{"id":12557,"date":"2008-07-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008"},"modified":"2014-06-27T19:21:17","modified_gmt":"2014-06-27T13:51:17","slug":"suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"Suresh vs The State Through Additional … on 15 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Suresh vs The State Through Additional … on 15 July, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: N.Ananda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH comm' op' KARNATAKA~ \ufb02\n\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARG_P;~~---- %    % \n\nDATED: THIS THE 15% DAY 01-' 2908 A T     \n\nTHE HoN'BL:-3 MR,..:psr\u00a74Cg\u00a3a;ANA\u00a7ii)A \" VA \nCRIMINAL REVISION pE*r5 *j*oN No,k374 cm-2007\n\nSure-sh, = V j\nS\/o.Shamu Naik,-- V  \nOoc:Drivcr KSRTQ \n\nDepot:'No.\"1,=..f5. 'V _  _\nR\/axoranti    \nTemp1e\"I.'handa--,.  ' \u00ab. V \"\nGulhargagv, -  % %\n\n4  .  ' .. PEPYTIONER\n(By fmsaga: lf'ati1.',.Aa\u00abgoc~ate)\n\n    \"\"\" \n\n A Stat\u00e9' Add}.\n 'I'1a\u00a3\ufb01c  \n\n j_  V .. RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
(By=\u00ab.S1*i.f3ubhas Mylapur, Govt. Plcader)<\/p>\n
This criminal It-vision pc\ufb01tion is am 1118.397 Cr.P.C.<\/p>\n
~  to set aside the order of dismissal passed by the
\n” _ ‘ –,Fri_.S\u00a7J., Gulbarga dated 14.2.2007 passed in Crl.A.No.51\/()6
\n‘  in con\ufb01rming the rxanvictima. order passed by the I Addl.<\/p>\n
   WJMI-“\u00ab’C, Gulbarga in c.c.No.159s\/200:3 dated 21.3.2006.<\/p>\n
This criminal revision petition, coming on for adn\ufb01ssioa,<\/p>\n
this day, the Court made the following:<\/p>\n
ORBER<\/p>\n
The petitioner was txiad and convicted $15 V
\npunishable under Sections 279, 337, 338 we
\noffence punishable under Section  of   ” u
\n1988. The \ufb01rst appellate court  “I
\nof conviction. Thcmfore, the is b\ufb02f\ufb01ifg   L.<\/p>\n
by invoking Scc\ufb01on 397 IPC.\n<\/p>\n
 ‘thewfacts of the case, it is
\nnecess\u00e9i.:Ay”    of the Supreme Court<\/p>\n
reported _ A1R  mag”  931 (STATE 01+’ KERALA vs.<\/p>\n
 .  Pua\ufb02\u00e9urgaazqa li;[a?.T.H…JATHAVEDAN NAMBOODIRI) wherein<\/p>\n
  \u00b0i1′{__3uI’\u00a3 has dealt with limitaticvns of rcvisional<\/p>\n
   of appreciation of cv:d’ encc when<\/p>\n
‘V congiigihpfv\ufb01sndmgs are recorded by the Trial Court and the<\/p>\n
K x V  \ufb01rst4_ua;pV\u00a7c1iate court. In the above decision at paragraph 5 it<\/p>\n
.’  ‘i\ufb01 <\/p>\n
“5. Having examined the impugned judgment of
\nthe High Cow! and bearing in mind the<\/p>\n
rm? ($~’9″‘*”‘J””‘<\/p>\n
contentions raised by the Ieamed counseifor the
\nparties, we have no hesizaiim to some iofihe’-\u00ab_ “-,V’
\nmnciusion that in the case on hand,
\nCourt has exceeded iis revisiana1ju:is\u00a2Ziei%\u00a3zifL’:.A_TInL” %<\/p>\n
iis revisional jurisdiction, iiigiriigh.     \u00e9
\nfor and examine the record  if
\nthe purpose of sa\ufb01sfjjfirg  ia$eg’,’ a.’\u20ac\u00bb”‘V’\u00a7\u00a72 : 3’}le’T\u00a7 A
\ncorrectness, legality or  ‘
\nsentence or order, ‘In other  the<\/p>\n
is (me of supemisnfy jzi\u00e9isiiiciiim  by the<\/p>\n
High Court for justice.\n<\/p>\n
Bu: the  be equated<\/p>\n
   Court nor can it be
\nireciieai evgii   Appellate Juiis’ diction
\nOrdinariiy,V  it would not be appropriate<\/p>\n
,  for the Hi’gh_’C3oi.i1’t to re-appreciate the evidence<\/p>\n
   to its own ooncfusions on the same<\/p>\n
  i.  has already been appreciated
\n”  by   as well as the Sessions Judge
\n in unless any glaring feature is brought to<\/p>\n
 notice of me High Court whidz would<\/p>\n
AA  otherwts’ e tantamount to gross miscarriage’ of<\/p>\n
k’   \ufb02miae-‘ N \u00e9,W.,i\u00a3,w<\/p>\n
however the same was disbelieved by the ‘l’r’na1  <\/p>\n
of positive evidence of PW–\u00bbI5 Motor   <\/p>\n
Shankar. The acc\ufb02 cm; was not:-diie-to    b j 2<\/p>\n
failure. Thus, We \ufb01nd that judgI:i\u00a3*.7;1t’:s;–A.A_{:i’1;V<\/p>\n
based on proper appxecia\u20acio1\u00a7*~9f   V<\/p>\n
and also attendant  _\n<\/p>\n
6.’I’hc accused’  d1’3’vi1ggL”a.._i3z;s\u00abwithin Gl\ufb01barga city<\/p>\n
limits. The bus went    a road side<\/p>\n
txcc.  ‘3″he:V  that due to sudden mechamca’ 1
\nfailum. “r1_;e i\ufb01ji\ufb02f\u00e9&.\u00a7y’\u20ac%i_Tit\ufb01\u20acSSCS have deposed that accident<\/p>\n
 upiace di1e.. t\u00a7 rassh and negligent driving of petitioner.<\/p>\n
