{"id":126177,"date":"2007-06-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-06-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007"},"modified":"2017-10-11T10:51:28","modified_gmt":"2017-10-11T05:21:28","slug":"state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007","title":{"rendered":"State Of Kerala vs M\/S. Brooke Bond India Limited on 26 June, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">State Of Kerala vs M\/S. Brooke Bond India Limited on 26 June, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nTRC No. 26 of 2002()\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. M\/S. BROOKE BOND INDIA LIMITED,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\n                For Respondent  :.\n\nThe Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN\n\n Dated :26\/06\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n                           H.L.Dattu,C.J. &amp; K.T.Sankaran,J.\n\n                 ------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n                 T.R.C.Nos.26\/2002, 72\/2002, 122\/2002,\n\n                               123\/2002 &amp; 124\/2002\n\n                 ------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n                        Dated, this the 26th  day of June, 2007\n\n\n                                            ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>H.L.Dattu,C.J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                 Since   common   question   of   law   and   facts   are   involved   in   all<\/p>\n<p>these Tax Revision Cases, they are clubbed together, heard and disposed of<\/p>\n<p>by this common order.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                 2. These  Tax Revision Cases arise under the provisions of the<\/p>\n<p>Kerala General   Sales  Tax   Act  (&#8220;KGST  Act&#8221;  for   short).   In  these  Tax  Revision<\/p>\n<p>Cases we are concerned with assessment years 1987-88, 1990-91, 1991-92,<\/p>\n<p>1992-93 and 1993-94.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                 3.   The   primary   question   that   arises   for   our   consideration   in<\/p>\n<p>these Tax Revision Cases is whether sale of Bru Coffee is taxable under Entry<\/p>\n<p>53 of the First Schedule to the Act or is it under Entry 77 of the First Schedule<\/p>\n<p>to the Act.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                 4. The respondent-assessee is a dealer under the provisions of<\/p>\n<p>the KGST Act and Central Sales Tax Act (&#8220;CST Act&#8221; for short). The business<\/p>\n<p>activity of the respondent-assessee is the sale of Bru Coffee.<\/p>\n<p>                 5.   The   assessee   had   filed   its   annual   returns   before   the<\/p>\n<p>assessing authority,  inter alia  claiming that its taxable turnover requires to be<\/p>\n<p>brought   under   Entry   77   of   the   First   Schedule   to   the   Act.   That   has   been<\/p>\n<p>negatived by the assessing authority and brought it under Entry 53 of the First<\/p>\n<p>Schedule to the Act. Aggrieved by the said order, the assessee had carried the<\/p>\n<p>matter by way of first appeal before the first appellate authority. The appellate<\/p>\n<p>authority had modified the orders passed by the assessing authority, but still of<\/p>\n<p>T.R.C.No.26 of 2002 &amp;<\/p>\n<p>connected cases                                      &#8211; 2 &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>the opinion that the coffee sold   by the assessee would fall under Entry 53 of<\/p>\n<p>the   First   Schedule   to   the   Act.   That   is   how   the   assessee   was   before   the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                  6.   The   primary  contention  of   the   assessee  before  the   Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>was that the Bru Coffee is admixture of coffee and chicory and, therefore, the<\/p>\n<p>sale   of   the   Bru   Coffee   requires   to   be   taxed   under   Entry   77   of   the   First<\/p>\n<p>Schedule to the Act. The contention of the assessee was found favour by the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal. Aggrieved by the orders so passed by the Tribunal, the Revenue is<\/p>\n<p>before us in these Tax Revision Cases.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                  7. The Revenue has raised the following question of law for our<\/p>\n<p>consideration and decision. The question reads as under:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>         &#8220;Question   raised   for   decision   of   the   High   Court   is   whether   the<\/p>\n<p>         Tribunal justified in coming  to the conclusion that  Bru Coffee is<\/p>\n<p>         an article coming under entry 77 taxable at 6% and not an article<\/p>\n<p>         coming under entry 53 of Schedule-I taxable at 10%&#8221;.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>                  8.   Sri.V.V.Ashokan,   learned   Special   Government   Pleader<\/p>\n<p>(Taxes) would submit that the coffee sold by the assessee is Bru Coffee and<\/p>\n<p>Bru Coffee  is a brand  name.  Therefore,  for  the purpose of  levying  tax under<\/p>\n<p>the   KGST   Act,   the   same   requires   to   be   brought   under   Entry   53   of   the   First<\/p>\n<p>Schedule to the Act. Therefore, he submits that the Tribunal was not justified in<\/p>\n<p>holding that the Bru Coffee sold by the assessee would fall under Entry 77 of<\/p>\n<p>the First Schedule to the Act.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                  9.   Sri.Anil   D.Nair,   learned   counsel   appearing   for   the<\/p>\n<p>respondent-assessee   would   ably   justify   the   impugned   order   passed   by   the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal. He also places reliance on the observations made by this Court in the<\/p>\n<p>case of Brooke Bond India Limited v. State of Kerala [(1992) 84 STC 334].<\/p>\n<pre>\n\n\nT.R.C.No.26 of 2002 &amp;\n\nconnected cases                                       - 3 -\n\n\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>                  10. In our view, the matter can be decided on the first principle<\/p>\n<p>without   reference   to   the   case   law   cited   by   the   learned   counsel   for   the<\/p>\n<p>respondent-assessee.