{"id":128557,"date":"2009-02-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009"},"modified":"2017-08-06T03:35:29","modified_gmt":"2017-08-05T22:05:29","slug":"vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Vijayalakshmi vs Rajashekara Reddy on 24 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Vijayalakshmi vs Rajashekara Reddy on 24 February, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: B.V.Nagarathna<\/div>\n
rzwwvuwnurt \"MIME \ufb01VaE\"1m\\i\u00a3'\u20ac\ufb02!\"1aIH\"$i'\\J'Q Kl\n\nawn wwumi yr mmmwmlnnm Wiwrl kawwlil WE' KAKNRERKA Niki?! EJGURT OF KARMAYAKA H335'? CQQRT Q? KAXNATQKA H53\n\nIN THE HIGH mum or KARNATAKA, AT  % 7\"f \n\nDATED mm THE 242:: DAY or FEE.\u00a72U\u00a7?:\u00a7F\u00a7?Y'2\u00a3).i\u00a79;.: %  3 ;T T 7\n\nTHE HON'BLE Imwsrzcs   \n\nBANGALORE.\n\nBEFORE  \n\nmas. N0. \n\nBETWEEN:     E  \n\n1)\n\n9)\n\n13\/ ex. \n\nX aged   years,\n\n\" ~ .. s,IoK% \n\n     4 month';\n\n  No.2a.'ad3 a.ra1nmx\u00a7 Wyi'-\"'%s?\u00a7\"%a\ufb02\u00ab23'm::W;\u00a7 mm mm;\n\n \n\n:~\u00a7%:2m Wwmww \ufb01w i\ufb02\ufb02\ufb02\ufb02 Wm \n\n\n\nw \u00ab mwrvmvun wrmavmpww\n\nW w-N- wvun\ufb02  nunavnz\ufb01n\ufb01 \ufb02lw\ufb02 LUUKI U1\" KAXNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARN&'\u00a7\"A\u00a7{A H3551 COURT (3? KRRNATAKA HM\n\nAND:\n\n1) Sri Rajuhckam Redwr __\n\n81\u00a2 ('.11 Raddy,       4\nNo.35'7, 3*' Cross,  Iarguia '   '\nUlnaor,    \"  --~\n\n2) M]: Orientallmuram\u00e9  \n13.0.): 213 to 217,    \n3\"1Ma.inroa.d,    \nChgmarqjpet, \"    _\n\n    \nmy  tau-R-2:\n\nms M.F.A\"'.\u00bbI$ F1Lw%U2~I13ER SECTION 173(1)\nor THE 1'UNA_C'l' maxnsr THE .JU9anmN'r AHD\nAmmo ::.a:rn5D%A  ' mssnn IN we\nNO;97\/E2004 cm THE FILE or ADDL clvn. JUDGE\nas ADDL; 1smcT;K9m3, many ALLOWING THE\n\n ..PE f!I'I'It'}H -}i\u00ab*oR coM1=ENsA1*IoH AND\nT gamma; snnmezmm or commwsanon.\n\n %      THCBLTGH wars MFA Is POSTED 1-'on\n\n  apnnme, WITH THE oonsmrr oraom sums 11*\n\n A %1s  mw.LY on THIS mvmm THE coum\n% %TnELIvmm3 THE FOLLOWING:\n\nawmm Wmww\ufb01 W WW3 Hmw  W mmw %W\u00a7%~\u00bb% wwmmw M Mam Mmw ww..;z.WW\u00a7%\u00a7 gm\u00bb ..EY%\u00a7%j\"?%\u00e9:'f%$~'%z\ufb02?\u00a7}\u20ac.?'3\u00a7f%=\u00a7:.\n\n\n\n'Wu II:-army W|\ufb02'1I\ufb01\"0I\\nl\"!l I5\n\n\u00abawn wwrwaml  nnmmmimnn \ufb02lw\ufb02 vuwwm U!' KAKNKIRKA NW9\" QQUKT QF      \n\nJUDG_ME\ufb02jIf\n\nof one I(.Veeraswan1y_. chaHeng1'n3thg\u00a7-:judgm\"__' '      7\nawaui pasted in MVC No.97\/20%;' 1-'5.2   \n\nby the Addl. met, at xo1a.r._\n\n2. The relevarn: mtg qr 1%:-2:;-:1  on\n173.2004 at    %  %  \u00e9  deeeaacd\n  with his\nfrimd an a.  bearing No. KA-\noa-EG-+995ag%&whu; near Padmanm\n  mitkkxszzliolar ---~ Bangalcme 1-mi, a\n\n  Na. KA-O3-C-27 was\n itfa  negligent maxmer by its driver\n\"  account of the impact, the dece\ufb02\n to SNR Hospital, Koaa: for \ufb01rnt aid and\n\nthereafter ahi\ufb01ed to Manipal whsrc he was declared\n\n\n\nME .W\u00a7%A{f%i'\ufb01e\u00ab-M\ufb02zaw mmmvmmm \u00abam mm,\n\n \n\n%@ Mmm \u00a7~%\ufb02\u00a7\u00a7~% =WsWZ$.WWE%\"%s%'\n\n \n\n%\u00bb%$1'.