{"id":130233,"date":"2008-10-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008"},"modified":"2014-04-25T11:43:35","modified_gmt":"2014-04-25T06:13:35","slug":"a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"A.Padmavathy vs The State Of Kerala Represented By &#8230; on 28 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">A.Padmavathy vs The State Of Kerala Represented By &#8230; on 28 October, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 27680 of 2008(T)\n\n\n1. A.PADMAVATHY, AGED 73 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,\n\n3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,\n\n4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,\n\n5. SMT.A.SOUMINI, W\/O.DAMODARAN, RESIDING\n\n6. SMT.A.BHARGAVI, W\/O.C.V.NANU, RESIDING\n\n7. SMT.A.VILASINI, W\/O.KUMARAN,RESIDING AT\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.R.SURENDRAN\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC\n\n Dated :28\/10\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                     ANTONY DOMINIC, J\n\n    -----------------------------------------------------------\n                    W.P.(C).No.27680\/2008\n    -----------------------------------------------------------\n            Dated this the 28th day of October, 2008\n\n\n                           JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>     Petitioner is presently the         Manager of S.N.B.U.P<\/p>\n<p>School, Vadakkumpad,        Thalassery in Kannur District. His<\/p>\n<p>father was the Manager of the School. After her father&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>death her mother succeeded in that position and continued<\/p>\n<p>as Manager till 1989, when         she expired. Thereafter the<\/p>\n<p>rights over the school devolved on the 5 children of the<\/p>\n<p>deceased couple. It would appear that, with the majority<\/p>\n<p>support among the children, the petitioner was appointed as<\/p>\n<p>Manager and that was challenged by the 6th respondent in<\/p>\n<p>O.P.No.6666\/1990 before this court and that O.P was<\/p>\n<p>dismissed by Ext.P1 judgment.\n<\/p>\n<p>     2. According to the petitioner, the 6th respondent<\/p>\n<p>pursued the challenge before the AEO, who by Ext.P2<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WP(C).No. 27680\/08           2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>rejected the challenge. Ext.P2 order was the subject<\/p>\n<p>matter of WP(c).No.16936\/2007 which was disposed of by<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P3 judgment directing that the AEO shall reconsider<\/p>\n<p>the claim of the 6th respondent.        AEO     thereupon<\/p>\n<p>reconsidered the matter and passed Ext.P4 order holding<\/p>\n<p>that the petitioner, the provisional manager cannot be<\/p>\n<p>removed till the dispute among the legal heirs over the<\/p>\n<p>management right of the school is finally settled.<\/p>\n<p>      3. Ext.P4 order was challenged before this court in<\/p>\n<p>WP(c).No.24925\/2007, which was disposed of by Ext.P5<\/p>\n<p>judgment directing the DPI to consider the appeal that<\/p>\n<p>was pending. The DPI there upon considered the appeal<\/p>\n<p>and issued Ext.P7 authorizing the Deputy Director of<\/p>\n<p>Education, Kannur to take a fresh decision on the issue,<\/p>\n<p>after hearing all concerned. Against Ext.P7, the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>filed Ext.P8 revision before the Government. In Ext.P9<\/p>\n<p>judgment in WP(c).No.478\/2008 this court directed the<\/p>\n<p>Government to consider the revision with notice to all<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WP(C).No. 27680\/08              3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>concerned.\n<\/p>\n<p>     4. Accordingly Ext.P10 hearing notice was issued and<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P11 order was issued by the Government. The<\/p>\n<p>relevant      portion of Ext.P11 is extracted below for<\/p>\n<p>reference.\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                 &#8220;In the above circumstances, Ext.P8 revision<\/p>\n<p>                 petition filed by Smt. A. Padmavathy is<\/p>\n<p>                 rejected and the proceedings read as Ist<\/p>\n<p>                 paper above is upheld. Deputy Director of<\/p>\n<p>                 Education, Kannur is also directed to appoint<\/p>\n<p>                 a legal heir, nominated by majority of legal<\/p>\n<p>                 heirs as Manager of the school until a bye-<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                 law   is framed    and   approved    by  the<\/p>\n<p>                 educational authorities. This shall be done<\/p>\n<p>                 after hearing   all the legal heirs of late<\/p>\n<p>                 K.P.Govindan and verifying the majority in a<\/p>\n<p>                 foolproof manner. The court direction is<\/p>\n<p>                 accordingly complied with.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WP(C).No. 27680\/08             4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     5. It is this order that is challenged by the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>in this writ petition.\n<\/p>\n<p>     6. The main contention raised by the learned counsel<\/p>\n<p>for the petitioner is that so long as Ext.P1, an inter-party<\/p>\n<p>judgment between the petitioner and the 6th respondent,<\/p>\n<p>has become final it is not open to either of the legal heirs<\/p>\n<p>to seek his change        of the petitioner&#8217;s     provisional<\/p>\n<p>managership.