{"id":129627,"date":"2010-07-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-07-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010"},"modified":"2019-02-01T21:13:05","modified_gmt":"2019-02-01T15:43:05","slug":"bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010","title":{"rendered":"Bambhaniya vs President on 26 July, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Bambhaniya vs President on 26 July, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.L.Dave,&amp;Nbsp;<\/div>\n<pre>   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nCA\/6802\/2010\t 3\/ 5\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nCIVIL\nAPPLICATION - FOR AMENDMENT No. 6802 of 2010\n \n\nIn\n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 8582 of 2006\n \n\n \n \n=========================================================\n\n \n\nBAMBHANIYA\nMANSUKHBHAI BACHUBHAI - Applicant\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nPRESIDENT\n&amp; 5 - Opponents\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMR\nKB PUJARA for\nApplicant. \nMR GM JOSHI for Opponents : 1 - 2. \nMR NIRAG PATHAK,\nAGP, for Opponents : 3-4, \nMR BIPIN P JASANI for Opponent : 5, \nMR\nBN PATEL for Opponent :\n6, \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 26\/07\/2010 \n\n \n\n \nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n<p>\tLeave<br \/>\nto amend. To be carried out forthwith.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.\tRule.\n<\/p>\n<p>Learned advocate Mr.Joshi waives service of notice of rule for<br \/>\nopponent Nos.1 &amp; 2, learned A.G.P. Mr.Pathak waives service of<br \/>\nnotice of rule for opponent Nos.3 &amp; 4, learned advocate Mr.Jasani<br \/>\nwaives service of notice of rule for opponent No.5 and learned<br \/>\nadvocate Mr.Patel waives service of notice of rule for opponent No.6.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.\tThis<br \/>\nis an application seeking an amendment to the main petition.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.\tHeard<br \/>\nthe learned advocates for the parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.\tLearned<br \/>\nadvocate Mr.Pujara indicated that this amendment is sought to be<br \/>\nbrought on record in light of subsequent development that has taken<br \/>\nplace pending the petition. Mr.Pujara submitted that this amendment<br \/>\nis brought in to put the petition technically in order and,<br \/>\ntherefore, the application may be allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.\tLearned<br \/>\nadvocate Mr.Joshi, learned AGP Mr.Pathak and learned advocate<br \/>\nMr.Patel have no objection to the grant of amendment.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.\tLearned<br \/>\nadvocate Mr.Jasani, appearing for opponent No.5, has strongly opposed<br \/>\nthis application. According to him, the application cannot be<br \/>\nentertained for the following reasons;-\n<\/p>\n<p>(i)\tthe<br \/>\napplication is preferred at a belated stage;\n<\/p>\n<p>(ii)\tby<br \/>\nbringing this amendment, nature of the \tpetition is sought to be<br \/>\nchanged;\n<\/p>\n<p>(iii)this<br \/>\nquestion was already considered by this \tCourt while considering the<br \/>\nquestion of interim \trelief; and<\/p>\n<p>(iv)<br \/>\nthis amendment is brought in to negate the \torder passed by this High<br \/>\nCourt in earlier \tpetitions preferred by opponent Nos.5 &amp; 6.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.1\t\tMr.Jasani<br \/>\nhas drawn attention of this Court to an order passed by this Court on<br \/>\n5.9.2006, which is passed after taking into consideration the<br \/>\nsubsequent development now sought to be brought on record. Mr.Jasani,<br \/>\ntherefore, submitted that the grant of this application would cause<br \/>\nprejudice to opponent No.5 and, therefore, may not be allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.\tHaving<br \/>\nregard to the rival submissions, at the outset, it may be noted that<br \/>\nthe amendments sought to be brought on record on account of<br \/>\nsubsequent development during the pendency of the petition had<br \/>\nalready attracted the attention of the applicant, opponents and the<br \/>\nCourt soon after the development took place when the Court dealt with<br \/>\nthe question of interim relief by order dated 5.9.2006. The Court, in<br \/>\nterms, has made reference to the development in that order. Even in<br \/>\nthe additional affidavit filed by the petitioner, there is reference<br \/>\nto the new development. Therefore, learned advocate Mr.Jasani is to<br \/>\nan extent justified in raising a plea that the applicant has<br \/>\napproached this Court at a belated stage. Almost four years have<br \/>\ngone-by and the petitioner has taken no action in this regard.<br \/>\nHowever, learned advocate Mr.Pujara is also right in stating that the<br \/>\npetition was not listed till 16.6.2010 after passing of the order on<br \/>\n5.9.2006. This is what reflected in the order itself. Mr.Pujara has,<br \/>\nin all frankness, taken the responsibility upon himself that upon<br \/>\nreading the petition when it was listed on 16.6.2010, he realised a<br \/>\nneed for putting the petition in order technically.\n<\/p>\n<p>9.