{"id":130183,"date":"2008-07-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008"},"modified":"2016-12-26T05:47:56","modified_gmt":"2016-12-26T00:17:56","slug":"b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"B Anand Shetty S\/O Seena Shetty vs The Karnataka Housing Board … on 15 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
B Anand Shetty S\/O Seena Shetty vs The Karnataka Housing Board … on 15 July, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: V.Gopalagowda & Nagaraj<\/div>\n
 \n\nIN THE HIGH COURT 0}? KARNATAKA T\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA   \n\nDATED THIS ma 15TH DAY OF' JULYA    T 1 \nTHE HOIWBLE MR. JUs'1f:<;E  A'\n\nTHE HONBLE  _NAf\u00a7Ai\u00a7AJ\nREGULAR  \n\n \n\nnmwznn:    \n\n1. B.Anand Sh\u20ac:tty._ 5.. \n\n3\/0 36533"       \nRepresented by  "'<)1de;"'~\u00ab___ _ --\nSri Anznachaiahan *  '   \n\nS\/0 K.V.Bhat,     \n\nR\/0 I Fioor, Leeds_4Vidya.N\u00a3ga1j_\nC}ulmI~m~585 F102."     *-\nW\/c\u00a7<A.1}at1d,S--hetty._  \nRcpremnizcd' by:"21cr.A\u00a7"htK.Homcr\n\n " Sri Anmachal  \n",3"\/'o K.V.Bimt,,__A% 35 years\n_ _R_\/0 "}I_3'Ioor, Lcegls Vixiya Nagar\n(\u00a72iI:53afga--L585" 102.\n\nV   \n\n   S!\u00a2M0Iaappa Shorty\n\n  V  Repmmzited by his P.A.I~IoIder\n\nQ ' --'.'3;ri.  Bhat\n"S "0 K.V.Bhat, A d 35 years\nI I\ufb01etge\n\n V--R:\/0 IF'1oor,\n\nVidya N.-aw\n\n(}u1barga.--585 102.\n\n\n\n4. Raju Shetty\n\nS o Ganamiah Shctty\nRe\/apresented by his 1?'.A.Holder\nSri Ammachal Bhat\n\nS\/o K.V.Bhat, Aged 35 years\nR \/ 0 I Fioor, Leeds Vldya Nagar\n\nGulbarga-585 102.    \n(By Sriyuths M.J.A1va and Nagaxaga I-I{$g;\u00a5.e,"TjAdvS'.-3   ,, .\n\nAND:\n\n1. The Karnataka Housing Board\n\nCauvcry Bhavan, V  \n\nBangalore--56O O09  _  \nRepresented by its Commissioner;  F \n\n2. The Executive   _,    \nKarnataka\ufb01ousing  _     \nGulbarga Division;       \nGulbarga-585 I01   \n\n3. The Asst.R\u00e9vei1u<-:   __\nThe Competent" 'Au"t1_1ority7   S " "\nKaxnataka Housing ' ' \nGulmrga msvision  _  "\n\n   ..... \n<\/pre>\n
4.    <\/p>\n
 \ufb01egzovexyp Housing Board
\n‘t\u20ac3auv_cry Bhavan v
\n. . .B}z_:-‘\u00a2p,gaIgI’e– 560 <\/p>\n
‘   E\u00bb.._’ ‘i’\u00a2\u00a3r”.\u00a3>_.S,I{talka:11i
\n ~ A    Asst. Revenue (mm &
\n ‘_  C\u00e9mpeteixt Authority KHB, Gulharga
\n ‘  V .Now..aLt’K\ufb01EiB, Mysore Divisian
\n” L4 _ ‘ L LM”ys\u00bb;>,=:*e–570 001. …Respor1dents.<\/p>\n
(By Sri Basavaraj N\ufb01abamsi for R1.
