{"id":127555,"date":"2009-05-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009"},"modified":"2018-01-03T04:35:09","modified_gmt":"2018-01-02T23:05:09","slug":"basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009","title":{"rendered":"Basanth Kumar Patil vs S Ramesh on 28 May, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Basanth Kumar Patil vs S Ramesh on 28 May, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Jawad Rahim<\/div>\n<pre> \n\n  % \u00a7 '   9   3 a~.9.w\u00a73ALoaE\n\nIN THE HIGH com? or KARNATAKA AT  k\n\nwarren THIS 'me 23\"' DAY OF MAY2:GO$9:V.: '   A'\n\n3EFOR\u00a3*\"' \n\nTHE HOWBLE MR. JUS1\"I;\u20ac:E3i\u00a5\u00a7:V\\i\\?AD\"f\u00abf@~!'}'b\u20ac \"\n\n. CRL. A. %f\u00a29%.=993.%%995,9996,  \n993, 999, 99;7_%cu=x2oc&lt;:;9  L 2\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nBASANTH i&lt;UMARHP_ATIVLv._ .    %\ns;*c.T.K.P9:cr;L   _ \nAGE9 A8&#039;Q\u00a7\u00ab,.\u00a3T&quot;S7:3YEARS *  \nocc._a:.Is9;m:s&#039;s; s\u00a7,&lt;m*.._# 599, H 9\nI&#039;A&#039;MAIfJ&#039;;_,.HSR :.mV., ma M\/S H.R.\nA\ufb01\u00a7ANTHAKRISHN;AV_mJR'\ufb01{Y 9 ASSQCIATES, ADV-S).\n\n    \n\n'AGE,:'.3 Aa::9w;9s5 YEARS\n\nPRQPRIETO\u00a7i,' M;s.MAHALAs&lt;sz-M\n. PIC&#039;TUR;--ES,&#039; yew 99:. RDAD\n WMAHAL VILAS EXTENSIGN\n\nMRESPGNDENT\nCOMMON IN ALL. CASES\n\n kT l_ &quot;&quot;&#039;:f&#039;$y sax .K.R. LANKESH, Am\/., F-&#039;GR W3 59:\n 4 &quot;9\u20ac:.}{&#039;.&#039;\u00a3\\5AGESH Assocmves, ADV$.,)\n\n*#*\n\n5\/\n\n \n\n\n\nV&#039;   h\u00e9af&#039;_r&#039;i :*:.a&quot;;--v. _\n\n \n\n&quot;\u00a7\nin\n\nTHESE APPEALS ARE FILED UIS 386(c)(iii)OF C.R.TP.C.\nB-Y THE Am\/C3CATE FOR THE APPELLANT ?RAYI_.N~G&quot;-..THAT\n\nTHIS \u00a5-i0N&#039;BLE CGURT MAY BE PLEASE!) T0 ENk!A&#039;\u00a7\u00e9CE&quot;THE\n\nseweuce or FINE AMOUNT TO THE%:%%Tuz~:\u00a7%A&#039;&lt;::s%%\nRS.10,G0,0GG\/- DGUBLE THE CHEQUE AMOUNT OF \nrz.s.s,oo,ooo,r- AGAINST THE RESPQNDE\ufb01&quot;T&quot;A!;\\iD &#039;AWAi?.D&quot;r \n\nSUITABLE ENHANCED COMPENSATION &#039; T\u00a7DV.THE- APPELLANT\nIN C.C.NO.293.86I&#039;9\u00a7, C.C.NO.291\u20ac-4?\/99,A.&quot;C.C.,NO\u00a729&#039;15S\/&#039;\u00a3\u00a7\u00a7,\n\nC.C.NO.29192\/99, C.C.NO.2.9190\/&#039;9_9&#039;,L_ C.C,.i_5!C};v291E&#039;%1f99&#039;--..\nAND c.c.:~:o.291e9;99 \u20ac3F*i_&quot;\u00ab\u00ab.&#039;\u00a7&#039;HE &#039;=FILE_  \n\nAooL.c.:~m., BANGALGRE,    _\n\nTHESE APPEALS&#039;%A%k_ARE~%&#039;\u00a7ct:rs%:k\u00a7i&lt;?a\u00ab oN&quot;Fo&#039;R FINAL\nHEARING THIS DAY; JTHE Lkjcoumh &#039;DELIVERED THE\nFGLi_{)WING:~     \n\n \n\nTffzes_e.AT*A&#039;a&#039;v?.:~*:;ge;a_\u00e9VAi2\u00bb mtf\u00e9- ,._f\u00e95.es3 under the provisions of\nSection &quot;3.? }&#039;.   Carnpiainant against the\n\n\u00a7ent\u00a7g2&#039;1r:a.en 45;h&#039;e.A_d:*\ufb01iura \u00a2:5 t\ufb01at it is inadequate.