{"id":126855,"date":"2008-11-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008"},"modified":"2016-02-19T12:39:26","modified_gmt":"2016-02-19T07:09:26","slug":"m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"M Venkataswamaiah vs Smt Keli Bai W\/O Late Champalal on 19 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M Venkataswamaiah vs Smt Keli Bai W\/O Late Champalal on 19 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: S.R.Bannurmath & Shantanagoudar<\/div>\n
Hi' TEIE Hi\ufb01i\ufb01 CXTWRT (SF KARHATAKA AT BAKGALORE \n\nDated this the 19*\" \u00e9ay of November, 20138';  A' \n\nPresent:\n\n'rim HON\"BLE Hr. Jus\ufb01w :fs'\u00a7ii\u00a7 _ _ ' \n\nA133)\n\nTHE Iiox*BLE 25:. Jt:s'rI<:L1 nQ;mH  \n\ncmmxxay ccc'\u00a7a\u00a2;.j'j'5'i;{.2oo2._  \n\n%TWEEN:\n\n1.\n\nM. VcnkatasWa1Vnaiah;="\n\nS\/o S1-i Mux:,ina\u00a7;;je:\u00a7rp\u00e9":. ' "\n\nChaxmasandra, ._ V. \nUttaxahaiii\ufb01x\ufb01irii, ' \u00a2 _\nSuhzamanya;p.uf\u00e9--;:,_PQst_,   ' a\nBang;Va1ore'-f;t3f_)V  _ " I\n\nM.Ravi, \u00ab V ._ _ \nS\/o Mufsidzlanjagspa\u00e9g; =\nC ;dm,.  '\n H"ob.1i,\nSubm\ufb01ianyapum Past,\n\n ~ 33ang\u00e91{\u00a71~:{515O 061.\n\n 1*\u00bb-'L  v V ' '\n'S\/'O Mtlniriarijappa,\n\nChanrgasa\ufb01dm,\nUttaraizalki Hobii,\n\n : AA Subraziianyapum Post,\n V\ufb01angalore-560 {)6}.\n\n*  (\u00a333; Sig. 3. Shekar Shetty, Adv.)\n\n...C0\ufb02?LAiNAN"\u00a5'$.\n\n\n\nAND\n\na-u-u-....._._..\n\nSmt. Keii Bai,\n\nW\/o late Champalal,   -\n\nAged about 75 years, I\n\nR] at No. 30, II Cross,\n\nMaj\ufb02cswaram, ,    . A ' j\nBanga}orc--\u00bbS60 003. * _   \n\n(By 311 Paras Jain, Adv.)\n\n'I'}1is contempt of [1'1i.1dcr Section 2(6)\nr\/W 11 and lzrfwu :5 ofthg: C<)11t\u00e9i11pt.. qf\u00a7lou1'ts Act, 19?: and\n\nArticle 215 _of thgt  {if i x_1dia praying to convict the\n\nrespondent  \ufb01\ufb02ontcmpt of Courts Act in<\/pre>\n
acoortiauce   _ M<\/p>\n
This; c\u00e9nreugpt  being heard and rcscrvcd
\nfor Orders  mg’ oi: f<\u00a7r Pronounccmcnt of Orders this<\/p>\n
. ~ . day,  ', V  the following: –\n<\/p>\n
(.1!3\ufb018<\/p>\n
A  filing of the cases inspitc of the dispute<\/p>\n
* ‘A4%._\u00a7ega;g1i;:{gi.%r\u00e9}1e suit schedule pmpcrty being \ufb01nally concluded<\/p>\n
VA   the complam’ ant and the pmdeccssor of the<\/p>\n
  .A:V1’w;:$;5ondcnt\/ accused and raising same objection and \ufb01ling<\/p>\n
    objection petitions in the execution pmoccding which<\/p>\n
\ufb02<\/p>\n
;;’.~\u00bb\/<\/p>\n
amounts to abuse: 01′ process law, the present oonteyngjjt<\/p>\n
is\ufb01lcd.\n<\/p>\n
2. ‘l”‘hc: brief facts leading td=,A_thc:.;)ij\u00e9:s\u00a3\u00e9n.{   the <\/p>\n
complainants are as follows:  .\n<\/p>\n
One Smt. A.V.v  gas th;.3 “O’\u00a3lE’Il\u20acI’ of the
\nproperty boazmg Nos.    sy.No. 8, Jodi
\nRanganatlapuxga’    claim to
\nbe the  Smt. A.V. Venkatamma.\n<\/p>\n
Aoooxding to  had \ufb01led a suit – 0.5..