%\u00a7%% W\ufb01w\ufb02mim\ufb01 W mam Wm -a:=-sa-'EwwMmm M imam mm wwmm\n\n\n\n-um - wwwnv  nnnlini\ufb01n\ufb02 nmvrs LUUK! or KARNATAKA EH6?-I CQLBRT OF KARNATAKA MGM COURT 0%' \u00a7(ARMA?'AMA H54:\n\nas dead. Contending that the dwcasad \ntclcoom mechanic and the only bread    \nclaim petition aeeldng  \n\nhleada.\n\n8. On maeipt of   the 1*\nrespondent  exparte.<\/pre>\n
while 2-=4  and \ufb01led its
\nntatemexllll’   averxnenta made
\nin the  its dismissal.\n<\/p>\n
   the above pleadings, thc<\/p>\n
  following isauea:-\n<\/p>\n
1) .. Whethcr the pc\ufb01tionelsm prove. that
\nwine K.Veeraswamy as\/0 Late Kallaiah
\ndied in a road traf\ufb01o anaidcnt that
\noccurred cm 17.3.2004 at about
\n8.00 pm. at NH 4 road in fmnt of
\nPadmanabha Jelly factory near IOC
\nKola:-Bangalore road, due to rush or<\/p>\n
negligent driving of lorry bearing
\nNELKA-03\/C-27 byita driver? .<\/p>\n
zi\ufb01 \u00e9c\u00e9\ufb02fi\ufb02\ufb02 M\ufb02m  $0 lw\ufb01\ufb02\ufb01 M\ufb02ii\u00e9\ufb01 W}W%W\u00a7%%&”=’l;\u20ac*”j;Z’=?I= \ufb01\ufb02 lm\ufb02\ufb02\ufb01 \u00a7~\u00a7\u20ac’T3%\u00a7M W\u00a7W’iEF%\u00ab\u00a73*;W’}*\u00a7 M3 lmlm %*\u00a7L;’\u00a7\u00a7%~\u00a7 %:*f’%@’..M’%%\u00ab\u00a7%%%}% \ufb01g ..3,M’&%<\/p>\n
*%”i2.”%\u00a7%l\u00a7 %}%’%”.i%W%’*’\u00abl=%”<\/p>\n
-uriluu wrumrmivi I E<\/p>\n
  Lei’  till maliaation. Nat bung’
\n    ‘ma award, the o1mxna.nta’ had
\n‘ <\/p>\n
 the learned Counsel m: the appenan<\/p>\n
swua wuwwn\ufb02  Wm\ufb02\ufb02\ufb01\ufb02l\ufb02\ufb02\ufb01 THWJVI 1.v\\J’3Kl Ur KAKl’R’AEA         <\/p>\n
2) Whether the reapondsenta prove that
\ntlry am not liable to pay the
\nomensation for the mama: atated’-._”<\/p>\n
inthe objection statement’-_’_4    ”  = ~   <\/p>\n
3) Whether the petitioners an  if
\nhe compensation, if go, in   ,:\n<\/p>\n
amountand \ufb01rm whom_’?~~._%’ ” ‘    <\/p>\n
4) What order?<\/p>\n
\n\n5. In support \nexamined P.W. 1    to Ex?-7.\n\n6. On   on recmtl the\n<\/pre>\n
Tribunal awarehd  of Ra.9,95,000[-
\n the  6% per mnum from the<\/p>\n
 the Ia:-ned Counsel for 2″ respondent –<\/p>\n
E’\u00bb%\ufb01}E%\u00b0% wmwgw \u00a30 i\ufb01\ufb02\ufb02\ufb02 W<\/p>\n
W Wwmmma M WW3 Wm Wwwmw W Msiw mm W%%?\u00a7.WM%5% m ,::gga\u00a79m\u00ab.~:a’  M We<\/p>\n
  mg  camended that the Tribunal
\n.    salary while awarding the.\n<\/p>\n
  ma in mat, the amount had to<\/p>\n
‘war “wan:  nnnnu-unnn l’El’&7l”\u00a5 LUUKI or KAKNATAKA HIGH COUR”? QF KARMATAKA HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HK<\/p>\n
V. tax and under the circuieas, no<\/p>\n
Vtnterthzrence can banana: in the said appeal. He<\/p>\n
8. It is submitted on behalf of the apwllant <\/p>\n
the deceased wasworkinaasa. Teleoom  i\ufb01i.   A. H
\nBSNL, Hoaalnte, he was mawiragw  \u00ab   L
\nR’8,1O5l_ per mm M P” %Ex%\u00a7P_6’%%   A
\nBut, the ‘l’ribu.na1 failed to  <\/p>\n
