{"id":129849,"date":"2008-09-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008"},"modified":"2016-11-21T15:42:49","modified_gmt":"2016-11-21T10:12:49","slug":"commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Commissioner Of Income Tax, &#8230; vs Goyal M.G.Gases Pvt. Ltd. on 10 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Delhi High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Commissioner Of Income Tax, &#8230; vs Goyal M.G.Gases Pvt. Ltd. on 10 September, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Badar Durrez Ahmed<\/div>\n<pre>*             THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI\n\n%                                 Judgment delivered on : 10.09.2008\n\n+                             ITA No.1038\/2008\n\nCommissioner of Income Tax Delhi-IV                     ..... Appellant\n                                   versus\n\nGoyal M.G.Gases Pvt. Ltd.                                ..... Respondent<\/pre>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:\n<\/p>\n<p>For the Appellant         :       Ms Prem Lata Bansal<br \/>\nFor the Respondent        :       Mr Prakash Kumar<\/p>\n<p>CORAM :-\n<\/p>\n<p>HON&#8217;BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED<br \/>\nHON&#8217;BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER<\/p>\n<p>1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may<br \/>\n   be allowed to see the judgment ?\n<\/p>\n<p>2. To be referred to Reporters or not ?\n<\/p>\n<p>3. Whether the judgment should be reported<br \/>\n   in the Digest ?\n<\/p>\n<p>BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL)<\/p>\n<p>1.     This appeal is directed against the order passed by the Income<\/p>\n<p>Tax Appellate Tribunal on 23.11.2007 in the assessee&#8217;s appeal<\/p>\n<p>before it for the assessment year 1999-2000. The facts relevant for<\/p>\n<p>the present appeal are that an assessment was framed under Section<\/p>\n<p>143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Commissioner, Income<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">ITA No.1038 of 08                                                Page 1 of 6<\/span><br \/>\n Tax invoking the provisions of Section 263 of the said Act passed an<\/p>\n<p>order on 25.3.2004 setting aside the said assessment order and<\/p>\n<p>directing the Assessing Officer to calculate taxable income<\/p>\n<p>according to the merchantile system of accounting.                    The<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner of Income Tax gave a specific direction that the<\/p>\n<p>Assessing Officer shall pass the consequential orders &#8220;within a<\/p>\n<p>period of three months approximately&#8221;.\n<\/p>\n<p>       The assessee being aggrieved by this order passed by the<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner, Income Tax preferred the said appeal before the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal. When the appeal came to be heard by the Tribunal on<\/p>\n<p>13.11.2007, the learned counsel for the assessee pointed out that the<\/p>\n<p>Assessing Officer had not framed any assessment order in<\/p>\n<p>consequence of the impugned order and that the time limit for<\/p>\n<p>framing such order had already expired. The learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>appellant submitted that the appeal had, therefore, become<\/p>\n<p>infructuous.        The   Tribunal   had   directed   the   departmental<\/p>\n<p>representative to examine the case records and inform as to whether<\/p>\n<p>any consequential order had been passed pursuant to the order<\/p>\n<p>passed by the Commissioner Income Tax on 25.3.2004.                  The<\/p>\n<p>impugned order indicates that the departmental representative<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">ITA No.1038 of 08                                              Page 2 of 6<\/span><br \/>\n produced their case records on 15.11.2007 and pointed out that no<\/p>\n<p>such consequential order had been passed by the Assessing Officer.<\/p>\n<p>The learned counsel for the assessee also made a statement at the<\/p>\n<p>Bar that no consequential order had been passed pursuant to the<\/p>\n<p>order passed by the Commissioner. In these circumstances, the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal was of the view that the appeal before it had become<\/p>\n<p>infructuous and any decision on any of the grounds of appeal would<\/p>\n<p>only be of academic interest. The Tribunal, therefore, dismissed the<\/p>\n<p>appeal as having become infructuous by virtue of the impugned<\/p>\n<p>order dated 23.11.2007.\n<\/p>\n<p>       It is the revenue&#8217;s contention in this appeal before us that no<\/p>\n<p>period of limitation has been prescribed in respect of orders which<\/p>\n<p>are to give consequential effect to orders passed by the<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner of Income Tax in exercise of his powers under<\/p>\n<p>Section 263 of the Act.      The learned counsel for the appellant<\/p>\n<p>referred to the provisions of Section 153(2A) and 153(3)(ii) to<\/p>\n<p>submit that no period of limitation has been prescribed for passing<\/p>\n<p>orders consequential to the order passed by the Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>Income Tax under Section 263. She submitted that the period of<\/p>\n<p>limitation that has been prescribed by virtue of Section 153(2A) only<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">ITA No.1038 of 08                                           Page 3 of 6<\/span><br \/>\n relates to cases where the entire assessment order has been set aside<\/p>\n<p>and a fresh assessment has been directed by the Commissioner in<\/p>\n<p>exercise of his powers under Section 263 of the said Act. She<\/p>\n<p>submits that to this extent the Tribunal has gone wrong in agreeing<\/p>\n<p>with the assessee that the appeal had become infructuous because no<\/p>\n<p>assessment order was framed within the time limit for framing such<\/p>\n<p>an order.\n<\/p>\n<p>       Having heard counsel for the parties, we are of the view that<\/p>\n<p>the order passed by the Tribunal does not call for any interference.