{"id":12675,"date":"2011-02-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-02-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011"},"modified":"2015-01-17T21:58:48","modified_gmt":"2015-01-17T16:28:48","slug":"amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011","title":{"rendered":"Amerika Rai & Ors vs State Of Bihar on 23 February, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Supreme Court of India<\/div>\n
Amerika Rai & Ors vs State Of Bihar on 23 February, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: V Sirpurkar<\/div>\n
Bench: V.S. Sirpurkar, Anil R. Dave<\/div>\n
                                                         1\n\n\n\n\n\n                                                                 Reportable\n\n\n\n\n                       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA\n\n\n                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION\n\n\n                 CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1516-1517 OF 2004\n\n\n\n\n\nAmerika Rai & Ors.                                                     ... Appellants\n\n\n\n\n                                          Versus\n\n\n\n\nState of Bihar                                                         ... Respondent\n\n\n\n\n\n                                    J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
V.S. SIRPURKAR, J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
1.     This judgment will dispose of Criminal Appeal Nos. 1516 and 1517 <\/p>\n
of   2004.     Five   accused   persons   have   filed   these   appeals,   they   being <\/p>\n
Amerika Rai (original accused No. 1), Darbesh Rai (original accused No. <\/p>\n
2), Mithilesh Rai (original accused No. 4), Sanjay Rai (original accused No. <\/p>\n
5)   and   Sipahi   Rai   (original   accused   No.   6).     The   appeal   of   Chulhan   Rai <\/p>\n
(original accused No. 3) is already dismissed.  Six accused persons came <\/p>\n
                                               2<\/span><\/p>\n
to be tried for having formed themselves into an unlawful assembly and as <\/p>\n
a common object of that unlawful assembly, having committed murder of <\/p>\n
one Shankar Rai.   Some of the accused persons were also charged with <\/p>\n
the offences under the Arms Act.  All the accused persons were convicted <\/p>\n
for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the <\/p>\n
Indian   Penal   Code   (IPC),   while   Chulhan   Rai   (A-3)   was   convicted   for <\/p>\n
substantive   offence   punishable   under   Section   302   and   for   offence <\/p>\n
punishable under Section 27 of the Arms Act.   Again, Mithilesh Rai (A-4) <\/p>\n
was   also   convicted   for   the   offence   punishable   under   Section   307   IPC   in <\/p>\n
addition to the offences punishable under Section 27 of the Arms Act and <\/p>\n
Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC.  He was booked for that offence on <\/p>\n
the allegation that he had fired at and injured one Dineshwar Rai (PW-7). <\/p>\n
The   appeals   of   all   the   accused   persons   were   dismissed   by   Patna   High <\/p>\n
Court  and that  is how the  accused persons are before  us  in the  present <\/p>\n
appeals.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
2.      The   prosecution   story   is   in   the   short   conspectus.     This   is   a   cruel <\/p>\n
murder of a young bridegroom Shankar Rai who was married only a day <\/p>\n
before.     He   was   put   to   death   virtually   without   any   reason.     As   per   the <\/p>\n
prosecution story, his marriage was held at village Ishupur, Police Station <\/p>\n
Lalganj,   District   Vaishali.     All   the   accused   persons   appear   to   be   either <\/p>\n
relations or neighbours of deceased Shankar Rai.  They all had joined the <\/p>\n
bridegroom party and were  present at the time of marriage.   It is alleged <\/p>\n
                                               3<\/span><\/p>\n
that   at   the   time   of   function   of   “Dwarpuja”,   there   was   some   altercation   in <\/p>\n
between the members of bride party on one side and bridegroom’s on the <\/p>\n