salary that the dmmd <\/p>\n
has awarded  loan<\/p>\n
of dependency,  the award
\nmade on  on the lower
\nside which<\/p>\n
9_.__ _ Pat..%l_1\u00a2\u00a3or:tr~aV,  for respondent H92
\n   and award of the Trmunal<\/p>\n
\ufb02\ufb02 \ufb01m\ufb02\ufb01 W\ufb02gt\u00e9 WWiW%%%% at\ufb01 mam %”\u00a7%i*\u00a7i%E~% W}Wim%%W% \ufb01g mam MQM WW&WM%W $3 i\ufb01\ufb02\u00e9<\/p>\n
 Wwiitfm\ufb02w\ufb01 \ufb01g \ufb01\ufb02\ufb01\ufb02f\ufb01 Wm <\/p>\n
vwrnwumvz wvn n\\r1.u\\IUr~nnr1I\\rwA V’<\/p>\n
aevww wwwn: yx’ mmmnumznnn HEW?! HIJUIII SJ!” KHKNRERKR Ni\ufb01\ufb02 UUURT OF KARf’\u00a3ATAKA     <\/p>\n
furtlmr submit that then: is no need to
\nthe \u00a3:ox!1P\u00a2333\ufb020I1 on the consnmtional    1 <\/p>\n
a\ufb01resaidreamnn.\n<\/p>\n
10. Having heard the  boat;\n<\/p>\n
only point thm arises f\u00a2:2r..;:1y  to\u00bb<\/p>\n
11. On ;.   on record, it is
\n in   aged 35 years at the<\/p>\n
%%%TtL;m-A   Ex.P-6 — pay slip, he was<\/p>\n
” f.  of Rs.a,1o5;-. There is no<\/p>\n
 %c.\u00bb:;   placed by the appellann with<\/p>\n
 \u00e9   cnhawad salary that tho \u00abnomad
\n  rweivedeithw with tlw mm oftime
\n account of pnmotiom. In the absence of<\/p>\n
  such materials, the Tribunal was jtmti\ufb01ed in not<\/p>\n
taking into eonasidcra\ufb01tm that aspca while<\/p>\n
iw\ufb01i\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01m\u00e9 Wmwaswz x\ufb01\ufb01 .,W”za:.%:\u00a7 E~%i”‘;%\u00a7\u00a7\u00bb% %”Z%Wi.WN%%”\u00a7E \u00a39 \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 %\u00b0~%i’\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9*\u00a7 %’W..WW%W\ufb01 23$ mawm mm  :\u00a7%f;\u00a7 J\u00a7:’&3s”a\u00e9mk:\u00a7..-;~%\u00a7’T\u00a7w%~\u00ab2 Ww..wm%m: \u00bb..am iwm<\/p>\n
rsrvucvwwu<\/p>\n
awarding the eompensaticn on the head of
\ndependency. Even otherwi\ufb01e. the Tribunal    A. H
\ndeducted the statutory deduction\u00bb sag; A
\ntax and Ineeme tax, but has WW1  %
\n\ufb01n-r the purpose of awarding  <\/p>\n
head of loss of i  e HtHl1e
\ncimumetanoen. I     with
\nthe award made  ‘1V<:aaiT.\u00a7.f:'f<\/p>\n
12. As   comemed,
\neonnidenng’  deceased, his age
\n as:   we and mm mm
\n and 4 months,  ,<\/p>\n
   an conventional heads requires
\n a%.\u00a7 normally what is awarded by this<\/p>\n
 be Ra.40,000\/- and he11oe,a.dd\ufb01ona1
\n   cf Ra.17,l50D\/- is awarded on the said
\n as only Ra.22,400\/- has been awarded.<\/p>\n
V’Vl’herc\ufb01::me, the total compensation would now be<\/p>\n
3%<\/p>\n
=%’%”W’M\ufb01W\u00a7 em mime mm Wwswmw  .mm::s::2 E\u00bb-zmgawg mmwmw M g,2\u00a7mm=\u00e9m~; wmvmmma M mm<\/p>\n
“%%:”\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7”\u00a7 ‘*;;’?\u00a7Wi\u00a7WW%\u00a7W\ufb01 33$’ mmmm \u00a7~\ufb01%3EE~\u00a7 <\/p>\n
iwwwnxna WM’! uwwmuwmamlwm mmwmwa www\ufb01n WT Wk\ufb02\ufb02i\ufb01\ufb02\ufb01i\ufb01\ufb02\ufb02 E’3!%’f\u00a5 HEJWKE $1!” MKWRIRKA         <\/p>\n
Rl.10,13,500f- instead Of
