{"id":124043,"date":"2008-12-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008"},"modified":"2015-04-08T08:32:09","modified_gmt":"2015-04-08T03:02:09","slug":"r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008","title":{"rendered":"R Chandrappa vs The Registrar Bangalore … on 1 December, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
R Chandrappa vs The Registrar Bangalore … on 1 December, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
U '.   ' ..... .. 'V\n\n (3Y\u00abs:\u00e9I. :'P.,i\u00a7\u00a7ciEv\u00a7\u00a7DRA !a}MAR sumsav, ADV.)\n\n '~._RND 227 QF' THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYIRG TO QUASH\n\n V' 'THE VEJSIDORSEMENT DATED 7.8.2003 VIBE ANIVEXURE-H SINCE\n\n 'F!fiE _ EFFEDORSEMENT IS TOTALLY UNJUST, ARSITRARY ANS\n\n   OF ARTICLES 1.4 AND 16 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF\n  INDIA.\n\nVA  ~ \"TMADE THE FOLLOWING:---\n\nIN THE HIGH couar or KARNATAKA AT 3ANGA1;op'p1oi_\u00a7*nt:1ient \" it<\/pre>\n
on compamonate grounos one—to’ the”resPorident to
\nimmediawy appoint hire’-in \ufb02eofpropnate post on
\ncornpossionate {$f0tinde_”‘”a’na:l’;tn_:’   The writ
\npetition reveoie   respondent time
\nand agei.n…_   parties would have
\ncome to an  had the rmpondmt taken a<\/p>\n
firm decieimj on the or not of the petitioner for<\/p>\n
 apbt\ufb02igtment on oonjpavosionate grounds. The litigation for<\/p>\n
  on compassionate grounds, which<\/p>\n
\ufb02ue year 1997, d\ufb01pite several rounds of<\/p>\n
H V’ _ iitigo’tion.,’,: is otiii pending. In View of the intervening time<\/p>\n
i  factor and not on any other ground, the petitioner is not<\/p>\n
  to the relief. I can only sympathize with his piight<\/p>\n
  -and express my anguish at the inconsistent and changing<\/p>\n
\/<3<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
stand of the respondent in the matter, keeping in vl,eoii:’the.vv<\/p>\n
age old saying that, a hard case shouid not make   <\/p>\n
2. The petitioner’s father-._ oi=jie..:’<\/p>\n
working as a sweeper in the”UniyerVs”J’i:y’V’—-Vvisiraweraiohv<\/p>\n
Engineering Coiiege Haste! of
\nto the petitioner, his mete-ie.\u00ab:   on o1.oo.19s9
\nafter informing wouid be going
\nto office, to attend’ doztieo, he did not
\nreturn  are not known. A
\ncomplaint regord!’ng.__i;ni$si.ng’…of.theHsaid person was iodged<\/p>\n
with the ;5o._|ir:e, Svh-do”:\u00a7\ufb01er\u00ab-..’fe\u00a7i-staring the case, informed<\/p>\n
the family   said Ramaieh could not be<\/p>\n
  th\ufb02ewe\ufb01orts to trace petitioners father<\/p>\n
i~*ent’_in’ iietiitioner approached the respondent giving<\/p>\n
 _infori’netion’ aidbont the missing of his father and requ\ufb01ong<\/p>\n
 oppointment on compassionate grounds by stating<\/p>\n
 that-\u00bb.the family is. in penury. The rapondmt on<\/p>\n
 ‘:”V.<:ot{sideration of the application for appointment on<\/p>\n
 Ncompassionate grounds, issued an endo\ufb01ernent dated<\/p>\n
\/'<\/p>\n
16.91.1997 directing the petitioner to produce  <\/p>\n
certi\ufb01cate of his father. Since the petitione_af'Hs':"i';a:tr:gf. <\/p>\n
only missing and since he had no %\u00a7ns$\u00a7i'sdgg oi' <\/p>\n
could not obtain and producgwthe <\/p>\n
father. In the circumstances, h\u00e9fiisd w.P.._  to it<\/p>\n
quash ths said endorssnjent   that,
\nin the peculiar drcumstsijic\u00e9s.  is  produce the
\ndeath <:ert\u00a3i'icz_:'i:'e"'j.;1T.t.\u00a7i"  iffa\u00e9tiiiar-xsiniis.  responwnt M
\ndlrmted    on compassic-nan
\ngrounds.    dismissed for non\u00bb
\nprosscnt:\u00absn~ on The wihoner having been<\/p>\n
advised toti'iia._:'aVsuitA'!nf'*"dedaration and obmn I decree<\/p>\n
 his."-fathgr  to have died on the grstmd that<\/p>\n
 s.'..he'_T.<ibai:d and was not heard and seen on and<\/p>\n