other.     It  is  alleged   that   the  brother  of   the   informant   Dineshwar  Rai  was <\/p>\n
assaulted   by   the   members   of   the   bride   party   and   in   retaliation,   the <\/p>\n
informant also attacked some members of the bride side.   Further, when <\/p>\n
one of the accused persons Sanjay Rai (A-5) was going back to Janmasa <\/p>\n
(the   place   where   the   bridegroom’s   party   stays   during   the   marriage),   he <\/p>\n
was  assaulted by some boys of the village.   However,  the marriage was <\/p>\n
solemnized.  The party of the bridegroom returned to their village alongwith <\/p>\n
bride, and alongwith them, the brother-in-law of the bride accompanied as <\/p>\n
per the custom.  On the next day, at about 11’o clock in the morning, when <\/p>\n
the said brother-in-law, namely, Ram Babu (PW-6) was going for rest after <\/p>\n
taking  meals, the  accused persons, namely,  Amerika Rai (A-1), Darbesh <\/p>\n
Rai   (A-2),   Chulhan   Rai   (A-3),   Mithilesh   Rai   (A-4),   Sanjay   Rai   (A-5)   and <\/p>\n
Sipahi   Rai   (A-6)   assaulted   him   with   fists   and   slaps.     When   this   was <\/p>\n
objected   to,   a   quarrel   ensued.   At   that   very   time,   Amerika   Rai   (A-1) <\/p>\n
exhorted  and  as a result,  Chulhan Rai (A-3)  brought  a licensed gun and <\/p>\n
fired 6\/7 rounds at Shankar Rai.   He fell down injured.   In the meantime, <\/p>\n
Mithilesh   Rai   (A-4)   fired   3\/4   rounds   from   his   gun   causing   injury   to <\/p>\n
Dineshwar Rai (PW-7) who was none else but the brother of Shankar Rai <\/p>\n
(deceased).  He suffered injuries to his hand, abdomen and thigh.  At this <\/p>\n
time,   Sanjay   Rai   (A-5)   and   Sipahi   Rai   (A-6)   also   opened   fire   from   their <\/p>\n
                                             4<\/span><\/p>\n
pistols.   Darbesh Rai (A-2) was present with a lathi.   Injured Shankar Rai <\/p>\n
was   removed   to   the   State   dispensary,   Parsa,   where   he   died   during   his <\/p>\n
treatment.   Dineshwar Rai (PW-7) was also treated.   The incident, having <\/p>\n
taken place in the broad day light, was  witnessed by number of persons <\/p>\n
including   the   villagers.     Dineshwar   Rai   (PW-7)   reported   the   matter   on <\/p>\n
26.6.1995 at 4.15 pm to the Officer-in-charge of Dariyapur Police Station. <\/p>\n
This was done in the State dispensary.    FIR was drawn  up by Dariyapur <\/p>\n
Police Station vide case No. 76\/95 and the offences were registered under <\/p>\n
Sections   302,   307,   324   read  with   Section   34   IPC   and   Section   27   of   the <\/p>\n
Arms   Act.     The   chargesheet   was   filed   and   the   matter   was   committed   to <\/p>\n
sessions.  All the accused abjured their guilt.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
3.     In   support   of   the   prosecution,   as   many   as   12   witnesses   were <\/p>\n
examined   including   the   eye-witnesses,   the   police   witnesses   and   the <\/p>\n
doctors.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4.     Some   of   the   witnesses   like   Dineshwar   Rai   (PW-7)   who   was   an <\/p>\n
injured witness,   Ram Babu (PW-6), Dhaneshwar  Rai  (PW-1),  Sheo Nath <\/p>\n
Rai (PW-2), Ramesh Rai (PW-3) and Ram Bhawan Rai (PW-4) supported <\/p>\n
the  prosecution  version.   However,  some  other witnesses  like Wakil Rai, <\/p>\n
Virendra Rai and Dina Pandit did not support the prosecution.  Relying on <\/p>\n
their   evidence,   the   trial   Court   firstly   came   to   the   conclusion   that   the <\/p>\n
accused   persons   formed   themselves   into   an   unlawful   assembly   and <\/p>\n
                                             5<\/span><\/p>\n
indiscriminately fired at Shankar Rai (deceased) and Dineshwar Rai (PW-<\/p>\n
7) and caused murder of Shankar Rai and attempted to murder Dineshwar <\/p>\n
Rai (PW-7).   However, it is only Mithilesh Rai (A-4) who is booked for the <\/p>\n
offence punishable under Section 307 IPC on the ground that he was the <\/p>\n
only person who fired at Dineshwar Rai (PW-7) and injured him seriously. <\/p>\n
The trial Court has also discussed the whole medical evidence as well as <\/p>\n
