{"id":124546,"date":"2011-09-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011"},"modified":"2016-02-19T10:27:29","modified_gmt":"2016-02-19T04:57:29","slug":"shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011","title":{"rendered":"Shri. Roshan Lal Goyal vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 21 September, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Shri. Roshan Lal Goyal vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 21 September, 2011<\/div>\n
                    CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                        Club Building (Near Post Office)\n                      Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067\n                             Tel: +91-11-26161796\n\n                                                Decision No. CIC\/SM\/A\/2011\/000652\/SG\/14722\n                                                       Appeal No. CIC\/SM\/A\/2011\/000652\/SG\n\n\nRelevant facts emerging from the Appeal:\n\n\nAppellant                            :      Mr. R. L.Goyal\n                                            H.NO.550, Kasauli Road,\n                                            Adjacent Punjab Dairy,\n                                            Kalka (Distt.Punchkula).\n                                            PIN-133302\n\nRespondent                   (1)     :      Mr. J. K. Arora\n                                            PIO & Dy. Zonal Head\n                                            UCO Bank, Zonal Office,\n                                            Sector-17-B,\n                                            Chandigarh.\n\n                             (2)     :      Mr. Sunil Kakar,\n                                            General Manager\n                                            UCO Bank, Zonal Office,\n                                            Sector-17-B,\n                                            Chandigarh.\n\n                             (3)     :      Mr. R. K. Sharma\n                                            AGM\n                                            UCO Bank\n                                            5, Sansad Marg,\n                                            New Delhi\n\nRTI application filed on             :      18\/01\/2010\nPIO replied on                       :      20\/02\/2010\nFirst Appeal filed on                :      02\/03\/2010\nFirst Appellate Authority order on   :      -------------\nSecond Appeal received on            :      01\/02\/2011\n\nInformation Sought:\nExcess Reimbursement of Rs.495\/- claimed by Mr. M.R.Mahajan, the then Chief Manager,\nUCOBANK, PATIALA MAIN BRANCH on 13.01.2006 on account of conveyance for December\n, 2005 and Rs.200\/- paid to Mr. Jaabir Singh on 6th May, 2006 which were debited to his cash\ncredit account on 9th May, 2006.\n                Provide the details of the action taken by the Personnel Department Zonal Office,\n               Chandigarh on his letter no CRO\/P&D\/2006 07\/63 along with the photocopies of\n               the correspondence between Patiala Main Branch and Zonal Office, Chandigarh\n               and Head Office on the two topics under RTI Act.\n\n\n                                                                                     Page 1 of 3\n Reply of PIO\nThe query raised at point no.1, 2,3 & 4 of the Appellant's RTI application are not covered within\nthe definition of information under section 2(f) of the RTI Act.\n\nGrounds for the First Appeal:\nThe information and documents were denied by the PIO.\n\nOrder of the First Appellate Authority (FAA):\nNot mentioned.\n\nGround of the Second Appeal:\n   1. The demanded documents were denied by the PIO by terming those documents as \"Not\n      covered within definition of information\" under section 2(f) of the RTI Act.\n   2. The FAA did not take any action on his appeal.\n\nRelevant Facts<\/pre>\n
 emerging during Hearing:\n<\/p>\n
The following were present:\n<\/p>\n
Appellant: Mr. R. L.Goyal on video conference from NIC-Panchkula Studio;
\nRespondent: Mr. J. K. Arora, PIO & Dy. Zonal Head on video conference from NIC-Chandigarh Studio;\n<\/p>\n
         The Appellant has sought copies of four letters of the period 2006 & 2008 and the action
\ntaken on this. The PIO has replied that this is not information as defined under Section 2(f) of the
\nRTI Act. This has been a completely irresponsible reply. The respondent now states that only one
\nof these letters is available on the records and other three letters are not available. It appears that
\nthe PIO has not supplied any information about the action taken on these letters either. It is serious
\nmatter that the bank claims that it does not have the letters and it is very evident at the time the
\ninformation was provided by its letter of 20\/02\/2010 the Bank had not claimed that three of the
\nletters had been stolen\/missing.\n<\/p>\n
The Commission directs Mr. Sunil Kakar, General Manager to inquire into the claim theft\/loss of
\nthree of the letters after February 2010 and send a report to the Commission and the Appellant
\nbefore 20 October 2011.\n<\/p>\n
The PIO states that the then PIO Mr. R. K. Sharma was responsible for refusing to give the
\ninformation claiming that it was not information under Section 2(f) of the RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n
Decision:\n<\/p>\n
The appeal is allowed.\n<\/p>\n
      The Commission directs the Mr. Sunil Kakar, GM to conduct an inquiry into
\nthe theft\/loss of the three letters and send a report to the Appellant and the
\nCommission before 20 October 2011.\n<\/p>\n
The issue before the Commission is of refusing the information by the then PIO Mr. R. K.
\nSharma PIO without any reasonable cause.\n<\/p>\n
From the facts before the Commission it appears that the then PIO Mr. Sharma is guilty of not
\nfurnishing information without any reasonable cause.\n<\/p>\n
It appears that the PIO’s actions attract the penal provisions of Section 20 (1). A showcause notice
\nis being issued to him, and he is directed give his reasons to the Commission to show cause why
\npenalty should not be levied on him.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                        Page 2 of 3<\/span><\/p>\n
 The then PIO Mr. R. K. Sharma will present himself before the Commission at the above address
\non 11 October 2011 at 12.30pm alongwith his written submissions showing cause why penalty
\nshould not be imposed on him as mandated under Section 20 (1). He will also submit proof of
\nhaving given the information to the appellant.\n<\/p>\n
If there are other persons responsible for the delay in providing the information to the
\nAppellant the PIO is directed to inform such persons of the show cause hearing and direct them
\nto appear before the Commission with him. If no other responsible persons are brought by the
\npersons asked to showcause hearing, it will be presumed that they are the responsible persons.\n<\/p>\n
This decision is announced in open chamber.\n<\/p>\n
Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.
\nAny information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                               Shailesh Gandhi
\n                                                                                     Information Commissioner
\n                                                                                            21 September 2011
\n(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)DIS<\/p>\n
                                                                                                         Page 3 of 3<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Shri. Roshan Lal Goyal vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 21 September, 2011 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi – 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No. CIC\/SM\/A\/2011\/000652\/SG\/14722 Appeal No. CIC\/SM\/A\/2011\/000652\/SG Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. R. L.Goyal H.NO.550, Kasauli Road, Adjacent Punjab […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-124546","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nShri. Roshan Lal Goyal vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri. Roshan Lal Goyal vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-19T04:57:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri. Roshan Lal Goyal vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 21 September, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-19T04:57:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011\"},\"wordCount\":553,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011\",\"name\":\"Shri. Roshan Lal Goyal vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-19T04:57:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri. Roshan Lal Goyal vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 21 September, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri. Roshan Lal Goyal vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri. Roshan Lal Goyal vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-19T04:57:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri. Roshan Lal Goyal vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 21 September, 2011","datePublished":"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-19T04:57:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011"},"wordCount":553,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011","name":"Shri. Roshan Lal Goyal vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-19T04:57:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-roshan-lal-goyal-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-21-september-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri. Roshan Lal Goyal vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 21 September, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124546","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=124546"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124546\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=124546"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=124546"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=124546"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}