 o1.ns%i.s;a,939, he mm 0.5. Ne.919\/'98 in the City cm<\/p>\n
Court"  Banaaiom which was decrew on 31.08.1999<\/p>\n
V'_AAv:th_'\u00e9t'if:sin, it was ciaiared that the wtionefs father is<\/p>\n
'   to be dead and consequentiy, me pedtionq \/<\/p>\n
plainmf is entitled to reprwent the praurvd death of his
\n\/I .\n<\/p>\n
the petitioner and provide him an appropriate ernpioynttarxt<\/p>\n
on compassionate grounds in accordance <\/p>\n
soon as vacancy arises In the Univers\ufb02zy. ‘me order     <\/p>\n
by the learned Single Judge w;s\u00a7”   it<\/p>\n
respondent In WA. No.224\/03 it &\u00a79_as~<\/p>\n
foIiows:-\n<\/p>\n
on conslderation\ufb02\u00e9e ciarjfyfthat tirade
\nIs only    rapondmt
\nafresh:   Yaw. Unda the
\ncirco’n:sta:nce\u00a7\u00a7; ‘*no\u00bb,interjfer\u00e9’en’ce Is called for.
\nTire apoevai’ii;-acco’rdti:n\u00a7iy’ dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
5. it vt\ufb01aereaftert’  respondent has issued an<\/p>\n
  endorsement .Vd’cte1dV”e7;i38:03 In which, it was stated that,<\/p>\n
  is  on the ground that his father is not<\/p>\n
 heaerdiifor\u00e9 7 years, is presumed to be dead, \ufb02ue<\/p>\n
 _ petitione_:”ca\u00a71not be considered as a dependant of his<\/p>\n
 4″=_’i’ati1Vier oecause, the presumption of aath of his father and<\/p>\n
 .._’the’\u00bb–d.\u00e9cree obtained by the petitioner is oniy a fiction in<\/p>\n
  .!a*}r and that, if It was the Intention to m ke provision for<\/p>\n
K<\/p>\n
K ,<\/p>\n
the deoendants of pmsons who are not
\nthan 7 vars, the some wouid have  =expr’ess\u00a3-y'”: <\/p>\n
specified in the Rules stating that the depeeeerks Vo–f[:even” \u00bb.
\nsuch persons are entitied to be co-nsi\u00e9ered\u00e9 for e.ppoi_ot;rn-anti”-V’<\/p>\n
on compassionate grounds.  to*thVe:.r$.p.onoent,
\nthe petitioner’s case does”:not.’_’fei\u00a7i’the and the
\nappointment cannot belighien    course and
\nthat he is not e’ntitieo    matter of right.<\/p>\n
Chaiienging this writ petition has<\/p>\n
6.  ffhe  has \ufb02ied statement of<\/p>\n
‘ objecitions contesting theivttvrit petition. I have heard the<\/p>\n
 V. “iearhe\u00a2i \u00e9ioeneei for\u00e9theiparties and perused the records.<\/p>\n
A   siready noticed, the first endorsmient of the<\/p>\n
.”‘\u00bb-’44.__V’respon&eV_nt issued to the petitioner stated that the<\/p>\n
  :”petiti.oher should produce death certificate of his father<\/p>\n
.  Sriikamaiah to consider his case for appointment on<\/p>\n
 \u00bb fcompassionate grounds. In the circumstances, as it was<\/p>\n
\\<\/p>\n
\/’ .\n<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
afresh, within the stipulated period. The  <\/p>\n
issued the endorsement ciaimina to be  of  <\/p>\n
the order dated 10.04.2094 passed in:t%ie.h.jiio.2ai15fo’1%,tif<\/p>\n
wherein, it took the stand that,.’_the ‘ciaim fortVa5’soofiotrn1:ont <\/p>\n
on compassionate grounds  of
\na deceased Govommetitwisaniaht\ufb01yi ah_d\ufb02that  ootitionor
\ncannot ciaim to ho a   crnowyeo
\nwho is missing’.”‘jii\u00a7o  set aside by
\nthis Court iii  dated 02.12.2002
\nand a  to\u00e9uth\u00e9vivrwpondant to consider
\nhis casoahd oroig_ido\u00a7aan1~V,abioi*opriate empioyment as soon<\/p>\n
as vae:ancy4″‘arises.’vin A’i:ho”.University. i-iowever, the sold<\/p>\n
aiitra9;d\u00e9\u00e9i’i’was ci.arifii-9.\u00a5dV””i’h”W.A. no.224\/o3 we order dam<\/p>\n
 Vav\ufb01ftor the said rounds of litigation and the<\/p>\n
 possodiilby this Court, the impugned endorsement<\/p>\n
“=-\u00bb_’__”-\u00bb.heroin” dated 07.08.2003 has been issued, stating that,<\/p>\n
   of petitioner’s father is ooiy a \ufb02ction in law, the<\/p>\n
‘  ,..rj4\u00a2’:V”_\u00bb\u00bbp-i\u00e9titioner is not a dependant and hence, mot entitled for<\/p>\n
 appointment on compassionate grounds. The case wouid<\/p>\n