 do not \ufb01nd any glaring errors committed by<\/p>\n
    appreciation of evidence. ‘fhcmfom, this<\/p>\n
  rc~appreciatc evidence to arrive at its own<\/p>\n
 A.m5nc1i:”s .ions.\n<\/p>\n
 7. As far as the conviction recorded by the courts<\/p>\n
” fbexaw under Section 137 of the Motor vehigzes Act, it is<\/p>\n
JV,<\/p>\n
neccssaxy to state that witnesses for prosecution _h\ufb01v;_-:, ~1r;_1ot<\/p>\n
deposed them was no mob fury and  <\/p>\n
position to take all reasonable s\ufb01gps  W <\/p>\n
attention for injured passcngexs.
\nrecord to Show that accused   L.<\/p>\n
police o\ufb01ccr any inbxmation    \u00e9hemfom,
\nconviction recorded   for   o\ufb02enoe
\npunishable undgr  Act is set<\/p>\n
aside. It is    have sentenced<\/p>\n
pctitidi1er’–fo1″.  under Sections 279, 337
\nand 333 rm” mg o\ufb01”eg1c\u00a7_’;1;1der Section 279 we is tcchmc’ al<\/p>\n
o\ufb01iigc\u00e9t and if’1m\u00a71fges:With the major o\ufb01hnccs like Section<\/p>\n
    304-A. Therefore, when petitioner was<\/p>\n
  o\ufb01ianccs like Section 337 and 338, there<\/p>\n
 ng.–_. 1ict:\u00a3f for the courts below to sentence petitioner for<\/p>\n
   \u20ac.*I3 o\ufb01.\u20acV\ufb01(\u00e9\u20ac under Section 279 {PC}. (NLNAGARAJU vs. STATE<\/p>\n
‘%%{2ca4} 4 Crimes 52 AT 56). In View of this, the jadgmtmts<\/p>\n
    by the courts below nscd to be mod\ufb01ed to the extent<\/p>\n
stated above.  .  M”\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
9. In the result, Ipass the     V<\/p>\n
Criminal petition is   VTh\u00a7  L’<\/p>\n
conviction passed by courts for’   ;_$3unishabIae
\nunder Section 187  is set aside and
\npetitioner is acgquittcvi : \u00a2ae:;\u00a7e%}%i%%;,;g\ufb01;shab:e under
\nSection 187 cf    passed by
\ncourts    S\u00e9c\ufb01on 2’79 IPC is set
\naside,   passed by the courts
\nbelow \u00a36:  under Sections 337 and 338<\/p>\n
3d\/—\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Suresh vs The State Through Additional … on 15 July, 2008 Author: N.Ananda IN THE HIGH comm’ op’ KARNATAKA~ \ufb02 CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARG_P;~~—- % % DATED: THIS THE 15% DAY 01-‘ 2908 A T THE HoN’BL:-3 MR,..:psr\u00a74Cg\u00a3a;ANA\u00a7ii)A ” VA CRIMINAL REVISION pE*r5 *j*oN No,k374 cm-2007 Sure-sh, = V j S\/o.Shamu Naik,– […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12557","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSuresh vs The State Through Additional ... on 15 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Suresh vs The State Through Additional ... on 15 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-06-27T13:51:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Suresh vs The State Through Additional … on 15 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-27T13:51:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":733,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008\",\"name\":\"Suresh vs The State Through Additional ... on 15 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-27T13:51:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Suresh vs The State Through Additional … on 15 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Suresh vs The State Through Additional ... on 15 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Suresh vs The State Through Additional ... on 15 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-06-27T13:51:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Suresh vs The State Through Additional … on 15 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-27T13:51:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008"},"wordCount":733,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008","name":"Suresh vs The State Through Additional ... on 15 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-27T13:51:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-the-state-through-additional-on-15-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Suresh vs The State Through Additional … on 15 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12557","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12557"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12557\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12557"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12557"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12557"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}