{"id":125002,"date":"1974-03-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1974-03-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974"},"modified":"2015-05-31T14:41:00","modified_gmt":"2015-05-31T09:11:00","slug":"area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974","title":{"rendered":"Area Committee, Hindu Religious &#8230; vs K. Kasinathan Padayachi And Ors. on 27 March, 1974"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Madras High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Area Committee, Hindu Religious &#8230; vs K. Kasinathan Padayachi And Ors. on 27 March, 1974<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: AIR 1975 Mad 6<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K Veeraswami<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: K Veeraswami, Varadarajan<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>   K. Veeraswami, C.J.  <\/p>\n<p> 1. The Court of the    Subordinate Judge of Thanjavur at Mayuram, in O. S. 14 of 1919, settled a scheme for   management      of   Sri   Viswanathaswami temple  at  Devanaoor village.    A  Board  of Trustees   was  constituted   under this scheme which inter alia provided that, if any vacancy occurred by death or resignation or removal, it should be filled up by the majority of the resident    villagers    of   Devanoor.     In    1961, three  persons were elected  by the  residents, of whom one Veeramuthu Padayachi was the managing trustee.   He died in February, 1961, and it was said that, on 5-3-1961 the first respondent  was  elected  in   that  vacancy.    The other two trustees relinquished office due to old age    and    the    Assistant    Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments appointed  respondents 2 to  5  as trustees of the  temple.    Alagiriswami,     J.  quashed  this order.   The learned Judge took the view that, so long as the scheme stood unamended, the Assistant Commissioner had no power to appoint any trustees of the temple.   He was also of the view that Section 118 (2) (b) (ii) could not  be  relied  on  by  the  Assistant  Commissioner, as it was irrelevant to the consideration of the question that arose in the case. Hence this   appeal   by   the  Assistant   Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment.\n<\/p>\n<p>  2.        It seems to us that the view of the learned Judge  as  to the application of Section   118  (2)   (ii)  cannot  be  sustained.    Section  118 is one of the transitional provisions. At the time the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act was enacted, there  were  schemes  settled   by  the  erstwhile Hindu  Religious and Charitable Endowments Board  and also by courts under Section  92, Civil   P.   C.     The   1950   Act   and   1959   Act brought about drastic changes in the control and  administration     of  temples  and  specific endowments.    The power to appoint trustees for  temples,  both  listed and non-listed,  was vested in the Commissioner or Assistant Commissioner Hindu Religions and Charitable Hn-dowments,  and     the period  for which  they could   function  is   also   fixed.     The  schemes which were settled by court, provided for appointment of trustees by it or by election or by other means, recognised by custom or usage. In view of this, the transitional provisions in Chapter XII were enacted, in order that uniformity  could be  achieved.    Clauses  (i)  and (ii) of Section  118 (2) (b) go together.    The first of them deals with repugnancy between any provision in any scheme settled or deemed to have been settled &#8212; in the present case under Section 92. Civil P. C, 1908 &#8212; and in force immediately before 30-9-195J, and the provision relating to the particular matter in the Act. In such an event, Clause (i) of Section 118 (2) (b) declares that the provision in the scheme shall be void to the extent of repugnancy and pro tanto the corresponding provision in the Act will prevail. Clause (ii) is the consequential provision. By enactment of Section 47 relating to appointment of trustees, the elective principle applied to the constitution of a Committee of trustees has been done away with. The Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act is intended to be a comprehensive Code which amended and consolidated the law relating to the administration and governance of Hindu Religious and Charitable institutions and endowments in the State of Tamil Nadu, so that, notwithstanding the provisions of the Act, it is not possible to hold that, even after the coming into force of the Act, Trustees of temples could be appointed by election. There being a specific provision in the Act, namely, Section 47, for appointment of trustees to temples and the power to make the appointment being vested in the authority named by the section, the provision in the scheme in this case to elect trustees is repugnant and, therefore, that provision is void. If it is void land the provision in the Act is to prevail, then it becomes clear that there is no longer any scope for the argument, namely, that, unless the scheme is amended, the elective principles will hold the field and the Assistant Commissioner has no power to appoint trustees.\n<\/p>\n<p> 3. But it is contended ihat, since Section 64 (5) (b) states that, if the Deputy Commissioner is satisfied that any such scheme referred to in Clause (a) is inconsistent with the Act and the rules made thereunder, he may, at any time, after consulting the trustee and the persons having interest, modify it in such manner as may be necessary to bring it into conformity with the provisions of the Act and the rules made thereunder, the scheme should continue to have force until it is amended. In our opinion, this provision will have to be read in conjunction with Section 118 (2) (b) (ii). Section 64 (5) (b) applies to a case where the scheme is inconsistent with the Act and Section 118 (2) (b) (ii) applies to a provision in the scheme repugnant to a provision in the scheme of Act. In the latter case, Section 118 (2) (b) (ii) specifically renders the repugnant provision in the scheme void. The effect is that the provision in the scheme because it is void, can have no longer any force and no amendment of the scheme is necessary in order to bring out the effect which is declared by the statute. It seems to us, therefore, that the scope of Section 64 (5) (b) will have to be confined to the amendment of the scheme not covered by Section 118 (2) (b) (ii).\n<\/p>\n<pre> 4.       On that view, the appeal is allowed with costs.    Counsel's fee Rs.  100\/-. \n \n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court Area Committee, Hindu Religious &#8230; vs K. Kasinathan Padayachi And Ors. on 27 March, 1974 Equivalent citations: AIR 1975 Mad 6 Author: K Veeraswami Bench: K Veeraswami, Varadarajan JUDGMENT K. Veeraswami, C.J. 1. The Court of the Subordinate Judge of Thanjavur at Mayuram, in O. S. 14 of 1919, settled a scheme [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-125002","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madras-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Area Committee, Hindu Religious ... vs K. Kasinathan Padayachi And Ors. on 27 March, 1974 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Area Committee, Hindu Religious ... vs K. Kasinathan Padayachi And Ors. on 27 March, 1974 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1974-03-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-31T09:11:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Area Committee, Hindu Religious &#8230; vs K. Kasinathan Padayachi And Ors. on 27 March, 1974\",\"datePublished\":\"1974-03-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-31T09:11:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974\"},\"wordCount\":932,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madras High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974\",\"name\":\"Area Committee, Hindu Religious ... vs K. Kasinathan Padayachi And Ors. on 27 March, 1974 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1974-03-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-31T09:11:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Area Committee, Hindu Religious &#8230; vs K. Kasinathan Padayachi And Ors. on 27 March, 1974\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Area Committee, Hindu Religious ... vs K. Kasinathan Padayachi And Ors. on 27 March, 1974 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Area Committee, Hindu Religious ... vs K. Kasinathan Padayachi And Ors. on 27 March, 1974 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1974-03-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-31T09:11:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Area Committee, Hindu Religious &#8230; vs K. Kasinathan Padayachi And Ors. on 27 March, 1974","datePublished":"1974-03-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-31T09:11:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974"},"wordCount":932,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madras High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974","name":"Area Committee, Hindu Religious ... vs K. Kasinathan Padayachi And Ors. on 27 March, 1974 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1974-03-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-31T09:11:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/area-committee-hindu-religious-vs-k-kasinathan-padayachi-and-ors-on-27-march-1974#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Area Committee, Hindu Religious &#8230; vs K. Kasinathan Padayachi And Ors. on 27 March, 1974"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125002","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=125002"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125002\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=125002"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=125002"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=125002"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}