{"id":128807,"date":"2010-09-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010"},"modified":"2019-03-29T20:40:35","modified_gmt":"2019-03-29T15:10:35","slug":"lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Lingappa S\/O.Rangappa vs Srihari S\/O Ramulu on 28 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Lingappa S\/O.Rangappa vs Srihari S\/O Ramulu on 28 September, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: N.Kumar And Adi<\/div>\n
 \" .8\"\/0 R'AEv1L3I1..rg\n\nI\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA\n\nDATED THIS THE 28?\" DAY OF SEPTEMBER.  1.0\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HONBLE MR.JUs'r1c1: N.KUMA;{.  *' \"\n\nAND   -\n\nTHE HON'BI.E MR. J{}S3'IC:E_SIjE3JH15{SI;i \n\nM.F.A.NO.57V7'E.,CO.F\u00bb' 20o7__ (Rm-,_:  \nBE'IVVE<3EN I I\nI. LINGAPPA\nS\/O RANGAPPA\n\nAGE 37 YEARS   '\n0cc:GOvr SE.R'=Jg\u00a7\\.NTI' '\n\nR\/o.Y{3~R9.mf2USI\u00e9gwp\ufb01  I \n'1:\/\\1.U:5< at DIS'i7:}2A1CIjIUE\u00a7.  . .. APPELLANT\n\n(By Sn';--sI\u00bbu.vAKuM}ig2_RvA\u00a71;Q'c;R. ADVOCATE)\nAND I I I I\n\n1. "  SEE} TAR1 A' \n\n \u00bb _[')'R}V\u00a3\u20ac1R',', v\n\n~ .G'A}\u00a7}W]\\L{'_ 1:) E'? ' ' *1;\n\n(1 g_\\.r,)wA_L (AP)\n\n2. ..Ij'1"\u00abg'ss1<3NA1.(:()N'I*Ro1,L10:MA.1 IABOOBNAGAR. .. . RI\u20acSPONI')I:'.N\"IS\n\n\"II-3y S1'i.SI'IIVAKUMAR \u00e9iz 5.iaUI\")\u00a7 HR SEN'(}I\"I I{.\u00a73\u00a7e.J:'\\PUR FOR R2:\n\nI\\\u00a7O'I'ICI\u00a3 '10 R1 I)ISI'I-ENSIZD WIT}---'1)\n\n\n\n\n\nIx.)\n\nMFA WLIEI) U \/ S 173(1) OI' MV AC1' AGz'-\\lNS\"I\" 'i'\u00a7---EB)\nJUDGMENT AND AVVARI) DATEE): 31\/O1\/2007 I\"ASSE\u00a3I}.'1'.Ev\u00a3b}\\\/{\\a'(3\n1'\\\u00a7O.602\/2006 ON THE FiLE OF Ti'-%}E3 PRESIDING .C)I*'\u00a7?I(I_I*3I'{.\nMEMBER MAC? (FAST TRACK COUR' F11}. Rz'~'dCHUR\".\u00abb \"I'--{\\'R'1'\u20ac..Y'\n\nALLOWiN(} 'l'f--IE3 CLAIM PE\"1'I'1'EON FOR C()r\u00bb41->;s5Nsg\\:':\"\u00a7(};'\\' \n\nSEEKING FEJR1?-IECIQ ENHA.E\\E(,ZEMEN'i' OF COMPENSA'I'1vQN;'e- \n\nThis MFA, Coming on for hear%r1gf_.' thifs\u00e9 d\u00a3i_\\_f;.'\u00a7{UV}'\u00bb'{A{{ J, V'\n\ndelivmed the foiiowirlg:\nJUDQMENI;\nThis is claimant's 2113peL\u00e91l_\u00bbs9,eI<ing- ehriantgement of\ncompensation for ii:.e fpea?so\ufb01:i"1"~--.jnj\u00a31ries sustained by\nhim in 21 motor_._vehie1e- v3,(:Cid'e.nE_. " \n\n2. Fqrj-._pu;i'pQses.oI?. comrgy;ief1{:'e", the parties would\n\nbe refe'i"red"j5to*\u00a3::s=.  a're~..r<\u00a7ferred to in the claim\npetititmf us pers01:m}\n\n\n\n3\ninjuries. imniediateiy, he was sl1ift:.ed to B1'1a1'ida1~i\nHospital at Raiehur. Th\u20acl't',\u00a31fiiCI' he was  to\nDistrict. Hospitai, Raieiiur. Frorn there, 'A .\n\nOPEC Hospital, Raieiiur a11d__,t.a}_:_e1i _Vi'.o\"\"I{t.ir1ioo'i. i;7o1*\"'\n\nseam1ii1g. After sc':ar'i11i1'1g, he Wziis o}'3e'i*2ifIeci'\"foi IV171'.