reveal that, the respondent has changw its stand time and<\/p>\n
\\<\/p>\n
\/,2<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
again. Had the respondent taken the stand  _<\/p>\n
taken now, in the beginning Itself, the mattereieu:id:::heyevp:” \u00ab. <\/p>\n
been examined and an appropriate decisfiori,.ren’d#edi._’__Vh\u00a7.\u00a7i E<\/p>\n
this Court. Whereas, the stand teken””the    u<\/p>\n
the endorsements dated   was
\nnot accepted and   consider the
\nmatter. In my view, the ‘o;E,_the case of the
\npetitioner  been in the true
\nspirit of   passed in W.P.\n<\/p>\n
No.241e\/our there iheiimr dated 02.12.2002
\npassed  WiP.’  against which, the writ<\/p>\n
Appeei –viio.2\u00a74Zii3’we:as-  and was dismissed with the<\/p>\n
 ‘.”‘ci3.?*\ufb01ta\ufb025’h.”‘In Arrifivopihion, the reependent has not<\/p>\n
 of the petitioner in the iight of the<\/p>\n
  afoiresaid  The respondent which is a statutory<\/p>\n
 ‘body, oueht to have examined the matter keeping in view,<\/p>\n
  :.”th’e..s\u00a7iirit of the orders passed by this Court. I express my<\/p>\n
  deep anguish against the manner in which, a peer person<\/p>\n
 s  like the petitionei; who has iosi: his father, was driver: to<\/p>\n
repeated rounds of litigation by the respondent and the<\/p>\n
\\\/,<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
petktioner has been made to incur <\/p>\n
undergo suffering. Though I express my  <\/p>\n
considering the plight of the petltlcyino-rr,::A’ar:.;t”\u00abln_o{<\/p>\n
settied position of iaw by the 1-!on’blto7′-Stjprarna’.t:oAurt; <\/p>\n
if there Is a long passage of   the
\ntime the cialrn for appoi}ntmen’\u00a3'”\u00a7\u00a7e,\u00bbVt.:r;\u20ac?@’\u00a7’ssIonate’V’around:
\nmade requires consIderatton_V atf the
\nfamily has   ‘Snot entitted for
\nappointment Vdtdrounds, I am leoaily<\/p>\n
unabiezvvtomorant_tha7’ffe!i\u00a7f\u00bb to the petitioner.<\/p>\n
.3. in [the of uc OF morn Vs. ASHA<\/p>\n
 ‘*–.RAt;%E:’HiH.;ANi)RA AMEEKAR reported in (1994) 2 sec 713,<\/p>\n
 nit’   that;_1..hardshlp of the candidate does not entitia<\/p>\n
hditn\ufb01dto ciaihrn ‘appointment donors the statutory provision.<\/p>\n
In th”eJ__Ar:i~ase of UMESH KUMAR NAGPAL Vs. STATE or<\/p>\n
V”t:V’_AAH.l:\u00a7iu?\u00a7’ANA reported In (1994) 4 sec 133, it has been<\/p>\n
.   o\ufb01bserved that, the compassionate appointment cannot N<\/p>\n
granted after a iapse of a reasonable time. In the case of
\nDEFENCE METAL RESEARCH LABORATORY vs. (5. MURARI
\ntk\/O’<\/p>\n
13<\/span><\/p>\n
reported in (2003) 9 sec 247, it has been had tnat\ufb01rd u<\/p>\n
writ pet-ttidner and his ramny had  dam: <\/p>\n
compassionate appointment for 1!37y\u00e9ars,<\/p>\n
warrant in such circumstances for dd\u00a7rectIr:\u00a7r’.A’the~. <\/p>\n
petitioner’s appointment on cortigdasslonato’V~.grod%\u00e9d\u00a7[ 3 In
\nthe case of STATE or 3A\u00a7\ufb02Mt$t'”}\ufb01\u00a7\ufb01tfnD; ‘lu(A$HM’iR”Vs”.vE SAJAD
\nAHMED MIR reported tndug tzood  it was had
\nthat, from the fdatgof  Lo-f  the date on
\nwhich the   for appointment on
\ncomPasfsIo’r1dt.4\u00a7Viovro’ii:rids:;’to’-‘ho rd.-iovant factor to consider
\nthe raddd ddddrzyddrdavea In spite of death of the<\/p>\n
empioyee.\n<\/p>\n
    ramp. no.3oo24\/oa VI-de order dated<\/p>\n
 that, in the matter of consideration<\/p>\n
of “the..__” ‘at\u00a7:\u00a7*pA|ication I claim for appointment on<\/p>\n
  :_.’com_pa.$s%onate grounds, considering the fact that naady 18<\/p>\n
  y_Ve’a-2′”..A”Ahad elapsed, the claim as not tenable.<\/p>\n
‘M<\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
9. Since the paitioners father was last seeh.r:’eh6~<\/p>\n
heard only on 01.06.1989 and the family of  <\/p>\n
has survived the crisis on now and :=\u00a7incettnere:i’s’ ‘a <\/p>\n
more than 19 years as of novv,-..__the ‘befits-onerV:”Vca;en_ot jtaeh<\/p>\n