\n_ ffhe a&#039;bp~aa~\u00a3s are admitted and are iisted for finai\n\n 3&#039;;  stage the amaeiiarst has \ufb02ied awiicatians\n\nin %\u00a5s\u00a7isa;:&#039;\u20ac:r3.A No. 201532009, 2015\/2099, 2018\/2909,\n\nkk%%%k2a;z2\/2039, 2020\/2909, 292112909 and 291932009 In an\n\n  a\ufb01peais, rapectiveiy under the previsions of Section\n\n \/\n\u00e9\n\n\n\n394 Cr.P.C. to eermit the aepeiiant te substitute one Smt.\n\nHemaiatha Rameeh, as the resparzdent in the epeeei in\n\npiece of Ramesh since deceese\u00e9 and to per{z3.iif\n\nproceed with the anneal.\n\n4. In suapart of the a9i3i:i\u00a2at\u00a7\u00a7:_:i1..:&#039;It&quot;is  ax\u00e9erre\ufb01.e.:ha:A\n\nS\ufb01amesh, the respondent ie&#039;ti*:.i\u00a7 a\ufb01ap-eei wae&#039;v:&#039;\u00e9ejrf.#iV:ted <\/pre>\n<p>the teamed triai judge ufi\u00e9e jud_\u00a7_ei:je:&#8217;-evdated:3e-U3-2604 in<br \/>\nc.c. No. 29186;&#8217;1994, c;\u00e9;N0*e.2eei87xea;&#8217;ec.;2e19\u00ab%a;\u00a7e, gf&lt;:.c.rs:o.29191\/99<\/p>\n<p>Am  te.e&#039;&quot;b\u00a7&#039;fence punishabie under<br \/>\nSection 61&#039;  and was sentenced to pay<\/p>\n<p>Rs.7,_25_,\ufb01\ufb01G&#039;\/- e&#039;w-Sift. sentence cf four mersths. The<\/p>\n<p>&quot;&quot;~..5;g;}.j&quot;&quot;:se;e\u00a7:ee\u00a2e i:\u00a7eir:&#039;:\u00a7&quot;Vi:&#039;:ede::uate appeiiant had seuaht<\/p>\n<p> &quot;;&#039;1urinq pen\u00e9ency cf this aepeat the said<\/p>\n<p>S.\u00a7Re:%nesh.e\u00a7&#8211;e:\u00a7 and is not aiive. Neticirn; the fact ef his<\/p>\n<p>&quot;~.~. __&#039;=.death &quot; new seeks te bring his wife Smt\ufb01emaietiwa<\/p>\n<p>4    his ieeal heir, as respenderzt. Eectier: 394 Cr.P.C.<\/p>\n<p>&#039;  is? imrekee. The eipeiicatiens are eppesed by the ieamed<\/p>\n<p> ceunsei wine ie repreiersting ariaginai respcmde\ufb01t &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Sjiamesh.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>5. Tim fact of death of S\ufb02ames\u00e9m, is 21\u00a2?i\u00a7.&#8217;3\\&#8217;i5xV \u00a33.i&#8211;;%:;3::iii&#8217;..en.<\/p>\n<p>The auesti\u00e9n is whaher the aprelications <\/p>\n<p>sasbstitute t\ufb01e deceased cmwicted:-a\u00e9cused&#8221;..by_;v\u00a7:\u00a7\u00a7:v @3331-1h\u00e9}a&#8217;s V &#8216; j  <\/p>\n<p>is \ufb01ermissibie. V __ _  A\n<\/p>\n<p>5. sectmrs 394 &lt;::=.s=V.cJ.,j%,j*raads;*::m;s:k_L<br \/>\n&quot;Abatement of avrmeais  1..  A&#039;<\/p>\n<p>(31) Ever?&#039; az3i9ea\u00a3 u:13_;\u00a7er&quot;&#039; 9.? section<br \/>\n3?8 shat! na!iyA&#039;.,_aLb;ate&#039;oAn. t\u00a71ev &amp;a:ast&#039;h of the<\/p>\n<p>BCCUSEC57 .\n<\/p>\n<p>  &amp;\u00a7.\u20ac:iz&#8217;ef&#8217;. 3;i:::\u00e9ai&#8221;~~aivr\u00a7dez&#8217; this Chapter<br \/>\n{except&#8221;ae:1..