>\n<p>Gadivii11gLadaha_iI\\1&#8242;:.E:V&#8217;Vilila\u00e9ie; &#8220;JTq.Chincho1i acquired by the<\/p>\n<p>resp&#8217;OIfIderIt;\u00bb  preferred this CroSS&#8211;objectior1 seeking<\/p>\n<p>V E&#8217; A .erihai1ce_Ir1ent.\n<\/p>\n<p> facts relevant for the purpose of the cross-<\/p>\n<p>objections are as under:\n<\/p>\n<p>The land of crosS&#8211;objeCtorS was acquired by the<\/p>\n<p>Hirespondent vide noti\ufb01cation under section 4(1) of the<\/p>\n<p>FE<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Whether the cross&#8211;objectors are entitled to<\/p>\n<p>the enhancement in the market value\u00e9..ofV:tlie~&#8217;i.l&#8217;and<\/p>\n<p>acquired if so to what extent?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>5. It is the contention  thelearnedicoiinsellior<\/p>\n<p>the cross~objector that in__&#8217;l\u00bb\/{FA  this<\/p>\n<p>court, dated 431 dune  &#8221;&#8217;enhanced the<br \/>\ncompensation to   of dry lands<br \/>\nand the counsellor   that the land<br \/>\nof the   the neighboring<br \/>\nvillag\ufb02latl\ufb01adilingadjallilxrillagei\ufb01 and same type of crops<br \/>\nwereVV1&#8243;-.gro$_m&#8217;iV  that he is entitled to<\/p>\n<p>compensation as the judgement of this court<\/p>\n<p>  above}&#8221;&#8216;-Further more he submits that, the<\/p>\n<p>   the judgment referred above was dated<\/p>\n<p>\/    in the present case the Noti\ufb01cation U\/s<\/p>\n<p> 4(1) was dated 18\/9\/1993. So he claims that the cross<\/p>\n<p> olqjectors entitled to escalation price at 10% per year.<\/p>\n<p>wit<\/p>\n<p>On these grounds he sought for enhancement of<\/p>\n<p>compensation.\n<\/p>\n<p>6. Per contra,   <\/p>\n<p>Government Pleader has supported <\/p>\n<p>award of the Reference <\/p>\n<p>7. I have carefuhy  judgement of<br \/>\nthe court _and&#8217;  referred by the<br \/>\ncross-objector;.&#8217;it&#8221;i&#8217;s._  the village Chennur<br \/>\nand    Viilages of same<br \/>\ntalukad;-.  is  that same crops were<\/p>\n<p>grown in the_:&#8217;dry&#8221;.&#8217;~1aAn.ds&#8221;acquired. This court after taken<\/p>\n<p> considerationdthe material piaced on record and<\/p>\n<p>  also&#8217; that the jawar and toor crops were grown.<\/p>\n<p>en-h__ance*d. compensation of Rs.65,000\/&#8211; per acre in<\/p>\n<p> respect for dry iands. So to maintain the parity in the<\/p>\n<p> of the acquired lands, it is necessary to enhance<\/p>\n<p>E<br \/>\n&#8216; .\n<\/p>\n<p>Ks\/4&#8243;.\n<\/p>\n<p>.,x<\/p>\n<p>is<br \/>\nthe compensation as decided by<\/p>\n<p>referred   .\n<\/p>\n<p>8. Apart from this, as the 1\\&#8217;otification__in:V&#8217;re4ss;de\u00abct<\/p>\n<p>of lands acquired is of the year 1993  <\/p>\n<p>case the noti\ufb01cation was of m;yea1~<\/p>\n<p>Objector is entitled to esca1ation&#8221;pri&#8217;ce atT,&#8217;1&#8243;.u&#8217;3e\u00b0i:\/Q&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>In the circumstances the cros.s+objectors&#8217;iare&#8217;entitled to<\/p>\n<p>Rs.65,000\/&#8211; + Rs.1Z%4_;O.O0,fA\u00a7. vd&#8217;Pt$;%8&#8242;,,OOO\/4.&#8217; tier acre.In<\/p>\n<p>the circumstances.  :boI:{}evcto&#8217;1js*V&#8221;are entitled to<\/p>\n<p>the enh&#8217;a1&#8217;1eed stated above. Hence, I<br \/>\nanswer. the Affirmative and proceed to pass<br \/>\ntheVfo11ovVi11g\u00a7V V .\n<\/p>\n<p> _ . . . .\n<\/p>\n<p> 4&#8242;(}ro_ss&#8211;Objections are aiiowed in part. The<\/p>\n<p>CrossfOhjectors are entitled&#8217; to the market Vaiue at<\/p>\n<p> AAI2s.&#8217;?8&#8242;,v.(\u00a7i&#8217;}:'()O\/&#8211; per acre in respect of land bearing<\/p>\n<p> -..&#8217;VSj,rNo.17O\/2 measuring 7 acres 23 guntas of<\/p>\n<p>this court in theu&#8217;.:1%sm&#8217;~e<\/p>\n<p>E5\/r.\n<\/p>\n<p>Gadilingadalli village with all other statutory bene\ufb01ts<br \/>\nand costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>The cross objections accordingly disposed<\/p>\n<p>Two weeks time is granted to  &#8220;to<\/p>\n<p>pay the deficit court fee.\n<\/p>\n<p>ARD*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Madeppa vs The Spl Lao on 3 November, 2009 Author: A.S.Pachhapure IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMR.,s;R_{2t\u00a7O9A BEFORE I. THE HON&#8217;BLE MR.JUSTIC_E~~.A.4S.FACVH\ufb01Af5URE A &#8216; CROSS OBJECTIO1\u00a7E4NO.I1&#8217;zi9\/12QCAL:V fa&#8217; IN MFA NO%.345*7.\/2002 I;;:_I;\u00a7\u00a7;_ I 1] BETWEEN I. MADEPPA , Age:39 &#8221; W. 39 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-123978","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Madeppa vs The Spl Lao on 3 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Madeppa vs The Spl Lao on 3 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-01-15T00:23:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Madeppa vs The Spl Lao on 3 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-01-15T00:23:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":546,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Madeppa vs The Spl Lao on 3 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-01-15T00:23:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Madeppa vs The Spl Lao on 3 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Madeppa vs The Spl Lao on 3 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Madeppa vs The Spl Lao on 3 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-01-15T00:23:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Madeppa vs The Spl Lao on 3 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-01-15T00:23:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009"},"wordCount":546,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009","name":"Madeppa vs The Spl Lao on 3 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-01-15T00:23:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madeppa-vs-the-spl-lao-on-3-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Madeppa vs The Spl Lao on 3 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123978","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=123978"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123978\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=123978"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=123978"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=123978"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}