{"id":12832,"date":"2009-11-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009"},"modified":"2018-10-28T03:32:26","modified_gmt":"2018-10-27T22:02:26","slug":"s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"S Veena @ Yashoda vs The Managing Director on 20 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">S Veena @ Yashoda vs The Managing Director on 20 November, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.K.Patil And Gowda<\/div>\n<pre> \n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT \n\nDATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF N0VEMBERg..2f}'Q::9'*A _\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR.  H33;  A  7\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE.VB.SREENIV'ASE\"G0WDA'VV\n\nM.F.A.No,. 1o5417fo\u00a3 2008 tlvm \nBETWEEN: T  5  A   \n\n1.<\/pre>\n<p> S. Veena @ Yashoda&#8221;,  &#8216;<br \/>\nW\/0. Late _De__Var2_1j. A&#8217;,<br \/>\nAged absju1&#8243;}29  j,r.e:arS,_  &#8220;&#8221; &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>2. Kum. D&#8217;;..vMa&#8217;1:;t&#8217;_sha,&#8217;   &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>S\/o&#8217;; &#8220;Late&#8217;jiDev\u00e9:gfaj<br \/>\nAged ab01,it&#8221;&#8216;8&#8243;years&#8217;;~__ .. &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>D\/_o. Late Deva&#8211;raj*,.\n<\/p>\n<p>.A_\u00a7gedz6 yeara&#8230; A   A.\n<\/p>\n<p>   &#8216; v  __<br \/>\n&#8216; __.  V EM,&#8217;  \u00bbI,avte&#8217;VDVevaraj,<br \/>\n._ Aged&#8217;  57&#8242; years.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n . F\/O.v.L&#8217;.&#8217;ate Devaraj.\n<\/p>\n<p> A&#8217; &#8216;Aged about 62 years.\n<\/p>\n<p>4_c:1<\/p>\n<p> Qkepellant No.2 81 3 being<br \/>\n Minors, represented by their<br \/>\nMother S.Veena @ Yashoda,<\/p>\n<p>2. This appeal is directed against the judgn1entva.,n&#8217;ds.award<\/p>\n<p>dated 14.12.2007 passed in MVC No.3048\/200&amp;6~~onj;the?{tieof<\/p>\n<p>the VI Addl. SCJ &amp; Member. MACT, Bangalore&#8211;..(&#8216;l\u20ac\ufb01bur1ai'&#8221;ior4\u00b0-.,<\/p>\n<p>brevity], on the ground tha.t,M&#8217;th*e._ of\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>Rs.4,75,000\/&#8211; awarded by the Tribhu.&#8217;nai.V0vith interest  at 7&#8242;)\/(:0?<\/p>\n<p>per annum as against the&#8217;-v..t4j:c&#8217;iVai111 of E1i3;P\u20acilant for<\/p>\n<p>Rs.25,00,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. The brief facts of 24.04.2006 at<br \/>\nabout 9.50   it travelling as a pillion<br \/>\nrider alongg. Um\u20acSh in 3 500033?\n<\/p>\n<p> L&#8211;5IO8 on Magadi road.\n<\/p>\n<p>When     of Prasanna theatre from<\/p>\n<p>northern side &#8220;&#8216;i:ov_VVVsout:hern side, a BMTC bus bearing<\/p>\n<p>   F-992 came in a rash and negligent<\/p>\n<p>m&#8221;ann_e1&#8217; anhd.,&#8217;dasiied against his motor cycle, as a result of<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;which_&#8221;;~ the &#8220;deceased fell down and sustained grievous<\/p>\n<p> On account of the injuries sustained in the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;_&#8217;_a_cci.d&#8217;ent he was admitted to hospital, where he<\/p>\n<p>nhstxectimbed to the injuries. On account of death of the<\/p>\n<p>deducting 1\/3 towards the personal expenses of tohe&#8217;e&#8217;de\u00bboeased.<\/p>\n<p>In the light of the judgment. of the Apex Court in..\u00abSai*la_&#8217;__&#8217;Vern2a&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>case reported in 2009 AG} 1298, the appropriate d:e&#8217;dLl&#8217;14ctilo&#8217;n <\/p>\n<p>1,\/4, having regard to the number :oI&#8221;&#8221;dependAan;ts..llV:&#8221; the id.<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal has erred in applying the  of :<\/p>\n<p>appropriate multiplier applicalj_le~._as per the.aioresaid&#8221;&#8216;decision<\/p>\n<p>is 16. The income assessed T1&#8217;ib_VL111al at.Rs,33,50O\/~p.m.<br \/>\n1s just and reasonable &#8211;f\u00a7Cc_or&#8217;ldin;Vgl}tubyfalpplyilig the same, we<br \/>\naward a sum of Rs. 5,04A.AO.0]Of-   16}. The Break<\/p>\n<p>up 1s as unde1&#8242;:;&#8221; 4 A<\/p>\n<p>1 .  \u00ab\u00ab\u00ab\u00ab ~-.To&#8217;w.a&#8217;rd&#8217;s::_;loss&#8217; -ofelovel &#8216;amid&#8217; it<br \/>\n_affe-ctioizsp  \u00ab f Rs. 25,000\/&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>2. &#8216;A * pp TOWa&#8217;1&#8243;dSV  ohsequies<br \/>\n&#8216;And .transpo_i&#8217;tatioI1 Rs. 15,000\/~<br \/>\n,, it  Towards. Vlossvof estate Rs. 10,000\/-<br \/>\n&#8216;A     loss of dependency Rs. 5,04,000\/-<\/p>\n<p>   medical expenses Rs. 5,000\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>Total = Rs.5,59,000\/&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>So far as the conipeusation awarded gdltowards<br \/>\nConventional heads are concerned they are just and&#8217; relascnable<\/p>\n<p>and does not call for interferance.