{"id":124023,"date":"2009-07-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009"},"modified":"2016-08-08T09:38:33","modified_gmt":"2016-08-08T04:08:33","slug":"girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Girijashankar Patil S\/O … vs Kalyanappa S\/O Pampanna Jawali on 21 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Girijashankar Patil S\/O … vs Kalyanappa S\/O Pampanna Jawali on 21 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: H.N.Nagamohan Das<\/div>\n
IN 'ms HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA   \nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHAR\\NA[}H_}\"V:\"'-   '\n\nDATED THIS THE 215* 0A? <5# 3Tt;\u00abs,.~:g,TT zoo\u00e9 -  T_ \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HOWBLE MR. JusncE'%akk;_N. NAG;\u00a2.\u00a74G:~\u00e9.Ani':,sAS\n\nRgeuma \u00a7\u00a7gV:3;;:g,,D_&P\u00a7\u00a7%&'%,5&  L    7\u00a74z;7\u00a7 as\n\nQETWEEE\n\nGIRIJASHANKAR?.PK\u00a73:L    \nsic BHIMANG\u00a7OUD.A;~....f;7_V "    A\nAsses ABOUT 63 z';EfARs;' %  t  L\n\nKARATAG.-IV \\kiTLL;A\u00a3;=E, " \n\nGANGAVATNITQ-633..2?.9;" :'~\u00bb---., % %\n\n...APPELL.ANT\n\n(BY M\/S. HEGQE, %r~:'E\u00a3%ri;)=\u00a7;,c=2:::_2a 'PATEL, ADVS.)\n\n" 2.1.} "\n\nn<azLx:m\u00a7P#A\u00ab\n\n Asst: \n\n~%1s;\u00a334 P:2\u00e9~2'r:3.Am&A 3AwA:.1,\n\nsz:s:$mEss;\u00a2 ; _!<};\u00a5;RA"!"IGI\negguaavamz 12-533 239.\n\n saAm3siQm=A\n \u00bb sxs 4.1%-'GAi"\u00bbi\u00e9.$\ufb01W9A\n  mar; 54 'mags\n\nszzusxzstsss,\ni_<;ARA'3'IGI mamas\n\nKSANGAVATHI TQ:583 229.\n. Huazmeu vEEa.11PAs<HApA\n\nS\/0 VEERABHA9RA?PA,\n\naw\n\n\n\nAGED 52 YEARS\nEUSINESS,\n\nKARATIGI VILLAGE\nGANGAVATHI TQ:583 229.\n\n4. SIDDAPPA s\/o  \nVEERABHADRAPPA HURAKA9LI,  \nAGED 43 YEARS,\nausmess,    \u00ab\nKARATIGI VILLAGE  "     J\nGANeAvA'rmTQ:sa3 229.    ...ru;--:sp<3Noe;~rrs\n\n(av SRI.CHANDRASHEKAR._P*.\u00ab. PAT!L_AN\u00a7}  \nsax. SASAVARAJ R. MATH,' %Aov*s.% FGR 5:\/9.;\nR2\u00bb SERVED A      'A\nR3&R4 ARE DEL.ETE?3)  _  % a ~\n\nTHI55 RSA"IS.,FILi\u00a7D UNDER SECTION 100 OF CFC AGAINST\nTHE 3UDGME--NT V81' *E) 'E.CREE-T__[3'--I'.'263.2006 PASSED IN R.A.NO.\n2212906 ON " THE' "  it?' THE CIVIL JUDGE(SR.DN.)\nGANGAVATHVI,..ALLOVv.'f_IN{5  APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE\nJUDGMENT AND  TDECREE DT.10.3.2006 PASSED IN\n\n_..vQ.S.N\u20ac}\u00a7-3.4\/2003 "ms: 'THE FILE as "me ADDL. c:vn_\n .V 3z3a:sE{JR.eme.},,GAMGAVATHI.\n\n comma on ma omens '1':-as my, THE\nC0tf~R.T--.VDELI%!\ufb02RE1\u00a7 THE FOLLOWING:\n\n M\n\n   v  appeai is directed against the Ju\u00e9gment and Decree\n\n%  ..._1':,;:\u00a7"g1j_e ij zsnzma in RA. No.22\/06 passed by the cm: Judge (Sr.\n\n ~.. Dn.) at Gangavathi reversing the judgment of the Trial Ceurt in\n\n0.5. No.14\/G3 and decreeirzg {he suit of ptaintiff.\n\n5\n\n\n\n3 V .\n2. Appellant is defendant No.2. First respon'deht<.i:$v.the\n\nplaintiff. The respondent Nos.2 to 4 are the defentiantafriil' 4_<\/pre>\n
4 respectively before the Trial Court*;” \u00abIn ‘tot’;<\/p>\n
convenience, the parties are referreclto  <\/p>\n
‘Trial Court.\n<\/p>\n
3. Plaintiff \ufb01led Q,S. No-.—-.’.t4fa3″–\u00bbagain\u00a7t*vtheitiefendants
\nfor decree of permanent  the defendants
