{"id":125629,"date":"2009-08-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009"},"modified":"2015-03-07T15:30:39","modified_gmt":"2015-03-07T10:00:39","slug":"state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"State By Shirahatti vs Babusab Ramjansab Doddamani on 5 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
State By Shirahatti vs Babusab Ramjansab Doddamani on 5 August, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Jawad Rahim<\/div>\n
_ Dist Qadag\n\n_  _I\u00bb--IOI\\I\"ISLI1;,__v'COiIR'I' MAY BE PLEASED TO ALLOW THIS\n 'jV-V'\u00ab.__ C.RIIMINAL__A'REVN. PETITION AND SET ASIDE 'I'I~II3, ORIDER\n v.Ii)'Ii5.L'IA.2.2008 LEARNED I)IS'I'. es: SESSIONS I,}U[j)C}E.\n\n_V  IN SC No.36\/08 (ORDERS ON BAIL APPLICATION\n jf \u00ab:I,E7'I'I\u00bb-II\u00ab: ACCUSED) 'I'I~1E BAIL AI>I'->I,ICA'rI_OI\\I FILED BY THE\n\nIN 'I\ufb01I-II; HIGH COU]E'{'I' OF KARNATAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD\nIDATED TI---I18 'FHI*3 5m 1)\/\u00abW OF AEJGUST. 2Or,)S 1'\nBEFORIS   ._ \nTHEI-1ON'BLE MR. JUSTICI\u00ab:JAw;\u00e9;r;~   A\n\nCRIMINAL RISVISION I>I\u00ab:'I'I*.If'I\"O.N N\u00a2;'2.QS0\/:2OOs_;I_'~\u00bb  \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nState by ShirahaI'I.i\nPolice STatiOI;1 '\n\n  P1'\u00a3'I.'1'I'10.I\\II\u20acR\n\n(By Sri. P. H.  t*!?L\"Q1P]__  3 . \"\n\nAND:\n\nBabu Sab I5{a;IIaj_e1I:1Se1b' \n\nAge: 32 yearsa, OCC: '\":!'e1i'i'0Ii11\u00a7g*--. '\n\nR\/ O. Shirha.tt.i\"._\"5l'ahI1::'V._Shi.r1i'9.'EI;i\n\n .....   RI3;SI>>ONI)I\u00ab:N'I\n = 'CRIAIQPV\"\u00bbI\u00a7iLI43I) U\/S397 & 401 CR.P.C BY THE\n\nAr)VOC:ATE\"_'FO'I\u00a7\"'*rISIIa PE'.'l'I'1\"IONER PRAYING THAT THIS\n\n&L,0\/\n\n \n\n\n\nACCUSED U\/SEC. 187{2) (a){ii) R\/W. s1\u00ab:C.439 01? _.,C\nAND FIFC. A \"\n\n\"nus REVISION Pi:3\".i'I'i'I()N COMING ON Irgiaz   0 A\"\n\nHEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MA1_):a;Vfr}11\u00ab: 1\u00a7'('J'k;'i;\ufb01(:)_'.?v\"IV'E'~I.C3--:_\n\n ..M' \n\nThis revision u11dc1:.SCLtiiQ:1  \u00a7i\u00a7;*&r(*1'.t>d\nagai11st the order    de\ufb01ed\n05.12.2008<\/pre>\n
 E111O\\&fii’1V\u00a7;:,._H16″H\u00e9i’p}3ii(‘a’1.i(\u00a7371_ iindei” S(;’.CI.i()1]
\n16′?[2)(a){ii) R[‘\u00bb>v”‘:’34\u00a7:C0A;;41.”39’C:\ufb01P..C 1133’ if’Cs0p(\u00a70\ufb01d0e11t,\/accused.<\/p>\n
2. VI?-Ieeifci AV’r5V5:a_ViC.11 .0 ‘ \u00bb <\/p>\n
3. C0\ufb01–i.raCt1.1\u00e911 i’\u00e9;Cis3. \u00e9Li=\u20ac::\u00a5 “\ufb01le 1’esp0n.dCr1i,\/ac’:<'*usad was<\/p>\n
 (11'1'c3.1'\u00a7'__ff::;C1"Vf\u00a33}' 0E'fei"1a:C\u00e9v,puhishabIe under SCct.i0r1 .376 of {PC<\/p>\n
 a.n.C'r,was' ,1.21\u00a7{C,_n into CuSt.0dy during ir1v\u20ac:s%4igat.io;'1 on<\/p>\n
  the daie of arresi he was in dCtCnt.ion<\/p>\n
. penci'i':r1g i.1'1'Ve:94ijig21t.i<)n. His remand was peri0div9.s “i11oE\u00b0\u00a7.’i1e(1 w\u00abit.i10’1′;1.<\/p>\n
that. period the Magis11’2:11.e cotlld 1}(E$E~..VE1L}U;i(}1fiZC _1’1i:=.sV (i’\u00e9fi.’ei11′.i~:*n:I1<\/p>\n
siibsequerii. io }’)\u20ac’i”i.()d of 60  i1:..*\u00a7*iv’..v.f S\u20acC{li’-:}I,1_ 1\u20ac_5v’\u00a77[?..} of<\/p>\n