\n<\/p>\n<p>In the light of the facts and :=circra&#8217;mstai9.cesjlstalted&#8211;labove<\/p>\n<p>the appeal \ufb01led by the appellants a._1lo&#8217;\u00ab.ved tire&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>judgment and award dated &#8217;12..u200&#8217;7&#8243;  in MVC<br \/>\nNo.3048\/2006 on thev;tfi.i&#8217;e. offdthfed SCJ &amp; Member,<br \/>\nMACT, Bangalore is lierehyflinodivfieid. &#8220;dint  appellants are<\/p>\n<p>entitled for a totem;,\u00a7on1\ufb01~.\u00a2ns;_aiiofi&#8217; &#8220;I-?_s;5;l&#8217;59,000\/&#8211; as against<\/p>\n<p>the date of  the appellants are not entitled<\/p>\n<p>for interest. &#8216;for tlieggdelayed\ufb01 period of 229 days in filing the<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;V   E&#8217;    A _. &#8216; . . . . -A &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p> _;.1u&#8217;heV::&#8217;res&#8217;poAr1d.ent&#8211;Corporation is directed to deposit the<\/p>\n<p>l   enhadnced corndptednsation together with interest, within a period<\/p>\n<p> . of-.f0ur  from the date of receipt of copy of thejudgment.<\/p>\n<p> of the enhanced compensation of Rs.8-4,000\/~,<\/p>\n<p>:&#8221;Rs;&#8221;1t7,000\/- each shall be released in favour of appellant 1 and<\/p>\n<p>4 and the remaining amount of Rs. 50,000\/- shall be&#8221;~invested<\/p>\n<p>in Fixed Deposit in any Nationalised\/Scheduled  the<\/p>\n<p>name of appellant.s 2 and 3. till they attain majparity<\/p>\n<p>No.1 is pern11&#8217;tt.ecl to withdraw _p.e.r1&#8217;_Qdi(:a&#8217;IH&#8217;int&#8217;ei&#8217;est&#8217; ._},1g:cfa.1edj&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>thereon. for the welfare of appellants    <\/p>\n<p>Office is directed to draW&#8217;vt.l:ile&#8211;laward&#8217;;&#8217; apccejfdinlgly.<\/p>\n<p>Vb\/-\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court S Veena @ Yashoda vs The Managing Director on 20 November, 2009 Author: N.K.Patil And Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF N0VEMBERg..2f}&#8217;Q::9&#8217;*A _ THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. H33; A 7 THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE.VB.SREENIV&#8217;ASE&#8221;G0WDA&#8217;VV M.F.A.No,. 1o5417fo\u00a3 2008 tlvm BETWEEN: T 5 A 1. S. Veena [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12832","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>S Veena @ Yashoda vs The Managing Director on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"S Veena @ Yashoda vs The Managing Director on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-27T22:02:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"S Veena @ Yashoda vs The Managing Director on 20 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-27T22:02:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":624,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009\",\"name\":\"S Veena @ Yashoda vs The Managing Director on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-27T22:02:26+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"S Veena @ Yashoda vs The Managing Director on 20 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"S Veena @ Yashoda vs The Managing Director on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"S Veena @ Yashoda vs The Managing Director on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-27T22:02:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"S Veena @ Yashoda vs The Managing Director on 20 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-27T22:02:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009"},"wordCount":624,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009","name":"S Veena @ Yashoda vs The Managing Director on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-27T22:02:26+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-veena-yashoda-vs-the-managing-director-on-20-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"S Veena @ Yashoda vs The Managing Director on 20 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12832","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12832"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12832\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12832"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12832"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12832"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}