{"id":126578,"date":"2009-03-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009"},"modified":"2017-11-08T19:23:00","modified_gmt":"2017-11-08T13:53:00","slug":"rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"Rahamathunnisa vs Azgar Barid & Ors. on 17 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Rahamathunnisa vs Azgar Barid & Ors. on 17 March, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar<\/div>\n
gm THE HIGH cousrror KARNATAKA AT l3Ai\\_3:6~.'\u00e9;!.j\u00a7i>'_\u00a7\u00a7\u00ab.'\u00a7-3' % \n\nDATED THIS THE 17\" may of MARCi~\u00a7\u00bb'2_(}CJ\u00a7A--f:  _ T _:     \n\nBEFORE\nHONBLE MRJUSTICE Monm TAr~;A\u00e9so:3:>As2\nREGULAR sgcong k%%ap:\u00bb= Mu. \n\n_.B...9.tJ.!..I:e_e_Iy \nW] o   .  \nAged ah9ut_52Vy\u00e9sa:s;,V'w%  \n\n2. Noo1jaha n\u00bb.  . % M V  _ \n\nD\/0 1\" defei::41a;mf.Va.1;xdA*--._ \"\nW\/o\ufb01bdnl \n\n '~  _AAgci17ab9ut .42 ye\u20acaI\"s*;--,..... *\n\nSb. M:-:i2ami2i \n\n\/Io  Mphiiit\ufb01dm Pasha,\nAge(i*about--  ?'years,\n\n4., sycci  d Band @ Sabuial\n\n  '\"3\/9 Raht\ufb01an Barid, Major.\n\n&   Begum\n'  D10 3'\" plainti\ufb02',\n\n about 40 years,\n\nZatnila Begum\nD \/ o 3\"! piainti\ufb02\"\nAged aboui 32 years,\n\n\n\n V.    _____ .. \u00ab\n\n 1\u20acb} ;r\u00a2a2.cczga%3a\ufb01-ubi\n  '((2) Sy-.4.:Vci  \n\nW  \"\u00e9iyr-,d  Barid,\nF\"   Fssyed Akar Barid,\n\n \"(ta syea shukur Band' ,\n\n7. Akila Begum,\nD \/ o 314 plainti\ufb01'\nAged about 3 1 years,\n\n8. Rahiman Barid @ Iqbal Pasha\nS\/0 3\"' plaintiff,   \nAged about 30 years, \n\nAll are residents of\n\nThadigol, ROIHII' Hobli,\"   _  \"\nSrinivasapur Taluk.   _   1 y. 2\"ppeHants\n\n( By Sri Sri\u00a3_ihar.f_or Vagda\ufb01i   \" \nAdvocate}     ,     \n\n \n\nRcpIescn1._\u00a2dby his \"LE3: \"  '\n\n(3.) Syezi Davo\u00e9d \n\n \nS] G  Barid,\n\"  o\ufb02\ufb01zgar Band,\n\" \"S\/0 Azgar Barid,\n\nS\/o Azgar Barid,\n\n\n\n   .. R.A.No.60\/88 on the \ufb01le of the Pr1.Civii Judge, Kevlar, allowing\n\n(g) Sydanobi,\nSfo Azgar Baxid,\n\n(h) Syed Mohiuddhl Pasha,\nS] 0 Azgar Barid,\n\n(i) Sycd Makboo1Barid,\nS] o Azgar Barid,\n\n(j) Ameenabi,\nW] 0 Azgar Barid,\n\nRonni' Hoblj,   \n\nAll are R\/o. Tadigol  if  '  \" \n\n2. Pathakotc Narajranappa,  \u00ab-\nMajor; '\ufb01iadi\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01l. A '75   * . \nRemit Hoblj,\"    *  V  _ _\nSIiniv3a_sa3)ur    V\u00bb \" \n\n3. Khasim \nMaivr\u00bb x   %\n V. \u00ab_ M6i1::hant.V \n .ROnuf'-H955, .\n' ,SIi;nivasa;;m_m7& Taiuk. .. Respondents<\/pre>\n
‘{ABy’S1iM’;(}.Ki1mar, Advocate for R-1(B-H)
\nand R-\u00ab2 Ta;-. 3, Sri s.M.ch.andmshckar,
\nV Advdcatc for R-2 and 3 (R1 (GE, G) and
\n S1’iM_.D.Vaishati, Advocate for R~1A)<\/p>\n
U I<\/p>\n
—   This RSA is \ufb01icd under Section 100 ofC.P.C;. against the
\n” jiidment and decree dated 23.1 1.1994 passed in<\/p>\n
the appeal and setting aside the judgmcnt and decree passed<\/p>\n
-4-<\/span><\/p>\n