\nfrom interfering with plaintiff’s   ‘enjoyment of the
\nplaint schedgelaa”   The ‘Vdetendant No.2entered
\nappearance ‘TriaiVl_T”C.oert, \ufb02ied written statement inter<\/p>\n
alia contentii.n4’\u00a7ri  schedule property is not in<\/p>\n
existent;-eg” the ‘-meaour\u00e9ments and bounoarles given are<\/p>\n
 illil-‘:ti,:’:’1:vi:tie._:’ he contended that defendants are the owners<\/p>\n
olifanid the Raichur – Gangavathi road runs in Sy.<\/p>\n
 No.292;!2. .._;On.l’:hAe basis of the pleadinga, the Triai Court framed<\/p>\n
” ” ‘T fol3ovir%:’l\u00a7’ four issues for its consideration:<\/p>\n
   “‘*  whether the plaintiff provw that, he is in lawful<\/p>\n
   in posswsion of the suit: schedule property as on the<\/p>\n
date of the suit?\n<\/p>\n
\u00a7i””\u00a7”\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
2. Whether the plaintiff further proves i:ne3V.:le’l’l’e\u00a7;e’d.T <\/p>\n
interference by the defendantsj   _ _v _ V 2<\/p>\n
3. Whether the plaintiff is ent:i.i;lecl”tl\u00a3:l”  <\/p>\n
permanent injunction ag*ei:1.\u00a7t. fl1e’V’defen::d:’e.nes:.. ll<\/p>\n
respect of the schedule   2   V’<\/p>\n
4. What order or deCr.ee?_    ”\n<\/p>\n
4. Beforeiv  ‘l’l’–ia\u00a3V_ examined two
\nwitnesses as gel: imam Exs.P1 to P15.\n<\/p>\n
Defenciantevvas aw-1 to DW-3 and got
\nmarked Exe.DJ1″ tn Def!Ailcin”—e’r\u00a7’p’reciation of the pleadings, oral<\/p>\n
and docurnentaruy eiqidence-, tine Trial Court passed the impugned<\/p>\n
 d–ismil*eeing ltlilellletiit of plaintiff on the ground that<\/p>\n
plVe’in_\u20aci’\ufb01fll,neejfeilerljteeiprove and atabiish that he is in possessian<\/p>\n
 V’=~and enj.9:ymenf’_i:\u00ab.~f’lV.the plaint schedule property. Aggrievecl by<\/p>\n
_.,ff;tbi’s-..jndgm’e,n\u00a3 of the Trial Court, the plaintiff filed an apseal<\/p>\n
 Lower Appeiiete Court In RA. No.22\/06. The Lewes”<\/p>\n
‘ V’V:”A_e;\u00a7e\u00a5l_ete Court after hearing arguments, framed the foiiowing<\/p>\n
 Atijurfee issues for its consideration:<\/p>\n
5 <\/span>
\n“1. Whether firzc\ufb01ngs of the tria$ court in <\/p>\n
14\/63 is correct?\n<\/p>\n
2. Whether the findings of the (earned _.tria%–:j’uvr1g’e in u  <\/p>\n
O.S.No. 14×03 calls for intertereecefr  V<\/p>\n
3. what order’? ”\n<\/p>\n
5. The Lower Appeslatetcskurt oh rm-:ap;\u00a7r–ees.\u00a7t:6:i’ of tire<\/p>\n
evidence on record passedthe i.rh’f5u.:\u00a7\u00a7ued-1udgrtie’nt”‘e|\u00a5owing the<\/p>\n
appeat, setting aside the’VjeA;fg’rr1’e:itTria| Court and<\/p>\n
decreeing’t’th\u00e9’szi:\u20acvt Hehte; this second appeal by the<\/p>\n
second cieV”‘fehd\u00aban’t..VV   2<\/p>\n
6. T’rx_\u00a7s* vcdurt’AV}r:dAe..\u00bbe.”‘erder dated 9.1.09 framed the<\/p>\n
_ _. Vfoilowinigj ‘su.bstan’tieiViehueetions of law:<\/p>\n
.’ ;n,(_Vi)   tvhether the Lower Appeiiate Ceurt erred in Saw in
\n1  the evidence of PW-1 who has stated<\/p>\n
.  the space measuring 20 ft. situated tewards<\/p>\n
the eastern side of Girish Taikies beiongs to the<\/p>\n
second defendant – appe\ufb02ant herein wh\ufb02e<\/p>\n
yeveretng the 3udgment and Decree gassed by the<\/p>\n
“me? Court?\n<\/p>\n
.\/<\/p>\n
reasons given by the Triai Court for its be<\/p>\n