\"V.-'.&i'\u00a3.J1..iAI:':-we\n\nfractures of his right ieg'r:\ufb01d._1'iipA'joi11t__  'plate-L'\n\nand screws. in the, aforesaid\"'v.a(::;ide1'it\",'he _.';3%{1Si1E1i1\"1\u20acd\n\ndislocation of right   right: tibia and\n\n\ufb01buia. Ti1erefore_, he\"prefe:1'red.:eiaiiiqyi\ufb01etition seeking a\n\neompensaiji on of   ;\u00ab'_--'. V _ i\n\n sei?%x\"i-ate'of-rioiideeg\"respondent No.1 did not<\/pre>\n
appear. –.There\ufb01;’re;i Vvas’p1aeed eX–parte. The 2″‘-1
\nI’\u20acSpOI1’C’l.\u20ac_l;1t.h }’~i_PS’RTC'”-e1’1’i.\u00e9red appearance, filed detaiied
\nstatemeii\ufb01ofyobj.eeifio1is eo1’ii.esting the claim. However,<\/p>\n
tlfiiegr  not Cii:’Spi.i..i’.\u20ac3′ the accident zmd injuries sustained<\/p>\n
, ‘Es i.11e’poeiit:ioner.\n<\/p>\n
‘  aforesaid pleaciings, the i;1’ibunai framed<\/p>\n
i:}1edfoilowi’1)g;i5 i,i’11*ee issues:\n<\/p>\n
a ii’;  Whether the pel1’t1’on.er proves that: on
\n16.5.2004 at about ‘.7.45 pm. on<\/p>\n
C?fic2r’zdr(m2o1.1ieshLora cross road in front of<\/p>\n
4<\/span><\/p>\n
Nczvata Transport he sustaz’_nec”I personal<\/p>\n
iryuries in rnoivr vcahicle accident \u00a3’I1O,E””!o0k<\/p>\n
place due to rash and I’1eglig(?Ii?_1′.\u00bbV:a<;"\u00a3;"Q1-<\/p>\n
respondent No.) the dn'.ver of V'<\/p>\n
bearing reg istrat_'io..r.1 , __ ' ; }\\?b;'A:P_j . I O\/ K "<\/p>\n
beforlgirlg to respor'1d};fr'1t  3213  _ 1<\/p>\n
{ii} Whether the peiiiiO'r1\u00a2r'\u00bb. is _.–"\u00ab:3.rii'if'{eci*. jgbrrv.<\/p>\n
compensatior1, \u00a7f'.._ ;sQ how. 'rm1(;_f1. Vavrid from <\/p>\n
whom? A A\n<\/p>\n
(iii) VW1a1f0rde’r?:7 _ ‘\n<\/p>\n
6. The .:?1ain1a.1=1’a:-1.e’a,d’-F;v1deh_c\u00a7\u00a3’ support of his<\/p>\n
claim.  .jcx21i:1ii2g:d  He produced 7<\/p>\n
(i0cur\u00a3V1errtts””  as Exs. P1 to P7. On
\nbehalf “tlle  the driver of the bus was<\/p>\n
exam-i_n_ed ais-,~V..- W1, 11:) d_or_?u_:11r:n_ts were pronlnrrmi.<\/p>\n
“?’7f’ The tribunal, on c0nsiderati()n of the aforesaid<\/p>\n
 0r9.I a.i1.:1 df;-111f.)ensz:z1’io:1. “H19 said finding has not been<\/p>\n
\u20ac*}’1aIic1’1gc\u00e9(.i by the APSRTC and it 11215:; bz:-,\u00e9vc:m1c finat.<\/p>\n
5<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
8. In coxnitlg to the ease of the peiitio1’1er 1’egzar(ii1′}g\u00a7<\/p>\n
i11juries and the compe11satio11 payable, it took 1::-!)_t.e of<\/p>\n
the wound Certi\ufb01cate to the effect that. he was “ii1′}’:=\u00a7f.it,i”c:.1j;t.<\/p>\n
in the OPEC Hospital, Raiehur from V’<\/p>\n
07.06.2004. The disabiigitfy  ..(?e_1ft.i\ufb01C.ate” * –:i;<:.svt'1wev:i.V \u00e9)_\\f' "<\/p>\n
Dr.P.P.Chatterji shows 11131:,  4(ii\u00e9sva1u'}V3Ai.1eit\u00a7;<\/p>\n
of 50%. It also took note of At—l_1e=. 1'z1c1t_io.[11,at.', "he; ivta\u00e9v.