by the r~>r1.Mu;s.si\ufb01’, Kolar, in <\/p>\n
1 1.9. 1987.\n<\/p>\n
This RSA having been heard \u00a31ii\u00e9i’1’eseI’ved\u00abufEJeuI\u00a7iei*s \u00a353; A<\/p>\n
31″ January 2009, the Court pmnougxced fhe jvsgeigxiientm;\n<\/p>\n
day, the 17th March 2009:    \" . 2   \n\nJUD\u00e9\ufb01%\ufb02i'ee\"\n\n<\/pre>\n
This Regular sscssa  by  plaintiffs
\nagainst the ju(igr\u00a7xent””a:1.\u00ae(1:   23.11.1994,
\npassed in  ‘r\u00a7\u00a7c[\u00abssi\ufb01ts%as \ufb01led by eight
\nplaj11ti\ufb01’$..fQr   Vpossession of the suit
\necheduie  “‘O.’S’.No.388\/ 1977 before the<\/p>\n
Munsi\ufb01’  atVVVKeV1e:.r;  suit came to be decreed in<\/p>\n
  plaintiff No.2 is entitled to 7\/ 24th<\/p>\n
 ‘–__sh:aI”e  No.3 is entitled to 113th share in<\/p>\n
ceifsn\u00e9  It is further held that the pxaimi\ufb01s are<\/p>\n
  ‘pot  any share in scheduled Item Nosf! to 9 and<\/p>\n
   I ‘The 18’-‘ ciefendant~–Azgar Barid, (since deceased,<\/p>\n
V’  ‘.”1’efi,aresented by legal representatives) was directed to<\/p>\n
 . ujfrender accounts in respect of the receipt and expenditure<\/p>\n
of the money earned out of the seheauled items to be<\/p>\n
\\\/7<\/p>\n
-5-<\/span><\/p>\n
divided. Questioning the judgment and  _<\/p>\n
0.S.No.388\/1977, the legal representa1:iv_e~s~oif~.defE?:13.ds\ufb01t*\u00ab V. <\/p>\n
No.1 \ufb01led Regular Appeal No.60] 19)-8:3?  <\/p>\n
Court, Chintamani. The appea}._.to be   v<\/p>\n
impugned judgment and   ofovember
\n1994. Consequently,  passed by
\nthe trial ()o1u’tfs..v_as  came to be
\ndismissed.    and decree
\npassed   the Civil Court, this<\/p>\n
second    <\/p>\n
2.. ., F014″   of convenience, the parties are<\/p>\n
  as per  fanks before the trial Court.<\/p>\n
      understanding of the relationship<\/p>\n
   fhedpm\ufb01es, it is proper to have the genealogy of<\/p>\n
‘ ”   The geneaiogy as per plaintiffs is as under;<\/p>\n
\\\/”‘<\/p>\n
– 5 –\n<\/p>\n
GENEOLOGY
\n(According to plainti\ufb01s)<\/p>\n
Mohiyuddin P.9:s’ha~. ..  _
\n(Propositusi died  1:96%?~)  ‘   a  <\/p>\n
(twc v?:’_m’e_s)<\/p>\n
{Wife – 1) ed on 1944),      :4.  — P1aiiiLti\ufb02’No.3)<\/p>\n
(Son. “– ziied on s_i;9\u00a5’%\u00a7}   ~i~}’3efei1ri_axi’E No. I)<\/p>\n
  I:\n<\/p>\n
(Wife — ‘No._1) (Daug_hter — Piaintiff No.2)<\/p>\n
.. –. _. V
\n” Syed Rahaman Barid (1;\n<\/p>\n
L’ Sabulal\n<\/p>\n
— Son — P1air.1ti\ufb01’No.4<\/p>\n
b) Shakila Begum\n<\/p>\n
— Daughter – Plaintiff No.5<\/p>\n
c) Zamila Begum\n<\/p>\n
— Daughter — P1aint.i\ufb01’ No.6<\/p>\n
(1) Akhila Begum\n<\/p>\n
—- Daughter — Plaintiff No.7<\/p>\n
e) Rahiman Barid @ Ikbal<\/p>\n
Pasha\n<\/p>\n
— Son — Plaintiff No.8<\/p>\n
\\\/5<\/p>\n
-3′-\n<\/p>\n
4. Case of the pia;’mi\ufb01’s is that : late Mogtgytmm<\/p>\n
Pasha is the original owner of the suit propefizies <\/p>\n
3rd plainti\ufb01’~Maza,mbi @  “is A <\/p>\n
Plaintiffs 4 and 8 are the sons 6′ <\/p>\n
are the daughters of Mohiyuddin .”PasI’xa: <\/p>\n
plainti\ufb02’ No.3. The   of Mohiyuddin