considered by the appellate Court. In the instan,tA4’jcevse;:’tlhe “Trial <\/p>\n
Court, on appreciation of oral and  *<\/p>\n
that the plaintiff has failed to prove an\u00b0dAestabiish–“–.hi.’sVl pos\u00e9geseiofts,<\/p>\n
over the entire suit schedule  as   the pieint.
\nThe Lower Appellate Courtwithoiit:eo’n:s\u00a7ol’erl.ng  ore! evidence
\nof PW-1 concluded that pleititiff  established his
\npossession over the:\u00ab.entire:A__pleiet s’ctied.u!e._.t5toperty as described
\nin the plaint. Lower Appellate Court is
\ncontrary  by the Supreme Court in Mudaliar’s<\/p>\n
case. Accortfeijhgiylg  .$:ifb.steetiel question of law 940.2 is<\/p>\n
answered ‘ih..theVaff\u00a7r_n1Vetivv{e. Therefore, the impugned judgment<\/p>\n
:’v’Vpa”ssed:”by  itowver Appellate Court is liable to be set aside.<\/p>\n
.71O’;’  this Court, during the pendency of this<\/p>\n
pepeeel, defeedent \ufb01led two applications under order 41 Rule 2?<\/p>\n
  eeeiging preeuction ef additional documentary evidence i.e.,<\/p>\n
 \u00e9\u00e9ettified extract of Form No.8\/A issued by the Tahsiidar<\/p>\n
u\ufb01iangavathi Teluk specifying that Sy. 510.292\/2 came to be<\/p>\n
 g,w\u00ab\u00bbtx<\/p>\n
acquired for the purpose of formation of Raichur <\/p>\n
Road. Plaintiff \ufb02ied objections to these appiigsti-onsjjinvt\u00e9ir<\/p>\n
contending that 3 portion in Sy.  ‘came-:to.:_’heVVeVC’o’dii*ed s’ it<\/p>\n
for formation of Raichur Gangayathi  In[.>’.si;i;\u00a7portv<\/p>\n
contention, the eieintiff has prodoteda cisri\ufb01getiioii by the
\noffice of Tahsildar Gangaiiesthi  that the
\niand in Sy. hio.293\/1 is acqioirediifoir  of formation of
\nRaichur Gangavethi:\u00ab.i\u00a7o–ad   The pieintiff<\/p>\n
aiso further  \u00a7:oi37\u00a7go’f.. -No.8 specifying that the<\/p>\n
land in  N.o’.;’.?\u00a7V3:V,’.T\u00a3.V-..ioias”‘a.\u00a7q–uii”ed for the purpose of formation<\/p>\n
of road in qtfestiioynf’  case, piaintiff contends that<\/p>\n
ti>eyond}gi:he~ Raichu\u20ac.V:Cv5an’gf;avathi Road, on its eastern side, the<\/p>\n
 ‘Ap%iai:ntiff is situated i.e., the piaint scheduie property.<\/p>\n
 ~ti?ie.Vot\u00a5ieVr’v_v\u00bbhan’d;” the defendant contends that his property in<\/p>\n
V Sy. N’o’;292t\/.2″ei<tends upto Reichur -~= Gangavatiwi Road on the<\/p>\n
'V'r\u20ac\u00a7:.rsstei:ri side. In View of this rive: contention, the documentary<\/p>\n
fe.vi'ciVen\u20ace now sought to be produced is necessary to resoive the<\/p>\n
T "'..:r\u00e9a'iicontroversy between the parties'. "Therefore, an opportunity<\/p>\n
 is to be erovided to both the parties to establish their respective<\/p>\n
ciaims before the Trial Court with reference to the documents<\/p>\n
.\/'''7'\\:_,.;\n<\/p>\n
,4′ 2 ,–I 3 2′:\n<\/p>\n
 “‘\u00b0 vi,<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
(iv) The Triai Court shaii decide the mattae:r~~–\u00e9\u00a7.f\u00a5%\u00a5\u00e9_ s_t\u00a7’..’\u00a7’fterI<\/p>\n
providing an opportunity to both thg’v:”p\u00a7rtiA\u00a7sVt.’3nd\\<\/p>\n
expeditiously as possibfef  . , . .   ”\n<\/p>\n
(V) The interim order granteda\u00e9bytlthtts Ci1’sf:!:’A'<::n"
\nwill be in force until ti1'e.;}d'ispo'.::"a!"oVf    S V'\n<\/p>\n
