{"id":126091,"date":"2008-07-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008"},"modified":"2014-06-11T19:37:24","modified_gmt":"2014-06-11T14:07:24","slug":"state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"State By Kowlande Police vs Ramesh on 31 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">State By Kowlande Police vs Ramesh on 31 July, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K.Sreedhar Rao Gowda<\/div>\n<pre>I\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA, BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 3 1-1 my 09 JULY\" 2002;\nPRESENT V_  _\nTHE I-ION'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. \nAND  V   \n\nTHE HONBLE MR. Jusrzcta B.sREE'Nij?ASE'GmVE,\u00e9;\n\nCRL.A. No.1349 OF 20m.C;\/_w 1\u00a7'\u00a7;.4@20oz,\u00bb&lt;i&#039;,i;.gg 2. \n}_.CRL.A No-.1349\/2001      L\n\nBETWEEN :\n\nState   V  V .... .. Appellant\n\n(Sn: G. BI\ufb01ava;n:I   \n\nA&quot;D=  \n\n &#039;~  _   \n\n &#039;  V L &quot; Jav&#039;aim  Razlgasetty\n\n 1\u00e9:.=ai:&#039;\u00a3s-:;_siz1iVi=\n\n3.CRL.A N0. 1351z2o(}1\n\nState by Kowlamlgh   ....Appe1la1:1t\n\u00e9\ufb02wgi \"\"\" H 2  .      '\nVenka:;;es1#\ufb02__ ~ '\n\n35    \n\nTailor,   '\nNanjangud\ufb01faitik.   ~* .....Rcspondcnt\n\n _ A' (   curiatc).\n\n  is \ufb01led U\/3 373(1) and (3) of Cr.P.C claallcnghzlg\n\n  ujusi'g2.3_1&amp;zitT-.Qi' acquittal passed by the Prl. Sessions Judge,\n\nMjrsqrc No.55 of 1996 ctc.,\n\n T\ufb01\u00e9sf: appeals are coming on for hearing this day,\n\n K.sREz=;_m~;AR RAG, .}., delivered the following.\u00bb\n\nA \ufb02m \nAll these three appeals pertain to the same offence of daooity\n\n\" coammittcd by eight accused persons. Some of the accused were\n\nabsconding.\n\n\n\n2. The matcxiai facts of the pmsccutiouttiarsct\n\nPWJ. (complainant) was    \n\nSy.No.79\/2 of Mallipuza v1Ilagc'  e\ufb01\u00e9ng {mg  PW 'A\n\n3(daughte1'), pw 44503) and 'cst:;r*.9t3 attaiiout\n1.<\/pre>\n<p>45 am. there was  I woke up,<br \/>\nswitched on the light\u00e9,   accused assaulted PW1,<br \/>\ngained envy inte the  PW} to PW3, PW4<br \/>\nand PW 6..   clothing, utensils were<\/p>\n<p>robbed   <\/p>\n<p>4.&#8221; __P&#8221;A(1 &#8216;  were taken to the hospital. The<\/p>\n<p>poIi&lt;;e&#8211;.cpm\u00a7\u00a7  and records the statement of PW1 as<\/p>\n<p>   on ai\u00a2t&quot;&#039;5a&#039;Vsis of which, the case is registerecl. The<\/p>\n<p>   are apprehended on 7.11.1993 and at their<\/p>\n<p> the valuable articles which were robbed, have<\/p>\n<p> been ntcovemd which were pledged with PWS, PW9, pwm, PW<\/p>\n<p>A   17 and PW 18. The accused am charged for committing<\/p>\n<p>  the o\ufb01bnce {Us 395 I&#039;\/&#039;W Section 397&#039; IPC.<\/p>\n<p>E&#039;<\/p>\n<p>Q\u00a7\/\/<\/p>\n<p>5. The trial court acquitted the accused 91:; &#8216;\u00e9&#8217;:}c;t1t;:i that<\/p>\n<p>the evidence led by the pmsecutioa is   not<\/p>\n<p>pmvc the guilt of the accused beygnii   <\/p>\n<p>State is in appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>6. The evidence of .2   Dacoit\ufb01i\/xivho<br \/>\ntrespasscd into the  face with mask.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore the   at the scene of<br \/>\no\ufb01imce  possibility of any of the<br \/>\ninmategpi;    of the face in onsler to<br \/>\nident\ufb01y    of time.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.  &#8220;1:;4e_  placed Itzliance upon the<\/p>\n<p>evidgzrzcg o1&#8242; n,=-cgmireiy.  At &#8220;the instance of A-1, a pair of ear rings<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; V&#8217;  {Ma\u00e9s).,&#8221;&#8216;ATha1; (Md-46) and Thali Chain ( MO 47) were mcovered.<\/p>\n<p>  me&#8221; Ex.P18. PW 2 identifies MO 45 (a pair of car<\/p>\n<p>ring) as  to her and PW 3 and PW 6 have identi\ufb01cd MO<\/p>\n<p> 45  46 as belonging to them. PW 17 is the pledges, with<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;ii A&#8212;-1 had pledged the said articles. PW I1 is the brother of<\/p>\n<p>i\u00e9w 17. He alazo states that A&#8212;1 has pledged M0 41 to M0 45 with<\/p>\n<p>PW&#8217; 17.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>8. At the voluntary instance of A-1, golden   (M.O 43)<\/p>\n<p>is recovered from the possession of PW &#8221; <\/p>\n<p>jcwellary shop. The recovexy is \u00a2\ufb01&#8217;\u00e9cin&#8217;cd   <\/p>\n<p>PW 18 however, states that he   Ar 1.  {if<\/p>\n<p>time. PW 2 has idcntJ\ufb01cd&#8217; M} as Be1ongj\u00a71g  <\/p>\n<p>9. At the voltz\ufb01taxy   (#18 golden thali<br \/>\n(M.C).-44) is recovered  from W 9 (pawn<br \/>\nbroker).    s\ufb01iiaethat he delivered M.{).44<br \/>\nto the    identify the person who had<br \/>\nplcdgfzd the   iagsse&#8217;  of time.