{"id":129964,"date":"2009-06-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009"},"modified":"2017-03-18T16:46:12","modified_gmt":"2017-03-18T11:16:12","slug":"radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"Radha Vijayakumar vs A.V.Mohandas on 26 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Radha Vijayakumar vs A.V.Mohandas on 26 June, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 2043 of 2009()\n\n\n1. RADHA VIJAYAKUMAR, W\/O.VIJAYAKUMAR,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. A.V.MOHANDAS, S\/O.VELUKUTTY,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH\n\n Dated :26\/06\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                        THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.\n              = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n                          CRL. R.P. NO.2043 of 2009\n              = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n                  Dated this the 26th day of June,    2009\n\n                                 O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>                                 &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>\n      Notice to respondent No.1 is dispensed with in view of the order<\/p>\n<p>I am proposing to pass which is not prejudicial to him.               Public<\/p>\n<p>Prosecutor took notice for respondent No.2.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      2.   This revision is in challenge of judgment of learned<\/p>\n<p>Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc-I), Palakkad in Crl. Appeal No.683 of<\/p>\n<p>2007 confirming conviction of petitioner for offence punishable under<\/p>\n<p>Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act but modifying sentence.<\/p>\n<p>      3.   Case arose on a private complaint preferred by respondent<\/p>\n<p>No.1. He alleged that for discharge of a liability to him petitioner<\/p>\n<p>issued Ext.P1, cheque dated 26.7.2006 for Rs.75,000\/-. That cheque<\/p>\n<p>was dishonoured for insufficiency of funds which is proved by Exts.P2<\/p>\n<p>and P3. Respondent No.1 issued statutory           notice to the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>intimating dishonour and demanding payment. Issue and service of<\/p>\n<p>statutory notice are proved by Exts.P3 and P4 series.           Respondent<\/p>\n<p>No.1 gave evidence as P.W.1 and stated that             petitioner borrowed<\/p>\n<p>Rs.85,000\/- from him and in partial discharge of that liability issued<\/p>\n<p>cheque for Rs.75,000\/-. Case pleaded by petitioner in the trial court<\/p>\n<p>CRL. R.P. No.2043 of 2009<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                  -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>is that she had no transaction with respondent No.1, nor had she<\/p>\n<p>issued any cheque. She had left a        blank cheque in her vehicle and<\/p>\n<p>respondent No.1 who stealthily got it misused the same. Courts below<\/p>\n<p>were not impressed by that contention of petitioner and found her<\/p>\n<p>guilty. That finding is under challenge in this revision. Learned counsel<\/p>\n<p>for   petitioner contends that due execution of the cheque is not<\/p>\n<p>proved.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4.     It is true that going by the suggestion to P.W.1 in cross-<\/p>\n<p>examination petitioner does not admit that she signed Ext.P1.        The<\/p>\n<p>contention of petitioner cannot be accepted since assuming that<\/p>\n<p>petitioner had lost unsigned blank cheque from her vehicle she would<\/p>\n<p>have in the normal course preferred a complaint to the authorities<\/p>\n<p>concerned.     Nothing of that sort was done.      She would have also<\/p>\n<p>informed her bank about the loss of cheque and given instruction for<\/p>\n<p>stopping payment as per that cheque. That also did not happen. A<\/p>\n<p>further fact to be noted is that in spite of respondent No.1 informing<\/p>\n<p>petitioner about dishonour of the cheque for Rs.75,000\/- and claiming<\/p>\n<p>that   petitioner issued that cheque for repayment of the loan and<\/p>\n<p>demanding payment of the amount petitioner did not reply to the<\/p>\n<p>notice. Learned magistrate has observed that none of the contesting<\/p>\n<p>parties took steps to get the signature in the cheque examined by<\/p>\n<p>expert.    Learned magistrate      was constrained to       compare the<\/p>\n<p>CRL. R.P. No.2043 of 2009<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>signature    with the admitted signature of petitioner.       Learned<\/p>\n<p>magistrate observed that no dissimilarity could be noticed between<\/p>\n<p>the    disputed      and admitted signatures of petitioner.   Learned<\/p>\n<p>magistrate further observed that there is no reason to disbelieve the<\/p>\n<p>evidence of P.W1 about the transaction and issue of cheque in his<\/p>\n<p>favour. So holding, petitioner was found guilty.   