\nNo.  may _o\u00a3:    the First Additional [1 Munoi\ufb01;<\/p>\n
  Esimt. Lakshmamma and others for<\/p>\n
V.   .\u00a7f\u00bb.titk: and mandatoxy injunction to dcnaolish the<\/p>\n
  and delivery of possession of the property<\/p>\n
m.<.=1 1"*i1;g  and 40 situated in sy.No. s, Jodi<\/p>\n
   village. It is stated that though the trial Court<\/p>\n
 , "  the suit, the complainant Smt. Venkatamma \ufb01led an<\/p>\n
 ..a\u00a7pcal in R.A.No. 108\/1965 in the Court of Civil Judge at<\/p>\n
V' Bangalore and the  Civil Judge set aside thc judmcnt<\/p>\n
and decree of the tztiai Court and while decmeing her suit<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
declared that, the said Venkatamma is the absoiute  of<\/p>\n
the suit schedule property and further  <\/p>\n
Lakshmamma and others to demolish the  <\/p>\n
and hand over the possession.   \u00abV<\/p>\n
judgment and decree has beqzme  It is'  e<\/p>\n
that in the suit, D.W.2 one 1   of the
\naccused appeared on behgaif of  a'I'.'l(Hi g\u00e9.'V\\VfC evidence
\nin the Court. Nevertheiese   of this suit, the
\nhusband of the    in dispute
\nfmm   uansaction was hit by
\ndocirinevivvof Eis   that after the death of<\/p>\n
Smt. Venl\u00e9atemme,_   became the absoiute<\/p>\n
 _ ownexe  as vvhei\u00e9xi\ufb01s of Smt. Venkamxama, prosecuted the<\/p>\n
 :%ixe::i\u00a7x:c;\u00a7.1~*z\u00a7\u00a7cex:eings bearing No. 460\/1969 initka\ufb02y \ufb01led by<\/p>\n
 (the same came to be renumbered as<\/p>\n
 _ Exeei1t:io:aHPetition No. 1045\/1976) later renumbered as<\/p>\n
W " "  ;'\u00a3;:m\u00ab:pe'on ineetaon No. 13211980.<\/p>\n
3. Aecoztlmg to the complainants as said iak <\/p>\n
 also expired during the pendency of the execution proceedings,<\/p>\n
her L.Rs., came on record and \ufb01led an appliwtion under<\/p>\n
\u00a7\/*’<\/p>\n
at<\/p>\n
Section 47 (2.11. 0., challenging the jurisdiction <\/p>\n
Court. This application came to be rejected 0:1″  <\/p>\n
thereafter they filed another app1icaVt\ufb01.\u00a3$i1’ct1451i:.11cngi1’ifg” \ufb02;c_icie;it21y T. V<\/p>\n
of the property to be recovered undtir. <\/p>\n
the compia1:1an’ ts, the said a\ufb01plitia\ufb01on     ‘ <\/p>\n
holding that the identi1ythc&;3;t:;tef\u00ae”is dc\ufb01taiie.  <\/p>\n
4. As   of the suit, the
\nhusband ofthtt\u00bb    the property set
\nup the  ”  t -t  obstruction applications
\nand wh\u00e9n 13\u00a2  any relief, approached the Civil<\/p>\n
Court in  renumbered as ().S. 2322\/83<\/p>\n
 _ scck*;:%,.gu1t\u00e91i\u00a3:f of that the decree obtained in O.S.No.<\/p>\n
   as well as fbr injunction. The suit<\/p>\n
\u00e9anita-to 011 1.4.1987 and the R.F.A.No. 519\/1937′<\/p>\n
V V _ Was”.’a1se3~.V:tii:3\u00a3t1isscd on 21.9.1991 and as this gunmen: in<\/p>\n
  xnira\ufb01 not challenged by any person, it became \ufb01naL<\/p>\n