\tIt<br \/>\nis true that delay defeats, but when the delay has not caused any<br \/>\nprejudice to the other side and when causing of delay is not likely<br \/>\nto accrue any unjust benefit to the person coming late to the Court,<br \/>\ndelay need not come in the way. If the order dated 5.9.2006 is seen,<br \/>\nappointment of opponent No.5 is already held subject to the final<br \/>\noutcome of the petition. Now, if that part is not challenged in the<br \/>\npetition, it would render the petition incomplete and technically<br \/>\ndefective. If an attempt is made to put the house in order, there is<br \/>\nnothing to read any ulterior motive behind coming to the Court late,<br \/>\nbecause that fact is already brought to the notice of all the<br \/>\nconcerned, including the Court and delay part, therefore, need not<br \/>\ncome in the way of the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>10.\tSo<br \/>\nfar as the contention that the petitioner&#8217;s attempt is to nullify the<br \/>\norder passed by this Court in the earlier petitions, which were<br \/>\npreferred by opponent Nos.5 &amp; 6 is concerned, no such relief is<br \/>\nsought, which would go adverse to that order. On the contrary, the<br \/>\norder dated 5.9.2006 makes it explicit that the appointment of<br \/>\nopponent No.5 is subject to the final outcome of this petition and<br \/>\nthat order has been accepted by opponent No.5, as it has not been<br \/>\nchallenged yet. This contention, therefore, cannot be accepted.\n<\/p>\n<p>11.\tSo<br \/>\nfar as the contention that by the amendment, the nature of the<br \/>\npetition is sought to be changed, probably, is not the correct way of<br \/>\nlooking at the petition. The petitioner is asserting his right, of<br \/>\nwhich he was deprived, firstly by opponent Nos.5 &amp; 6  while<br \/>\nbypassing him and getting appointment. The details have come to the<br \/>\nnotice of the petitioner only after he sought information under the<br \/>\nRight to Information Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>12.\tLastly,<br \/>\nit hardly needs to be stated that by mere grant of amendment of<br \/>\npetition, no relief is granted. It only enables the petitioner to<br \/>\ncanvass a point before the Court and seek relief, which may or may<br \/>\nnot be granted. This amendment, on the contrary, reduces burden on<br \/>\nthe shoulder of the judicial system by filing a fresh petition, which<br \/>\nthe petitioner could have filed.\n<\/p>\n<p>13.\tIn<br \/>\nview of the above discussion, this application deserves to be allowed<br \/>\nand the same is allowed. The amendment to be carried out forthwith.<br \/>\nRule is made absolute. No costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>13.1\t\tThe<br \/>\npetitioner shall supply a fresh copy of the amended petition to the<br \/>\nCourt and shall serve to respondent Nos.1 &amp; 2 and supply to<br \/>\nlearned A.G.P and learned advocates for rest of the respondents. This<br \/>\nshall be done by the petitioner within two weeks.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t[A.L.Dave,J.]<\/p>\n<p>(patel)<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Bambhaniya vs President on 26 July, 2010 Author: A.L.Dave,&amp;Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print CA\/6802\/2010 3\/ 5 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL APPLICATION &#8211; FOR AMENDMENT No. 6802 of 2010 In SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 8582 of 2006 ========================================================= BAMBHANIYA MANSUKHBHAI BACHUBHAI &#8211; Applicant Versus [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-129627","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Bambhaniya vs President on 26 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bambhaniya vs President on 26 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-07-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-01T15:43:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bambhaniya vs President on 26 July, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-01T15:43:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010\"},\"wordCount\":966,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010\",\"name\":\"Bambhaniya vs President on 26 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-01T15:43:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bambhaniya vs President on 26 July, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bambhaniya vs President on 26 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bambhaniya vs President on 26 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-07-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-01T15:43:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bambhaniya vs President on 26 July, 2010","datePublished":"2010-07-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-01T15:43:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010"},"wordCount":966,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010","name":"Bambhaniya vs President on 26 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-07-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-01T15:43:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bambhaniya-vs-president-on-26-july-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bambhaniya vs President on 26 July, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129627","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=129627"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129627\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=129627"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=129627"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=129627"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}