\nPasha was Noomhi. Mohiyfnddixy I  expired in the
\nyear 1964 and  ash  \ufb01redeeeased Mohiyuddin<\/p>\n
Pasha.  th:{e~,veat\u00a7 ekk1<\u00a744, leaving behind two<\/p>\n
sons   'in the year 1948) and Azgar<\/p>\n
Barid (i.e.Q'defendant.'.N'o:_';i')t The piajmi\ufb01s 1 and 2 are the<\/p>\n
 A' da  "'3.te1f____\u00e9respectively of deceased Rehaman<\/p>\n
 .,I%.(\u00a7CtiIdiI1g to the plaintiffs, they are in joint<\/p>\n
 enjoyment of all the suit schedule<\/p>\n
Ivhpropertiee, hnlong with defendant No. 1; but, defendant<\/p>\n
V' "C_i'~}'oV. denied their share; Defendant No. 1 has been<\/p>\n
  enjoying the usu\ufb01ncts and income of all the properties;<\/p>\n
 '4 defendant No.1 wanted to eel} away the usufruets of the<\/p>\n
properties to defendants 2 and 3, plaint\ufb01fs protested for<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
-3-<\/span><\/p>\n
the same; as their share in the propsrties is denied by<\/p>\n
defendant No.1, plaintiils, filed the do <\/p>\n
0.S.No.388\/1977 for partition and <\/p>\n
According to plaintiffs, MoI1i\u00a7fL1ddinV”*P\u00a3isha diedl_dpe1;;t 1 if d<\/p>\n
years prior to the tiling of    the
\nfirst son of Mohiyuddvix’-f”   Barid, born
\nthrough Noorabi_A{\ufb01;’st Wife}  years prior to<\/p>\n
filing of the   ‘ 1<\/p>\n
Pe:~iieex1i;.~\u00a5\u00e9\u00abid  e defendant No.1 that the
\npiaa’nt1’\ufb01’s”‘} uand  dot\u00e9ndded for any share, inasmuch<\/p>\n
as, thsir 14\/1961 filed for partition<\/p>\n
  V’ssi3\u00a7ai*at\u00e9C:_>osses’sion came to be dismissed; that the<\/p>\n
id piainti\ufb01fs that \ufb01rst son of Mohiyucidin<\/p>\n
M  _Pasi1″a,  send aman Barid, died ten years prior to filing<\/p>\n
 ”   .th(_: suit is incorrect, inasmuch as, he died in the year<\/p>\n
 “itself as is clear from the admission made by<\/p>\n
i  1 and 2 in O.S.No.5I4\/1961; that plainti\ufb01” No.3<\/p>\n
9’ ii 3 is not the second wife of Mohiyuddin. Pasha and that<\/p>\n
\\<\/'"2<\/p>\n
– 19 –\n<\/p>\n
Court is not justi\ufb01ed in dismissing the suit in its ent:1rety,<\/p>\n
inasmuch as, p1a:nt;i:1′ No.3 s the second <\/p>\n
Mohiyuddin Pasha and plaintifis 4 to 8 are   *<\/p>\n
daughters born to Mohiyuddins’    ;<\/p>\n
Mazambi — p1ainti\ufb01’No.3; that  at:EExs.P~1
\nto P47 conckusively reve\u00e91i\u00ab-{fiat  is the Wife and<\/p>\n
plaintifts 4 to 3 are m\u00a2.v4c}*;j1\u00a7gysn’.’s.sgf4A’Meii:iy’i1ddi11 Pasha<\/p>\n
born thI’011g.h_V   N\u00e9\u00a73). He further<\/p>\n
subznited  at by the first
\nAppeHate1.,.ACeux’\u00a7. is\u00bb 1:0′ the records and therefore,<\/p>\n
the same is””1ia;b1e ‘:0 be”  aside. However, the learned<\/p>\n
~   A011″  of the plaint:iffs~appeiia11ts<\/p>\n
 that plainti\ufb01s 1 and 2 may not be entitled<\/p>\n
   to    ” share through Rehaman Barid who<\/p>\n
 % % his \ufb01ather – Mohiyuddin Pasha – the<\/p>\n
 _ pfopesitus.\n<\/p>\n
 ” ~  Per contra, it is argued on behaif of contesting<\/p>\n