the evidence of the eye-witnesses and convicted all the accused persons. <\/p>\n
The appeals of the accused persons before the High Court failed and that <\/p>\n
is how the matter is before us.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
5.     The   learned   counsel   appearing   on   behalf   of   the   accused   persons <\/p>\n
firstly urged that the role of Amerika Rai (A-1) and Darbesh Rai (A-2), as <\/p>\n
attributed   to   them   by   the   prosecution   witness,   itself   suggests   that   these <\/p>\n
two   accused   persons   did   not   use   any   fire   arms.     The   learned   counsel <\/p>\n
further urged that Amerika Rai (A-1) was merely standing and at the most, <\/p>\n
it could be said that he exhorted for bringing the guns; however, even that <\/p>\n
could not be said in respect of Darbesh Rai (A-2) who was merely standing <\/p>\n
in the door with a lathi.  The learned counsel were at pains to point out, by <\/p>\n
reference to evidence, that Darbesh Rai (A-2) did not in any manner either <\/p>\n
assault the deceased or take part in the whole affair.  The learned counsel, <\/p>\n
therefore, urged that at least insofar as Amerika Rai (A-1) and Darbesh Rai <\/p>\n
(A-2)   are   concerned,   they   could   not   be   said   to   be   the   members   of   the <\/p>\n
unlawful   assembly.     The   learned   counsel   appearing   on   behalf   of   Sanjay <\/p>\n
                                                6<\/span><\/p>\n
Rai  (A-5)  and   Sipahi  Rai  (A-6)  pointed   out  that  though   it  was  suggested <\/p>\n
that   these   two   accused   persons   fired   with   their   pistols,   those   pistols   are <\/p>\n
nowhere to be found in the whole investigation, as nothing was recovered <\/p>\n
from these two accused persons.   The learned counsel, therefore,  urged <\/p>\n
that   it   will   be   difficult   to   say   that   these   two   persons   either   shared   the <\/p>\n
common   intention   or   had   the   common   object.     It   was   pointed   out   that <\/p>\n
Sanjay  Rai (A-5) and  Sipahi  Rai (A-6)  were  not  even  related  to Amerika <\/p>\n
Rai (A-1) and his family or deceased Shankar Rai and his family.<\/p>\n
6.      There can be no dispute that Shankar Rai died a homicidal death. <\/p>\n
As   many   as   5   eye-witnesses   whose   presence   was   most   natural   on   the <\/p>\n
spot, have supported the prosecution version regarding the deadly attack <\/p>\n
on   Shankar   Rai,   as   also   the   firing   at   his   brother   Dineshwar   Rai   (PW-7). <\/p>\n
The evidence of the two doctors being Dr. Shradha Nand (PW-8) and Dr. <\/p>\n
Amarnath   Jha   (PW-10),   who   conducted   the   autopsy   is   sufficient   to   hold <\/p>\n
that   Shankar   Rai   died   an   almost   instantaneous   death   because   of <\/p>\n
indiscriminate   firing   at   him   by   Chulhan   Rai   (A-3).     It   has   already   been <\/p>\n
stated   earlier   that   appeal   of   Chulhan   Rai   (A-3)   is   already   dismissed. <\/p>\n
Deceased Shankar Rai had suffered as many as 8 injuries, all attributable <\/p>\n
to   the   gun   shot   injuries,   so   also   the   injuries   suffered   by   Dineshwar   Rai <\/p>\n
(PW-7)   were   found   to   be   dangerous   to   his   life,   though   he   ultimately <\/p>\n
survived.     The   question,   however,   is   whether   all   the   accused   persons <\/p>\n
                                             7<\/span><\/p>\n
could be booked with the aid of Section 149 IPC on the ground that they <\/p>\n
were the members of the unlawful assembly having the common object.<\/p>\n
7.     There can be no dispute that the presence of the accused persons <\/p>\n
on the spot was well established by the five eye-witnesses named above. <\/p>\n
All   the   five   eye-witnesses   who   supported   the   prosecution   have   in   one <\/p>\n
voice deposed to the presence of all these accused persons and the acts <\/p>\n
performed   by   them.     Dineshwar   Rai   (PW-7),   Dhaneshwar   Rai   (PW-1), <\/p>\n
Ram Bhawan Rai (PW-4), Ram Babu (PW-6), Sheo Nath Rai (PW-2) and <\/p>\n
Ramesh Rai (PW-3) are unanimous on the question that Amerika Rai (A-1) <\/p>\n