__a;.:Apv2=;i&#8221;&#8221;\u00bbf:&#8217;ert*\u00a7 a sentence cf \ufb01ne}<\/p>\n<p>shaii _fmai&#8217;iy}..ab.aE1&#8217;\ufb01n the death of the<br \/>\napp.e iia,nt: &#8221; &#8221;   &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>;&#8217;Previded-. mat where the appeai is against a<br \/>\n._&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;\u00ab:.c;3_fwi5:tion a&#8230;r.t..c.:!\u00ab&#8217; santence of death or of<br \/>\n_ &#8221; i\ufb01agb\ufb01seizment, and the appeilant die&#8217;; during<br \/>\nV. &#8220;-V.Tth.g&#8221;%;;e.n1dancy of the appeai, any of his ma-sat&#8217;<br \/>\n freiat\u00e9vesf-.mav, &#8220;withir: thirty days ef the death<br \/>\n.  sf f:f%.&#8217;-\u00a2-i.-&#8216;;_ appeiiant, apply tn: tha Appa\ufb02ate Ceurt<br \/>\n far ieave tea continue the appeal; and if ieave is<br \/>\ngrsguted, the appaai shai! not abate.\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8216; &#8220;~.,Exn-iaraaticsrz &#8211;~ In this sectian, &#8220;near relative&#8221;<br \/>\n&#8221; ..*means a parer\ufb01g, spouse, iineaf descendant,<br \/>\nbrather fl?&#8217; sister.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>;&#8217;\u00bbm\/<br \/>\n5\/<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;uh<\/p>\n<p>?. The nrcvisic\ufb01s of Seatiors 394 Cr.P.C_..V&#8217;\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7a_r\u00a7v<\/p>\n<p>\u00e9rrvi\ufb01aaas t\ufb01at &#8216;every appeai under Sectier: <\/p>\n<p>Cr&#8217;.?.C. Sinai! \ufb01aaiiy abate on the deaf!) ef   w <\/p>\n<p>Sectior: (2) aravides that &#8216;every 79therT .\u00e95\ufb01&#8217;b\u00abe\u00a7!..&#8217; uh&#8217;d&#8217;ar_____Vf%\u00a7\u00a7Vs&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Chapter (except an appeai f?&#8217;\ufb01nj a V$egi\u00a3ence.&#8217;v:\u00a7f*V_:f5:z}\u00a7) &#8216;;ish.\u00e9i\u00a7 <\/p>\n<p>finaihr&#8217; abate an the death of  tvfTi*xe a2::V1:ae\u00a7E&#8221;a&#8217;\u00a7&#8217;1*:tVV.:&#8217;_  iiiravise to<br \/>\nSecticr: 394, &#8216;provicia  &#8216;=.:a&#8217;=fs_e. &#8216;a1s$\u00a7eai is against a<\/p>\n<p>camiictian an\u00e9 serztez1ce;A..::f&#8217;_:fie2itVij:pr&#8221;bf&#8221;i%?s%g;3&#8217;%isonmet:t, and<\/p>\n<p>the a;2;;fe.*i&#8217;i\u00e9ir;t.x\ufb01}:e_s \u00e9\u20aci&#8217;\u00e9&#8217;;f&#8217;\u00a7n\u00a7* ;3\u00e9.?\u00a7ici&#8217;\u00e9i\u00a7cy cf the appeal, any cf<br \/>\nhi3 neafV&#8217;re!&#8217;\u00e9:\u00a3iveas \ufb01?\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7;&#8217;,_&#8217;w.\u00a7\ufb01i*z.\u00a7i..t\ufb01i\ufb01y days cf the death cf the<\/p>\n<p>apzaeiia\ufb01t, \u00e9bpiyv t\u00a7Vth\u00e9~-.\u00e9kb:i&#8217;\u00e9i\u00a3ate Ccurt for ieave ta cerxtimze<\/p>\n<p>-&#8216;&#8221;~..;:_he..