 fespondents i.e., defendants I (a) to 16) that, the first<\/p>\n
}’>
\n\\{-..;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
-13..\n<\/p>\n
(3) Whether the first Appellate Court is
\njusti\ufb02ed in dismissing the suit \ufb01led by
\nPlainti\ufb01fs 3 to 8 mainly on the gbund <\/p>\n
the Nikhanama: evidencing the max\ufb01ege cf    A<\/p>\n
plaintiff No.3 with Mohjyuddjn Pash\u00e9aigjss-sf \u00ab
\nnot produced? 1 4′ ”  “id ‘ 4’<\/p>\n
(4) Whether the .1buIi.ti~..\n<\/p>\n
Deed Ex.I)~1 Jexecutedxifbyss Mo1\ufb01}*1.1ddiii
\nPasha in tavous\ufb01 \ufb01rst; \u00bb\u00ab3%irs\u00bb.sNeqrabi are
\nliable to     to
\nthe P1’\u00a7s\u00a211xtVj’sui\ufb01? :[    ‘  V<\/p>\n
As     of the defendant<\/p>\n
NO. I thati-31\u00a2  have the second wife. In<\/p>\n
other woxwde; the   No.3 that she is the<\/p>\n
‘._second.;%g\u00a7?ife.of the is denied by defendant No. 1.<\/p>\n
 __ is argued by defendant No. 1 that<\/p>\n
 ” V    the sons and daughters of plajmi\ufb02<\/p>\n
 Pit1’Q.3   get any share in the property. in this<\/p>\n
s   an applimtion is filed by defendant No. 1 in<\/p>\n
 appeal, before this Court, under Order 41<\/p>\n
1\/><\/p>\n
..1q..\n<\/p>\n
Rule 27 of C.P.C. for leading additional evidence. He<\/p>\n
produced a Xerox copy of Nikhanama of   _<\/p>\n
contend that plainti\ufb02” No.8 had  a_.z1″oi1\u00a7.e3_t  dd ” = <\/p>\n
 Shaik Suiaimansaheb Zamirmdar mute year i9?\u00a5i’.{‘3n\u00a7..n_:\u00ab<\/p>\n
therefone, she is not the Wife ‘me     ”<\/p>\n
contended by the deiendant by  t.’1e’Ast;dte1nent
\nof objections \ufb01led byv    to 8 to the
\napp\ufb01cauon for e   em the
\nplaintiffs have   plailltiif No.3
\nmarrying      Sulaimansaheb
\nZami11dat;”*i;1\ufb01_16     ”  %<\/p>\n
8.V_State1aeI1t_o,-f ebjee\ufb01ons are filed by the piaint\ufb02fs<\/p>\n
to .tI1e.e{ppl:\u00a7;ea3:ion  ieading additional evidence by<\/p>\n
tote? oiia  that the marna’ ge of plainti\ufb01” No.3 is<\/p>\n
  stated! to.  been taken place when she was just<\/p>\n
”  the same never came to be acted upon. The<\/p>\n
A   Nikha certificate mentioned above is stated to<\/p>\n
 Iihave been issued by the Secmetary, Masjid Edga<\/p>\n
1\/><\/p>\n
-15..\n<\/p>\n
Kabrastan, Noorpur Village, Srinivasapura ‘l’al1A.~r.~}:;” <\/p>\n
District. According to the plainti\ufb02e,   n_11031:’   b <\/p>\n
even attain the puberty at    e<\/p>\n
consequentiy, she never Iived.wi1_;1;    ;<\/p>\n
Zamindar as his wife. ‘ _ _ ‘ V<\/p>\n
9. The eonteI1tio1e.s'”f-eiA’1 eermot be
\naccepted. Deiendatlt    Veiliewed to lead
\nadditional   30 years. The
\nsuit is   bbe matter had gone
\nup to Hoigfblgg.  gt’ India. The Apex Court<\/p>\n
has remanded Ltil\u00e9\ufb01 xixafierv  Court. After remand, the<\/p>\n
appiieetggemer 1eee.iege;1c1iuona1 evidence is filed. The<\/p>\n
A’eepAy;’ef;  cannot be ailowed to be produced at<\/p>\n
  ‘– ..  No plausible explanation is<\/p>\n
   to why the document sought to be<\/p>\n