  the respondent as L.R., of the said Champalal has<\/p>\n
   \ufb01ling one car the other appiication in the Executing Court<\/p>\n
A’ ‘obsu-acting execution of the legitimate decree obtained by me<\/p>\n
complainants’ predecessor in ().S.No. 544\/1959. it is<\/p>\n
the authoritative pronouncements of the Courts in. of<\/p>\n
the light of the complainants over the suit <\/p>\n
\ufb01ling repeated applications and obstxnc\ufb01ng \u00a2x\u00a2\u00a2u&:_n;”am9untg~ . <\/p>\n
to abuse of process of law as Weii \ufb01gs <\/p>\n
the Court and thus the  2 <\/p>\n
contempt of Court as defined    (iii) of
\nthe Contempt of Court  _a\ufb01_d  punished under
\nSections 11 and 12 of \ufb01ne.  61′ Act (heminafter
\nreferred to as       V’ <\/p>\n
 O11   name, the respondent appeared<\/p>\n
through tizie  detailed objections inter aiia<\/p>\n
 _ oonte\ufb01ciing ”   face of the records as the property<\/p>\n
   husband of the zespondentj accused was<\/p>\n
h””–\/Ta. 3:” property of Smt. V\ufb01llkatalllllla in dispute in<\/p>\n
V V’ _ the  ‘fjamceedings, the respondent had every right to<\/p>\n
 j\ufb01zmtect  right and title in the property at all stages and it<\/p>\n
  be equated to either abuse of process of law or<\/p>\n
 v .imerference with aeim1’nz’stxat:ive of justice.<\/p>\n
2;\u00bb<\/p>\n
  in respect of the property<\/p>\n
  40 was located at Jodi Ranganathpura
\n Whereas according to the accused, the
\n    purchased by her husband beam Muncipal
\n No. 83143 located “at 11 Main Road, Palace
\n I\ufb01angalore. It is to be noted that there is no much<\/p>\n
V. ciisputc that the erstwhile Jodi Ranganathpura village is known<\/p>\n
7. After hearing both the Ceunscl as   i.-:1:_=v_s_s
\nprima facie satis\ufb01ed as to the contentions of it
\n\ufb01amed charges and the trail was   ”
\ncase, the. complainant cxamjmeq’ ons”xs ii:1css
\nseveral documents. T1116 mspoxi\ufb01cggitf   sster into
\nthe witness box, howevcf ‘got   dsstitsents dmting
\nand in the cross cxamma’   VAA-‘Qsg’.’conciuswn of the
\ntrial, both     I detailed synopsis
\nreiterating     V<\/p>\n
3.  have   :gs,f;\u00a7ms in depth and heard the
\nlearned st  S <\/p>\n
.  ‘V VAtVA_t1a.e’0:iitsct it is to be noted that the suit \ufb01led by the<\/p>\n
W”\n<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
litiga\ufb01on. In spate of the same, he has not only ‘the<\/p>\n
property cluxting the pendency of the suit   19 <\/p>\n
object the same even after his   ‘V 7<\/p>\n
independent suit in U.S.No. 2:322\/195:\u00a7’–but ax}-:;:.’j4aasan;; esm,<\/p>\n
objections in the execuuon  ‘i’hei1g,i:  of the
\nhusband of the accused I1i=g;&}ed,.viii”is.v;s7:1ao  continued
\nby way of \ufb01iing  Ii is to be
\nnoted. that in  on 21.6.2001<\/p>\n
it has been gexdf’  ” -Z  <\/p>\n
 “””  qee’ru’i\u00a3ed1y the applicant