\nR2, R3, R4 and R5 Sewmi)<\/p>\n
K\/<\/p>\n
This Regular First Appeal filed under Section of
\nCPC against the Judgment and Decree dt.2O.12.2QU5Tix1<\/p>\n
O.S.No.374\/2000 on the \ufb01le of the 11 Addl.  \u00ab3:i1\u20aci.ge” H
\n(Sr.Dn), Gulbarw at Gulbarga dismissing the sj1itsj’*~fo;*\u00ab.- <\/p>\n
recovery of damages.\n<\/p>\n
This Regular First Appeal  ‘on7._fo1I”
\nthis day, Gopala Gouda, J,  foHoix’i;;1g\u00a7– ~ <\/p>\n
k L x    <\/p>\n
This Regular
\nquestioning the correcfxiess and Decree
\npassed by the    (in short
\n‘the Trial    urging Various
\ngI’ounds_.aI1d__.V   same and decree
\nthe s11i:fv–__f0r   :Rs.11,25,{)G0\/- towapds
\n  $.\u00a71is.’Ji1dvg:e.ent, for the sake of brevity, the<\/p>\n
elf  gm “is: is referred to as mt their rank1I1g’<\/p>\n
     Trial Court.\n<\/p>\n
3.  pxaimers have filed suit claiming damaw<\/p>\n
r  sRg.;s1,25,mo;w mm the defendants with interest 33:<\/p>\n
 of 21% pa. from the date of suit til} the<\/p>\n
V V ‘  A .  realisation of entire amount.<\/p>\n
4.Ttmr:aseef\u00a3hep1ainti\ufb01’sisthat,meyaIethe<\/p>\n
tenants of shops mating Nos. 1,2,3 and 4 in the gamma<\/p>\n
floor and Room No.4 in the second floor of <\/p>\n
Housing Board, Old Shopping Complex .. V<\/p>\n
Mill Road, Gulbarga. They have been  GI} <\/p>\n
business in the said premises   ‘styv1e:’of<\/p>\n
M\/s.Hotei Kamal since the <\/p>\n
possession of the wt} shops ei’ {he<\/p>\n
same was taken by the\ufb01 <\/p>\n
5. Then: wg.s%    pxaintiss and
\nthe defendsgsts     Gulbarga in
\nMisc.  of the shops which
\nwere   fpdes\ufb01oning the correctness<\/p>\n
of the denis;;d..I\u00a3et:_1;:es”  to the plain\ufb02\ufb01s by the<\/p>\n
 , A(Isfe;*;\u20ac;1_a’V1:1;i:s   :3 towards arrears of rent, which<\/p>\n
 on 10.11.1997 with a liberty to<\/p>\n
 nmssary steps as provided under<\/p>\n
  Karnataka iieusiilg Board Act (in short<\/p>\n
‘    As}. It is the case of the plainti\ufb02s that defendants<\/p>\n
 and 5 without yvi’ mg notice to the piainiziffs as<\/p>\n
  fprevided under Sec.45 of the Act Imd with Rules<\/p>\n
framed thsneunder for the purpose of taking possession<\/p>\n
of the shops fmm the plaintiffs, they tried to evict tzhem
\nM<\/p>\n
forcibiy and tress–passed into the premises whichf’w_as<\/p>\n
in occupation of the plaintiff on 10. 12. 1997  <\/p>\n
9.00 am. by misusing their e\ufb02icial    ‘V<\/p>\n
mala fide intention by    and’  <\/p>\n
documents. Further, it is staied    <\/p>\n
on that day the defendant\ufb01\u00bb   the
\nmovables mentioned    stuffs
\nmentioned in    with the
\nhelp of    of plainti\ufb01s,
\nwhich  In lawful.\n<\/p>\n
1  \ufb01e defendants action<\/p>\n
was 11igh’11a4\u00a7ude(i”Vanii’  the Inandatary provisions<\/p>\n
V cf ting; Act  ns fhey have taken possession of<\/p>\n
  from the plaintiffs without giving’ any<\/p>\n
 to pay the allaged arrears to amid<\/p>\n
H V’ the  evic1::i\u00a5:>I;;  They further stated that they have<\/p>\n
‘ W H ”   the illegal acts of the defendants by way of<\/p>\n
.44AjA’Win’.\u00a7f’p\u00a3\u00a7\ufb01\ufb01ons and the same was allowed on 3. 4. 1998.<\/p>\n
T  they also paid 3. sum of Rs.3,94,,Oi()\/~ on<\/p>\n
u A 26.12.1997 t0 the debt Board under pmtmt towartis the<\/p>\n
alleged ar1%s af rent tewards the shops which was in<\/p>\n
‘\\a~M\/<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
occupation of the plaintiffs. Further it is stated that<\/p>\n
defendants preferred writ appeals against the <\/p>\n