  Iiew was not produced eariier. Even according<\/p>\n
   ciefeedant No.1, the Nikhanama is found in the register<\/p>\n
bk  eeeietaz’ned by the concerned Muthavali in Dargah. 11’ it is<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
-17..\n<\/p>\n
Rehaman Barid died in the year 1945. lt is   _<\/p>\n
by plaint1’\ufb01’s 1 and 2 herein in the .  s%;:j1t% x <\/p>\n
O.S.No.514\/1961 that Reha111a11:=..:13a.3<-igi .fiv\u00a21uie(i -.ii*1- <\/p>\n
1945. It is not in dispute thaiz pfepdsitus  'I$fie.t3iy1\u00a7iddm:V: e<\/p>\n
Pasha died in the year 31964.   the first
\nson of Mohiyuddin   u his \ufb01r-st wife
\nNeorabi. 'I'h1;s,–  it   Barid
\npmdeeeasee__   I and 2 being the
\nwife and   claim share in the
\npmperdes   who predeceased his<\/p>\n
father (Mot'iiy3;:cI.dVii;._."V1-'?:';1s3\u00a7\u00e9;\u00bb4the propositus}, they are not<\/p>\n
  1;_e   the suit scheduled properties.<\/p>\n
 ..  fmm ciaiming any share in the<\/p>\n
prc\ufb01ertiee'  ef;_}:?:?{VehiyuddiI1 Pasha. Moreover, the earlier<\/p>\n
  them in 0.S.N0.5I4\/1961 came to be<\/p>\n
'    on merits. The proper\ufb01es invoived in the said<\/p>\n
"  'etzif. are also involved in the present suit. Hence, plaintiifs<\/p>\n
  :1 and 2 are not entitled to any share in the property and<\/p>\n
V'<\/p>\n
-13-<\/span><\/p>\n
consequently, their claim is rightly dismissed <\/p>\n
Appellate Court.\n<\/p>\n
11. Re: second and third <\/p>\n
second and third questiof15 “~C,>i’ iavf a:.=..\u00a21a\u00a2ase}s<\/p>\n
conveniently by clubbing “t_hey_  ‘  up for<\/p>\n
consideration together.\n<\/p>\n
12. In  {suit 14\/ 1961,
\ndefendant 1 -I9.  had contended that
\nMomyucidio   had got second wife<\/p>\n
and \ufb01ve Chiliirer\ufb01   through second wife. it was<\/p>\n
fuJthe.fr’co11tei1de\u00a7i”ihei*ei11 that the earlier suit was not<\/p>\n
V”     View of non—joinder of the second wife<\/p>\n
 ‘the ii1ie~.efjiIdien born to her. In View of the same, it is<\/p>\n
   that the Mohiyuddin Pasha — the<\/p>\n
H H K  ~44″}:\u00a5.\u00a3’0;.1:1.sit1js..had got second wife and \ufb01ve children are hem<\/p>\n
sthrough second wife. If realiy the plaintiff No.3 is<\/p>\n
T  the second wife and plaintiifs 4 to 8 are not the<\/p>\n
 “children born to Mohiyuddin Pasha through his second<\/p>\n
<\\.J'**\u00ab<\/p>\n
-19-<\/span><\/p>\n
wife, the defendant No.1 should have taken a ‘fie\ufb01x\ufb01te<\/p>\n
stand by disclosing the name of second wiie I <\/p>\n
children born to second wife. The silence  <\/p>\n
No.1 in this regard amounts to   ‘<\/p>\n
defendant No.1 that  is, the  wife and
\nplaintiffs 4 to 8 are the   to Moh1y1′ iddi\ufb02<\/p>\n
Pasha – the pmpesitus’  <\/p>\n
13.  V.   of the year 1977 of
\nThadigel   The said voters list
\nis prepared\u00e9’ in  elections of 1977. Ex.P–1<\/p>\n
revea}s”tI;1a.t  prainair is the Wife of Mohjyuddin Pasha<\/p>\n
 &aadV:%V%’shaA%%\u00a7aas\u00abaged ‘about 45 years duI’1n’ g the said year.<\/p>\n