\n<\/p>\n<p>      7. I am not in a position to accept this contention.<\/p>\n<p>As is evident from the facts as disclosed in Ext.P11, the<\/p>\n<p>Manager has left behind 5 children and among them with<\/p>\n<p>the majority support of three, the petitioner was appointed<\/p>\n<p>as the provisional manager pending resolution of the<\/p>\n<p>dispute among the legal heirs. Ext.P11 itself shows that<\/p>\n<p>now one of the legal heirs, viz. Smt. Soumini withdrew her<\/p>\n<p>from the group which supported         the petitioner and is<\/p>\n<p>supporting the group lead by the 6th respondent. Thus the<\/p>\n<p>group opposing the petitioner has got the majority support<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WP(C).No. 27680\/08            5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>now. It was taking into account these circumstances that<\/p>\n<p>the Government have in Ext.P11 ordered that the Deputy<\/p>\n<p>Director shall appoint a legal heir nominated by the<\/p>\n<p>majority of the legal heirs as the Manager of the School<\/p>\n<p>until a bye law is framed and is approved by the<\/p>\n<p>Educational Authority. In my view, the view taken by the<\/p>\n<p>Government is a fair and reasonable view and it does not<\/p>\n<p>warrant interference at the hands of this court exercising<\/p>\n<p>its jurisdiction under Art.226 of the Constitution.<\/p>\n<p>      8.   The counsel for the petitioner referred to me<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P1 judgment and with particular emphasis referred to<\/p>\n<p>the sentence therein that the provisional approval to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is not open to challenge. As I understand, the<\/p>\n<p>effect of this sentence is only that the provisional approval<\/p>\n<p>of the petitioner could not be challenged in a proceeding<\/p>\n<p>under Article 226. On the other hand, if I understand this<\/p>\n<p>sentence one conferring total immunity to his appointment<\/p>\n<p>as provisional Manager, the next sentence in paragraph 5<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WP(C).No. 27680\/08             6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>of Ext.P1 judgment, relegating the parties to peruse the<\/p>\n<p>legal remedies will not carry any meaning. In this view of<\/p>\n<p>the   matter, I cannot     understand Ext.P1 judgment as<\/p>\n<p>conferring an absolute immunity to the provisional<\/p>\n<p>appointment of the petitioner as Manager. On the whole, I<\/p>\n<p>do not find any substance in the challenge raising against<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P1.\n<\/p>\n<p>     Writ Petition fails and is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                ANTONY DOMINIC<br \/>\n                                     JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>vi.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WP(C).No. 27680\/08    7<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court A.Padmavathy vs The State Of Kerala Represented By &#8230; on 28 October, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 27680 of 2008(T) 1. A.PADMAVATHY, AGED 73 YEARS, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE &#8230; Respondent 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, 3. THE DEPUTY [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-130233","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>A.Padmavathy vs The State Of Kerala Represented By ... on 28 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A.Padmavathy vs The State Of Kerala Represented By ... on 28 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-04-25T06:13:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"A.Padmavathy vs The State Of Kerala Represented By &#8230; on 28 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-25T06:13:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":843,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008\",\"name\":\"A.Padmavathy vs The State Of Kerala Represented By ... on 28 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-25T06:13:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A.Padmavathy vs The State Of Kerala Represented By &#8230; on 28 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A.Padmavathy vs The State Of Kerala Represented By ... on 28 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A.Padmavathy vs The State Of Kerala Represented By ... on 28 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-04-25T06:13:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"A.Padmavathy vs The State Of Kerala Represented By &#8230; on 28 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-25T06:13:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008"},"wordCount":843,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008","name":"A.Padmavathy vs The State Of Kerala Represented By ... on 28 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-25T06:13:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-padmavathy-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-28-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A.Padmavathy vs The State Of Kerala Represented By &#8230; on 28 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130233","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=130233"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130233\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=130233"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=130233"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=130233"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}