passed in writ petitions \ufb01led by the  <\/p>\n
sai\ufb01 writ appeals were dismissed\ufb02men 23.’7T1V1e” ‘* <\/p>\n
plaintiffs allege that inspite of passmga <\/p>\n
court in the writ petitions theVdefend’ant:s  vrest-sre%<\/p>\n
the possession of shops  ‘   and
\ntherefore they  ? —  on
\n27.7.1998 befsre’  these, the
\nplaintiffs  – against the
\ndefenda\ufb01itsviiai  ‘ aii5i.?V:a.b1es and food stuffs
\nas stated  in’  and “B” of the plaim;<\/p>\n
re5P3<_:tively " A ' ~ <\/p>\n
.  _ V" m'te1'…tI1e siJ.if&s11mmans were served, umn the<\/p>\n
  appeared through their counsel.<\/p>\n
2  _ Defemdaxjats and 3 \ufb01kzd common written statement and<\/p>\n
W " 'T serendazxts 1 and -4 did not file their written statement.<\/p>\n
 defendant N's.5 has \ufb01led his written statement<\/p>\n
VT  "0i1: 14. 12.2004 the said Writtexx statement was not taken<\/p>\n
 H. on record by the ma! court on the groimd that he failed<\/p>\n
\\m\/<\/p>\n
7<\/span><\/p>\n
to file the written statement within the stipulated <\/p>\n
under order VIII Rule 1 of CPC.\n<\/p>\n
8. Defendants 2 and 3 in their  <\/p>\n
have admitted that the shops I-“Were.   ‘\ufb01ne ‘V<\/p>\n
piaintiffs as averred in the piaint.  <\/p>\n
the plainti\ufb02s were irregular payn 1’en.t
\nthat they were in  of t\u00a3f1\u00e9y’atimitted
\nhaving issued demand   claiming
\narrears of rent     I ‘ taken
\nup by the  Court and in High
\nCourt,    written statement<\/p>\n
have dexiicgifhe :_’:gtxV.f’:e”i*1’1″1eI1ts regarding allegations<\/p>\n
of  _   action on their part and<\/p>\n
  tak1I1g  ” .’\u00ab   possession of the shcsps which were in<\/p>\n
p1a.inti\ufb02’s. Further they contended that<\/p>\n
 the  Aarc not entitied far any damags as<\/p>\n
% \u00e9gaimgd by them. They have also contended that in the<\/p>\n
 31:98 the plainti\ufb01s had \ufb01ied a suit fer injunction in<\/p>\n
T  No.63′?\/98 and subsequently withdrew the said suit<\/p>\n
‘4 3 unconditionally.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
9. The learned trial Judge has framed the issues<\/p>\n
on the basis of pleadings of the parties –<\/p>\n
determina\ufb01ons. On behalf of the  V  <\/p>\n
witnesses were examined as PW   <\/p>\n
documents Exs.P1 to P37 in jI.1sti1ie\u20acz;:iG:1 of   <\/p>\n
On behalf of defendants  ‘SW2
\nThe ‘E’r1a’ .1 Court f1″amez\u00a7 ‘4  deieiziiixaation<\/p>\n
which read as fellews:\n<\/p>\n
” 1-‘%V11\u00e9\u00e9th.\u00a2r.  ” 913~in1’3\ufb01”$’***”P1’9V\u20ac
\nthat they”_\u00ab\u00ab.have_ sustai-nVe<i 'degr-.ages of
\nRs. 1 1,25,'{"..'\u00a2(}\u00a7)\/~  Schedule A
\nanti "B of  '  <\/p>\n
_ 2. 'WI1ei1'1e;~.._the _.p1aintiffs prove
\nthat~~..t11e defe:ida1"1–t.s"'s1*e jointly and<\/p>\n
severaiiy i1,ab!._e to 'pay the damages as
\nV\u00bb  in. suit?\n<\/p>\n
  Whether the plaintiffs are
\n V _ ”   reliefs claimed?\n<\/p>\n
‘A .   Order or Decree?”\n<\/p>\n
. ..  n ‘_ }0 .” The Trial Court after appreciation of evidence<\/p>\n
  ‘sis: j\u00e9eesrd has answered Issue Nos. 1 ts 3 in the negative<\/p>\n
T   issue No.4 as per final order. Consequently it has<\/p>\n
A. passed the Judgment dismissing the suit under appeal.<\/p>\n
\\\u00a73:\u00a5\/\/\/<\/p>\n
The cerreemess of the same is questioned in this apgyeal<\/p>\n
urging various gonads.\n<\/p>\n
1 1. It is cantended by the learned   u  <\/p>\n
plaintiffs that the trial Court  <\/p>\n
evidence on record and therefore, the_ fi;1Vdi1’1}gSA._reeordiedt
\non the eontentieus issues by  enideeeus in law.
