{"id":127047,"date":"2008-11-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008"},"modified":"2015-08-14T18:43:15","modified_gmt":"2015-08-14T13:13:15","slug":"smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Smt Papamma vs Smt Muninanjamma W\/O Late Papaiah on 19 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Papamma vs Smt Muninanjamma W\/O Late Papaiah on 19 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: V.Jagannathan<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
IN THE HIGH ceum OF KARNATAKA M 3ANGALQ:2E:’_”‘jT._<\/p>\n
Dated: This the 1931 day of Nevembar   A’ <\/p>\n
BEFCIRE<\/p>\n
THE’. HOIKVBLE MR.JUS’I’\u00a7CE fv.>J;a!-:;AN–:f4A* 1?:%:’;$;.:s:_   <\/p>\n
REGULAR SE-CQND APPEAL Na;”1_\u00e9>’90l213f0_\u00a7. ~. ” ”<\/p>\n
BETWEEN :<\/p>\n
1 SM’? PAPAMMA V  .    ,
\nW\/0 LATE VENKATAR\ufb01;M_fg.N.APPA  ‘ _
\nAGE 55 YEARS ‘ ‘ 1  <\/p>\n
2 sR:CV~i\\\u00a7i&–5\u00a5\u00a7\u00e9JUriATEi..\u00a7;~’: <\/p>\n
3; C} um: ‘\u20ac?EgN 1<Afm::;3Mm=:j;\\.PPAW;<\/p>\n
AGE 533 'fE:_ARS–. . x<\/p>\n
3 F~?'ji:'\u00bb&t3i\u00a7::;i<:.A.;3:;j"- _
\n:31 Q LATEE,'-fET~\u00a7 KA'7f?\u00a7'RAMfxNAPPA
\nAGE 28 '{EA\u00abRSV   <\/p>\n
All ARE R\/AT CHAENASANDRA VILLAGE
\n; ' B:mRA:~\u20ac,ALLI HOBLE T
\n"  B}?;N\u20ac;%ALORE…S.\u00a3}UTH Tawx
\nB*AT\u00a3{31~1";LORE 5:50 66?.\n<\/p>\n
   ” ..  APPELLANTS<\/p>\n
‘(B\u00a35;*’VS:iVGA’.:\u00a7’j_i;}ii{SHMIPATHY REDDY, ADV. 3<\/p>\n
 AN?’ 1..\n<\/p>\n
— Sm’ M\u00a7\u00a7NiNA.NJAEviMA W\/0 LATE PAPAEAH
\n szwcg man, BY ms<\/p>\n
H51; BYRAMMA Wm ERANNA<\/p>\n
2 RCEMPAKKA Df\ufb01 \u00a73’PsPAEPs.H
\nAGE 66 YEARS
\nR\/AT’ CHANDRAPURA “B”CROSS
\nNELAVAGALU HQBLI,<\/p>\n
H{)SKC}’I”i~3 TALUK.\n<\/p>\n
BANGAL-GEE RURAL DISTRWCEE’
\nBANGALORE 560 067.<\/p>\n
\n3 SW LAKSHMAMMA<\/p>\n
W\/O BYRAPPA<\/p>\n
AGE 55 YEARS    :\n<\/p>\n
R\/AT CHANNASANDRA VILLELGE ‘
\nBIDARAHALLI HOBLI   ~’
\nBANGALORE EAST TALUK<\/p>\n
BANGALORE 560 067. ” _ <\/p>\n
SR1 MUNISWAMY
\nSENCE DEAD, BY <\/p>\n
4 SM’1′.C3HOWDAMMA  . i
\nW10 LA’rgMUNIswAMiY’..\n<\/p>\n
AGE 60 YEARS   _
\nR\/AT TITiA’1′;+u:4tsR ‘VI\u00a3,L’23\u00a7GE’ _  -V
\nUTTAR.AHAL1..1′;’–H’0g;_\u00a7,I’  ‘  .