Appellate court has<\/p>\n<p>confirmed that finding.    I have gone through the judgments under<\/p>\n<p>challenge and I do not find reason to disbelieve the evidence of P.W1<\/p>\n<p>regarding the transaction and due execution of the cheque. Petitioner<\/p>\n<p>cannot successfully challenge her conviction.<\/p>\n<p>      5.    Learned magistrate sentenced petitioner to undergo simple<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment for six months and directed her to pay Rs.75,000\/- as<\/p>\n<p>compensation. In default of payment, sentence of two months&#8217; simple<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment was also was ordered. Appellate court while retaining<\/p>\n<p>the direction for payment of compensation and default sentence<\/p>\n<p>modified substantive sentence as simple imprisonment till rising of<\/p>\n<p>the court. I do not find reason to     interfere with the sentence as<\/p>\n<p>modified by the appellate court,          direction for payment of<\/p>\n<p>compensation and the default sentence as confirmed by that court.<\/p>\n<p>      6.    Counsel for petitioner requested six     months&#8217; time to<\/p>\n<p>deposit the compensation. Counsel submits that petitioner is a lady<\/p>\n<p>and is    unable to raise the amount immediately. Considering the<\/p>\n<p>CRL. R.P. No.2043 of 2009<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                  -: 4 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>circumstances stated by learned counsel I am inclined to grant five<\/p>\n<p>months&#8217; time to the petitioner to deposit compensation in the trial<\/p>\n<p>court.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Resultantly, this revision fails.   It is dismissed.    Petitioner is<\/p>\n<p>granted five months&#8217; time from this day to deposit compensation in<\/p>\n<p>the trial court. It is made clear that   it shall be sufficient compliance<\/p>\n<p>of  the direction for deposit of compensation if petitioner paid the<\/p>\n<p>compensation to respondent No.1 through her counsel in the trial court<\/p>\n<p>and respondent No.1 filed a statement in the trial court through his<\/p>\n<p>counsel acknowledging receipt of         compensation within the said<\/p>\n<p>period.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Petitioner shall appear in the trial court on 28.11.2009          to<\/p>\n<p>receive the sentence.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                              THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nvsv<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Radha Vijayakumar vs A.V.Mohandas on 26 June, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2043 of 2009() 1. RADHA VIJAYAKUMAR, W\/O.VIJAYAKUMAR, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. A.V.MOHANDAS, S\/O.VELUKUTTY, &#8230; Respondent 2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY For Petitioner :SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-129964","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Radha Vijayakumar vs A.V.Mohandas on 26 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Radha Vijayakumar vs A.V.Mohandas on 26 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-18T11:16:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Radha Vijayakumar vs A.V.Mohandas on 26 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-18T11:16:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":781,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009\",\"name\":\"Radha Vijayakumar vs A.V.Mohandas on 26 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-18T11:16:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Radha Vijayakumar vs A.V.Mohandas on 26 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Radha Vijayakumar vs A.V.Mohandas on 26 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Radha Vijayakumar vs A.V.Mohandas on 26 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-18T11:16:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Radha Vijayakumar vs A.V.Mohandas on 26 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-18T11:16:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009"},"wordCount":781,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009","name":"Radha Vijayakumar vs A.V.Mohandas on 26 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-18T11:16:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radha-vijayakumar-vs-a-v-mohandas-on-26-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Radha Vijayakumar vs A.V.Mohandas on 26 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129964","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=129964"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129964\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=129964"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=129964"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=129964"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}