\nHence requested to seteeside the  and decree<\/p>\n
and further it    Court has
\ncommitted     the defendants
\nhave  _  to the movables
\nnrzentiofied L ieets\u00a2ht\u00e9\u00a2u1\u00a2 e to the plaint, in the<\/p>\n
deeuments’g\ufb011;9.r1\u00a7er1.’4Ve’fs” :\u00e9’;x.P\u00bb29 to Ex.P-31, which are<\/p>\n
 , their=<%1.oe\u00a5;,xzneI1tS "iIi.T\u00a7SpCCt of the premises in question<\/p>\n
  _said documents would elwrly estabiish<\/p>\n
tt1e.t'aet  is mused by the defendants to the<\/p>\n
 . 44 'meveiaie\ufb01 tiespite the apfxliant pmdueing adequate<\/p>\n
  "'~evt;ie"mee on reeerd, the trial Judge has recorded the<\/p>\n
'  ..__""'e:*rq:)neeus fmdings on the eententieue issues.<\/p>\n
12* Further another geund of attack of the<\/p>\n
impugned ju\u00e9ment is that the ma} Ceurt has failed te<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
frame the issue with regard to the genera} damages<\/p>\n
caused to the food items mentioned in the ‘B’ 2.<\/p>\n
propert}; Therefore, they have prayed to V’ <\/p>\n
impugneci judment and decree,   tthet<\/p>\n
the trial Ceurt has erred  netV._ ~.oi”<'ier~.:' <\/p>\n
passed in the writ petition  pre\u00e9etzed 16
\ndated 3.4.1998, wherein   Vuheitl that
\ndefendants actien is     decision is
\nupheld by    eppeal as per
\nEx.P.24 ~   writ appeal. The
\n5'  learned counsel on<\/p>\n
behah' et' ' the,  baked items and other<\/p>\n
  goods::i1;:.: M ..z\u00a7i'tie1es mneoned seheduie "B" to the<\/p>\n
   perishable in Iiature due to lapse of time<\/p>\n
Aft ' taking illegal poeseesien of the shops<\/p>\n
 . and"."'re–ci:eiiv'eIy of the possession of those articles.<\/p>\n
 it is a fetal lees to the plairltiffs. This impertant<\/p>\n
 of the matter is not taken into consideration by<\/p>\n
" tfie learned trial Judge at the time of answering the<\/p>\n
eenten\ufb01eus issues framed in the suit. Therefoxe, the<\/p>\n
\\~W\/<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
learned counsel submitted that the impugned judgment<\/p>\n
is liable to be set aside.\n<\/p>\n
13. We have heard the learned  3.3:-l,l\u20ac;   <\/p>\n
Krislmachar on behalf of the  <\/p>\n
impugned judment and also  cop};  .<\/p>\n
made available to us at ‘of this
\nappeal by the learned   Having
\nregard to the cause of plajnt and it
\nis an   dispossession
\nof the  12.10.1997. On
\nthe   az\ufb01cles mentioned in “A”\n<\/p>\n
schedule   were illegally, taken<\/p>\n
 . A_a.wa\u00a7\/’\ufb01byi dele:’1da11ta and alse damage was sustained<\/p>\n
 articles mentiened in Sehwuled “B” to<\/p>\n
thee .1:$ia\u00a7z1li..  the claim of the pxamues is that<\/p>\n
   azelezztl\ufb02ed for damages at 125.}. 135,000] -.<\/p>\n
” ,  We have sue\u00bb meta examined the question of<\/p>\n
‘  :li1:xf=.itation regarding irtstimtion of the suit by the<\/p>\n
 \u00bb ‘4 plaintiff theugh there is no plea taken by the defen\u00e9a\ufb01ts<\/p>\n
befare the vial Court in their written statemem, as the<\/p>\n