  of Birth issued by the competent<\/p>\n
 _ autfieritgf.’ -The said certi\ufb01cate clearly reveals that female<\/p>\n
.4 H ”  .e:L:i.I;:I_”was “born to Mohiyuddin Pasha and plairltiff No.3 on<\/p>\n
1953. Ex.P–3 reveais that a male child was born to<\/p>\n
T Mehiyuddin Pasha and piaintitr No.3 on 13.2.1956.<\/p>\n
x Ex?-4 reveals that female child was born to Mohiyuddin<\/p>\n
V’<\/p>\n
-20..\n<\/p>\n
Pasha and pia1’nti\ufb01’ No.3 on 22.10.1958.  _<\/p>\n
that male chiid was born. to Mo1}i.yuddiz1″‘ =  =  ” = <\/p>\n
plamtiff No.3 on 1.4.1961. ..\n<\/p>\n
certi\ufb01cate issued by Goveitmaem: Hitghe1* _Sck\u00a7ool,  *<\/p>\n
Thadigol, relating to pIam1i\ufb02’No{A8:–_lq1\u00a7al  _1\u00e9i;x.P.–7 is
\nthe transfer certi\ufb01cate   \/A Primary Boys
\nSchool, ‘I’11adigo1,–  in   No.4-Syed
\nRehaman    reveal
\nthat the  .:};\u00a7Q1.or}iiyuddin Pasha. Thus,
\nit is   plaintiffs 4 to 8 are the<\/p>\n
children  to _k:\u00bb1\u00a71:iyu\u00a7idm Pasha through Mazambi<\/p>\n
 .3).  to P\u00bb? are the public documents<\/p>\n
 —by the jurisdictional authorities ciurm g<\/p>\n
  the’co1″3\u00e9rse.\u00abo\u00a75ifeg1:’Vxlarwork.<\/p>\n
 14′._ EI1 further support of the case of the plajn\ufb01ffs,<\/p>\n
   brother of the \ufb01rst wife of Mohiyuddin Pasha<\/p>\n
 “‘–‘.\u00e9isV_e$(am1’ned as PW-1. He was aged about 75 years at the<\/p>\n
  \u00abtime of his examination. He is none other than the<\/p>\n
\\f<\/p>\n
-21-<\/span><\/p>\n
maternal uncle of defendant No. 1. He has ciearly <\/p>\n
emphatically deposed that Mohiynddin Pasha   _<\/p>\n
wives i.e., Noorabi and Mazamhi  Ne;3}.:’jj’~_I\u00a7lo~\u00bbsrabi V’: d v <\/p>\n
is the genitive sister of PW- 1. PV:V._-1  ”<\/p>\n
Mohiyuddin Pasha took   eeifter the
\ndeath of his first wife  ‘\u00ab\u00a71e{_i”.s_ss” as to how
\nthe marriage  ‘Attended the
\nmarriage of   Pasha. In
\nspite of   by defendant No. 1,
\nnothing   evidence of PW–1. if<\/p>\n
really plaintifi’..__N0.(\u00a7  legally wedded wife of<\/p>\n
_.1’s*!.o1r1iy1Vfad:.diV1:”‘:_5iA’ VvPasha,…__.PW\u00ab1 wouid not have supported<\/p>\n
  ‘npeiirticularly when defendant No.1 is none<\/p>\n
 \u00bb,___otheI.’  \ufb01he’eisiefer’s son of F’W- 1. The evidence of PW– 1<\/p>\n
 V .natL1fa}  reliable. No reasons are torthcommg to<\/p>\n
 me version of PW- 1, particularly in the \ufb01ght of<\/p>\n
  -\ufb01oiun\u00e9inous supporting documentary evidence in the form<\/p>\n
7 I -. ‘Exs.P- 1 to P-‘?’.\n<\/p>\n
\\\\;'”\\<\/p>\n
-23-<\/span><\/p>\n
15. The evidence of PW\u00bb 1 is fully  _<\/p>\n
evidence of PW-2 who is an independent    ” = ‘V<\/p>\n
also deposed that plainti\ufb01’ No.3 is:’\u00bb3;he1-~1t\u00e9?i3ie4″of <\/p>\n
Pasha and Mohiyuddin Pasha,    *<\/p>\n
the death of his frst Wife Noor3,_oi’:A:\u00a711d._\u00bb_tha1’t’  4 to 3
\nwere born to  –  -to the wedlock
\nbetween    <\/p>\n
16.    supported by the
\nevidenceVovof.PW~f3   r;;eid:eVV_:~\u00a7*:side11t of same vmagc.
