{"id":130754,"date":"2007-08-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-08-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007"},"modified":"2017-09-06T00:25:12","modified_gmt":"2017-09-05T18:55:12","slug":"union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007","title":{"rendered":"Union Of India vs P.Radhamma on 17 August, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Union Of India vs P.Radhamma on 17 August, 2007<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C) No. 33866 of 2003(S)\n\n\n1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER,\n3. THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL PERSONNEL\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. P.RADHAMMA, W\/O. M.N.BALAKRISHNA PILLAI,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.P.DANDAPANI\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.T.C.GOVINDA SWAMY\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice HARUN-UL-RASHID\n\n Dated :17\/08\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n             K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ.\n            ---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n                           W.P.(C) No. 33866 of 2003\n            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------\n                       Dated, this the 17th day of August, 2007\n\n                                         JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
Balakrishnan Nair, J.\n<\/p>\n
       The petitioners challenge Ext.P3 order of the Central Administrative<\/p>\n
Tribunal in O.A.No.599\/2002.\n<\/p>\n
       2. The respondent was the petitioner in the above O.A. Her husband late<\/p>\n
Balakrishna Pillai was a casual employee under the Railways since 1967. He<\/p>\n
was appointed as a substitute worker on 6.11.1972. On completion of six months’<\/p>\n
period on 6.5.1973 he attained temporary status. While working in that post, he<\/p>\n
died in an accident while on duty on 13.8.1977. The legal heirs were granted<\/p>\n
compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. His dependent son was<\/p>\n
appointed under the compassionate appointment scheme.                                 Though the<\/p>\n
respondent moved for family pension at the relevant time, the same was rejected.<\/p>\n
Later she came to know that a similarly placed widow’s claim was upheld by the<\/p>\n
Apex Court in a judgment in 1996 and also by the Central Administrative Tribunal<\/p>\n
in the very same year. So she filed a representation on 25.6.1999 before the<\/p>\n
Divisional Railway Manager, Southern Railways, Madurai Division, claiming family<\/p>\n
pension. On coming to know that the area where her husband worked was<\/p>\n
presently under the Thiruvananthapuram Division, she submitted an application<\/p>\n
before the General Manager, Thiruvananthapuram Division on 22.3.2000. When<\/p>\n
there was no response to the said application, she filed O.A.No.599\/2002 before<\/p>\n
the Ernakulam Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal. The respondents in<\/p>\n
the O.A., who are the petitioners herein, resisted the application contending that<\/p>\n
the claim was barred by limitation. Further, it was also urged that as per the<\/p>\n
WPC No.33866\/2003                        Page numbers<\/p>\n
rules, she is not eligible to get family pension.         The Central Administrative<\/p>\n
Tribunal, after hearing both sides, held that her claim is covered by the judgment<\/p>\n
of the Apex Court in Prabhabvati Devi v. Union of India & Others – AIR 1996 SC<\/p>\n
752 and ordered to grant family pension with effect from 25.6.1999, the date on<\/p>\n
which she applied for family pension at the first instance. The respondents in the<\/p>\n
O.A. challenged the said judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal in this<\/p>\n
writ petition on various grounds. But, at the time of hearing, the learned counsel<\/p>\n
for the petitioners submitted that the main ground pressed before this court is<\/p>\n
only the question of limitation. The learned counsel pointed out that going by<\/p>\n
section 20 of the Administrative Tribunal’s Act, 1985, the claim is hopelessly<\/p>\n
barred by limitation.\n<\/p>\n
       3. We find that though in the reply statement before the Central<\/p>\n
Administrative Tribunal, the respondents raised the plea of limitation, it appears<\/p>\n
that the same was not argued before the Tribunal. A perusal of the judgment of<\/p>\n
the Tribunal would show that the said point was not considered by it. Normally,<\/p>\n
the reason must be the non-urging of the said contention. If it was urged and it<\/p>\n
was not considered, the same should have been raised as a specific ground in<\/p>\n
this writ petition. But we find that in the writ petition no such ground is taken.<\/p>\n
Further, as rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the respondent, the<\/p>\n
question of limitation is not at all raised in this writ petition. The learned counsel<\/p>\n
for the petitioners contended that it is a pure question of law and therefore the<\/p>\n
petitioners are entitled to raise it even in the absence of pleadings to that effect in<\/p>\n
the writ petition. Going by the facts of the case, we feel that by the delay in<\/p>\n
approaching the authorities for family pension and thereafter              the Central<\/p>\n
WPC No.33866\/2003                        Page numbers<\/p>\n
Administrative Tribunal, the respondent\/applicant alone suffered.       In fact, the<\/p>\n
petitioners herein stood to gain. The denial of pension takes place every month.<\/p>\n
So it is a continuing cause of action. Therefore, the plea of the petitioners that<\/p>\n
the respondent’s claim for family pension is barred by limitation, cannot be<\/p>\n
accepted. The respondent lost her family pension benefits from 1977 to 1999 as<\/p>\n
a result of the delay from her part to claim the same in time. No one else is<\/p>\n
adversely affected by that.         Therefore, we are not inclined to accept the<\/p>\n
contention of the petitioners and in that view we agree with the order passed by<\/p>\n
the Central Administrative Tribunal granting family pension to the respondent.<\/p>\n
        In the result the writ petition fails and it is dismissed.<\/p>\n
                                                          K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR
\n                                                                  JUDGE<\/p>\n
                                                           HARUN-UL-RASHID,
\n                                                                  JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n
mt\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Union Of India vs P.Radhamma on 17 August, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C) No. 33866 of 2003(S) 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE … Petitioner 2. THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER, 3. THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL PERSONNEL Vs 1. P.RADHAMMA, W\/O. M.N.BALAKRISHNA PILLAI, … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.K.P.DANDAPANI […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-130754","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nUnion Of India vs P.Radhamma on 17 August, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Union Of India vs P.Radhamma on 17 August, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-08-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-05T18:55:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Union Of India vs P.Radhamma on 17 August, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-08-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-05T18:55:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007\"},\"wordCount\":725,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007\",\"name\":\"Union Of India vs P.Radhamma on 17 August, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-08-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-05T18:55:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Union Of India vs P.Radhamma on 17 August, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Union Of India vs P.Radhamma on 17 August, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Union Of India vs P.Radhamma on 17 August, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-08-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-05T18:55:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Union Of India vs P.Radhamma on 17 August, 2007","datePublished":"2007-08-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-05T18:55:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007"},"wordCount":725,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007","name":"Union Of India vs P.Radhamma on 17 August, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-08-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-05T18:55:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-vs-p-radhamma-on-17-august-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Union Of India vs P.Radhamma on 17 August, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130754","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=130754"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130754\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=130754"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=130754"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=130754"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}