\\a\/<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
same is pezrmissible in View of Section 3 of ._ the<\/p>\n
Limitation Act 1963 which provisions road thus:-.. ‘  .1 V’<\/p>\n
“3. Bar of Limitation: (1) Subjectil _
\nto the provisions contained in sections  o
\n4 to 24 (inclusive), every’ suit” V’
\niristituted, appeal prcfexrm,” ‘ 3}’.J.d:iA  ” V
\napplication made after  _ A’  _ ‘
\nperiod shall be dismissed, “‘alt}1ough*V~i- A . V’
\nlimitation has not  up.__a:sxa._
\ndefence.”  V’\n<\/p>\n
15. Article 91(3)’ o_fThe–‘_S<:;h\u00a7id1Ji\u00a2"'to the Limitation
\nAct reganiing period 'of.' _1imitatio:i".  under<\/p>\n
Sec\ufb01ons 2,  of::'th\u00e9_   article the<\/p>\n
period    is prmcribed for
\ninstitution  '
\nVi""'E\u00e9r' VViF0.Ii&.'f1h3Vii '  tam g or injum g
\nor _vvrongt';_111'y detaining any other
\n._ '\u00e9zmoi\ufb01p movabie property."
\nV   "  we have framed the issue regarding<\/p>\n
tho  for institution of the suit by the plaintiffs<\/p>\n
'damages. The foilowing additional issue is<\/p>\n
i   " in this appeal regarding the limitation. Whetimr<\/p>\n
. K  suit instituted by the p1aint:i\ufb02's claiming damages is<\/p>\n
 ' iiowithin three years \ufb01om the date of alleged taking illegal<\/p>\n
possession of {hf} Ax\ufb01cies and food items mentioned in<\/p>\n
\\':x:v\/\/<\/p>\n
13<\/span><\/p>\n
the Schedule ‘A’ and ‘B’ to the plain: by the defendants<\/p>\n
frorn the piaintiffs 011 10.12. 1997.?<\/p>\n
17. The said additiena} issue is answarg\u00e9\u00e9i  <\/p>\n
the plaintiffs for the following reaso\ufb02sz… A  H  ‘<\/p>\n
Without remandi\ufb01g the ca5\u20ac3 ?-‘Q  <\/p>\n
this court is of the View on
\nthe above additional issug \ufb01by”-Ausviis this
\nappellant itse\ufb01’. The   by the
\nplaintiffs in   12. 1997 the<\/p>\n
defendants    into the shops<\/p>\n
which was % in  __i)f the plaintiffs in their<\/p>\n
absence tx:’:ithV\u00a3)t1tVV’a;”1Vy..V  or authority of law and<\/p>\n
 4, fqrc\u00e9i\ufb01y  htlxem and removed all their movables<\/p>\n
kLk%%ka;-451′ j  carried with them forcibly by<\/p>\n
misq\u00e9i\ufb01g  position takmg’ help of the mlice.<\/p>\n
“J,fl:1ercby:f3:~.e3Vz were dispcssessed from the pramiaes and<\/p>\n
‘   ” the ax\ufb01cltts mentiuned in gchedule ‘A’ and ‘B’,<\/p>\n
h   caused damage in rt-spect of food ar\ufb01clcs<\/p>\n
  :.’ment;ioned in scheduie ‘B’ as they are peri\ufb01hable gomis.<\/p>\n
Having regrd to the aferesaid admitteczi fact pleaded by<\/p>\n
the p1ai11ti\ufb01’s and further the 311%.: was \ufb01led 0:1<\/p>\n
‘ X”\n<\/p>\n
l4<\/p>\n
14.12.2000, the same is barred by li1}:1itatien_…___as<\/p>\n
prescribed under Article 91(8) of the schedule -.4<\/p>\n
Limitation Act. Therefore, the institution of  ” <\/p>\n
reliefs as prayed by the plaintiffs  _ ‘_    V’<\/p>\n
as the same is \ufb01led after lapse of ‘yea’.3>.fe~:.A\ufb01l’:31?a’V <\/p>\n
date of cause of action arose ‘meni.