\nenhanccd compensation shall carry mmr\u00e9\u00e9t   A’
\nrate of 6% par axmum fmm  ‘ Of-I<\/p>\n
petition an realisation. an depgsst  ‘ <\/p>\n
enhanced compensation,   \u00e9lcascd
\n1:01:11: 1* appellant. VA  3  <\/p>\n
        A  sa\/…\n<\/p>\n
:\u00ab%e:::g\u00a7\u00a7\u00ab\u00ab%     *Wa%wNa\u00a7%;%\u00a7% M m\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01f\ufb01 \u00a7\u00bb%\u00a7;2%\u00ab\u00a7 WWWWW M .Wm.:} WMM WW\u00a3.’@%%\u00a7W% gm    <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Vijayalakshmi vs Rajashekara Reddy on 24 February, 2009 Author: B.V.Nagarathna rzwwvuwnurt “MIME \ufb01VaE”1m\\i\u00a3’\u20ac\ufb02!”1aIH”$i’\\J’Q Kl awn wwumi yr mmmwmlnnm Wiwrl kawwlil WE’ KAKNRERKA Niki?! EJGURT OF KARMAYAKA H335′? CQQRT Q? KAXNATQKA H53 IN THE HIGH mum or KARNATAKA, AT % 7″f DATED mm THE 242:: DAY or FEE.\u00a72U\u00a7?:\u00a7F\u00a7?Y’2\u00a3).i\u00a79;.: % 3 ;T T 7 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-128557","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nVijayalakshmi vs Rajashekara Reddy on 24 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vijayalakshmi vs Rajashekara Reddy on 24 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-05T22:05:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Vijayalakshmi vs Rajashekara Reddy on 24 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-05T22:05:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":727,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Vijayalakshmi vs Rajashekara Reddy on 24 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-05T22:05:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vijayalakshmi vs Rajashekara Reddy on 24 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vijayalakshmi vs Rajashekara Reddy on 24 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vijayalakshmi vs Rajashekara Reddy on 24 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-05T22:05:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Vijayalakshmi vs Rajashekara Reddy on 24 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-05T22:05:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009"},"wordCount":727,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009","name":"Vijayalakshmi vs Rajashekara Reddy on 24 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-05T22:05:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijayalakshmi-vs-rajashekara-reddy-on-24-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vijayalakshmi vs Rajashekara Reddy on 24 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/128557","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=128557"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/128557\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=128557"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=128557"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=128557"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}