\n   L.Rs,, ofher husband
\n   ctaiming any independent<\/p>\n
: * \u00bb _ \ufb01fe :’o_ in question His titie\ufb02ows
\n  1;\u00bb.-pm tie’  debtor. Therefore, he is
\n  w;zc’t: ‘er;titIed to make an application either
\n‘ ‘iirder 21′ Ruie 93?’ or under any other<\/p>\n
‘ V.  of Ian: before the Executing Court
\n” ..  }_oo)npIaz’m’ng ofany illegal dispossession. His
\n vendor is \ufb01zliy bound by the decree. Having
\npurchased the property during the pendency
\nofthe suit and not making any e\ufb01brts to come<\/p>\n
on reorgrrd and implead himself,’ he as fully
\nbound by the decree passed and therefore he<\/p>\n
has no right to make an application<\/p>\n
5\/Xv<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
requesting the Court to adjudicate upon
\nclaim as his ciaim is not independent {gr  ”
\nyuczgmenz debtor whiaz is 7′  .\n<\/p>\n
adjudioazed upon in nwre_!han4onejb\ufb011r:id{*  ‘<\/p>\n
“Therefore, 1 am of the   only  T”\n<\/p>\n
appiioation\ufb01ied by  the
\namounts to \u00e9abuts\u00e9’ proo\u00e9S\u00a7”‘ojV;vthe
\ncourt and   :3 fiable to
\nPay _   ‘ <\/p>\n
order, {gmch \ufb01n? rejected. Even in RFA No.<\/p>\n
792\/2001′  by 61\u00a2  herein decided on 14.3.2002<\/p>\n
_ agaj;;\u00a7;t’me oxademfa\ufb01ed 3.1.8.2001 passed in Execution Case No.<\/p>\n
 hgitveen the same party, the learned Single Judgt<\/p>\n
A \u00a3\u00a7i5.fhc identity ofthc propexty observed thus:<\/p>\n
“13. One more cxrntention was taken
\njbr the appiicant that, suit was \ufb02ied in the
\nyear 195?’ and 1959 whereas, {I} Main at
\nMaiieswaram Palace Guttahai\ufb01 existed
\nfrom 19.51 onwards. As such, the Decree
\nhofder has not established the very
\nidentification offhe pmperty. ”<\/p>\n
5″\n<\/p>\n
“14. in more than one Fomnz,  Vt?” ‘M
\nhas been given by tiye..\u00bb.J14di(r:t11  <\/p>\n
13<\/span><\/p>\n
upholding the wnten\ufb01qn pf. ith\ufb01e.   ‘A<\/p>\n
hoider and rejecting the4’oqritention,C;q,*\u00b0<\/p>\n
Applicant. Now, th\ufb02r\ufb01iltzpliactrtt  S<\/p>\n
that 1!-Iaileswaram  _,<_;uzt\u00e9naIzz_'H
\nwas atmadgfin  vl\u00e9arlier to the
\n.515.\n<\/p>\n
ofatt\u00e9’\u00a7z1\u00a7\u00a73:i1’gi:a1t\u20ac4\ufb01t\u00e9ct:”\u00e9ct:ti\u00a7\u00e9r”BIO 21 Rule
\n51%  5\u00a2?\u00a2;z\u00a7”‘ct~’:\u00a7;:m’s;ed by this Court,<\/p>\n
tori’ t)f”‘\u00a73s.  000\/-. Even the
\nHc1)ttt**\u00a2:e\u00ab.V_t’1’\u00a3gh \u00abvtttiiourt -in CRP No. 2242 of<\/p>\n
 . 2001  rm: CRP with a cost of<\/p>\n
xRs,A10, -“Even then, the same<\/p>\n
  Apptuzctrtt  approached this Court on<\/p>\n
 = ahqther application: U\/0 21 Rule 9? CH3,
\nA  gtcttrng the same grounds alieged in the
\n ‘  cgpplioatron. If at! these facts are<\/p>\n
 ‘seen it clearly goes to Show that the<\/p>\n
” 3Appliccmt is making some e\ufb01orts to see<\/p>\n
somehow, the decree is not executed.