\nBAf\\\u00a7C\u00a7ALi’)_RE s’::wz!4Ti{‘*m;,1\u00a7K”v.\u00a7 <\/p>\n
U}<\/p>\n
SR1 sAMP;%mi % ‘.     %
\n$3.0 LATE MUNISWAEJIE’
\nAG1E_1_39 YEAR’S ~ _ —  %
\nRfAT”–HEC}Gf\u00a7D.\u00a7;NA}iALL1
\n ‘vaavimug 141031;:\n<\/p>\n
”  BAN C’;ALOR.F;…S_G’\u00a2\u00a7TH TALUK<\/p>\n
‘ .6″  $.jR’i~C2~.i\u20ac3\u00a3:DAPPA<\/p>\n
  E\u00a7[G.VV’L\u00a7\\.TEv*’PAPA\u00a7AH<\/p>\n
‘?’—<.._ Sm \u00a7..iI;L.EYELLAPPA
\n'.330 L.A'"f'E PAPAIAH<\/p>\n
 .. " 3\u00bb i-Z\u00e9i\u00e9i BYRAPPA<\/p>\n
R6 TO R8 ARE<\/p>\n
RJAT CHANNASANBRA CQLQM<\/p>\n
BIEARAHALLI HQBLZ<\/p>\n
BARE QALURE SOUTH TALUK<\/p>\n
BANGALORE 5:360 067.\n<\/p>\n
 RESPC}NI3EN’I’S
\n(33; Sri I”-LR. SHI\\fALiNGAiAi–i, A{)\\i’.}<\/p>\n
3<\/span>
\nRSA FILED U\/S100 OF CFC AGAINST THE<\/p>\n
dU’D(}MEP~1’I’ AND [BECKER D’T’.1.2,i2()06 PASSED IN
\nR.A.NO.179\/ 1995 ON THE FILE 012* THE ADDL. 32$.’<\/p>\n
ANS sass. …IUI}GE1, F”‘\u00a3’C~I”\\f, BANGALORE: RURA.;,’_’\u00a3\u00a7\u00a7ift:~r%j”;.,.”‘vV. V
\nBANGALORE, If)ISMiSS\u00a3NG THE: APPE._.{\u00a7;  :}a72\\;j:”‘1*:;%.
\nCQNWRMENG ‘mg JUDGMENT Amgw\u00bb. . D.ECr1?EE 1′<\/p>\n
::r1t-22.9.1995 PASSED IN 0.s.m{;39Qj\u00e9s:\u00e9 \u20ac}2\\fi <\/p>\n
OF’ THE: ADDL. 1; MUNSIFF, BANGA;;,Q:2\u00a3:”.’<\/p>\n
THZS APPEAL comma ‘G:si”=FOR A::>_r’s\/:;.$\u00a7;I<:$::;I \ufb01ixs
\nDAY, THE <:0uRT :}B:LIx$EREp.?m'E_F\u00a3:LLowmG <\/p>\n
The pieifitgfffs  Sufftzred ,3<\/p>\n
dismig\u00e9sai < 3f* fheir:V'1.s'uif'ai1d the lower appeliate caurt<\/p>\n
. c'\u00a3ismis$er_i_ me  by thenl and this the<\/p>\n
piaixgijffs 1"1\u00e9{v'e c01.i1e :'1p'.'in this second appeal against<\/p>\n
 mfzt \ufb011'1&ifzg$ cf the courts beknv.<\/p>\n
V'  'E356-:"pIair1ti\u00a7'f's filed the suit for (ie\u00ab::}3.z'ati0r1<\/p>\n
that. thgy 31%'. the abseiute owners in possession of the<\/p>\n
  sz._:s.i'; sicfiedule pmperty and also for penrganelzt<\/p>\n
 "i191\u00a7u3ictic:I1 against the defendaxlts arid it was their<\/p>\n
 ""\u00e9t}11te:1ti0n that the 3" p\u00a3ai;1ti\ufb01' being the Wifsz 0f<\/p>\n
'ifarlkataramanappa and the 2" 3.1131 3" piaintiifs<\/p>\n
%~<\/p>\n
'I'<\/p>\n
being his sens, after tha death <\/p>\n
Venakataramanappa, contixlued 11:3 enjoy thyg'  <\/p>\n
scheduie property and it is 3.15:3: their Cas\u00e9   —  M<\/p>\n
year 198!) there was 3 par%jti0:i t1r1:: f\u00a7:a311;il\u00a79\u00ab' <\/p>\n
members :31' V\u20acnkatarama:i:.a_ppa ~._afid. in  <\/p>\n
partitien, the suit pruperty  ta V iiiie:
\n13' piaintiifs lausband\u00e9"'~E'011:\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7jf:g:…j;1ie\ufb01\u00e9fe:i(:e by
\nthci e::i:::fendants,_ thtii  {has trial<\/p>\n
court. for the \u00a7:1f0:}e$aid:*.reEi&1'.    " <\/p>\n
I5. ""   .Ei3<:7fr:tz1c\u00a5:.V;aI};ts\ufb01  v:}1eir part contested
\nthe said' $i_1it  the sstand that Whik: the<\/p>\n
partitian is. aI\u00a7I}1i'5{_t\u20ac{"3\u00a7., \u00a3116}; d\ufb01\ufb02i\ufb01d the Cass ef the:<\/p>\n
 "  _'p1a'i_f;tiff\u00a7 .35 r\u00e9gsams existence of any laud in<\/p>\n
 :3~;';Ncs.":.3 *<\/p>\n
 V But aacmrdhig to the defendarits, it was<\/p>\n
i<\/p>\n
f0Zf;11\u20ac\u20ac{V_iIii{} 7a 13.}; out and di\ufb01erent  at' land<\/p>\n
 were 'said to diffemnt }3\u20ac1''S()I1S.<\/p>\n
: 4. ()1: H16 basis 0f the pleadings of the<\/p>\n
V' "uparties, th\ufb01 trial court fraxned the reli-tzvant igsues as<\/p>\n
found in pa\u00a7a.6 of the judgxnant 01' the appeliate seam:<\/p>\n