(vi) In View of the\ufb01a\u00e9ct th\u00e9tVVtf’r’aAttet\u00a7\u00a7”‘p\u00e9t:ding for a
\ntong time, the  the matter and
\ndispoge’:t\u00a7fV;’theiz\u00e9tttttiii  tvfth law within the
\ntim\u00e9t   the date of receipt of<\/p>\n
    s&\/-\n<\/p>\n
‘   ttttt  \u00a7UDGE’.\n<\/p>\n
1t*.,,sac*tA ‘<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Girijashankar Patil S\/O … vs Kalyanappa S\/O Pampanna Jawali on 21 July, 2009 Author: H.N.Nagamohan Das IN ‘ms HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHAR\\NA[}H_}”V:”‘- ‘ DATED THIS THE 215* 0A? <5# 3Tt;\u00abs,.~:g,TT zoo\u00e9 – T_ BEFORE THE HOWBLE MR. JusncE'%akk;_N. NAG;\u00a2.\u00a74G:~\u00e9.Ani':,sAS Rgeuma \u00a7\u00a7gV:3;;:g,,D_&P\u00a7\u00a7%&'%,5& L 7\u00a74z;7\u00a7 as QETWEEE GIRIJASHANKAR?.PK\u00a73:L sic BHIMANG\u00a7OUD.A;~….f;7_V […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-124023","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nGirijashankar Patil S\/O ... vs Kalyanappa S\/O Pampanna Jawali on 21 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Girijashankar Patil S\/O ... vs Kalyanappa S\/O Pampanna Jawali on 21 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-08T04:08:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Girijashankar Patil S\\\/O … vs Kalyanappa S\\\/O Pampanna Jawali on 21 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-08T04:08:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1000,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Girijashankar Patil S\\\/O ... vs Kalyanappa S\\\/O Pampanna Jawali on 21 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-08T04:08:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Girijashankar Patil S\\\/O … vs Kalyanappa S\\\/O Pampanna Jawali on 21 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Girijashankar Patil S\/O ... vs Kalyanappa S\/O Pampanna Jawali on 21 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Girijashankar Patil S\/O ... vs Kalyanappa S\/O Pampanna Jawali on 21 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-08T04:08:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Girijashankar Patil S\/O … vs Kalyanappa S\/O Pampanna Jawali on 21 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-08T04:08:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009"},"wordCount":1000,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009","name":"Girijashankar Patil S\/O ... vs Kalyanappa S\/O Pampanna Jawali on 21 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-08T04:08:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/girijashankar-patil-so-vs-kalyanappa-so-pampanna-jawali-on-21-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Girijashankar Patil S\/O … vs Kalyanappa S\/O Pampanna Jawali on 21 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124023","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=124023"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124023\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=124023"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=124023"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=124023"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}