{"id":129935,"date":"2010-12-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-12-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010"},"modified":"2018-04-29T12:01:01","modified_gmt":"2018-04-29T06:31:01","slug":"ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010","title":{"rendered":"Ram Nath Prasad vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 20 December, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Patna High Court &#8211; Orders<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ram Nath Prasad vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 20 December, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA\n                            CWJC No 7555 of 2006\n            Ram Nath Prasad, son of late Babu Prasad, resident of village -\n            Chandherpur, Via - Narga, P O - Muktapur, P S - Kalyanpur,\n            District - Samastipur                                 -       Petitioner\n                                     Versus\n         1 The State of Bihar\n         2 The Secretary, Department of Cooperative, Government of Bihar, Patna\n         3 The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Government of Bihar, Patna\n         4 The Additional Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Government of Bihar, Patna\n                                                                 -      Respondents\n                                     WITH\n                            CWJC No 9965 of 2006\n          1 Haricharan Mahto, son of late Ram Sundar Mahto, resident of village -\n             Dekari, P S - Khanpur, District - Samastipur\n          2 Shailendra Shahi, son of Sahdeo Prasad Shahi, resident of village -\n             Goriawadih, P S - Baraiya, District - Muzaffarpur -          Petitioners\n                                     Versus\n           1 The State of Bihar\n           2 The Secretary, Department of Cooperative, Government of Bihar, Patna\n           3 The Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Government of Bihar, Patna\n           4 The Additional Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Government of Bihar,\n              Patna                                               -       Respondents\n                                   -----------\n<\/pre>\n<p>3   20.12.2010                 By these two writ petitions, the three petitioners challenge<\/p>\n<p>                 the order of the Registrar, Cooperative Societies as passed in Case No 66<\/p>\n<p>                 of 2003 (Annexure-1) which was issued pursuant to directions of this<\/p>\n<p>                 Court in CWJC No 1103 of 2004 which was disposed of on 26.09.2005.<\/p>\n<p>                               The facts of the two writ petitions are similar and, as such,<\/p>\n<p>                 have been taken up for final disposal together at this stage itself with<\/p>\n<p>                 consent of parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>                               The sole petitioner in CWJC No 7555 of 2006 was<\/p>\n<p>                 appointed as a Clerk in the office of Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies<\/p>\n<p>                 in January, 1986. Petitioners No 1 and 2 in CWJC No 9965 of 2006 were<\/p>\n<p>                 appointed on daily wages in the year, 1981 in the office of Joint Registrar,<\/p>\n<p>                 Cooperative Societies. Subsequently, in the year, 1988-1989, apart from<\/p>\n<p>                 others, services of the petitioners were terminated on the ground that they<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                          2<\/span><br \/>\nwere wrongly and illegally appointed. Petitioners challenged the same<\/p>\n<p>before this Court and this Court, in the year, 1992-1993, held that the<\/p>\n<p>order of termination could not be sustained as it was passed without<\/p>\n<p>notice. The termination orders were, thus, set aside and the petitioners<\/p>\n<p>were directed to be reinstated with full back wages. Petitioners were<\/p>\n<p>reinstated on 11.02.1994 with full back wages, as directed by this Court<\/p>\n<p>but immediately thereafter, within a month and a half, they were again<\/p>\n<p>terminated. It appears that some other persons were also terminated being<\/p>\n<p>a group of 73 employees. They preferred appeal before the Secretary,<\/p>\n<p>Department of Cooperative who set aside their termination and directed<\/p>\n<p>their reinstatement. Petitioners also then approached the Secretary who<\/p>\n<p>directed their reinstatement treating them similarly to the earlier batch. It<\/p>\n<p>appears that Department filed a review application before the Secretary.<\/p>\n<p>The Secretary, without notice to these petitioners, reviewed his earlier<\/p>\n<p>order and recalled his order for reinstatement of the petitioners.        He<\/p>\n<p>remanded the matter to the Registrar, Cooperative Societies for a fresh<\/p>\n<p>consideration. This time, he refused to treat the petitioners similar to<\/p>\n<p>those who were also dismissed being about 73 in number. Petitioners<\/p>\n<p>challenged this order of the Secretary reviewing his earlier order before<\/p>\n<p>this Court. This Court, in writ petitions, directed the Registrar to examine<\/p>\n<p>the matter and pass speaking order keeping in view the plea of<\/p>\n<p>discrimination. It is obvious that this Court did not interfere with the<\/p>\n<p>order of the Secretary by which the Secretary had reviewed his earlier<\/p>\n<p>order. Now, by the impugned order, the Registrar has refused to treat the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners similar to other 73 persons. This has brought the petitioners to<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                          3<\/span><br \/>\nthis Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>              Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, in my<\/p>\n<p>view, no cause for interference in the order of the Registrar is made out.<\/p>\n<p>First, learned counsel for the petitioners strenuously argued that the case<\/p>\n<p>of the petitioners and those of the 73 other persons were similar. They<\/p>\n<p>must receive similar treatment. In my view, that submission cannot be<\/p>\n<p>accepted. Firstly, it must be remembered that the Rule of Article-14<\/p>\n<p>against discrimination is a positive Rule and not a negative. If someone<\/p>\n<p>has been wrongly reinstated, others cannot blindly follow the same.