311:1 after appmciatmg the evid\ufb01rxce 0:1 I'6CGI'\u20ac\u00a7, {ha<\/p>\n
}<\/p>\n
'I<\/p>\n
iearnad Judge of the trial court did not accept the<\/p>\n
case cf the plaiint\ufb01s and accordingiy the Suit <\/p>\n
dismi$s\u20acdw The lawer app:-Lllate crourt alga \u00e9i$:z1iS$.%_:fd'.j* " <\/p>\n
the appea: preferred by the plaintiffs and  cigi\ufb01g T '<\/p>\n
S0, 3316 lawer appallate court alsfa s:3j1\u00a74S\u00a2.r\u00a2\u00a7d .._ <\/p>\n
piaintiffs have 11<:at been a;b1\u20ac:___ \u00a310   V<\/p>\n
iand which they claimcd in E';}%';\u00ab"EV'\u00a7fu..}L302\/'3 'S-'tiil \u00e9gisted
\n\u00e9espm-:2 farmauon of =.13,;y_c:::,1t;_Var;<1"..Ad1ff\u00a7rent xa\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01r
\nbeing said ta c3:iffQr<:11:\u00a7"* p\u00e9:ifso1'}_$;._  appe\ufb02ate<\/p>\n
ceurt aiso.fr\u00a7-a1I1\u20ac'i _\u00a7\u00a7tJ1\u00e91' S\u00a3rio}:.sfj– discf\u00e9parieies in the<\/p>\n
p1a:n:;3\u00a7fs*T\u00a2a;:3\u00a2__%  in_\u00a7.:?{\u20ac,::'1'e{'<)rse.'u ii A decmm to iI1terfe1"e<\/p>\n
with i:h\u20ac:' j;T1z:i;g.,r\ufb02~:':;:.1tA:_L\u00a7:;:ftI'iai court.<\/p>\n
~   Vv .L6 a;:";:1<::\u00a71____g;;r3u:;s\u20ac1 for the appeiiazits argued<\/p>\n
 ' i:.i'i\u00e9it, b@_th th\u00e9 +::_0uri:s were in error in lmt appreciating<\/p>\n
f:}1e"V eI;ide\u00e9ij;{;\u00e95= 'V frem proper angle: and thsugh the<\/p>\n
 gya\ufb01iiii\ufb01rg  admitteci, ya': the murts below failed ta<\/p>\n
V' :~ " if(\u00e9\u00e9'd.f{}r1"e evidence 161?; in by the plaintiffs and 313:) the<\/p>\n
\ufb01\u00e9aitumaxats praducsd. L\u00e9zarned (3(}'t11E1S\u20ac1 took me<\/p>\n
through the judgneilts af tha 3011115 helm? in thig<\/p>\n
regard. 4L'<\/p>\n
xv"\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
6. Having heard the submissions of fzhe<\/p>\n
appc:11a:1ts caunsei and on going througli .<\/p>\n
judgments of the courts below, I find   M<\/p>\n
piaintiffs have mat 1361311 able to f;:\u00e9i:1′::”:\u00ab.z;1::.’w’:t}i’2:_\u20ac:1e2=;:* <\/p>\n
Dictum of their case befortt 11316:  <i;4,?i1r'\u00a3, iil~a;$.n1t1\u20ac:f1\u00ab..  "<\/p>\n
as, the b0L111darit:s mention\u20ac:d '\u00a7;sy '\u00a3,hem 'me_"'_2:1{5'i', id be
\nfound in existence s.vhc;=;f_1 coziiijar\u00e9d '\ufb01g the btjuridaries
\nd “ia11{i_ jaI1d the third<\/p>\n
aspec\ufb01is  -are not sure of tha extent
\nof ian\u00e9 ‘\u00e9vi\ufb01l-1’\u00e9gaf& \u00a7ic:.  the suit is filed by them<\/p>\n
311:3 git ‘is.:101’.: dia\u00a73V\u00a7Vi1\u00a7:ther it is 8 guntas of land 01′ 11<\/p>\n
  A1331′: fmm this, the document<\/p>\n
 ‘;\u00a5;’_\u00a7x’.”P6 and P7 also revea1\u00a7d that after the<\/p>\n
-V my :::=11t”wa’:’~;s’f0rH1ed ii} Sy.N0.13()\/3, sev\ufb01ral $3 of<\/p>\n
uIazT1\u20aci_AW \u00e9’i’e sold 1:0 different persons and the piainiiiffs<\/p>\n
–  f;;a\u00a3f\u20ac  not been abie to produm any evitiencs 1:9 Show<\/p>\n
mtuhat 8 gurztas of land in S_gaNo.13Q\/3 was still in<\/p>\n
\u20acxis1:eI1c*:: and it: has also CGi”1SiCi\u20ac’.I’\u20acd th\ufb01 evidence cf<\/p>\n
ma;-1 vzhc) has spoken to th\ufb01 effect that the W<\/p>\n
}\/<\/p>\n
‘F<\/p>\n
\u00ab-1<\/p>\n
plain\ufb01jfs htzsband was given 7 guntas sf Land in a<\/p>\n
partitieri, out 01’ which, he sald 3 guntas of lancifio<\/p>\n
(>116 Bhoomik, 2 guntas to Chaudry and  ” <\/p>\n
guntas 3:0 Venkatappa.\n<\/p>\n
7. Thuss, on a car&fu1:=.A_appr\u00a2Cia–ti\u00e931″–r;f”Vt;i3ew, .’<\/p>\n