had ordered to bring the guns.  As many as 4 witnesses being Dineshwar <\/p>\n
Rai (PW-7), Dhaneshwar Rai (PW-1), Ram Bhawan Rai (PW-4) and Ram <\/p>\n
Babu (PW-6) spoke about Darbesh Rai (A-2) standing holding a stick.  All <\/p>\n
these   4   witnesses   also   suggested   that   he   was   instigating.     Insofar   as <\/p>\n
Mithilesh Rai (A-4) is concerned, all the witnesses are unanimous that he <\/p>\n
fired 3-4 rounds with his gun and caused injury to Dineshwar Rai (PW-7), <\/p>\n
so   also   all   the   witnesses   are   absolutely   unanimous   in   respect   of   Sanjay <\/p>\n
Rai (A-5) and Sipahi Rai (A-6) to the effect that they were  firing with  the <\/p>\n
pistols in their hand.  Sheo Nath Rai (PW-2) and Ramesh Rai (PW-3) also <\/p>\n
went   to   the   extent   of   saying   that   these   two   accused   persons   fired   2-3 <\/p>\n
rounds   of   shots   though   no   injury   was   caused   by   those   gun   shots. <\/p>\n
Therefore,   there   can   be   no   doubt   that   all   these   accused   persons,   who <\/p>\n
were   staying   in   the   nearby   house   of   the   deceased,   had   attacked   the <\/p>\n
                                              8<\/span><\/p>\n
deceased   and   his   brother   Dineshwar   Rai   (PW-7).     There   was   a   definite <\/p>\n
background  to this attack  which  related to the altercation  in between  the <\/p>\n
bride’s party and bridegroom’s party at the time of marriage and accused <\/p>\n
Sanjay   Rai   having   been   beaten.     It   has   come   in   the   evidence   of   the <\/p>\n
witnesses   like   Dineshwar   Rai   (PW-7)   and   Ram   Babu   (PW-7)   that   there <\/p>\n
was an unpleasant incident of altercation in between the bride’s party and <\/p>\n
bridegroom’s   party   at   the   time   of   Dwarpuja.     It   has   also   come   in   the <\/p>\n
evidence   that   Sanjay   Rai   (A-5),   when   he   was   returning   back   from <\/p>\n
bridegroom’s place on cycle, was  beaten.   Therefore, it appears that the <\/p>\n
accused persons had carried a grudge and seeing Ram Babu (PW-6), the <\/p>\n
brother-in-law of Shankar Rai’s bride, there was an instantaneous reaction <\/p>\n
on   their   part.     It   has   come   in   the   evidence   that   Ram   Babu   (PW-6)   was <\/p>\n
slapped and fisted when he had finished his meals and was going for rest. <\/p>\n
The   presence   of   Ram   Babu   (PW-6)   acted   as   a   flash   point;   perhaps   it <\/p>\n
reminded the accused persons and more particularly, Sanjay Rai (A-5), of <\/p>\n
the insult meted out to them and then the idea of taking revenge emerged. <\/p>\n
What   happened   is   that   deceased   Shankar   Rai   seeing   that   his   wife’s <\/p>\n
relation   was   being   slapped   and   fisted   by   the   accused   persons,   had <\/p>\n
resisted the attempt on the part of the accused persons and that ultimately <\/p>\n
proved to be a  raison d’etre  of his death.   Therefore, there is no doubt in <\/p>\n
our mind that this was undoubtedly done with a common object of teaching <\/p>\n
lesson to deceased Shankar Rai who had taken – as was expected- side <\/p>\n
                                             9<\/span><\/p>\n
of Ram Babu (PW-6), the brother-in-law of his bride.   What is liable to be <\/p>\n
seen is as to whether there was any active participation and the presence <\/p>\n
of all the accused persons was with an active mind in furtherance of their <\/p>\n
common   object.     The   law   of   vicarious   liability   under   Section   149   IPC   is <\/p>\n
crystal clear that even the presence in the unlawful assembly, but with an <\/p>\n
active   mind,   to   achieve   the   common   object   makes   such   a   person <\/p>\n
vicariously liable for the acts of the unlawful assembly.  In that light, when <\/p>\n
the evidence is examined, it is obvious that Amerika Rai (A-1) who was the <\/p>\n
elder in the family and father of Darbesh Rai (A-2), Mithilesh Rai (A-4) and <\/p>\n
Chulhan   Rai   (A-3),   instead   of   acting   in   a   responsible   manner   and <\/p>\n
preventing any unpleasant incident, exhorted the accused persons to bring <\/p>\n
the   gun.     The   guns   are   normally   not   brought   for   making   a   show.     The <\/p>\n