C1*.P.C..\n<\/p>\n
4. The St.ai’e”op”pose_d \u20ac_.1′;e’: 21ppIie_a’i;i()i1f’con1′.em.ing that.
\nthe offences 1: ioii.-4″wVhie:h.  “:;tr::eus’e_ci=* was crhargecl was
\n\u00a7)L1r1.ishatj>’ie Wit}: V:5iII].1)1.v’\u00a7);’\u00a7:’:V’;v’L311’I’11′(Vi”1’1t i'()f”I1’1′”e and miriimiim period<\/p>\n
Of.i1T1p1’iSO’i’3.In\u20ac.\ufb021. was 4″\/f..’I”1L1S. the period for I”i1ing the<\/p>\n
(\u00e91i’121rge sheet “was  d’.’.iyV:’\u20acs~;”V The leanied Sessions Judge<\/p>\n
‘V’i?.<::jec:'Lec'i~ proseeiiiiofi's——–eo'ni,ention and ac.reepi.e(.1 the plea of<\/p>\n
*i'he=ai'e'(:y1sed'a'r'ic\u00a7'by the iinpugiied order directed his ielease.<\/p>\n
Aggriekfed by iij_i.e5'sa1"1ie. the Si'.a1.e is in revision.<\/p>\n
_ 5. T1-"1'.e main. question that arises is whether ihe period<\/p>\n
0' _S.\u00a7i'.-1}V)'[1l21i:\u20acd for filing of charge sheet: in the case ieleltiiigg to<\/p>\n
gap<\/p>\n
(3<\/p>\n
life. is the main pL'esc1"ipii011 and not the mini.mun1 s<311t:enC6:
\nof 10 years. in the instarll. case. the 'c1CC11S(,'C1 itlass been<\/p>\n
(.:ha1'gg11 376 of {PC<\/p>\n
which on proof of guilt could be imposed with a pu11ish:r:1ic:_i1\u00e9 <\/p>\n
of i}’1″1p1’iSOI11’I1\u20acT1I. of eiiiher p1*escri;3iTion for 3 ‘:”er111 \\vh’1’c’%i1.f{i;1.ziy*7 _. <\/p>\n
not be 1035 tha1’1 7 yezlrs. wlxich 1112.-1y be for 21 liffff_\u00a75’i7.V&i’v.t:\u20acr1’;”{“1<\/p>\n
..’l<\/p>\n
which exteziu it 10 ycars. The acctgsed.f\u00a3her\u00e9.\u00a7’c>i*c;=.1’i2;tssn_nt5 ‘<\/p>\n
estrclpe {,0 come 0111; of the })r0\\?isi\u00a2311 of proviso (2:1)(Ti.)v-‘Vt31’ASe{:.:tid.1’1<\/p>\n
167 C1-.1>.c.  _ <\/p>\n
8. The 1%-3a1r:.i’c’rr:i misiead hi111s;<21f in
\nbe1ieving  th\u00e91tTA 5the '7f1%;i.1'11I1:j{i;::I1 "pe"r'i'od of i1'11p1'ism11m:I1t,<\/p>\n
presc1\u00b0ibeC1',un.d\u00e91* t.hi's.a'pr\u00e9iuislofr\ufb01g\u00e9ing 10 years and as Section<\/p>\n
376 e1'n_risa1ges%"..111i.r1im_uri~1 s'e:1' 11.e'1'1(:e of 7 years. it d()e.%s 1101:<\/p>\n
 'e?v,1) J}.\\,:..:  crrro1'1eduss…xi<321c1iI10. i~io\\Tve?ve1*. the-: 1c:ar1'1cd .J:.:c:1fe<\/p>\n
 hasv 'r"ei's2_1*t'*5:4\u00e91'~\u00a3\u00a7)'v+.'tA};1e_(:1eci.si()11 of this Court rep()r1ec1 in 2004(4)<\/p>\n
Crimes 255;'V'%:TNE'1z1t.evet1' may be the dictum of such d\u20ac('.iSi()I"i.<\/p>\n
 .iVr_1 \\\u00bb'ic:vv..oVl .111Vc?. decision of the Apex Court re.po1'1<"3.ci\u00a7 11': AIR<\/p>\n
 V2622 [in the case of Bhupinder Singh 82. Ors.\n<\/p>\n
‘ \u00ab ‘vs\u00a7’\u00a7JcirnaiI Singh and Anr.) wh.e1’e: the Apex” C(.>2,21’1 <\/p>\n
” i.a\u00a7<e11 into Co1'1.=sic1e1*at.i011 {he minirmsm perio(.i }.)1'es:s<'rr&_}3t'd <\/p>\n
(39%<\/p>\n
7<\/span>
\na<\/p>\n
applicable. The facts in issue before the Apex CoL1}.’1 1’e1z=m’%’.e 10
\nCharge for offences under Secrticm 3O–4iwB of IPC and
\n(t()1’1side.1’ingg such (‘,OI’1It’.1″11i()l”] as raxiseci in 1:hi.<s <".:\u00bb1.:~ae_ the Apex<\/p>\n
Courit held thus:\n<\/p>\n
“Where minimum and maximum se11te1\ufb011″e’e’-\u00ab.f_2i~re” :_.<\/p>\n