avidence, thus lower appel\u00a7at&_ c01i17t ‘i’:>un=i”‘*:f’;V”;\u20ac~;fg tifie VA<\/p>\n
plaintiffs have fa\ufb02ed te estabiisa ‘i;\u00a5:1_\u00a7::ir cm: mi have
\nfailed to establish tE1\u00e9;t’– if1_gi1t1:<j_a.:V\u00a7 ek\u00a3j:a\u00a7;d%\u00bb still exists in<\/p>\n
the \ufb01uit survey  \u00ab if V<\/p>\n
  of  aforesaid I'\u20ac\u00a31St)I1iI1g
\ngiven  the '\u00a7\u00a7\u00a3t.:;{=;;}:?{\u00bb Vai\ufb01jib\ufb01\ufb01iate court and both '\u00a3116:<\/p>\n
courts beidirv ..,if;avi11g '-c<:$i1cu;:'ent1\u00a7,r held 011 facts that<\/p>\n
 "t.h\u00e9" pl\u00e9\ufb01iztiifg ixavef\u00e9iled to prove tlaeir case, I tic: not<\/p>\n
saris': ._'sLi.b.$"7:antia1 questien of law arising for<\/p>\n
r:<3:'xssic1t_:i'ati\u00a7:iI1 and as such, the appsal lacks merit<\/p>\n
V    it  dismissed,<\/p>\n
Sd\/Q
\nIudq\u00e9<\/p>\n
Bvr:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Papamma vs Smt Muninanjamma W\/O Late Papaiah on 19 November, 2008 Author: V.Jagannathan IN THE HIGH ceum OF KARNATAKA M 3ANGALQ:2E:’_”‘jT._ Dated: This the 1931 day of Nevembar A’ BEFCIRE THE’. HOIKVBLE MR.JUS’I’\u00a7CE fv.>J;a!-:;AN–:f4A* 1?:%:’;$;.:s:_ REGULAR SE-CQND APPEAL Na;”1_\u00e9>’90l213f0_\u00a7. ~. ” ” BETWEEN : 1 SM’? PAPAMMA V . , W\/0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-127047","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Papamma vs Smt Muninanjamma W\/O Late Papaiah on 19 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Papamma vs Smt Muninanjamma W\/O Late Papaiah on 19 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-08-14T13:13:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Papamma vs Smt Muninanjamma W\\\/O Late Papaiah on 19 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-14T13:13:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1339,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Smt Papamma vs Smt Muninanjamma W\\\/O Late Papaiah on 19 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-14T13:13:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Papamma vs Smt Muninanjamma W\\\/O Late Papaiah on 19 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Papamma vs Smt Muninanjamma W\/O Late Papaiah on 19 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Papamma vs Smt Muninanjamma W\/O Late Papaiah on 19 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-08-14T13:13:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Papamma vs Smt Muninanjamma W\/O Late Papaiah on 19 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-14T13:13:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008"},"wordCount":1339,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008","name":"Smt Papamma vs Smt Muninanjamma W\/O Late Papaiah on 19 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-14T13:13:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-papamma-vs-smt-muninanjamma-wo-late-papaiah-on-19-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Papamma vs Smt Muninanjamma W\/O Late Papaiah on 19 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/127047","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=127047"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/127047\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=127047"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=127047"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=127047"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}