\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;m.&#8217;At th\u00a7&#8217;\u00a7%\u00a71a:;nt%\u00a7:;:\u00a7 of A-4, a pair ofcar rings (MO<\/p>\n<p>48) is IBC;\u00a7Vf\ufb01Bd find\u00e9r  Ex.P16 \ufb01om the possession of PW<\/p>\n<p> V. &#8216;_ 13$ !;}mI\u00a7t\u00e9i&#8217;).\u00ab \u00ab13 does tcsti\ufb01; to the fact that he produced<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;   police but cannot say that it was A-I who had<\/p>\n<p>   at the time of EXPI6 because of lapse of<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217; &#8221;   The eviadenct: of PW9, PW 13 and PW 18 in not<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;}E\u00a2:v1\u00a7\u00e9:&#8217;1it:&#8217;i1&#8217;yiI1g A-1, A-2 and A-4 may not be a serious flaw to<\/p>\n<p>  wiisbeiievc the recovery evidence. The 1.0 with whom A-1, A-2 and<\/p>\n<p>A-4 have made confession which led to recovery of incriminating<\/p>\n<p>%\/T<\/p>\n<p>articles testify to the fact that the articles haveishm at<\/p>\n<p>the instance of A4. A-2 and A-4.. Themfqxf\ufb02eun   _Qf\ufb01_1e<\/p>\n<p>end&#8221; cues of the 1.0., it gets  <\/p>\n<p>robbed by A-}., A-2 and A-4&gt;ax_1d tiiey   &#8216;thgatgove<br \/>\npawn brokers. Themfom;   the<br \/>\nevidence, we find, o =a.__&#8217;the &#8220;&#8211;.t._1A1e  evidence the<br \/>\nprosecution has p1t&gt;vcc&#8217;i&#8217;t11_\u20ac&#8217;   A-4. With mgaxd<br \/>\nto other accused}     then&#8217;: is no evidence<br \/>\nto pmve  ithg   that View of the matter,<br \/>\nthe on_\u00a2erTVqf&#8217;    A. 1 A2 and AA is bad in<br \/>\nlaw and ithe  Th\u00e9 appeals are partly allowed. A1,<\/p>\n<p>A-2 and A-4&#8242; ,c\u00a7nv\u00a3\u00a3:;cdV:&#8217;f;;r&#8217;the o\ufb01ence was 395 and 397 we<\/p>\n<p> and   vvsexgtienced to undergo life impnlsonment. The<\/p>\n<p>  &lt;:v~ftie1_&#039; &lt;&#039;)f  in respect of other accused is con\ufb01tmed.<\/p>\n<p> _  amicus curiae is \ufb01xed at Rs.5000\/~&#8211;. The State<\/p>\n<p> _Sha1I pay&#039; \ufb01he-a\u00e9me.\n<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-gm<br \/>\nIudq\u00e9<br \/>\nSdf-3<br \/>\nI6 .1<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court State By Kowlande Police vs Ramesh on 31 July, 2008 Author: K.Sreedhar Rao Gowda I IN THE HIGH COURT OF&#8217; KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 3 1-1 my 09 JULY&#8221; 2002; PRESENT V_ _ THE I-ION&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE K. AND V THE HONBLE MR. Jusrzcta B.sREE&#8217;Nij?ASE&#8217;GmVE,\u00e9; CRL.A. No.1349 OF 20m.C;\/_w 1\u00a7&#8217;\u00a7;.4@20oz,\u00bb&lt;i&#039;,i;.gg 2. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-126091","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>State By Kowlande Police vs Ramesh on 31 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State By Kowlande Police vs Ramesh on 31 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-06-11T14:07:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State By Kowlande Police vs Ramesh on 31 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-11T14:07:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":607,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008\",\"name\":\"State By Kowlande Police vs Ramesh on 31 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-11T14:07:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State By Kowlande Police vs Ramesh on 31 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State By Kowlande Police vs Ramesh on 31 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State By Kowlande Police vs Ramesh on 31 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-06-11T14:07:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State By Kowlande Police vs Ramesh on 31 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-11T14:07:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008"},"wordCount":607,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008","name":"State By Kowlande Police vs Ramesh on 31 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-11T14:07:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-kowlande-police-vs-ramesh-on-31-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State By Kowlande Police vs Ramesh on 31 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/126091","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=126091"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/126091\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=126091"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=126091"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=126091"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}