extended the reiief, even after  the..uehttor’s;ement
\ndated 87.08.03 —  .;tiz.gfirespondertt. The
\nCourt cannot Iose_s1ghtvof..t:he i,?e\u00a7i*cun&ancee,
\nespeciaily the ‘_:fa;:;i:or{_i’:\u00e9;  rnetterwjhof the present
\nnature. Heneg,   prayed for to the
\npetitlonerg     ‘
\nIn thereeuitkiolv\ufb01ees~.the:foIIowlng:<\/p>\n
 *  4′ ehefazeemsgaongr’etc: entitled to the relief, considering<\/p>\n
  factor I circumstanca. Considering<\/p>\n
   thetfeot th.=$tr;v’r\u00a7n.:;account of the rweated changing stand of<\/p>\n
 respotedent, the petitioner was made to repeatedly<\/p>\n
  eppro\u00e9eh this Court, even though the petitioner is not<\/p>\n
V’  granted the main rend’ prayed for In the wrtt<\/p>\n
  ijpetition, I dmrn It proper to award cost of Rs.20,000\/- In<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
15<\/span><\/p>\n
his favour, which shall be paid to the petit!qg3’ar\u00ab’.A’\u00a7;\u00a7i.j: _<\/p>\n
respendent within a period of two months  <\/p>\n
Writ petition stands disposedlaf, }\u00a7cc\u00e9r6in\u00a7\u00a5\ufb01’;v   <\/p>\n
  _[  Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court R Chandrappa vs The Registrar Bangalore … on 1 December, 2008 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda U ‘. ‘ ….. .. ‘V (3Y\u00abs:\u00e9I. :’P.,i\u00a7\u00a7ciEv\u00a7\u00a7DRA !a}MAR sumsav, ADV.) ‘~._RND 227 QF’ THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYIRG TO QUASH V’ ‘THE VEJSIDORSEMENT DATED 7.8.2003 VIBE ANIVEXURE-H SINCE ‘F!fiE _ EFFEDORSEMENT IS TOTALLY UNJUST, ARSITRARY ANS OF […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-124043","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nR Chandrappa vs The Registrar Bangalore ... on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"R Chandrappa vs The Registrar Bangalore ... on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-04-08T03:02:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"R Chandrappa vs The Registrar Bangalore … on 1 December, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-08T03:02:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1624,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008\",\"name\":\"R Chandrappa vs The Registrar Bangalore ... on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-08T03:02:09+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"R Chandrappa vs The Registrar Bangalore … on 1 December, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"R Chandrappa vs The Registrar Bangalore ... on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"R Chandrappa vs The Registrar Bangalore ... on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-04-08T03:02:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"R Chandrappa vs The Registrar Bangalore … on 1 December, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-08T03:02:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008"},"wordCount":1624,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008","name":"R Chandrappa vs The Registrar Bangalore ... on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-08T03:02:09+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-chandrappa-vs-the-registrar-bangalore-on-1-december-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"R Chandrappa vs The Registrar Bangalore … on 1 December, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124043","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=124043"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124043\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=124043"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=124043"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=124043"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}