\nworking in the Teiephone -.IJepart.1i;r3_11t.VaS_ \u00e91..:'L'inema11\u00a7'~<\/p>\n
Notwithst.andi1'1g the inju1'ies___\u00e9ustajnedh,' he eoI'i%t.im.1ec1 to<\/p>\n
be in employment  d:_?awi11g_ t..1i'e_very same saiary<\/p>\n
which Tie  ciAV'1:"5ax';\u00bbvi1*1's;.\u00a7'p;rio:9"to"t11e ace.i.dent. It also took
\nnote of   injuries are not completely
\ncured. Acivisability  Jhe needs further operation in
\n11is:.futL1re"." ..Ta11{.i'11g."-int'o consideration all these aspects<\/p>\n
hvajSi:~a\u00a7,x,r:a1r\u00a3ied aHSu–m"of Rs.\/\u00a35,000\/~ under the head pain<\/p>\n
\u00bb i\u00e9mod SL1'f.f6lT_if"1gS, Rs.8,000\/a towards diet, at.tenda1'at and<\/p>\n
 .i;iiei\u00a71crn\u00a7t\u00aba3l_ ffheirges, Rs.3,000\/- towards transportatio1'1<\/p>\n
"in-.._aI1 Q: S1111} of Rs3.1.21,000\/~. It 1'1as.:; not g;\u00a7r:111i_.eci any<\/p>\n
Charge-(5.. _\u00a7{:3'.040.OOO\/~ towards Eoss of Future ame11ities in<\/p>\n
Iife Ellld Rs3.2f3.000\/~ towards future medical expeaxses.<\/p>\n
6<\/span>
\ne0mper1sat,i0r1 either E.1l’]ClC1′ the head of meclieal<\/p>\n
experises or under the head of loss of fiiture ez1_1*i:1iii.gs..e1s<\/p>\n
the claimant, was an employee of BSNL \u00a31_I’;Ci, liis-.f\u00a7:;i1’tfiv:re’ <\/p>\n
medical expenses was reimbur_sed._anti” 1’16’ e(jmi’fi’r’1’_i.:.e =f,_(‘3\u00ab’<\/p>\n
draw the same salary e’ve1.1 afi.e1′”1,lie_’_A\u00a31ee.i\u00a3’le.a’1’f,._ }’-‘\\ggrie{~*e.Cl<\/p>\n
by the said award of the t1*1b_i’1’h;1i, elaim21_ntv-vis””i.fi” ‘i1]3’f)\u20ac211.  V<\/p>\n
9. Learned covu-r.1..sel  siiibmititecl,
\nadmittedly, the  fractures and
\ndislocation,:.he;;was  which work
\nhe  “:.}.j;1:.A’th_(i:se:.eirc;umst:anees, award of<\/p>\n
 \u00e91’r”‘1’d* ‘suffering is on the lower
\nside.  the hospital for more than 15
\ndays airidltl’1e1’eeii’te}l,.he,:eent:ii’1ued treatment. for nearly
\nsix\u00bb ..m0114thsv.   circumstances, award of\n<\/p>\n
— i:exvs.rrl\u00abs diet, atitenclant: and ineiclentai<\/p>\n
‘elsiarges i’s”\u00ab.._also on the lower side and t.herefe1’e, he<\/p>\n
sjubm  .\n<\/p>\n
‘:ae;eit)u11 1.-.  ‘ –.\n<\/p>\n
” af~.e;<:1se for enhaneemeiit, is made on t,ha-it.<\/p>\n
EC)". "1-'11
\nbeez-1*:.v1s'e. of {his aeeiderit, was not able to ez;-1.ri"'y m.1_i, his<\/p>\n
"e evicicnee on record shows that, the C'}&11iII1\u00a31.I'}l.<\/p>\n
7<\/span>
\nnormal work. for nearly six moiaths he was on leave.<\/p>\n