prescribed both me i1’np0sa1b1e c.\u00a7ependi1’1g <')11"i.]'e1:* Ia.;:'ts T<\/p>\n
of Ihe Cases. It is for the C01;i1'*i;.,e1f'ie1'_,.1"eef):"c1V1ng.<\/p>\n
comriction. to impose apg)1"()})1"i21fe se'1"1eL.:-"'m"\u20ac<\u00bb._ 'H 't:;,11u1;\u00a7:-)1' <\/p>\n
t.here\u00a3'ore. be a(:eep':,ed ,'\u00a2'n;11' O1'11_y' U16',1\u00bb"E5fi\u00a7Ej'ii1i11.lf"\u00a7'}.<\/p>\n
$en't:enc:e  imposable and net. the. niaxi1'1'1LuL1i'_=sc-=i*:1ef\u00e9ee.<\/p>\n
Merely b\u20ac?(;ZE*.'L':'f~:;\u20ac4 .. 'iiheig  is pzmvided
\nthat does" '\ufb01_e}t,::'1?:1'\u00a5;;_21.i1ffpheii V1':}?"_e"$e1j_T;e11(e~e imposabie is
\n<')1'11yv_L1n:e f1'}\u00a7f1i\u00a3'i:t_;I::1_I1;}   \ufb01nding that in ease
\nof QVf'\u00a3e11ee" _I304f3 IPC. the ;3(~2n'11is:9;ib1e<\/p>\n
;3eri(5d f;0.r [\ufb02ing'ei*:.;11'iV21.fi'–\u00a7,:3"'Q0 days. woukd be proper.<\/p>\n
9, Simre Li1'}._C1(?]"~SC(?U()I'{ 3048 of {PC also the I'I1iI'1i1'\u00a7I{.lI'E1<\/p>\n
 s'e121'Lje1"1'e('e p'1i\u20ac::S(':ribed  years as in this (ruse for <"'.l'12:11'ge<\/p>\n
 the dictum of the Apex Court appkies<\/p>\n
sq141e1i'sE:'iy iQ.t:}'ie—-__i'2ic?t,:=s of 11115 case anci I am $ati.<sf'iec1 than" the<\/p>\n
 ~.._impL.1g11ed_ 6-rcier needs to be Set. aside. Ac'<"o1*(ii.1'1giy, the<\/p>\n
V'  ifr;i1):;g1i'ed order passed by the teamed Sessions J1..iCi\u00a7;'\u20ac'. is set<\/p>\n
  and it is held {hat the penod  s1ipuEat.ec1 1'01' filing<\/p>\n
aw<\/p>\n
8<\/span><\/p>\n
final report of (?11e1i’g\u00a7c sheet’. in this case. as it’. 1’c1e:.a1.cs E0
\noiieiiccs 1.1fld\u20acI’ Section SW3 IPC, was 90 days and noi 60<\/p>\n
C1 ay 5 .\n<\/p>\n
10. The next” question is whether at this point ()f–‘:I:i’I~]:.1:t”_’.<, "'<\/p>\n
ihe rcqucsi 0%' 1.110 pr0s3ccL1('i01'1 cmilcl be 21Ccc13i'.ed__"%E-9 c~.;-i_i'1c:\u20ac'E;i <\/p>\n
1,119 bail granted 10 the ziiccruscd in &'.x\u20ac1i\u00a3;i:5_c, Off'])(.)'\\\u00a5(?I.T:\u00bb!,_1I.'iC\u00a7(i\u00a7\u00a3TV<\/p>\n
Scct.i0i'1 439(2) 0!" C1*.P.C.\n<\/p>\n
11. Be 1.1.121t as it may. bj,I_ I’:h.t? i1′}’i})u\u00a7\u00a71’1\u00a7?Civ.v()1″d(f1’~.I.l”I:\u20ac’<\/p>\n
accused has be.cz’*:.  110* bai1_\u00ab–aifid ht: has I’t’.11’l\u20ac-1iI’1(i(‘1 so
\non bail dL1fi.i’}g”‘f’.1fiv2(i:>’1\u00a31,}ld i_,1*1v~:=_1″\u20ac~. it:-.___1_10 ;\u00a71iiegat’i()I1 zxgziiiusl tliie
\naccused f-\u00a33at._ he Vl’1’i=a1s3v.._V\u00e9{ci.c(:i._ii2..__ 2i1’1y mannc1′ adx-‘c1″sc E0 the<\/p>\n
prosecutrix or the pi”-0s”ecu.1iE3–i1 itiscli’. The (:’.\u00a3:1S\u20ac is said to be<\/p>\n
2.11 the .()f1’c(>”c>rfdi’1ig E?ViCi\u20acfI1(T(f and (that. st”a.1ggc has 1’ca.<.*1'1cd<\/p>\n
"v.ii1'iii}i.1}}:  i,\u00e9"\u00ab:\u00a7t.ai.cc\u00a5 that. all fhc w1'11"1t-tsscs haw been<\/p>\n
cx\u00a31iii'i-\ufb01xed  is only i11\\res'{iga1'.ing Officer whose<\/p>\n
rexaiiiiiu-1i.iQ_ii'i'is.-i1c)w being Lmdcriaikcn by the Trial {.I<_)1.1r'\u00e9'. if<\/p>\n
" :".."' 't.1"1.'c:::.(1': J9 sofii docs 11c)t'._\u00a7u.si4iiy (..'i:iI1(_'t?HEiT.iO1'1 of bail in him..<\/p>\n
1f2.i'i,-hm". he could  bond Over with c.01'1di'L.jons not I1") \u00ab:rz.msc<\/p>\n