<\/p>\n<p>Reinstatement is on the basis of personal rights. The second and more<\/p>\n<p>important reason is that, by the impugned order, the Registrar has given<\/p>\n<p>cogent finding in paragraph-13 of the impugned order as to why he cannot<\/p>\n<p>treat the cases similarly. The Registrar found that so far as the 73 other<\/p>\n<p>persons are concerned, they had worked for a very long period before<\/p>\n<p>State took a decision to terminate them on ground of their illegal<\/p>\n<p>appointment. So far as petitioner in the first writ petition is concerned, he<\/p>\n<p>was appointed in 1986 and terminated in 1989. The period was hardly<\/p>\n<p>two to three years.     Learned counsel states that this Court directed<\/p>\n<p>petitioner&#8217;s reinstatement with back wages and, accordingly, petitioner<\/p>\n<p>was reinstated in the year, 1994 with back wages and, thus, it should be<\/p>\n<p>deemed that the petitioner was in continuous employment from 1988 to<\/p>\n<p>1994 that is eight years.     In the facts of the case, it is not correct.<\/p>\n<p>Petitioner was in employment for about 3 years only but because he was<\/p>\n<p>dismissed without show cause, in 1994 he was reinstated with back wages<\/p>\n<p>with continuity of service on this technicality.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                        So far as petitioners in the second writ petition are<\/p>\n<p>          concerned, they were appointed in the year, 1991 and their appointments<\/p>\n<p>          were cancelled in the year, 1998. As noticed by the Registrar in the<\/p>\n<p>          impugned order, in so far as the other 73 persons are concerned, they were<\/p>\n<p>          all in service continuously for over nine years and it is because of this<\/p>\n<p>          reason that the Secretary reviewed the order which, as noted above, was<\/p>\n<p>          not interfered with by this Court. This Court did not set aside the order of<\/p>\n<p>          the Secretary on review.     The Secretary had remanded the matter to<\/p>\n<p>          Registrar for fresh decision which order was merely reiterated by this<\/p>\n<p>          Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>                        For the aforesaid reason, in my view, on the facts, as<\/p>\n<p>          obtaining in the present cases, the plea of hostile discrimination does not<\/p>\n<p>          stand established. The petitioners have been out of service since 1994.<\/p>\n<p>          They cannot now be ordered to be reinstated in service on ground<\/p>\n<p>          aforesaid.\n<\/p>\n<p>                        The writ petitions are, accordingly, dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<pre>M.E.H.\/                                        (Navaniti Prasad Singh)\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Patna High Court &#8211; Orders Ram Nath Prasad vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 20 December, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No 7555 of 2006 Ram Nath Prasad, son of late Babu Prasad, resident of village &#8211; Chandherpur, Via &#8211; Narga, P O &#8211; Muktapur, P S &#8211; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-129935","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-patna-high-court-orders"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ram Nath Prasad vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 20 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ram Nath Prasad vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 20 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-12-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-29T06:31:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ram Nath Prasad vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 20 December, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-29T06:31:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010\"},\"wordCount\":878,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Patna High Court - Orders\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010\",\"name\":\"Ram Nath Prasad vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 20 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-29T06:31:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ram Nath Prasad vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 20 December, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ram Nath Prasad vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 20 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ram Nath Prasad vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 20 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-12-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-29T06:31:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ram Nath Prasad vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 20 December, 2010","datePublished":"2010-12-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-29T06:31:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010"},"wordCount":878,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Patna High Court - Orders"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010","name":"Ram Nath Prasad vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 20 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-12-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-29T06:31:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-nath-prasad-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-20-december-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ram Nath Prasad vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 20 December, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129935","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=129935"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129935\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=129935"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=129935"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=129935"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}