\nitself the suit is liable   we
\nanswer the abovelegal <\/p>\n
18. Tm;1g:*;T l’   lme aforesaid
\nadditional   arose for our
\n this Appeal, we have
\nalso gone’  and reasons recorded by<\/p>\n
the learned   oil the contentious issues 1 to 3<\/p>\n
    ed . Ju\ufb02ge an pmper<\/p>\n
 ofvlihcts and legal evidence on record has<\/p>\n
V V’ . recoi'<lec1':ei \ufb01hding of fact with reference to the amount<\/p>\n
 by the plaix1ti\ufb02's at Rs.3,94–,0l()\/– towards<\/p>\n
–‘ of rent on 26.12.1997 subsequent to the<\/p>\n
” hdiepessession of the plainti\ufb01e from the premises and<\/p>\n
after \ufb01ling writ petitions is a strong eimmnstanee<\/p>\n
against the piain\ufb01\ufb01s fer dismissing the suit. The<\/p>\n
\u00a5:w.\/<\/p>\n
yr,<\/p>\n
16<\/span><\/p>\n
erroneeus er su\ufb02ers from errm’ in law. The very fact<\/p>\n
that occupation charges of Rs.3,94,000\/- is not _V<\/p>\n
the piainti\ufb01b itself was the cause of action    _
\ndefendants to disposscss the  1  >
\npossessien of the premises. In   <\/p>\n
Court: has directed the Board ts; m\u00e9mf\u00e9   ‘A<\/p>\n
the shops that was in occupati\ufb01f\ufb01-..f;>f–.t\u00bbhc  that
\nby itself does not cons\ufb01t\ufb01ic. Atl\ufb01e  damages
\nin respect of the  i\ufb01\ufb01entioned in<\/p>\n
schedule ‘A’    plaintiffs in<\/p>\n
respect    _–‘uai}{:ic1es mexltioned “B”<\/p>\n
schedule  _  which were kept in<\/p>\n
the prtgnises  of taking possession of the<\/p>\n
 V . “ICV-._v   \u00abtha Board.\n<\/p>\n
   1.31;\/A..\n<\/p>\n
 ._ V-\ufb01bnsidexed View it is net a \ufb01t cm for<\/p>\n
V V.  eur inicxfgraiztn\u00e9 in this Appeal. Therefore, the sme is
\n“.r.V._:’:.-“”‘iia’,blg ta  dismissed and acormiingly the appeal is<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
‘E393
\nJUDGE<\/p>\n
NG*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court B Anand Shetty S\/O Seena Shetty vs The Karnataka Housing Board … on 15 July, 2008 Author: V.Gopalagowda & Nagaraj IN THE HIGH COURT 0}? KARNATAKA T CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA DATED THIS ma 15TH DAY OF’ JULYA T 1 THE HOIWBLE MR. JUs’1f:<;E A' THE HONBLE _NAf\u00a7Ai\u00a7AJ REGULAR nmwznn: 1. B.Anand […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-130183","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nB Anand Shetty S\/O Seena Shetty vs The Karnataka Housing Board ... on 15 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"B Anand Shetty S\/O Seena Shetty vs The Karnataka Housing Board ... on 15 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-26T00:17:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"B Anand Shetty S\/O Seena Shetty vs The Karnataka Housing Board … on 15 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-26T00:17:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":2163,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008\",\"name\":\"B Anand Shetty S\/O Seena Shetty vs The Karnataka Housing Board ... on 15 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-26T00:17:56+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"B Anand Shetty S\/O Seena Shetty vs The Karnataka Housing Board … on 15 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"B Anand Shetty S\/O Seena Shetty vs The Karnataka Housing Board ... on 15 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"B Anand Shetty S\/O Seena Shetty vs The Karnataka Housing Board ... on 15 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-26T00:17:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"B Anand Shetty S\/O Seena Shetty vs The Karnataka Housing Board … on 15 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-26T00:17:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008"},"wordCount":2163,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008","name":"B Anand Shetty S\/O Seena Shetty vs The Karnataka Housing Board ... on 15 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-26T00:17:56+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-anand-shetty-so-seena-shetty-vs-the-karnataka-housing-board-on-15-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"B Anand Shetty S\/O Seena Shetty vs The Karnataka Housing Board … on 15 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130183","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=130183"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130183\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=130183"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=130183"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=130183"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}