&#8217;\u00a7i:;g-\u00e9i;.._and &#8216;if&#8217;-\u00e9eave is granted, the aweai shaii nut<\/p>\n<p>  it, it is clean&#8217; that by oiaeraticsn af sub-\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;\ufb01ecti\u00e9\u00e9n. $i1.) %ii agzmaais tmder settler: 377 and 378 shaii<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;v.ffab:afe&#8211;..A:;:\u00b03H&#8217;the \u00e9eath of accuse\ufb01. In the instant case, the<\/p>\n<p>a\u00ae\u00e9a i is undi\ufb01putably under Section 3?&#8217;? Cm&#8217;-\u00b0.C. and upar:<\/p>\n<p>.  V   hid\u00e9ath of the resporndent it shai! abate. Sub-Secticm (2) aisa<\/p>\n<p>adumbrates that in every appeai, except an appeai from a<\/p>\n<p>sentence cf \ufb01ne, shali aisa abates an the deat_i2..VV_\u00a2f_:&#8217;the<\/p>\n<p>armel\u00e9ant. The pmvisa makes it very clear that_.3\u00e9&#8217;\u00a7*i&#8217;\u00e9&#8217;\u00a24\u00a3\u00e9-_;2&#8242;:i:f\u00a7*.:&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>atzpeiiarzt (convicted accuse\u00e9) refe:f2f\u00a7:i\u00bb_t\u00aba&#8217; ir\u00a7*&#8221;5uvt$\u00a7\u00e9E&#8221;2:e\u00e9t\u00a3ia&#8217;nV (2 )&#8217;~ <\/p>\n<p>wiii net abate if the iev\ufb01i repraa\ufb01tatirm.\n<\/p>\n<p>appeiiarzt apzaiy to the \u00a2.&#8217;:\u00a2f1&#8217;Li2&#8243;iiV_f\u20ac:__.t&#8217;.E&#8217;.\u00a5iV&#8217;;&#8217;f.i!&#8217;I&#8217;tV;1e&#8217;:Vt?i\u00e9&#8217;\ufb01:p:pg\u00a7I.i&#8217;\u00a7 vv:;Eti1 ,<\/p>\n<p>ieav\u00e9 ef the cnurt. Tifi-5 is aV;*1: 1L:&#8221;e&#8217;._*-.\u00bba*\u00a7a%~:z,i_\u00bbi_\u00bbz*1a&#8217; .&#8217;;:ar&lt;:\u00a7\u00a7f\\a:vVi&#039;j&#039;.=.ic::\u00a7?fn ta legai<br \/>\nreiareseratatives cf cen\u00a7ic {ed_ .t;L\u00a7&#039;A:&#039;\u00a7:a:;1tin:ze &#039;the appeai<br \/>\nagainst the conx\u00a7.:&#039;ct_jen sa%\u00e9.i,\\\u00a7&#039;v&#039;w\u00a7tI3 :.L\u00a7  remove stigma<br \/>\non the   That errabiina<br \/>\nprovisi\u00a7;;:1__Vi\u00a7   ti\u00e9f\ufb01piaina\ufb01t \/&#039; prosecuticn<br \/>\nta ca\ufb01:inu&amp;AAVV\u00e9&#039;\u00a29-fe\u00e9\u00e9i&#039;  &#8211;when the app\u00e9ai abate-5 as<\/p>\n<p>man\ufb01ate\ufb01 cf Section 394 C&#039;r.P.C.\n<\/p>\n<p> \u00ab.13: t\u00a7&#8217;\u00a7&#8217;\u00e9&#8217;t:i&#8217;:*z:umsta:1t$, the reciuest made by the<\/p>\n<p>s\ufb01a\ufb01ccnceived as the appeal is under Sectirm<\/p>\n<p> amen death cf resaondent &#8212; S.Ramesh, it<\/p>\n<p>shaft &#8216;a\ufb01\u00e9ste and accordinuiy, it abates. Thus, questian ef<\/p>\n<p> ieave to substitute Smt. Hernaiatha Rammh, w\ufb01e<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;   deceased Rarrsesh &#8212; ariamal resrsonderat, aisa dues net<\/p>\n<p>arise. Canseauently, the amsiicatians. ie., r\u00ab\u00a5isc:.. Cri. No.