exhortation   to   bring   the   gun   definitely   speaks   about   the   guilty   mind   of <\/p>\n
Amerika Rai (A-1), so also the use of guns by Mithilesh Rai (A-4), Sanjay <\/p>\n
Rai (A-5) and Sipahi Rai (A-6) is very clear that they also had guilty mind. <\/p>\n
Mithilesh   Rai   (A-4)   went   to   the   extent   of   injuring   Dineshwar   Rai   (PW-7). <\/p>\n
Therefore,   even   their   presence   and   part   played   by   them   was   obviously <\/p>\n
pointing towards the common object of committing murder of Shankar Rai. <\/p>\n
Unfortunately, Shankar Rai became the victim of the circumstances.   The <\/p>\n
accused persons had nothing to do with Shankar Rai.  Their main ire was <\/p>\n
directed  at  Ram   Babu  (PW-6).    But,  perhaps   because  Shankar  Rai  took <\/p>\n
side of Ram Babu (PW-6), he became the victim of circumstances and had <\/p>\n
                                               10<\/span><\/p>\n
to pay with his own life.   Therefore, at least insofar as these persons are <\/p>\n
concerned, their presence and their active participation would make them <\/p>\n
guilty under Section 149  IPC,  though  the  author of the  injury to Shankar <\/p>\n
Rai was Chulhan Rai (A-3) whose appeal has already been dismissed.<\/p>\n
8.      However, that canot be said about Darbesh Rai (A-2).  He had been <\/p>\n
given the role of standing in the door of his house with a lathi.  We feel that <\/p>\n
the   evidence   of   the   eye-witnesses   that   he   was   instigating   the   other <\/p>\n
accused   persons   to   fire,   appears   to   be   an   exaggeration.     He   would   not <\/p>\n
have kept on standing there holding a lathi had he shared the intention and <\/p>\n
the common object of committing murder of Shankar Rai.   In our opinion, <\/p>\n
the role of Darbesh Rai (A-2), as attributed to by the eye-witnesses, should <\/p>\n
not  make  him  vicariously  liable.    We, therefore,  grant  benefit of  doubt to <\/p>\n
Darbesh Rai (A-2) and acquit him.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
9.      It   was   tried   to   be   suggested,   relying   on   the   defence   witnesses, <\/p>\n
namely, Ajit Kumar Singh (DW-1) and Ram Dhani Chaudhary (DW-2), that <\/p>\n
Chulhan   Rai   (A-3)   did   not   have   any   gun,   as   his   gun   was   deposited   in <\/p>\n
Singh Gun House.  This argument is already rejected by trial and appellate <\/p>\n
Courts and we also endorse the finding.  Insofar as Ram Dhani Chaudhary <\/p>\n
(DW-2)   is   concerned,  he  stated  that  there   was  a   distance  of  250   feet  in <\/p>\n
between the house of Chulhan Rai (A-3) and deceased Shankar Rai and <\/p>\n
there   was   a   pond   in   between   their   houses.     He   also   found   brick   bats   in <\/p>\n
                                             11<\/span><\/p>\n
front of the house of the deceased and Chulhan Rai (A-3).  Thereby it was <\/p>\n
suggested   that   there   was   exchange   of   brick   bats   between   the   parties. <\/p>\n
That may be so.  However, there is evidence that when Ram Babu (PW-6) <\/p>\n
was going for rest after the meals, he was actually fisted and slapped by <\/p>\n
Amerika Rai (A-1), Darbesh Rai (A-2), Chulhan Rai (A-3), Mithilesh Rai (A-<\/p>\n
4),   Sanjay   Rai   (A-5)   and   Sipahi   Rai   (A-6).     When   this   was   informed   to <\/p>\n
Shankar Rai, Shankar Rai came and made enquiry from Chulhan Rai (A-3) <\/p>\n
and   then   when   there   was   exchange   of   abuses,   the   brick   batting   started <\/p>\n
between   the   parties.     The   evidence   of   Ram   Dhani   Chaudhary   (DW-2), <\/p>\n
S.D.P.O., does not in any manner shake the prosecution case.  It was not <\/p>\n
as if the defence came up with a plea of right of private defence of person <\/p>\n
and   property   and   indeed   they  could   not   have   done   so   as   they   were   the <\/p>\n
aggressor   party  using  guns.    We  have   considered  the   defence  evidence <\/p>\n
also at the instance of both the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the <\/p>\n
defence and we do not find that this evidence would in any manner help <\/p>\n
