{"id":124601,"date":"2009-08-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009"},"modified":"2014-10-25T09:45:09","modified_gmt":"2014-10-25T04:15:09","slug":"sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri. Veerabhadreshwara &#8230; vs The Director Of Marketing on 27 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri. Veerabhadreshwara &#8230; vs The Director Of Marketing on 27 August, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ajit J Gunjal<\/div>\n<pre>WP NOs.64903~914 of 2009\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD\n\nDATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST \nBEFORE  ' A A\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE;\"AJIT J;G\"\u00a7if1\u00a7Imf}\u00a7I.'-- _ V': \"  \nWRIT PETITION NOs.6-4903-16149 14 \/T12OA0\u00e9g.(AOPi\\\/:::g;,.A \nBETWEEN: A A A A A A\n\n1. Sri Veerabhadreshwara Ind1istri'e.$,\nBy its Prop: Sharanagjpa,  A \nS\/O Ayyappa Sureban} '  '-\n\nAge: 58 years. \"\n\n2. Shanthi' Ag\u00e9n_\u00a2ies,. \"  f \nBy its PrOpE\"\u00bb.I\u00e9's*\u00a2\\:antr,aj,_V\" \" \nS\/O Bhavar1al_Jai1h; _  \"\n\nAge:   4' A\n\n3. J.K.Tr'a;1eArs,,  O A \nBy its Propf' Jaikumzar, '\nS \/O-iKaui11arayya~ AV1_f_1_1;\u00e9iy,.\n\n * Age: Bi\ufb01yevars.\n\n   Jwatraj\n\n]53.Ohra, ?3y7jij_t.sf'PrOp: Couthamchand,\nS\/\"Q Manickichand Zangda,\n\n Age; 50}\/\"ears.\n\nA '~?_\" Rajashree Trading Company,\nBy its prop: Rasheed Ahammed,\n\n123\/ O Rajesab Hanajageri,\n\n  -*-'Age: 40 years.\n\n\n\n6. Shree Raghavendra Traders,\n\nBy its Prop: Susheelabai,\n\nW \/o Shivabasayya Kochalapurmath,\nAge: 60 years.\n\n7. Mahendra Trading Company,   \n\nBy its Prop: Mahendrakumar,\nS\/o I-Iirechand Jain,\n\nAge: 42 years.\n\n8. Sri Manjunath Trading Conip.:_ainy3\n\nBy its Prop: Devaraj,\n\nS \/ o Veeranagouda Hos__a3mar1_i, 3. .  ~ V \n\nAge: 35 years.\n\n9. Sri. Sharanabasaveishwaija  \nTrading Compiariy; _ _    V\nBy its Prop; 'Sharaiiappag-\u00ab-._V  _ _\nS\/0 Channappa ;i_\\\/\u00a3utta1,.  .. \nAge: 42v3'8--3I'VSV.\":.    \n\n10. Sri SanthoShVTrjaders; \nGeneral m'erCh,antS  \" T\"\nCommission Agents, \n\nBy  Prop: Shivasharanappa,\n\n A\" 'V V'  S\/0' vsGu'rIdappa Hosangadi,\n  _v50_ years __\n\nii 1  A'oi.d'V..Traders,\nBy its Propz\" Saleem Abid,\n\n   . S\/0 KashimsabTalka1,\n\"~.~e.___\"Age: 35.years.\n\n-  Deepchand\n --  Rathanchand 85 Sons,\n  Qriound nut and cotton Merchants,\n\nWP Nos.64903-914 of 2009\n\n\n\nWP Nos.64903--914 of 2009\n\nBy its Partner: Shanthilal,\nS\/o Deepchand Jain,\nAge: 60 years,\n\nA11 are Businessmen,\nAll R\/o Kuknoor,   _   \nTq: Yelburga, Dt: Koppel.     '\n\n(By Sri. P.G.Moga1i, Advocate)\n\nAND:\n\n1. The Director of  3.   1'  v\nNo. 16, 2116 Raj BhaVah_._Roadf; \nBangalore--1.__  _  \n\n2. The Agric1i,_1tu;iai_VProd1.i\u00a7:e   B' \nMarketirigCoirriniitteoe,     \nYelburga-,3 R1,\/\u00ab:.~; VKu1;anooBfr ,. A  V;\nTq: Ye'1\"t3u.If\u00a7;:a, Ut:'-Kopppal,  'B\n\nBy S__ecret'.:3.1{,_3_zL'.y   ...RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p>{By Smt. K.Vidya\\rath_i; \ufb01es? for R1<br \/>\nShri. Ma11.ii&lt;arriju;C.Basareddy, Adv., for R2)<\/p>\n<p>. vhvpetitions are filed under Articles 226 and<br \/>\n22&#039;7&quot;=of the.j&#039;j_C-onstitution of India praying to quash the<br \/>\norde.r\/resolution No.4 passed by respondent No.2 dated<\/p>\n<p> 07.08.2609 vide Anr1exure&#8211;C insofar as it relates to the<br \/>\nA .V&#039;&quot;p.etitior1ers; direct the respondent No.2 to execute the<br \/>\n_ \ufb01fregistyered leasewcum-saie deeds in respect of the sites<br \/>\ni  ailotted to the petitioners within a stipulated time; and<br \/>\n&quot; etc.<\/p>\n<p>WP N0s.64903&#8211;914 of 2009<\/p>\n<p>These petitions coming on for preliminary hearing<br \/>\nthis day, the Court made the following: &#039; <\/p>\n<p>Snm. ixxndyavaun, ke}a\u00a7dai\\}\ufb01gnhe,\u00a2aarr<br \/>\nGovernment Pleader, accepts<br \/>\nNo.1. Shri. Ma\u00a31ikarjun.C.Basa1;e-ddy,  copnsel, is<br \/>\ndirected to take   <\/p>\n<p>Even   are listed for<br \/>\npre1irnina1&quot;;\u00a7,r&quot;V1ri\u00a7fVp3j&#039;*\u00ab1,:ri:&quot;i\\;-&#039;1g__ the same is taken up<\/p>\n<p>tmm@&amp;w\u00aeaTth&#039;<\/p>\n<p>2. I\u00e9ienticai have been disposed of wherein<\/p>\n<p> the\u00bb\u00bb&#8217;1iprfeifure .&#8217;1&#8217;iOti.(;_e__pis the subject matter of a batch of<\/p>\n<p>V&#8221;. 2 &#8216; writ. pevtitiolnsf V .. _<\/p>\n<p>  Agrievance of the petitioners is that without<\/p>\n<p>.&#8217;4&#8243;&#8216;-dgiving &#8220;si.1fficient time notice has been issued. It is<\/p>\n<p>  Cori:-ended by the learned counsel appearing for the 21&#8243;&#8221;-&#8216;1<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I<\/p>\n<p>WP Nos.64903-914 of 2009<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">: 5 :<\/span><br \/>\nrespondent that in these cases, the APMC has not<br \/>\nexecuted the necessary lease-cum&#8211;sale deed agreerrients.