Because he was am empioyee of the Teleplione<\/p>\n
Depart.ment.. the tribunai was jiistified in not _;i.w2i.rt1i_I1g<\/p>\n
any compensz.tti01’1 under the head of Iil\ufb02dicjitii’C\u00a7{}’)f\u00a7IiS\u00a735″<\/p>\n
as the entire expenditure is borne by 1’1is__e’r:1pi\u00a3\u00a7y*L>r .:1″rid_ ”<\/p>\n
reimbursed. Simiiariy, though:the’c7ertii’ie;at_e”i.ss1,1ei:i by<\/p>\n
the doctor shows that eEaimahti.__sustaihegi p:?1’11ia11Ii–!:\u00a7Ii’t:.’V<\/p>\n
disability of 50%. that hzgis-.._n0t.Atsiffeetetiy iv;1iStitV.e.;:erni11giJ<\/p>\n
capacity, he eontiraued to be7i.1_i the s\u00e9m1Ae’ ’emp1oyment.,<\/p>\n
he is drawing the jsanie .__s,a12~zsry whieli he was<\/p>\n
dra\\xrihg”‘priC:r teifiijtheh”?ieeidehi:;”‘”There’f0re, tribunal. was
\njLlSt,ifif3d”f1’1vtltjtfi-3\u00a2\\>i?a7,1I’Ci-ilig any eompexlsatioh under the
\nhead of Viqss v()fVf’.-,_1t’V1;11’l:3,i’f’;~COII]C. When the claimant has<\/p>\n
sustajijied ‘V wrjisidctatiioii and three fractures, the
\n(:cj1d*:.pe.11sz3tii011\u00b0’aw.ardeci under the liead of pain and<\/p>\n
\u00bb :S”u1ff@IfiI1’\u00a7_i’i’\u00a7i\\.,,.?l_ sum of Rs.45,000\/– is on the iower side.<\/p>\n
 ‘Ei\\>:Va,rdVVf’V’\u00bb.2i sum of Rs.20,000\/–  a<iiditi0ha1<\/p>\n
' ..chz:irge*s, t.m1issp()ri.21ii<)n charges is on the lower side.<\/p>\n
if<\/p>\n
CQrh\u00a7)e;1.s\u00e9it_i:3'11. tinder the z\ufb01oresaitii head. Sim_\u00a712;tr1.y, the<\/p>\n
aineuht ziwarded tzowarris diet, 2:1t,t,endant and inctide1'1t2:11<\/p>\n
8<\/span>
\n‘We award a sum of Rs.10,000\/– under the said. head.<\/p>\n
Thoiigh the clairnzmt is being paid salary during the<\/p>\n
period of leave, that is bezu1se he earned it. I’hzi\u00a31 is<\/p>\n
no jL1stifieati0ri to deny the eiainiarit the :_\u00a2_:;?)’.’l’2i1*j,.\u00bb.V_’ ‘-E_’p11>V’1\u20acAiV(‘-:%’Ivl..! _<\/p>\n
the head of loss of income d111’irag_.~t1hef,peifio(i v'(3E’~..4<\/p>\n
treatmerit. His salary is about 1;Rs.6_,p1’QO’,1 – “per: irzpvritlhp as<\/p>\n
is clear from the salary (teri.ifica1te_. “tie was on }.e\u00e91V’e–.Vf{)r_V<\/p>\n
six months, therefore. 21  4’\u00a7.is’~\u00bb1ia’b}e to-it<\/p>\n
be paid to him under the he\u00e91″d_b0fui0ss”uf\u00abiricoziae during<\/p>\n
period of trea.tme13’i_;.’*~.ThI;is._the_ne–}iain1aht:Hvwould be<\/p>\n
entit3.e’d”‘t-0AV’:j:Rs.’t3\u00a33;6OQ\/-M 2is””a’ddit.i<)11a1 compensation.