\nHe has   ~ No.3 is the wife of<\/p>\n
Mohiyuddiri’   of the said wedlock, piainti\ufb01s<\/p>\n
, .4 to s;a;~ejba;-:1. .’I5\\+’\\=L4_.oi\u00ab’.~:\u00abvp1ai11’\u20aciif No.3 herself. Pws.2 to 4<\/p>\n
“have”  in their cI’oss—-examination. ‘1’It1e evidence<\/p>\n
  of PWSQ I V1:o’.v’V?\u00e9if_,V.ooupieci with the documents at Ex-s.P-1 to<\/p>\n
  ‘P37  it amply clear that Mohiyuddin Pasha married<\/p>\n
   after the death of his \ufb01rs: wife Noorabi. 1:; is also<\/p>\n
‘.   from the material on record that pla}.z11:i1fs 4 to 8 are<\/p>\n
   to Mohiyuddin Pasha through Mazambi.<\/p>\n
“*3<\/p>\n
\\4<\/p>\n
..27..\n<\/p>\n
handed over to the first Wife Noorabi under Mehar Deed<\/p>\n
and that the Deed of Mehar was created only a witlia <\/p>\n
to avoid share to the first son born  *<\/p>\n
Noorabi. According to them, the i’11*st~weon  K V’<\/p>\n
viz., Rehaman Barid (husband of   <\/p>\n
of plaintiff No.2) was ‘  the
\nproperties and was residing  skins. a to
\navoid him any share in   Mohiyuddin
\nPasha created    oi’ Noorabi
\nnominally.   on record, the
\ntrial    was not acted upon
\nand that   nroperties continued with<\/p>\n
Mohiyuddin  ‘.’l11i”‘urie’&irV of the $6 fmding arrived at<\/p>\n
ofgtllel passed in earlier suit in<\/p>\n
058..\u00a7\u00a2’o.’5e1%\u00a7’\/.oi955V=lIVilgdisposed of on 19″: January 1963),<\/p>\n
x””V’vwnicn =.\u00a7vas.-  on the admission of the propositus<\/p>\n
” iiisdid\u00e9liyuddinii’ Pasha himself and the admission of the<\/p>\n
 defendant No.1 herein, it is not open for<\/p>\n
 lieieieiidant No.1 again to contend that the properties\u00bb:<\/p>\n
\\J’2<\/p>\n
.. 23 –\n<\/p>\n
belonged to Noorabi (the iirst wife of the preposits<\/p>\n
Mohiyudciin Pasha) exclusively as they were _’t..ezher<\/p>\n
in Mehsar. The judgtnent and decree”   <\/p>\n
O.S.N0.514\/I961 has attained  see” <\/p>\n
defendant No.1 himself has   <\/p>\n
passed in O.S.No.514\/ 196k1e.sjj9F;ts.eEx. 1′:5\u00ab_16  ‘re1iec:V<\/p>\n
upon the same for opposizlgzhes. s9g1j{.,1b;.’\u00a7p9;1tition.
\nHence, the com;em::on<% in that regard
\n and  med
\nwas nomi\ufb01ei    _.;;1pon. Hence, item
\nNos. 14i'fpI'0perties also are liable
\nto be    to 8 and defendant No. 1.\n<\/p>\n
:.,.’_!_\u00a7g;u   “The first Appellate Court is not<\/p>\n
 4.\u00b0j’!15%'{ecif”\u00a7:1″h\u20ac3ldi1i\u00a7”‘iifeat items N0s.3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10,. 12<\/p>\n
  \u00a3iQf.1~*}iabie to be divided as the same are not<\/p>\n
‘  _   {he name of Mohiyuddin Pasha, but are<\/p>\n
   L in the name of Ramachandra Rao 85<\/p>\n
   Rao. These properties are tenanted<\/p>\n
V7<\/p>\n
-29-<\/span><\/p>\n
properties. Mohiyuddin Pasha was  <\/p>\n
properties. Said Ramaehandra Rae and   <\/p>\n
Rae are the owners of iands. ‘I’he  tenis\ufb01\ufb01tetip  <\/p>\n
liable to be partitioned. ‘I’hu’s,  ” L.<\/p>\n
are to be divided among the (i’eiefode;r1tV’1\\!’er.VV1’encifgplain\ufb01tfs
\n3 to 8. As aI’o1’eI11en’ti:<)._i':I–.i-:_('i,"_V:V   are not
\nentitled for sharejn tl1e..e2dird.proIder\u00a7\u00a7ie_s'Rehaman Barid\n<\/p>\n
— husband Nd:   of plainti\ufb01’ No.2
\npredeceased  t Rehaman Barid had
\npmdecerdsed.’ 3  i branch is excluded rmm<\/p>\n
claiming ;5:arfrtio1i;– .  the earlier suit for partition<\/p>\n
 _ and  f>’0sse’ssiAon \ufb01led by the plaintiifs 1 and 2<\/p>\n
  ‘O.-S:\u00a71’1’o.514\/1961 is also dismissed. in View of<\/p>\n
 r  I and 2 are not entitled for partition.<\/p>\n
‘Hence, zthe  persons now entitled for partition are<\/p>\n
  “‘..(‘1effeI1:;1_anr.No.1 and plaixlti\ufb02s 3 ta 3 — i.e., plaiI1\ufb01\ufb01’N’o.3 is<\/p>\n
    of the propositus, p1aim:i\ufb01’No.4 and pla1’nti\ufb01’No.8<\/p>\n
 V    the sons and piainti\ufb01s 5, 6 and 7 are the daughters.<\/p>\n
Thus, it is clear that the properties wilt have to be divided<\/p>\n
V7<\/p>\n
..3g..\n<\/p>\n