01%\u00bb<\/p>\n
9<\/span><\/p>\n
any inlpeciimems in {lie trial Q,i{‘.hL”.}” by sc=:*eking; :2(:1jo1.11’1’1H1@:1\u00a51S<\/p>\n
0}” U1 Zcl\ufb02y IT1E1}111\u20ac1’.\n<\/p>\n
With these ()13sc3:’vz;1ti0ns. the pemim:  z\u00bb111<")wcr(.i_<\/p>\n
\u00a7;a't3* \/ GH<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court State By Shirahatti vs Babusab Ramjansab Doddamani on 5 August, 2009 Author: Jawad Rahim _ Dist Qadag _ _I\u00bb–IOI\\I”ISLI1;,__v’COiIR’I’ MAY BE PLEASED TO ALLOW THIS ‘jV-V’\u00ab.__ C.RIIMINAL__A’REVN. PETITION AND SET ASIDE ‘I’I~II3, ORIDER v.Ii)’Ii5.L’IA.2.2008 LEARNED I)IS’I’. es: SESSIONS I,}U[j)C}E. _V IN SC No.36\/08 (ORDERS ON BAIL APPLICATION jf \u00ab:I,E7’I’I\u00bb-II\u00ab: ACCUSED) ‘I’I~1E BAIL […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-125629","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nState By Shirahatti vs Babusab Ramjansab Doddamani on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State By Shirahatti vs Babusab Ramjansab Doddamani on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-03-07T10:00:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State By Shirahatti vs Babusab Ramjansab Doddamani on 5 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-07T10:00:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1315,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009\",\"name\":\"State By Shirahatti vs Babusab Ramjansab Doddamani on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-07T10:00:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State By Shirahatti vs Babusab Ramjansab Doddamani on 5 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State By Shirahatti vs Babusab Ramjansab Doddamani on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State By Shirahatti vs Babusab Ramjansab Doddamani on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-03-07T10:00:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State By Shirahatti vs Babusab Ramjansab Doddamani on 5 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-07T10:00:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009"},"wordCount":1315,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009","name":"State By Shirahatti vs Babusab Ramjansab Doddamani on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-07T10:00:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-shirahatti-vs-babusab-ramjansab-doddamani-on-5-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State By Shirahatti vs Babusab Ramjansab Doddamani on 5 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125629","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=125629"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125629\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=125629"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=125629"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=125629"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}