<\/p>\n<p>There are several reasons for this. First of all, the Tribunal has not<\/p>\n<p>invoked any statutory provision to set up a statutory bar of limitation<\/p>\n<p>for passing a consequential order. Therefore, the submissions made<\/p>\n<p>by the learned counsel for the appellant pertaining to the provisions<\/p>\n<p>of Section 153(2A) and 153(3)(ii) are of no consequence. This is so<\/p>\n<p>because the Tribunal has not referred to these provisions. Secondly,<\/p>\n<p>the Tribunal has only gone by the direction given by the<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner in his order passed under Section 263 of the said Act.<\/p>\n<p>Under Section 263(1) the Commissioner is empowered to call for<\/p>\n<p>and examine the record of any proceeding under the Act and if he<\/p>\n<p>considers that any order passed by an Assessing Officer is erroneous<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">ITA No.1038 of 08                                            Page 4 of 6<\/span><br \/>\n in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue, he may,<\/p>\n<p>after giving the assessee an opportunity of being heard and after<\/p>\n<p>making or causing to make such enquiry as he deems fit, &#8220;pass such<\/p>\n<p>order thereon as the circumstances of the case justify&#8221;, including an<\/p>\n<p>order enhancing or modifying the assessment, or cancelling the<\/p>\n<p>assessment and directing a fresh assessment.         In view of this<\/p>\n<p>provision it is clear that the Commissioner may pass any order as the<\/p>\n<p>circumstances of the case justify. In the present case we find that the<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner while passing the order under Section 263 has given a<\/p>\n<p>specific direction that the Assessing Officer shall pass the<\/p>\n<p>consequential orders within a period of three months approximately.<\/p>\n<p>This direction would certainly fall within the expression &#8220;such order<\/p>\n<p>thereon as the circumstances of the case justify&#8221; appearing in<\/p>\n<p>Section 263(1) of the said Act. It appears that it is in this context<\/p>\n<p>that the Tribunal concluded that the time for passing the order had<\/p>\n<p>expired. The consequential order had not been passed for over a<\/p>\n<p>period of approximately three years and eight months. Thirdly, we<\/p>\n<p>are of the view that where no period of limitation is prescribed then,<\/p>\n<p>in any event, a reasonable period of limitation ought to be adopted.<\/p>\n<p>The non-specification of a period of limitation does mean that the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">ITA No.1038 of 08                                            Page 5 of 6<\/span><br \/>\n Assessing Officer can wait interminably or for an infinite period<\/p>\n<p>before passing the consequential order. And, in the context of the<\/p>\n<p>direction given by the Commissioner for passing the consequential<\/p>\n<p>orders within three months approximately, a period of three years<\/p>\n<p>and eight months is certainly much beyond the reasonable period<\/p>\n<p>that could be allowed to the Assessing Officer to pass the<\/p>\n<p>consequential order.\n<\/p>\n<p>       For all these reasons, we find that the Tribunal has come to the<\/p>\n<p>correct conclusion that the time limit for framing the consequential<\/p>\n<p>order had expired and in accepting the assessee&#8217;s plea that its appeal<\/p>\n<p>before the Tribunal had consequently become infructuous. We see<\/p>\n<p>no reason to interfere with the impugned order.        No substantial<\/p>\n<p>question of law arises for our consideration.          The appeal is<\/p>\n<p>dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                     BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J<\/p>\n<p>                                             RAJIV SHAKDHER, J<\/p>\n<p>September 10, 2008<br \/>\nmb<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">ITA No.1038 of 08                                            Page 6 of 6<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court Commissioner Of Income Tax, &#8230; vs Goyal M.G.Gases Pvt. Ltd. on 10 September, 2008 Author: Badar Durrez Ahmed * THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on : 10.09.2008 + ITA No.1038\/2008 Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-IV &#8230;.. Appellant versus Goyal M.G.Gases Pvt. Ltd. &#8230;.. Respondent Advocates who [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-129849","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs Goyal M.G.Gases Pvt. Ltd. on 10 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs Goyal M.G.Gases Pvt. Ltd. on 10 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-21T10:12:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Commissioner Of Income Tax, &#8230; vs Goyal M.G.Gases Pvt. Ltd. on 10 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-21T10:12:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1147,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs Goyal M.G.Gases Pvt. Ltd. on 10 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-21T10:12:49+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Commissioner Of Income Tax, &#8230; vs Goyal M.G.Gases Pvt. Ltd. on 10 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs Goyal M.G.Gases Pvt. Ltd. on 10 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs Goyal M.G.Gases Pvt. Ltd. on 10 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-21T10:12:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Commissioner Of Income Tax, &#8230; vs Goyal M.G.Gases Pvt. Ltd. on 10 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-21T10:12:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008"},"wordCount":1147,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008","name":"Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs Goyal M.G.Gases Pvt. Ltd. on 10 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-21T10:12:49+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-goyal-m-g-gases-pvt-ltd-on-10-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Commissioner Of Income Tax, &#8230; vs Goyal M.G.Gases Pvt. Ltd. on 10 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129849","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=129849"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129849\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=129849"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=129849"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=129849"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}