among Wife and ttmee sons and three 5 daughters of
\nMohiyuddin Pasha. H  .\n<\/p>\n
Under Mohamadan Law, the wife  <\/p>\n
as the Sharer. The   >
\ndefendant No.1 and piai11tj1I’se’4_.te a e’tt1e  *’
\nthree sons together or jointly \/   three V
\ndaughters together   _  out of the
\nremaining 7\/831  each of
\nthe three so\ufb01is\u00e9    and each of the
\ndaughter’ 2    of the suit scheduie
\nproperties. ._    order is made :\n<\/p>\n
2. Plaint\ufb01f No.3 \u00abg ea.  Pyarembi<\/p>\n
is en\ufb01tle\ufb01 to ” — 1\/8*h share<\/p>\n
 2. Defeodant   Barid
\n A    …..  –  Stlare<\/p>\n
  Syed Rehman Bane ‘cl
\n‘\u00ab@’~Sabu1.@.  entitled to — 7\/3631 share<\/p>\n
4. \u00a3)ef’?e:1:1\u00a7iai1\u00a3.VNo.8 — Rahiman Barid – 7\/36\u00a2 share<\/p>\n
1\/’<\/p>\n
1 .i . ,_  %rb;<\/<\/p>\n
m31m<\/p>\n
5. Plaintiff No.5 —- Shakila Begum
\nis entitled to — 7\/7295′.\n<\/p>\n
6. Plai11ti1i’N’0.6~–ZamilaBegum 1 v A_  .g
\nis entitled to   .. 4–=.7\/.’Z’2″d’<\/p>\n
7. P1a\u00e9nt.i\ufb01’No.7 — Akhila Begum V<\/p>\n
is entitled to  Lk    ?’\/”\u00a3253 “Share V<\/p>\n
Appeal is allowed j\ufb01dgj\ufb01exzt and decree of
\niower Appellate  isiset  the suit
\nis decreed   to be <\/p>\n
    Sd\/-\u00bb
\nJudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Rahamathunnisa vs Azgar Barid & Ors. on 17 March, 2009 Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar gm THE HIGH cousrror KARNATAKA AT l3Ai\\_3:6~.’\u00e9;!.j\u00a7i>’_\u00a7\u00a7\u00ab.’\u00a7-3′ % DATED THIS THE 17″ may of MARCi~\u00a7\u00bb’2_(}CJ\u00a7A–f: _ T _: BEFORE HONBLE MRJUSTICE Monm TAr~;A\u00e9so:3:>As2 REGULAR sgcong k%%ap:\u00bb= Mu. _.B…9.tJ.!..I:e_e_Iy W] o . Aged ah9ut_52Vy\u00e9sa:s;,V’w% 2. Noo1jaha n\u00bb. . % M […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-126578","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nRahamathunnisa vs Azgar Barid & Ors. on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rahamathunnisa vs Azgar Barid & Ors. on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-08T13:53:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"16 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Rahamathunnisa vs Azgar Barid & Ors. on 17 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-08T13:53:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":2835,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009\",\"name\":\"Rahamathunnisa vs Azgar Barid & Ors. on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-08T13:53:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rahamathunnisa vs Azgar Barid & Ors. on 17 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rahamathunnisa vs Azgar Barid & Ors. on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rahamathunnisa vs Azgar Barid & Ors. on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-08T13:53:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"16 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Rahamathunnisa vs Azgar Barid & Ors. on 17 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-08T13:53:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009"},"wordCount":2835,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009","name":"Rahamathunnisa vs Azgar Barid & Ors. on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-08T13:53:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rahamathunnisa-vs-azgar-barid-ors-on-17-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rahamathunnisa vs Azgar Barid & Ors. on 17 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/126578","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=126578"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/126578\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=126578"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=126578"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=126578"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}