<br \/>\n2315\/2669, 2016;&#8217;20G9, 2018\/2039, 202252009,<\/p>\n<p>J<\/p>\n<p>2028:2009, 2621\/2939 and 2\u00a3}19i2009, are aisa dismisse_\ufb01~ _ &#8216;-&lt;._ _=._<\/p>\n<p>as aim the appeais shaii abate.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Basanth Kumar Patil vs S Ramesh on 28 May, 2009 Author: Jawad Rahim % \u00a7 &#8216; 9 3 a~.9.w\u00a73ALoaE IN THE HIGH com? or KARNATAKA AT k warren THIS &#8216;me 23&#8243;&#8216; DAY OF MAY2:GO$9:V.: &#8216; A&#8217; 3EFOR\u00a3*&#8221;&#8216; THE HOWBLE MR. JUS1&#8243;I;\u20ac:E3i\u00a5\u00a7:V\\i\\?AD&#8221;f\u00abf@~!&#8217;}&#8217;b\u20ac &#8221; . CRL. A. %f\u00a29%.=993.%%995,9996, 993, 999, 99;7_%cu=x2oc&lt;:;9 L 2 BETWEEN: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-127555","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Basanth Kumar Patil vs S Ramesh on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Basanth Kumar Patil vs S Ramesh on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-02T23:05:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Basanth Kumar Patil vs S Ramesh on 28 May, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-02T23:05:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009\"},\"wordCount\":845,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009\",\"name\":\"Basanth Kumar Patil vs S Ramesh on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-02T23:05:09+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Basanth Kumar Patil vs S Ramesh on 28 May, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Basanth Kumar Patil vs S Ramesh on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Basanth Kumar Patil vs S Ramesh on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-02T23:05:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Basanth Kumar Patil vs S Ramesh on 28 May, 2009","datePublished":"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-02T23:05:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009"},"wordCount":845,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009","name":"Basanth Kumar Patil vs S Ramesh on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-02T23:05:09+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basanth-kumar-patil-vs-s-ramesh-on-28-may-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Basanth Kumar Patil vs S Ramesh on 28 May, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/127555","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=127555"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/127555\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=127555"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=127555"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=127555"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}