{"id":12779,"date":"2007-12-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-12-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007"},"modified":"2016-06-25T06:44:13","modified_gmt":"2016-06-25T01:14:13","slug":"chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007","title":{"rendered":"Chinnamma Simon vs Additional Sales-Tax Officer on 4 December, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Chinnamma Simon vs Additional Sales-Tax Officer on 4 December, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWA No. 2832 of 2007()\n\n\n1. CHINNAMMA SIMON,W\/O.LATE MATHAI SIMON,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. SURESH SIMON,S\/O.LATE MATHAI SIMON,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. ADDITIONAL SALES-TAX OFFICER,CHENGANNUR.\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE APPELLATE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER.\n\n3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,PATHANAMTHITTA.\n\n4. THE TAHSILDAR (R.R),KOZHENCHERRY\n\n5. THE VILLAGE OFFICER,NARANGANAM VILLAGE\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.LIJU.V.STEPHEN\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH\n\n Dated :04\/12\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n                           H.L. DATTU, CJ. &amp; K. M. JOSEPH, J.\n                           --------------------------------------------------\n                                   W.A. NO. 2832 OF 2007\n                           ---------------------------------------------------\n                            Dated this the 4th December, 2007\n\n                                            JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>H.L. DATTU, CJ.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>        Questioning the correctness or otherwise of the Order passed by the learned<\/p>\n<p>Single Judge in W.P.(C). No.9782\/07 dated 22.3.2007, the petitioners are before us<\/p>\n<p>in this Writ Appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>        2. The learned Single Judge, by the impugned order, has only directed the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners to execute the Decree said to have been passed by the Munsiff Court,<\/p>\n<p>Pathanamthitta in OS No.92\/03.\n<\/p>\n<p>        3. Petitioners were before this Court in O.P. No.9052\/03. In the said Writ<\/p>\n<p>Petition, the primary question was the revenue recovery notices issued by the<\/p>\n<p>respondent Authorities (Exts.P2 and P2(a)), for realisation of the sales tax due under<\/p>\n<p>the Kerala General Sales Tax Act. The learned Single Judge by the Order dated<\/p>\n<p>11.8.2005 had disposed of the Writ Petition and in that, had stated as under:<\/p>\n<p>                   &#8221;        Petitioners        are      challenging         the recovery<\/p>\n<p>           proceedings initiated for recovery of arrears of sales tax due from<\/p>\n<p>           the husband of the 1st petitioner.                  Government Pleader on<\/p>\n<p>           instructions submitted that the late husband of the 1st petitioner<\/p>\n<p>           during his life time conducted business which led to assessments,<\/p>\n<p>           and appeals were dismissed. Thereafter, it appears that he had<\/p>\n<p>           filed civil suits, result of which is unknown. In the circumstances,<\/p>\n<p>           petitioners are not entitled to challenge the recovery proceedings<\/p>\n<p>           for recovery of arrears of sales tax from the estate of the<\/p>\n<p>           deceased, whether it is devolved on them or not.                     Recovery<\/p>\n<p>           against defaulter&#8217;s property is permissible even after his death by<\/p>\n<p>           virtue of Section 20 of the KGST Act. However, following the<\/p>\n<p>           amnesty scheme of 2004 not availed by petitioners, petitioners are<\/p>\n<p>           given time till 15.11.2005 to clear the arrears with 40% interest<\/p>\n<p>           and if payment is made 60% interest will stand waived. If liability<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WA NO.2832\/07                               2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>          is not settled, recovery proceedings will be continued against the<\/p>\n<p>          property of the deceased whether it is devolved on the petitioners<\/p>\n<p>          or transferred to any one person. However, the petitioners and<\/p>\n<p>          other claimants can file claim petition under Section 46 of the<\/p>\n<p>          Revenue Recovery Act which the Recovery Authority will dispose<\/p>\n<p>          of with reference to statutory provisions and after hearing the<\/p>\n<p>          claimants. The Original Petition is disposed of as above. No<\/p>\n<p>          costs.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       4. Before the trial court, for reasons best known, the appellant\/petitioners did<\/p>\n<p>not bring to the notice of the court the Order passed in O.P. No.9052\/03. That may<\/p>\n<p>be the reason for the trial court in granting the relief sought for by the plaintiffs in the<\/p>\n<p>Suit.\n<\/p>\n<p>       5. In the present Writ Petition filed by the petitioners, the question involved is<\/p>\n<p>the very same revenue recovery notices which were the subject matter in O.P.<\/p>\n<p>No.9052\/03. In our view, for the very same cause of action, the writ petitioners could<\/p>\n<p>not have approached this Court by filing a separate Writ Petition. The Writ Petition<\/p>\n<p>so filed by the petitioners is hit by the principles of res judicata. In that view of the<\/p>\n<p>matter, while rejecting the Writ Appeal, we confirm the orders passed by the learned<\/p>\n<p>Single Judge, though on a different footing.\n<\/p>\n<p>       Ordered accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                H.L. DATTU,<br \/>\n                                                              CHIEF JUSTICE<\/p>\n<p>                                                                 K.M. JOSEPH,<br \/>\n                                                                     JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>kbk.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Chinnamma Simon vs Additional Sales-Tax Officer on 4 December, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WA No. 2832 of 2007() 1. CHINNAMMA SIMON,W\/O.LATE MATHAI SIMON, &#8230; Petitioner 2. SURESH SIMON,S\/O.LATE MATHAI SIMON, Vs 1. ADDITIONAL SALES-TAX OFFICER,CHENGANNUR. &#8230; Respondent 2. THE APPELLATE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,PATHANAMTHITTA. 4. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12779","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Chinnamma Simon vs Additional Sales-Tax Officer on 4 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chinnamma Simon vs Additional Sales-Tax Officer on 4 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-12-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-25T01:14:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Chinnamma Simon vs Additional Sales-Tax Officer on 4 December, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-12-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-25T01:14:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007\"},\"wordCount\":524,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007\",\"name\":\"Chinnamma Simon vs Additional Sales-Tax Officer on 4 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-12-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-25T01:14:13+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chinnamma Simon vs Additional Sales-Tax Officer on 4 December, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chinnamma Simon vs Additional Sales-Tax Officer on 4 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chinnamma Simon vs Additional Sales-Tax Officer on 4 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-12-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-25T01:14:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Chinnamma Simon vs Additional Sales-Tax Officer on 4 December, 2007","datePublished":"2007-12-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-25T01:14:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007"},"wordCount":524,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007","name":"Chinnamma Simon vs Additional Sales-Tax Officer on 4 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-12-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-25T01:14:13+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chinnamma-simon-vs-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-4-december-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chinnamma Simon vs Additional Sales-Tax Officer on 4 December, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12779","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12779"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12779\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12779"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12779"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12779"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}