<\/p>\n<p>4. If it is so, I am of the View that the<br \/>\nissuing forfeiture notice would not  of<br \/>\nsame is liable to be quashed.\n<\/p>\n<p>after the intimation of allotment,'&#8221;&#8216;res&#8217;ponc&#8217;.entg<br \/>\nnot executed the 1ease&#8211;curriV;&#8217;sa1:e.vVdeed*iagreernents in<br \/>\nfavour of the petitio;:I7.1_;\u00e9?.&#8217;sA.  reasons are<br \/>\nsought to be attributed,   sale deed<br \/>\nagreements.  _e.:;eicu:ted,ii&#8217;inevertheless, without<br \/>\nresorting   1ease&#8211;cum&#8211;sale deeds,<\/p>\n<p>forfeiturenotice could&#8221;  have been issued.<\/p>\n<p>if &#8216;Le\u00e9arned counsel for the petitioners submits that<\/p>\n<p>I bpefissued to the 2nd respondent to execute<\/p>\n<p>necessaryilease&#8211;cum&#8211;sale deeds if they are not already<\/p>\n<p>executed. Indeed, such an exercise is required to be<\/p>\n<p>i &#8216;diozieii by respondent No.2 on the petitioners&#8217; furnishing<\/p>\n<p>   necessary details as well as depositing the requisite<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>WP N0s.6-4903-914 of 2009<\/p>\n<p>amount required to execute necessary 1ease&#8211;curI_1.:_saEe<\/p>\n<p>deed agreements. Hence the following order is <\/p>\n<p>(1&#8217;) Petition stands disposed of.\n<\/p>\n<p>notice is set aside.    &#8221;  V\n<\/p>\n<p>(ii) The second respondent sPLq;II&#8221;exe(rate..  dd<br \/>\nlease&#8211;cum~sale deeci%.V:VV:i&#8217;72 favouf<br \/>\npetitioners s&#8211;1gbject..t&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;td_:&#8217;&#8211; &#8216;sa.t.isfytiiig*-A the<\/p>\n<p>allotment Rule\u00a7_:7s, &#8221; &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>  Governrnent Pleader, is<br \/>\npermitted to appearance within four weeks.<\/p>\n<p>Shri Ma11i\u00a7{afjun.;&#8221;CBssdereddy, learned counsel, is<\/p>\n<p>d  &#8216;peratnaitfed t&#8217;e..&#8217;fi1e pd\ufb01sie\u00e9r within four weeks.<\/p>\n<p>se,\/w<br \/>\njuDGE<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  K1;:s*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri. Veerabhadreshwara &#8230; vs The Director Of Marketing on 27 August, 2009 Author: Ajit J Gunjal WP NOs.64903~914 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST BEFORE &#8216; A A THE HON&#8217;BLE MR.JUSTICE;&#8221;AJIT J;G&#8221;\u00a7if1\u00a7Imf}\u00a7I.&#8217;&#8211; _ V&#8217;: &#8221; WRIT PETITION NOs.6-4903-16149 14 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-124601","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri. Veerabhadreshwara ... vs The Director Of Marketing on 27 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri. Veerabhadreshwara ... vs The Director Of Marketing on 27 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-10-25T04:15:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri. Veerabhadreshwara &#8230; vs The Director Of Marketing on 27 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-10-25T04:15:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":463,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri. Veerabhadreshwara ... vs The Director Of Marketing on 27 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-10-25T04:15:09+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri. Veerabhadreshwara &#8230; vs The Director Of Marketing on 27 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri. Veerabhadreshwara ... vs The Director Of Marketing on 27 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri. Veerabhadreshwara ... vs The Director Of Marketing on 27 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-10-25T04:15:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri. Veerabhadreshwara &#8230; vs The Director Of Marketing on 27 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-10-25T04:15:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009"},"wordCount":463,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009","name":"Sri. Veerabhadreshwara ... vs The Director Of Marketing on 27 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-10-25T04:15:09+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabhadreshwara-vs-the-director-of-marketing-on-27-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri. Veerabhadreshwara &#8230; vs The Director Of Marketing on 27 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124601","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=124601"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124601\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=124601"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=124601"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=124601"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}