the prosecution.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
10.    In   short,   there   can   be   no   dispute   about   the   formation   of   unlawful <\/p>\n
assembly and its common object.   We, therefore, dismiss all the appeals <\/p>\n
excepting that of Darbesh Rai (A-2) who  has been granted the benefit of <\/p>\n
doubt.  He shall be acquitted.  All the accused persons are, therefore, held <\/p>\n
guilty and their appeals are dismissed excepting that of Darbesh Rai (A-2) <\/p>\n
                                            12<\/span><\/p>\n
whose   appeal   is   accepted   and   who   is   directed   to   be   released   forthwith <\/p>\n
unless required in any other matter.   His bail bonds are discharged.    It is <\/p>\n
reported that accused No.1, Amerika Rai is on bail.  He shall be taken into <\/p>\n
custody immediately for serving out rest of the sentence.   His bail bonds <\/p>\n
are cancelled.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                                     ………………………………..J.\n<\/p>\n
                                                     (V.S. Sirpurkar)<\/p>\n
                                                     ………………………………..J.\n<\/p>\n
                                                     (Anil R. Dave)<\/p>\n
New Delhi;\n<\/p>\n
February 23, 2011.\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Supreme Court of India Amerika Rai & Ors vs State Of Bihar on 23 February, 2011 Author: V Sirpurkar Bench: V.S. Sirpurkar, Anil R. Dave 1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1516-1517 OF 2004 Amerika Rai & Ors. … Appellants Versus State of Bihar … Respondent J […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12675","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-supreme-court-of-india"],"yoast_head":"\nAmerika Rai & Ors vs State Of Bihar on 23 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Amerika Rai & Ors vs State Of Bihar on 23 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-02-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-01-17T16:28:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Amerika Rai & Ors vs State Of Bihar on 23 February, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-17T16:28:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011\"},\"wordCount\":2737,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Supreme Court of India\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011\",\"name\":\"Amerika Rai & Ors vs State Of Bihar on 23 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-17T16:28:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Amerika Rai & Ors vs State Of Bihar on 23 February, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Amerika Rai & Ors vs State Of Bihar on 23 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Amerika Rai & Ors vs State Of Bihar on 23 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-02-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-01-17T16:28:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Amerika Rai & Ors vs State Of Bihar on 23 February, 2011","datePublished":"2011-02-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-17T16:28:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011"},"wordCount":2737,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Supreme Court of India"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011","name":"Amerika Rai & Ors vs State Of Bihar on 23 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-02-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-17T16:28:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amerika-rai-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-on-23-february-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Amerika Rai & Ors vs State Of Bihar on 23 February, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12675","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12675"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12675\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12675"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12675"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12675"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}