\nThougii : the V"Iii-stiraizint"vhas to take future medical
\ntreatmenpt and"-he'.:has'*–tOV incur medical expenses, it is
\nhoped tihatr  in  past, his employer would<\/p>\n
r(3:ii:'\u00a31t)Eu:rse any'~3..m0L1nti spent by him towards future<\/p>\n
. :Inedica1_expenses. Because of the ob1ig__\u00a7ation on the<\/p>\n
  '(a4f'i"–\u00ab.{_1'1ev.i'V'ernployer to pay for such future medical<\/p>\n
 we p-;\u00ab,ss the following:\n<\/p>\n
eX:peI1ses;*–,We detziine to award any such sum. Hence,<\/p>\n
he<\/p>\n
9<\/span><\/p>\n
ORD ER<\/p>\n
(1) The appeai is 21ii0wec1;i12 g_)’21rt;.  J ”\n<\/p>\n
[ii] In addition to what 11:35 bA_Ac\u00a5ci:’1T1 eivmrclled. <\/p>\n
of Rs.66,6o0\/;  aw\u00e9ir<:1__ed4 as,'-\u00ab. \u00e91'(:%ciifional'~ '<\/p>\n
c0mpensati011 wrii:~h..int.\u20ac:*:\u00a2\u00a7:st zit'v8%..\/:p.e1. {r0111<\/p>\n
the date 0\u00a3"pe{.iti011:'I'\u00bbt;j1\u00a3 f}1V\u00a7;;=*r;i2ite of pe1ymcm..
\nParties to b't\u20ac1}'~th\u20aciI' C)VVf] C()i;\u00a7Y:S;<\/p>\n
\n\nSd\/3\nJUDGE\n\n%%  %      sd\/\u00e9\nJUDGE\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Lingappa S\/O.Rangappa vs Srihari S\/O Ramulu on 28 September, 2010 Author: N.Kumar And Adi ” .8″\/0 R’AEv1L3I1..rg I IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA DATED THIS THE 28?” DAY OF SEPTEMBER. 1.0 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUs’r1c1: N.KUMA;{. *’ ” AND – THE HON’BI.E MR. J{}S3’IC:E_SIjE3JH15{SI;i M.F.A.NO.57V7’E.,CO.F\u00bb’ 20o7__ (Rm-,_: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-128807","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nLingappa S\/O.Rangappa vs Srihari S\/O Ramulu on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Lingappa S\/O.Rangappa vs Srihari S\/O Ramulu on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-29T15:10:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Lingappa S\/O.Rangappa vs Srihari S\/O Ramulu on 28 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-29T15:10:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1346,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Lingappa S\/O.Rangappa vs Srihari S\/O Ramulu on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-29T15:10:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Lingappa S\/O.Rangappa vs Srihari S\/O Ramulu on 28 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Lingappa S\/O.Rangappa vs Srihari S\/O Ramulu on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Lingappa S\/O.Rangappa vs Srihari S\/O Ramulu on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-29T15:10:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Lingappa S\/O.Rangappa vs Srihari S\/O Ramulu on 28 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-29T15:10:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010"},"wordCount":1346,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010","name":"Lingappa S\/O.Rangappa vs Srihari S\/O Ramulu on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-29T15:10:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lingappa-so-rangappa-vs-srihari-so-ramulu-on-28-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Lingappa S\/O.Rangappa vs Srihari S\/O Ramulu on 28 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/128807","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=128807"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/128807\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=128807"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=128807"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=128807"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}