\nTenabie grounds are not at all noticed
\neither to up-hotd any contention of the
\napplicant-obstmctor to with hold issue of<\/p>\n
l}eh’very Warrant, ”\n<\/p>\n
Y”\n<\/p>\n
15<\/span><\/p>\n
12. After having heard the learned <\/p>\n
pecu\ufb01ar facts and circumstances of the case,    <\/p>\n
the accused, who is 3 house wife agedA~a?)Qut.”’7;E”\u00a7’jf\u00e9\u00e9zirs.Vha{s\u00a2.b\u00e9e\ufb01V ‘ j ‘<\/p>\n
possibly misguided by iegal advice;”1\u00ab;3.n\u00a31  ea; <\/p>\n
considera\ufb01on her age, we deemT_i{‘~~ymper-not.to1’se1:i\ufb01e1tce”io  V<\/p>\n
imprisonment but instead  ‘$0   \ufb01nd of
\n123.2000\/~. x A . .\n<\/p>\n
13. In :1,   stated above, the
\ncontempt   xee\ufb01ondeni Smt. Keii Bai is
\nheid ;go\u00a7.\u00a7\u00a2\u00a7{;p:’a;\u00a7:\u00a7\u00a2\ufb01nee1 under Section 2(c:}(;ii)
\nand (iii) ‘tlgee  Act and is sentenced to pay a<\/p>\n
\ufb01ne of RS. .’2O(1}4′()~; weeks fmm today in default, she is<\/p>\n
  u\ufb01ciergo si:en\u00a71\u00e9”iinpx\u00e9sona;ent for 15 days.<\/p>\n
Sd\/-u
\nJudge<\/p>\n
Sd\/..\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M Venkataswamaiah vs Smt Keli Bai W\/O Late Champalal on 19 November, 2008 Author: S.R.Bannurmath & Shantanagoudar Hi’ TEIE Hi\ufb01i\ufb01 CXTWRT (SF KARHATAKA AT BAKGALORE Dated this the 19*” \u00e9ay of November, 20138′; A’ Present: ‘rim HON”BLE Hr. Jus\ufb01w :fs’\u00a7ii\u00a7 _ _ ‘ A133) THE Iiox*BLE 25:. Jt:s’rI<:L1 nQ;mH cmmxxay ccc'\u00a7a\u00a2;.j'j'5'i;{.2oo2._ %TWEEN: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-126855","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM Venkataswamaiah vs Smt Keli Bai W\/O Late Champalal on 19 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M Venkataswamaiah vs Smt Keli Bai W\/O Late Champalal on 19 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-19T07:09:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M Venkataswamaiah vs Smt Keli Bai W\\\/O Late Champalal on 19 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-19T07:09:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1485,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008\",\"name\":\"M Venkataswamaiah vs Smt Keli Bai W\\\/O Late Champalal on 19 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-19T07:09:26+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M Venkataswamaiah vs Smt Keli Bai W\\\/O Late Champalal on 19 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M Venkataswamaiah vs Smt Keli Bai W\/O Late Champalal on 19 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M Venkataswamaiah vs Smt Keli Bai W\/O Late Champalal on 19 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-19T07:09:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M Venkataswamaiah vs Smt Keli Bai W\/O Late Champalal on 19 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-19T07:09:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008"},"wordCount":1485,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008","name":"M Venkataswamaiah vs Smt Keli Bai W\/O Late Champalal on 19 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-19T07:09:26+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-venkataswamaiah-vs-smt-keli-bai-wo-late-champalal-on-19-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M Venkataswamaiah vs Smt Keli Bai W\/O Late Champalal on 19 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/126855","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=126855"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/126855\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=126855"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=126855"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=126855"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}