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                  11. We  are concerned with the assessment years, as we have<\/p>\n<p>already noticed, 1987-88 and onwards. The Entry relevant for the purpose of<\/p>\n<p>these assessment years are as under:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>         Entry 36 &#8211; Coffee but not including coffee drink and French coffee.<\/p>\n<p>         Entry 37 &#8211; Coffee powder sold under brand name.<\/p>\n<p>Entry after 1.7.1987, in so far as coffee is concerned, was Entry 52, Entry 53<\/p>\n<p>and   Entry   77.   Entry   52   speaks   of   coffee   but   not   including   coffee   drink   and<\/p>\n<p>French   coffee.   Entry   53   speaks   of   coffee   powder   sold   under   brand   name.<\/p>\n<p>Entry 77 speaks of  French Coffee (admixture of coffee and chicory).<\/p>\n<p>                  12. A close reading  of the aforesaid Entries would indicate  the<\/p>\n<p>following: Entry 52 speaks of coffee but not including coffee drink and French<\/p>\n<p>Coffee.   Entry   53   specifically   states   that   coffee   powder   if   it   is   sold   under   a<\/p>\n<p>brand name. However, Entry 77 speaks of French Coffee (admixture of coffee<\/p>\n<p>and chicory).\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                  13. It is an undisputed fact that the Bru Coffee is nothing but an<\/p>\n<p>admixture of coffee and chicory.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                  14.  If   for  any reason the assessee  had effected  sale of   coffee<\/p>\n<p>powder   simplicitor   under   a   particular   brand   name,   then   its   taxable   turnover<\/p>\n<p>would have been brought under Entry 37 of the First Schedule of the Act. But<\/p>\n<p>in the present case what is sold by the assessee is an admixture of coffee and<\/p>\n<p>chicory.  Certainly  that   would   fall   under   Entry   77   of   the  First   Schedule   to   the<\/p>\n<p>Act.<\/p>\n<pre>\n\n\nT.R.C.No.26 of 2002 &amp;\n\nconnected cases                                         - 4 -\n\n\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>                   15. Keeping these Entries in view, in our view, the Tribunal was<\/p>\n<p>justified in holding that what is sold by the assessee is an admixture of coffee<\/p>\n<p>and chicory and, therefore, it would fall under Entry 77 of the First Schedule to<\/p>\n<p>the Act.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                   16. In view of the above, we are of the opinion that the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>was justified in holding that  Bru Coffee is an admixture of coffee and chicory<\/p>\n<p>and,   therefore,   it   would   fall   under   Entry   77   of   the   First   Schedule   to   the   Act.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the question of law framed by the Revenue requires to be answered<\/p>\n<p>against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.<\/p>\n<p>                   Ordered accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                           H.L.Dattu<\/p>\n<p>                                                                        Chief Justice<\/p>\n<p>                                                                         K.T.Sankaran<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                Judge<\/p>\n<p>vku\/-\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court State Of Kerala vs M\/S. Brooke Bond India Limited on 26 June, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM TRC No. 26 of 2002() 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. M\/S. BROOKE BOND INDIA LIMITED, &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :GOVERNMENT PLEADER For Respondent :. The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-126177","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>State Of Kerala vs M\/S. Brooke Bond India Limited on 26 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Of Kerala vs M\/S. Brooke Bond India Limited on 26 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-06-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-11T05:21:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Of Kerala vs M\/S. Brooke Bond India Limited on 26 June, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-06-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-11T05:21:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007\"},\"wordCount\":921,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007\",\"name\":\"State Of Kerala vs M\/S. Brooke Bond India Limited on 26 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-06-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-11T05:21:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Of Kerala vs M\/S. Brooke Bond India Limited on 26 June, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Of Kerala vs M\/S. Brooke Bond India Limited on 26 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Of Kerala vs M\/S. Brooke Bond India Limited on 26 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-06-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-11T05:21:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Of Kerala vs M\/S. Brooke Bond India Limited on 26 June, 2007","datePublished":"2007-06-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-11T05:21:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007"},"wordCount":921,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007","name":"State Of Kerala vs M\/S. Brooke Bond India Limited on 26 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-06-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-11T05:21:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-ms-brooke-bond-india-limited-on-26-june-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Of Kerala vs M\/S. Brooke Bond India Limited on 26 June, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/126177","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=126177"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/126177\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=126177"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=126177"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=126177"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}